8

Click here to load reader

Collaborative Mitigation and Section 106: The Georgetown Rock Fall Projects

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Collaborative Mitigation and Section 106: The Georgetown Rock Fall Projects

Collaborative Mitigation

and Section 106:

The Georgetown Rock Fall

Projects Statewide Conference on

Heritage

Lancaster, Pennsylvania

July 17, 2012

Page 2: Collaborative Mitigation and Section 106: The Georgetown Rock Fall Projects
Page 3: Collaborative Mitigation and Section 106: The Georgetown Rock Fall Projects

Rock fall structures

Page 4: Collaborative Mitigation and Section 106: The Georgetown Rock Fall Projects

Georgetown, Colorado

circa 1885 2011

Page 5: Collaborative Mitigation and Section 106: The Georgetown Rock Fall Projects

Section 106 Consultation

• 7 consulting

parties, including

SHPO

• Controversial

corridor

• Rock fall

structures create

adverse effect

based on visual

change

• Programmatic

Agreement signed

Page 6: Collaborative Mitigation and Section 106: The Georgetown Rock Fall Projects
Page 7: Collaborative Mitigation and Section 106: The Georgetown Rock Fall Projects

The Takeaway

• Mitigation doesn’t

have a specific

price tag

• Mitigation doesn’t

have to sit on a

library shelf

• Mitigation should

have a

preservation

benefit

• It doesn’t hurt to

ask

Page 8: Collaborative Mitigation and Section 106: The Georgetown Rock Fall Projects

Lisa SchochColorado Department of [email protected]