View
1.218
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This is a summary of some innovative technologies being researched and used in the tree fruit industry.
Citation preview
Developments in Technology and Automation for Tree Fruit
Katie EllisPenn State Cooperative Extension of
Adams County
Penn State Specialty
Crop Innovations
Ag Innovations Team
PSU FREC – Jim Schupp, Larry Hull, Henry Ngugi, Jim Travis, Greg Krawczyk, Lynn Kime, Edwin
Winzeler, Tom Kon
PSU Southeast Region - Tara Baugher, Katie Ellis, Jim Remcheck,
Student Interns
PSU State College – Rob Crassweller, Rich Marini, Paul Heinemann, Jay Harper
Adoption of New Ag Technologies
8 yr lag to early adoption/15 yrs to full adoption
From Alston, Norton, and Pardey
Science Under Scarcity,1995.
Innovative Technologies for the Thinning of Fruit
USDA-SCRI
Specialty Crops Research Initiative
PSU, UC Davis, Clemson, WSU, UMD, UIL, USDA
Innovative Technologies for Thinning of Fruit
Trans-disciplinary goal:To develop and field test novel mechanized
methods of thinning specialty crops and to assess sociological and economic feasibilities of industry implementation
A multi-disciplinary team will investigate approaches that integrate electronics, mechanical components, and decision making algorithms to provide efficient, cost-effective, and ecosystem-based fruit thinning. These objectives include both research and extension components, and provide for industry interaction to address the many issues involved in the development to delivery process.
Selective Thinning Investigations
Simulating human movement with machines
Non-Selective Thinning InvestigationsIn Cooperation with WSU, UC Davis, Clemson, USDA
Mechanical Thinning at Various Bud Stages
Modifying Pruning Practices to Improve Access by Mechanical Thinners
Various combinations of labor efficient thinning methods
Photo by Mark Seetin, USApple
String Configurations
Thinning Results
• Blossom removal ranged from 20-55%. Factors that affected removal rates included string arrangement, tractor speed, spindle rotation speed, cultivar, tree training system, pruning, and bud stage.
• Hand thinning requirements were reduced by 25-65%, and fruit size distribution improved in all but one trial.
• Net economic impact at optimum tractor and spindle speeds was $462-$1490 and $230-$847 for processing and fresh market peaches, respectively.
Thinning Results
Implications for Growers
Mechanical thinners are consistent in both reducing labor costs and increasing fruit size
(Chemical thinners are fairly consistent in reducing fruit set and increasing fruit size but not in reducing follow-up hand thinning)
Blossom Thinned with String Thinner
Hand Thinned
Outreach & Grower Input
“ I saved $3,000 in labor over a two
month period”
“My operation cut down on hand thinning time by a week”
Comprehensive Automation for Specialty Crops
USDA-SCRISpecialty Crops Research
Initiative
CMU, PSU, Purdue, OSU, WSU, USDA
Reconfigurable Mobility
Goal: develop reconfigurable vehicles that can be used for several functions, like spraying, mowing, harvest, pruning, and thinning
- Research on accurate
vehicle positioning to
georeference crop and
environmental conditions
Augmented Fruit Harvesting Devices
Needs:
– Hand picking accounts for ~50% of total fruit production costs
– Up to 30% of fruit is damaged during harvest
Photo by Mark Seetin, USApple
Russell Rohrbaugh & Alex Leslie
Detection of Plant Stress, Disease, and Insect Infestations
Input Images Detection Results
Monitoring Insect Populations
Goals:
– Automatically monitor orchard pest (moth) populations with high spatial and temporal resolution
– Reduce costs associated with checking conventional wing traps
Autonomous Crop Load Scouting
Goals:
– Better crop load measurements (more accurate and less costly than manual approach)
• Crop load measurements influence various orchard management decisions (e.g., matching harvesting to orders; fertilizer, irrigation, pest control measures)
• Autonomous scouting enables orchard management decisions to be made in a more timely and accurate manner
Other Components of CASC
• Sociological Implications
– Socioeconomic surveys
• Value Proposition
• Outreach
• Feedback from
advisory panel
Related Investigations in New Technologies
CIG Plots · Orchard Platform · WeedSeeker®
United States Department of AgricultureNatural Resources Conservation Services
Conservation Innovation Grant
Brad & Bruce Hollabaugh Brian JacquesDave & Shawn GarretsonBill Gardenhour
Brian, Kevin, & Kyle Knouse Corey McCleaf Neil Starner Ed & Justin Weaver
Seth & Dan Boyer Ken Guise/Dave Cox Michael FlinchbaughTony & Terry Fetters
Field Laboratories
on New Training Systems
for Intensive Orchards
Narrow Vertical Axis
Vertical Axis Hedgerow
(4-Wire Trellis)
Platform Trials
Photo by Sally Colby
WeedSeeker® Trials
Many cooperators contributed to this research – Thank You!
• PSU College of Agriculture Seed Grant Program• PA Department of Community and Economic
Development First Industries Program• State Horticultural Association of Pennsylvania
Extension Committee• PDA Peach and Nectarine Board• Robert C. Hoffman Foundation• Washington Tree Fruit Research Commission
Important funds used to support Specialty Crop Innovations Coordinator and
Student Interns
Work conducted so far - made possible by:
Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences research, extension, and resident education programs are funded in part by Pennsylvania counties, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Where trade names appear, no discrimination is intended, and no endorsements by Penn State Cooperative Extension is implied.
The Pennsylvania State University is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to programs, facilities, admission, and employment without regard to personal characteristics not related to ability, performance, or qualifications as determined by University policy or by state or federal authorities. It is the policy of the University to maintain an academic and work environment free of discrimination, including harassment. The Pennsylvania State University prohibits discrimination and harassment against any person because of age, ancestry, color, disability or handicap,
national origin, race, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or veteran status. Discrimination or harassment against faculty, staff, or students will not be tolerated at The Pennsylvania State University. Direct all inquiries regarding the nondiscrimination policy to the Affirmative Action Director, The Pennsylvania State University, 328 Boucke Building, University Park, PA
16802-5901; Tel 814-865-4700/V, 814-863-1150/TTY.
Penn State Cooperative Extension of Adams County
Penn State Fruit Research and Extension Center
Penn State Departments of Agricultural and Biological Engineering and Horticulture
www.abe.psu.edu/scri
www.cascrop.com