Upload
istituto-nazionale-di-documentazione-innovazione-e-ricerca-educativa
View
188
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Collaboration-Autonomy-Collaboration?A history of school improvement in the UK Peter Rudd University of York
MA in Post-War Recovery Studies: Quantitative Method
Aims of this presentation1. To provide a brief history of school
improvement in the UK based on a cycle of collaboration-autonomy-collaboration
2. To discuss the pros and cons of these approaches and their potential applicability to other national schooling systems.
MA in Post-War Recovery Studies: Quantitative Method
Cycle of school system interactions: Collabor-
ation between schools
Autonomy for
schools
Collabor-ation to
rebalance autonomy
?
MA in Post-War Recovery Studies: Quantitative Method
Collaboration 1: Natio
nal Governme
nt
• Ministry/Department for Education• Secretary of State for Education
Local Governme
nt
• Local Education Authorities (LEAs) (152)• First created by the Education Act 1902
Schools
• Primary schools (age 5-11 years)• Secondary schools (11-16 or 18)
MA in Post-War Recovery Studies: Quantitative Method
Towards school autonomy• City Technology Colleges (CTCs)• Local Management of Schools (LMS)• Grant Maintained Status (GMS)• [Faith and Grammar Schools]• Specialist Schools Programme------------------------------------------------------• Academies• Free Schools
MA in Post-War Recovery Studies: Quantitative Method
“The Government wants schools to take more responsibility for themselves and each other in delivering a true self-improving school system. It wants schools to look not to local authorities for expertise but to each other… a self-improving system needs a degree of coordination and strong incentives to encourage schools to look beyond their own school gate. Otherwise there is a danger that many schools will operate in isolation rather than in cooperation.” Graham Stuart, Chair of Education Committee, 2013.
MA in Post-War Recovery Studies: Quantitative Method
Challenges to school autonomyDriven by notions of parental choice and locally-run schools, school autonomy increased dramatically from the 1990s onwards. But there were three underlying issues:• School accountability• Central government direction• Was this improving attainment?
MA in Post-War Recovery Studies: Quantitative Method
‘Partnerships’ to re-balance autonomy• Beacon Schools• Federations of Schools• Excellence in Cities• London Challenge • City Challenge• NLEs, LLEs and SLEs• National Teaching Schools• Academy Chains
MA in Post-War Recovery Studies: Quantitative Method
The new Conservative Government• 500 more Free Schools • Challenge to ‘coasting’ schools• Many more academies
Back to autonomy? Husbands (2015) refers to “a largely autonomous system of competing schools” and says that “England’s school system will look like few others in the world”.
Revised title (since May 7th):Collaboration-Autonomy-Collaboration-AutonomyApproaches to school improvement in the UK [email protected]
MA in Post-War Recovery Studies: Quantitative Method
References and further reading:
• Education Committee (2013). School Partnerships and Cooperation. House of Commons Select Committee, London.
• Husbands, C. (2015). ‘Conservative victory means England’s school system will look like few others in the world’. The Conversation, 9 May 2015.
• OECD (2011). ‘School autonomy and accountability: Are they related to student performance?’ PISA In Focus. OECD,
• Whitbourn, S, with Mitchell, K. & Morris, R. (2000). What is the LEA For? National Foundation for Educational Research, Slough, UK.
• Woods, D. (2014). ‘Re-balancing a school-led improvement system – lessons learned from the London Challenge’. Institute of Education, London.