CHESDATA OVERVIEWC H E S DATA T E A M

J U LY 1 5 , 2 0 1 4

OBJECTIVES Review Teacher Statistics Discuss demographics View CRCT results in ELA/Math for the prior

three years Identify strengths and weaknesses Identify areas in need for improvement

ABOUT CHES TEACHERS 37 Teachers

35 Females, 2 Males 100% Certified in the field in which they are

teaching. Average years experience is 10 years

CHES DEMOGRAPHICS Enrollment is decreasing Student demographics by race has stayed

steady over the 3 years Even though there were 4 different races in

our population, there wasn’t enough test data to collect by race/ethnicity

Therefore, the data overview will focus on the lowest performing subject in the lowest performing grade level

CHES TOTAL STUDENT ENROLLMENT 2011 - 2013

2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

717

610588

Years of Enrollment

# o

f S

tud

en

ts

2011 2012 20130%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

97% 97% 98%

1% 1% 1%

CHES Student Population by

Race/Ethnicity Changes by Year

HispanicBlackWhiteMixed

% o

f S

tud

en

ts

CHES CRCT RESULTS In ELA, our proficiency percentage of students

has steadily decreased over the 3 years. We are performing better in ELA than we are in

Mathematics. Our Mathematics proficiency percentage of

students had increased from 2011 (65%) to 2012 (71%).

In 2013, our proficiency level in Mathematics decreased by 15 percentage points.

2011 2012 2013

Math 0.65 0.71 0.56

ELA 0.81 0.78 0.71

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

CHES % of Students Proficient in ELA and Math-ematics on the CRCT 2011-2013

% o

f S

tud

en

ts

CHES CRCT – MATHEMATICS RESULTS In 2012, CHES’s proficiency rate in

Mathematics was above the district’s with 71% to 64%.

From 2012 to 2013, the proficiency rate in Mathematics decreased 15 percentage points from 71% to 56%

In all three years, CHES proficiency rate was close to the districts level.

2011 2012 2013

School 0.65 0.71 0.56

District 0.758 0.64 0.624

5%

15%

25%

35%

45%

55%

65%

75%

85%

95%

% of Students Proficient in Mathematics on the CRCT for CHES and District 2011-2013

% o

f S

tud

en

ts

CHES CRCT – MATHEMATICS RESULTS Mathematics is our lowest performing

subject. Over the three year period, 4th grade has the

lowest performance. From 2012-2013 there was a 15-point

percentage decrease in 3rd grade Mathematics.

From 2012-2013 5th grade had a 9-point percentage increase in Mathematics.

2011 2012 20130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

CHES % of 3rd, 4th, & 5th Mathematics Proficiency

on the CRCT

3rd 4th5th

Years Tested

% o

f S

tud

en

ts

CHES CRCT - MATHEMATICS RESULTS In 2013, there were slightly more female

students in the 4th grade than male. For all 3 years, the female students are

performing better than the male students in 4th grade mathematics.

In 2013, there was an achievement gap of 15 percentage points between male and female proficiency level in 4th grade mathematics.

Male46%Female

54%

CHES# of Students in 4th Grade by Gender in 2013

2011 2012 20130%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

CHES% of 4th Grade Students by Gender at Profi-

ciency on the CRCT in Mathematics 2011 - 2013

MaleFemale

Years of the CRCT

% o

f S

tudents

STRENGTHS CHES is stronger in

ELA There was an increase

in mathematics from year 2011 to 2012.

WEAKNESSES Mathematics is our

weakest content area. There was a decrease

in percentage points in mathematics from 2012 to 2013.

Enrollment is decreasing

Diversity is limited within the student population

AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT The content area that is in need of

improvement is mathematics. The student centered problem is in the

content area of mathematics in the 4th grade. Our next step is to do an item data analysis

on our 4th grade male students in mathematics.

TASK

Please list three suggestions that we, as teachers, can do

to address our student centered problem.

Catrina Reid

Kennesaw State University

EDL 7305 Data Analysis and School Improvement

Summer 2014