44
Prepared by: GVCCC and GVR Resident Survey 2010

C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Overview of Survey Results

Citation preview

Page 1: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

Prepared by:

GVCCC and GVRResident Survey 2010

Page 2: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 2

Survey Purpose Sponsored by:

Green Valley Community Coordinating Council and Green Valley Recreation

Assess: quality of life quality of services use of amenities policy options

Page 3: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 3

Survey Methods

Three mailings to 3,000 randomly selected GV residents or GVR members Prenotification postcard 1st wave survey 2nd wave survey

1,525 completed questionnaires 55% response rate 95% confidence interval (“margin of error”) +/- 2.5%

Page 4: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 4

Geographic Areas

Page 5: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 5

Quality of Life

Highest ratedHighest rated

Neighborhood as a place to live

93%

Volunteer opportunities

92%

Percent Rating as “Excellent” or “Good”Percent Rating as “Excellent” or “Good”

Green Valley as a place to live/retire

95%

Page 6: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 6

Lowest ratedLowest rated

Availability of paths and

walking/biking trails

71%

Shopping opportunities

44%

Percent Rating as “Excellent” or “Good”Percent Rating as “Excellent” or “Good”

Opportunities to participate in

meetings about local government or

community matters

73%

Quality of Life

Page 7: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 7

Recreation Opportunities

Percent Rating as “Excellent” or “Good”Percent Rating as “Excellent” or “Good”

Recreation opportunities

90%

Community events

84%

Fitness opportunities

88%

Outdoor physical activity

87%

Cultural or social activities

79%Skill-building,

educational and personal

enrichment classes

82%

Page 8: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 8

Differences in Ratings of Green Valley

Generally Highest Ratings

Generally Lowest Ratings

San Ignacio/ Canoa East

La Posada

Country Club/ Pueblo

MaderaCanoa Ranch*

*Except Canoa Ranch received the highest, or near highest, ratings for:• Opportunities to participate in meetings about local government or community matters• Availability of information about resources for older adults

Page 9: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 9

Consider Green Valley “Home”

No, 27%Yes,

73%

Do you Do you consider consider Green Valley Green Valley your home?your home?

Page 10: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 10

Length of Residency

2%

18%

32%

22%

14%

13%

Less than 1 year

1-5 years

6-10 years

11-15 years

16-20 years

More than 20 years

Page 11: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 11

Activities of a Typical Week

Activities of a Activities of a Typical WeekTypical Week

Help to friends or relatives

79%

With friends and/or family

93%

Recreation program or

group activity 66%

Volunteering in Green

Valley 56%

Community club 43%

Civic group 24%

Working for pay 16%

Religious or spiritual

activities with others 57%

Percent of Respondents Spending One or More Hours Doing Each in a Typical Week

Page 12: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 12

Volunteering in Green Valley

Types of Volunteering

Sitting on a committee or board 20%Organizing or supervising events 12%Volunteering for a GVR club 12%Monitoring for GVR 9%Teaching, educating or mentoring 9%Collecting, serving or delivering food 6%Providing health care or support 6%Office/clerical work 4%Environmental issues 4%Other volunteering for GVR 4%Other 11%

How Learned of Opportunity

“word of mouth” (from friend or family member) 59%

was asked to be a volunteer 44%

approached the organization on my own initiative 31%

through a newsletter 14%

Percent Having Done Each in Previous 12 Months

Page 13: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 13

Top Reasons for Volunteering

How important to you personally, if at all, are the following reasons for volunteering?

To make a contribution to the community 60%

The volunteer work is enjoyable 47%

To use my skills and experiences 41%

To network with or meet people 41%

To help others or important causes 65%

Percent of respondents rating as “very important”

Page 14: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 14

Sources of Information

“Word of mouth” 85%

Newspaper 84%

Keeping Current 83%

Green Valley Community Directory 74%

GVR bulletin boards 62%

GVR catalogues 59%

Announcements at GVR events or ads on back of GVR event programs 50%

GVCCC monthly President's letter 42%

GVCCC monthly meetings 40%

GVR monitorsGVR monitors 36%36%

GVR websiteGVR website 32%32%

GVR newsletters toGVR newsletters to volunteers or clubsvolunteers or clubs 30%30%

GVR monthly member GVR monthly member orientationorientation 24%24%

GVR board meetings 38%

GVR email blastGVR email blast 22%22%

GVCCC websiteGVCCC website 20%20%

HOA email and newsletters 66%

Percent saying they got “most” or “a lot” of their information from each

Page 15: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 15

Familiarity With or Use of Activities, Amenities & Organizations

UsedHeard of/ not used

Green Valley Community Food Bank 29% 68% 3%

Pima County Sheriff's Auxiliary Volunteers (SAV) 44% 53% 4%

Friends in Deed 51% 44% 4%

Lion’s club recycle program 56% 37% 7%

Community Performing Arts Center 40% 53% 7%

Hazardous Waste Disposal 42% 49% 9%

The Greater Green Valley Arts Council 12% 72% 16%

Green Valley Assistance Services 10% 69% 21%

Catholic Charities 8% 69% 22%

Casa de Esperanza 15% 63% 23%

Household Medical Disposal Drops 19% 54% 27%

Mature Workers Connection 3% 36% 61%

Green Valley/Sahuarita Volunteer Clearinghouse 2% 35% 63%

Never heard of

Page 16: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 16

Functioning of HOAs

Enforcing the provisions of the CC&Rs (covenants, conditions and restrictions) 77%77%

Communicating with members 73%73%

Planning and attending social events 69%69%

Attending GVCCC meetings and workshops 69%69%

Percent rating as “excellent” or “good”

Page 17: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 17

Interest In “Green” Functions

Photovoltaic electric panels Photovoltaic electric panels (storing solar energy to use as (storing solar energy to use as electricity)electricity)

Water harvesting (capturing rain or Water harvesting (capturing rain or run off to re-use on your property)run off to re-use on your property)

Solar water heater (using solar Solar water heater (using solar energy to heat the water)energy to heat the water)

61%61%

58%58%

63%63%

Might be Might be interestedinterested

in this in this

5%5%

5%5%

7%7%

Plan to Plan to have thishave this

2%2%

6%6%

2%2%

Already Already have thishave this

Page 18: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 18

Additional Types of Businesses Desired for Green Valley

A hospital 77%

Health care providers (e.g., primary care, Internists, heart, cancer, etc.) 72%

Restaurants 61%

Specialty grocery stores 55%

General practice and specialist dentists and eye doctors 55%

Percent “strongly” support

Page 19: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 19

Functions of GVR/GVCCC Percent Percent

“excellent” “excellent” or “good”or “good”

PercentPercent“very “very

important”important”

Provide opportunities for residents to maintain Provide opportunities for residents to maintain and improve their physical health and improve their physical health 90%90% 80%80%

Provide recreational and social opportunitiesProvide recreational and social opportunities 90%90% 69%69%

Provide opportunities for residents to Provide opportunities for residents to make social connections that strengthen make social connections that strengthen the community's social fabricthe community's social fabric

82%82% 58%58%

Provide recreation opportunities to underservedProvide recreation opportunities to underservedresidents who might not otherwise be able to residents who might not otherwise be able to participate in recreation activities (such asparticipate in recreation activities (such aspeople with disabilities or people with low incomes)people with disabilities or people with low incomes)

55%55% 57%57%

Provide greater mobility, with trails and paths for residents Provide greater mobility, with trails and paths for residents to use for exercise and for non-motorized transportation to use for exercise and for non-motorized transportation 64%64% 54%54%

Provide workshops to the community (e.g., tenants Provide workshops to the community (e.g., tenants in an HOA; legal issues within an HOA; landscaping; in an HOA; legal issues within an HOA; landscaping; leadership training and other common issues within an HOA) leadership training and other common issues within an HOA)

56%56% 43%43%

Page 20: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 20

Differences in Quality Ratings of Functions of GVR and GVCCC

Generally Highest Ratings

Generally Lowest Ratings

San Ignacio/ Canoa East

La Posada

Country Club/ Pueblo

Madera

Page 21: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 21

Issues Residents Consider Important

for GVCCC to Address

Percents may add to more than 100%, as respondents could choose more than one issue

Addressing water supply issues in the communityAddressing water supply issues in the community 82%82%

Increasing the number and types of retail, business and Increasing the number and types of retail, business and medical services available in the communitymedical services available in the community 77%77%

Increasing transit service in the Green Valley areaIncreasing transit service in the Green Valley area 51%51%

Improving air qualityImproving air quality 50%50%

Addressing planning and design issues in Green ValleyAddressing planning and design issues in Green Valley 47%47%

Improving public safetyImproving public safety 46%46%

Continue to provide workshops for HOA'sContinue to provide workshops for HOA's 44%44%

Increasing cultural and educational opportunities in Green Increasing cultural and educational opportunities in Green ValleyValley 31%31%

Page 22: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 22

Usefulness of HOA Membership in GVCCC

No, 15%Yes, 85%

Do you think Do you think membership of your membership of your HOA in GVCCC is HOA in GVCCC is useful?useful?

Page 23: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 23

Usefulness of HOA Membership in GVCCCby Geographic Area

Most Likely to Rate as Useful

Least Likely to Rate as Useful

San Ignacio/ Canoa East

Canoa West/ Desert Hills

Country Club/ Pueblo

La Posada

Canoa Ranch

Page 24: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 24

Ratings of Green Valley Recreation

Level of cleanliness of facilitiesLevel of cleanliness of facilities 95%95%

Quality of classes/ activities/ programsQuality of classes/ activities/ programs 89%89%

Variety of classes/ activities/ programsVariety of classes/ activities/ programs 86%86%

Staff service to you as membersStaff service to you as members 86%86%

Accessibility of GVR staffAccessibility of GVR staff 86%86%

Volunteer/monitor courtesy to you as members.Volunteer/monitor courtesy to you as members. 81%81%

Appropriateness of times classes/ activities/ programs offeredAppropriateness of times classes/ activities/ programs offered 80%80%

Cost of classes/ activities/ programsCost of classes/ activities/ programs 69%69%

Value received for membership dues paidValue received for membership dues paid 67%67%

Page 25: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 25

Differences in Ratings of GVRby Geographic Area

Generally Highest Ratings Generally Lowest Ratings

San Ignacio/ Canoa East

La PosadaPortillo/ Las Campanas

Madera

Quality of classes/ activities/programs

Country Club/ Pueblo

La Posada

Madera

Cost of classes/ activities/programs

Value received for membership

dues paid

Santa Rita Springs

La Posada

Country Club/ Pueblo

Page 26: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 26

Participation in GVR Offerings

Percent who participated in last 12 months

57%

Outd

oor

swim

min

gpo

ols

44%“D

rop-

in”

exer

cise

30%

Conce

rts

23%

Socia

l/ho

bby

clu

bs

21%

Indoo

r

swim

min

gpo

ol

21%

Movi

es

Most Popular

Page 27: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 27

Ratings of GVR Offerings

Percent rating as “Excellent” or “Good”

Highest Rated57%

Outd

oor

swim

min

gpo

ols

97%

Outd

oor

swim

min

gpo

ols

44%

“Dro

p-in

exer

cise

93%

“Dro

p-in

exer

cise

30%

Conce

rts93%

Conce

rts

23%

Socia

l/ho

bby

clu

bs

95%

Socia

l/ho

bby

clu

bs

93%

Fitn

ess/

wel

lnes

scl

asse

s

Mo

st

Po

pu

lar

Page 28: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 28

Importance of GVR Offerings

Percent rating as “Very Important”

Mo

st

Po

pu

lar

Most Important57%

Outd

oor

swim

min

gpo

ols

97%

Outd

oor

swim

min

gpo

ols

77%77%

Out

door

Outd

oor

swim

min

g

swim

min

gpo

ols

pool

s

44%

“Dro

p-in

exer

cise

93%“D

rop-

in”

exer

cise

64%64%

““Dro

p-in

Drop-

in”

exer

cise

exer

cise

30%

Conce

rts

93%

Conce

rts52%52%Con

certs

Conce

rts

52%52%

Cer

tific

atio

ns

Cer

tific

atio

ns

(CPR

, etc

)

(CPR

, etc

)

93%

Fitn

ess/

wel

lnes

scl

asse

s

50%50%

Fitn

ess/

Fitn

ess/

wel

lnes

s

wel

lnes

scl

asse

s

clas

ses

Hig

hes

t R

ate

d

Page 29: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 29

93%

Conce

rts

93%

44%

“Dro

p-in

exer

cise

93%

Least Popular GVR OfferingsL

eas

t Im

po

rta

nt

Least Popular

57%

Outd

oor

swim

min

gpo

ols

93%

“Dro

p-in

exer

cise

3%3%

Bocce

30%

Conce

rts

Tabl

e te

nnis

1%1%

Foo

d an

d be

vera

ge

clas

ses

2%2%

Mus

ic le

sson

cla

sses

Lo

we

st R

ate

d

3%3%

Lang

uage

art

s an

d w

ritin

g cl

asse

s

Tabl

e te

nnis

2%2%

Page 30: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 30

Use, Quality and Importance of GVR Facilities

West Social CenterWest Social Center 85%85% 97%97% 55%55%

East Social CenterEast Social Center 84%84% 97%97% 47%47%

Desert Hills Social CenterDesert Hills Social Center 83%83% 96%96% 44%44%

Canoa Hills Social CenterCanoa Hills Social Center 83%83% 99%99% 43%43%

Las Campanas Social CenterLas Campanas Social Center 80%80% 98%98% 37%37%

Santa Rita Springs Recreation VillageSanta Rita Springs Recreation Village 77%77% 96%96% 29%29%

Canoa Ranch Social CenterCanoa Ranch Social Center 75%75% 96%96% 29%29%

Abrego South Satellite CenterAbrego South Satellite Center 59%59% 86%86% 15%15%

Madera Vista Satellite CenterMadera Vista Satellite Center 60%60% 89%89% 15%15%

Abrego North Satellite CenterAbrego North Satellite Center 56%56% 86%86% 10%10%

Continental Vistas Satellite CenterContinental Vistas Satellite Center 57%57% 87%87% 10%10%

Casa Paloma I Satellite CenterCasa Paloma I Satellite Center 56%56% 86%86% 8%8%

Casa Paloma II Satellite CenterCasa Paloma II Satellite Center 55%55% 86%86% 8%8%

Participated in Participated in last 12 monthslast 12 months

Percent Percent “excellent:” or “excellent:” or

“good”“good”

Percent “very Percent “very important”important”

Page 31: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 31

Support For or Opposition To Potential GVR Improvements

Special needs fitness roomSpecial needs fitness room

Items That Half or More Supported

Therapy poolTherapy pool

Computer center/Internet café / arcade / games, etc. Computer center/Internet café / arcade / games, etc.

Additional hobby shopsAdditional hobby shops

Dance / aerobics studio spaceDance / aerobics studio space

Additional multi-purpose spacesAdditional multi-purpose spaces

Additional class meeting roomsAdditional class meeting rooms

Specialized servicesSpecialized services

OpposeOppose SupportSupport

60%

64%

76%

77%

55%

55%

56%

53%47%

45%

45%

44%

41%

37%

24%

23%

-100% 0% 100%

Page 32: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 32

Support For or Opposition To Potential GVR Improvements

Outdoor adventure programs or extreme sportsOutdoor adventure programs or extreme sports

Items That Half or More Opposed OpposeOppose SupportSupport

44%

40%

41%

38%

38%

24%

47%

45%

45%

48%52%

53%

55%

55%

56%

60%

59%

62%

76%

62%

-100% 0% 100%

Recreation vehicle rentalsRecreation vehicle rentals

Additional tennis courtsAdditional tennis courts

Spinning classesSpinning classes

Racquetball / handball courtsRacquetball / handball courts

Additional enclosed swimming poolsAdditional enclosed swimming pools

Multi-purpose gymnasiumMulti-purpose gymnasium

Pickleball courtsPickleball courts

Overnight excursions, backpacking or campingOvernight excursions, backpacking or camping

Sauna and steam roomSauna and steam room

Page 33: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 33

68% 32%

Preferred Option for Guest Boundary Line Bylaw

This Bylaw This Bylaw should be should be preservedpreserved

Members should be Members should be allowed to bring guests allowed to bring guests regardless of where the regardless of where the

guests liveguests live

Page 34: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 34

Support For or Opposition to Expanding GVR Boundaries

29%17% 18% 37%

-75% -50% -25% 0% 25% 50% 75%

Strongly Strongly OpposeOppose

Somewhat Somewhat SupportSupport

Strongly Strongly SupportSupport

Somewhat Somewhat OpposeOppose

45% 55%

Page 35: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 35

Support For or Opposition to Expanding GVR Boundaries by GVR Membership Status

18%

18%

26%

38%

42%

27%

14%

17%

-75% -50% -25% 0% 25% 50% 75%

Non-members

Members of GVR

Strongly Strongly OpposeOppose

Somewhat Somewhat SupportSupport

Strongly Strongly SupportSupport

Somewhat Somewhat OpposeOppose

44% 56%

56% 44%

Page 36: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 36

Support For or Opposition to Potential GVR Funding Options

Options That Half or More Supported AgreeAgree Disagree Disagree

GVR should continue to maintain capital reserves for facility GVR should continue to maintain capital reserves for facility replacements and renovationsreplacements and renovations 97%97% 4% 4%

GVR should expand rental of its facilities (currently only to non-GVR should expand rental of its facilities (currently only to non-profit groups at reduced rates) to commercial/for-profit groups at profit groups at reduced rates) to commercial/for-profit groups at increased ratesincreased rates

73%73% 27% 27%

GVR should seek grants and donations, which require raising GVR should seek grants and donations, which require raising matching funds from the community on a portion of the monies matching funds from the community on a portion of the monies receivedreceived

67%67% 34% 34%

In order to preserve funds for expansion and renovation, GVR In order to preserve funds for expansion and renovation, GVR should close facilities with low usageshould close facilities with low usage 65%65% 36% 36%

GVR should seek corporate sponsors in order to supplement GVR should seek corporate sponsors in order to supplement recreation funding (such as signage with logos or recreation funding (such as signage with logos or advertisements, use of banners with logos or advertising during advertisements, use of banners with logos or advertising during events or games, naming of facilities, etc.)events or games, naming of facilities, etc.)

52%52% 49% 49%

Page 37: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 37

Support For or Opposition to Potential GVR Funding Options Options That Half or More Opposed Agree Disagree

GVR should keep member dues low, but implement a one-time GVR should keep member dues low, but implement a one-time assessment to pay for maintenance of aging facilitiesassessment to pay for maintenance of aging facilities

25% 75%

GVR should raise member dues to pay for maintenance of aging GVR should raise member dues to pay for maintenance of aging facilitiesfacilities

29% 71%

Although it has never borrowed money in the past, GVR should Although it has never borrowed money in the past, GVR should borrow money, if necessary, to pay for needed renovation and borrow money, if necessary, to pay for needed renovation and expansion of facilities (similar to a bond by a municipality), expansion of facilities (similar to a bond by a municipality), knowing it could pay off these debts with future duesknowing it could pay off these debts with future dues

32% 68%

GVR should partner with other municipalities, school districts or GVR should partner with other municipalities, school districts or nonprofits to develop joint use recreational facilities or programsnonprofits to develop joint use recreational facilities or programs

37% 62%

GVR should partner with private organizations to develop GVR should partner with private organizations to develop recreational facilities or programsrecreational facilities or programs

40% 61%

Page 38: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 38

Other Comments

Great place to live. Thank you to all the volunteers.

GVR does an excellent job for this community, as does the GVCCC.

GVR is a bargain & GVCCC is beneficial.Get county to repair

streets; filling pot holes with cinders does not last.

GVR needs to allow member to opt out of membership (i.e. medically unable to use facility) and not be hold hostage to [the] fee.

I love Green Valley. The roads are a disgrace, no hospital, and drivers are horrible. GVR & GVCC do a terrific job.

Need better medical. We have all our doctors & tests done in Tucson.

Page 39: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 39

In Conclusion

Residents of Green Valley are generally very happy with the quality of life in the community

Among the community improvements they would like to see are more businesses, particularly:

a hospital medical/health care services restaurants and specialty grocery and retail stores

The highest ratings of the community were generally observed in: San Ignacio/ Canoa East La Posada

The lowest ratings of the community were generally observed in: Madera County Club/Pueblo

Page 40: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 40

In Conclusion

Residents are generally happy with GVR and GVCCC

They would most like to see GVCCC address: water supply issues increasing medical services, businesses and retail

opportunities in the community

Additions most supported for GVR are: Special needs fitness room Therapy pool Computer center/Internet café

GVR members did not like the idea of paying more in order to maintain facilities, nor did they support the idea of GVR borrowing monies for expansion and renovation.

Page 41: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 41

Slides you may not need

Do you still want these slides on the next 3 pages? One of them is the map of geographic areas turned sideways – it’s larger this way, but probably harder to read. I put it in in case you’d rather have this version than the one that is currently slide #4.

Page 42: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 42

Reporting the Results

Appendix B: Frequencies of responses to all questions

Appendices D and E: Crosstabulations

Appendix F: Description of survey methods

Appendix G: Survey materials

Page 43: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 43

Thank You!

Contact:Erin Caldwell

Senior Research AssociateNational Research Center, Inc.

303-444-7863 x102

Page 44: C:\Fakepath\Gv Presentation 2010 06 08

© 2010 National Research Center, Inc. 44

Geographic Areas