16
DAY 6 – DISTRICTING IN THE HOUSE (CONT’D.) July 3, 2013

Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Please contact me at [email protected] for original files.

Citation preview

Page 1: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

DAY 6 – DISTRICTING IN THE HOUSE (CONT’D.)

July 3, 2013

Page 2: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

Announcements

Fill out survey on which state you prefer to study in your legislative portfolio. https://pennstate.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=

SV_0TdRZTfxQqVeU3r Current Events Essay #1 due on TUESDAY.

Look over rubric and sample essay in Assignments folder. Check with me if you have questions about the article you

selected. Article should focus on topics we’ve covered in the course.

Elections Institutionalization Concepts of Representation and Responsiveness

Page 3: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

Results If Plan Were Adopted Nationwide

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/24/republican-vote-rigging-electoral-college_n_2546010.htmlPennsylvania Breakdown - http://www.politico.com/2012-election/map/#/President/2012/PA

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/11/07/1159631/americans-voted-for-a-democratic-house-gerrymandering-the-supreme-court-gave-them-speaker-boehner/

Page 5: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

Gerrymandering

District line-drawing that purposefully maximizes seats for one party or voting bloc.

Types of gerrymandering Partisan Pro-Incumbent Majority-minority

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RtKwhd60Q8

Page 6: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

Majority-Minority Districts

Before VRA, “blacks were systematically ‘packed’ into or ‘cracked’ across congressional districts to weaken their influence” (DOL p.53)

What are the pros and cons of majority-minority districts?

How have the courts ruled?

Page 7: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

http://www.nationaljournal.com/congress/since-1982-minority-congressional-districts-have-tripled-graphic-20120413

Page 8: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

North Carolina 4th District

Source: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/NC/4

Page 9: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

Maryland 3rd

Source: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/MD/3

Page 10: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

Texas 27th

Source: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/TX/27

Page 11: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

Texas 23rd

Source: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/TX/23

Page 12: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

John Sides – “Gerrymandering is not what’s wrong with American politics”

Why should both of these lines slope downwards?

Page 13: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

Sides - Gerrymandering

Page 14: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

Abramowitz et al. (2006)

Test three hypotheses to explain the decline of competition in U.S. House races Redistricting

Hypothesis Partisan

Polarization Hypothesis

Incumbency Hypothesis

Page 15: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

Conclusions

Declining competition explained by: A shift in the partisan

composition of House districts. But most of the change

is occurring between redistricting cycles.

Decline in ability of challengers to compete financially.

NOTE: Challengers classified as financially competitive if they accounted for at least 40 percent of combined challenger and incumbent spending. High-risk districts are those in which vote percentage of vote for presidential candidate of incumbent’s party is less than national percentage.

Page 16: Day 6 - Districting in the House (Part 2)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrvpZxMfKaU

Happy Independence Day!