10
KITCHENETTE CASELET PRESENTED BY : ALOK KUMAR CHANDRAKANT EZONG JINIA BISWAS NAYAN SAHA PANKAJ AGARWAL POUSALI MUKHERJEE PRETAM LAHA RAJESWARI SAHU SRIPARNA CHAKROBORTY

Case study on Kitchenette

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Case study on Kitchenette

KITCHENETTE CASELET PRESENTED BY :

ALOK KUMARCHANDRAKANT EZONG

JINIA BISWASNAYAN SAHA

PANKAJ AGARWALPOUSALI MUKHERJEE

PRETAM LAHARAJESWARI SAHU

SRIPARNA CHAKROBORTY

Page 2: Case study on Kitchenette
Page 3: Case study on Kitchenette

PROBLEM FORMULATION

Page 4: Case study on Kitchenette

MBIL did not carry out a thorough research in the Indian market.

A hypothesis testing should have been carried out to check whether the Kitchenette product would work or not across India.

Competition from makers of aluminium and steel containers should have been assessed.

Who were the major decision makers in a typical Indian family in general?

“Potential” of the tin containers to do well vis-à-vis competion , not measured.

Page 5: Case study on Kitchenette

Beliefs, perceptions and attitudes of Indian, urban ladies were not researched on.

Parameters like income, spending habits, buying pattern and lifestyle were different in Western and Northern India compared to Eastern and Southern India.

Unequal distribution of income in India, making the Kitchenette products a failure in Eastern and Southern parts of India

Analysis of all the parameters of PESTLE concept not done, technological or environmental issue(hygiene) involved.

An initial focus group interview across the targeted cities could have reflected ,- product quality acceptability, price acceptability and place availability.

No customer-level interaction was done to assess customer reactions.

Page 6: Case study on Kitchenette

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION

Page 7: Case study on Kitchenette

Conceptualisation followed by hypothesis testing and proper research methodologies were necessary to launch expensive tin containers in India.

No research instruments used Launching efforts were clearly based on assumptions

that Kitchenette has to do well in India too. The Indian market was thought to be homogeneous

throughout. Citywise, percentage and number of ladies going out to

work was much lesser in Eastern, Central and Southern parts of India compared to Northern and Western parts of India.

Indian consumers not very happy with the texture of the containers(Feel sensory organ) and preferred aluminium, steel or containers that came free with packaged food in containers.

Page 8: Case study on Kitchenette

City-wise data collection, recording, analysis, interpretation and report preparing were not done

Short, pilot studies not done Degree of satisfaction vs expectation not measured Who are the consumers(educated ladies) who took pride

in keeping their kitchens clean Purchasing power and purchasing attitude, city-wise not

assessed.

Page 9: Case study on Kitchenette

Responses on product quality, price acceptability, easy availability, level of awareness(interest), quality of backup servicing(process) and most importantly, retailer-level customer interaction measured through Customer Satisfaction Index(PKG Parameter) not measured through market survey(Descriptive survey).

Page 10: Case study on Kitchenette

http://www.unitedworld.edu.in/

Campus Ahmedabad Campus: Karnavati Knowledge Village, A/907,Uvarsad,

S.G.Highway, Gandhinagar

Kolkata Campus: Infinity Benchmark Tower 10th Floor, Plot - G1, Block - EP& GP, Sec - V, Salt Lake, Kolkata.

Reg. Office: 407, Zodiac Square, 4th Floor Opp. Gurudwara, S.G. Road, Bodakdev, Ahmedabad.