102
1 VII The Tort of Negligence Privacy Human Rights SWOT Review Part 3 NAIT Bus Law April 2, 2006

Business Law 3

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Business Law 3

1

VII The Tort of NegligencePrivacy

Human RightsSWOTReview

Part 3

NAIT Bus Law

April 2, 2006

Page 2: Business Law 3

2

Tort Law Pg 19A: A civil wrong (between individuals)When an intentional or careless act harms

another Injured party usually sues for monetary

compensationB: Purpose to compensate victimC: to determine liability

– person at fault pays– Strict liability – did act reasonably– Vicarious liability

Page 3: Business Law 3

3

Torts p 19Because Torts is a "common law” (court

developed) area of liability, it requires judges to interpret and apply earlier precedents.

Torts is still very much a live subject For example, they have created new areas

of liability for negligent statements and financial loss, or for car accidents when automobile was invented

Page 4: Business Law 3

4

Liability for businesses p 19DirectlyIndirectlyCareful HR practices, hiring, training,

performance appraisalsSee Rylands v Fletcher case p1 (case handout)

Page 5: Business Law 3

5

Categories of Tort pg 20

Intentional or deliberate acts that cause injury or loss

On purpose

Careless or negligent acts that cause injury or loss

Accidental or unintentional

Page 6: Business Law 3

6

Intentional Torts pg 20Intentional conduct that causes injuryExamples

– Assault and Battery– Trespass to Land– False Imprisonment– Nuisance– Defamation

Courts may award punitive damages

Page 7: Business Law 3

7

Intentional Torts pg 20

Assault and Battery– Assault - where there is fear of

contact– Battery - least touching in

angerDefenses

1. Consent (informed)2. Self-defense (reasonable

force)R. v McSorley (case handout)

Page 8: Business Law 3

8

Trespass on Land pg 21

entering another’s land without authority– permission implied for business

offering public servicesOccupier owes only minimal

duty to trespasserContinuing trespass remedied

by injunction

Page 9: Business Law 3

9

False Imprisonment pg 22

The unlawful and intentional restraint of a person against his/her will

Restraint must be total

Victim must submit or be forced to comply

Restraint may be justified if the trespassing person has done something s/he can be arrested for – ie robbery

Page 10: Business Law 3

10

Private Nuisance pg 22

Private nuisance interferes with another’s use of his/her property

Interference must involve unusual activity

Page 11: Business Law 3

11

Defamation pg 22

A false statement about someone to his detriment - must be published or broadcast

Slander - spoken defamationLibel - written defamationNote the innuendo

Page 12: Business Law 3

12

Defamation/2

Defences 1. Truth (Justification)2. Absolute Privilege3. Qualified Privilege 4. Fair Comment

But mistake is no defence

Page 13: Business Law 3

13

Reference letters pg 23

Page 14: Business Law 3

14

Negligence pg 23

Inadvertent, careless conduct that causes injury to another

Important area of tort liability for professionals

Page 15: Business Law 3

15

Negligence A – D pg 24

Essential Elements:A: A duty to exercise careB: Breach of the standard of careC: Causation – The act caused the

injuryD: Damages -Victim suffered a loss

Page 16: Business Law 3

16

Reasonable Person Test

Reasonable person is a prudent person exercising care– conduct falling between

average and perfect– Like par in golf

Page 17: Business Law 3

17

Is a Duty Owed?

Reasonable Foreseeability Test- If it would be apparent to a prudent person that

the conduct was likely to cause injury - duty is owed.

We owe a duty to anyone we can reasonably anticipate might be harmed by our conduct

Page 18: Business Law 3

18

A - Duty of Care Misfeasance

– an act that causes harm to another– court will provide remedy

Nonfeasance– a failure to prevent an injury– courts reluctant to provide remedy

If a person attempts to help there is a duty to exercise reasonable care

Courts reluctant to provide remedy without special relationship

Page 19: Business Law 3

19

B – Breach of a Standard of Conduct

What would a reasonable person have done in the circumstances?

Actions that fall below socially acceptable standards create liability for damages

Risk - The greater the risk of injury the higher the standard

Note Reasonable expert

Page 20: Business Law 3

20

Special situations

- Children liable for their torts– standard is that of a reasonable child of that age

- Occupiers must take reasonable steps to protect visitors

- Innkeepers must look after property of guest - Note modification of duty by statute

Page 21: Business Law 3

21

C - Causation

There must be injury or damage Which was a direct result of the careless

conductNote thin skull rule

Page 22: Business Law 3

22

Torts law of NegligenceHandout

Page 23: Business Law 3

23

Defenses to contributory neg pg 26

Contributory negligence– plaintiff partially responsible for own loss– This used to be a complete defence

Negligence Act now allows court to apportion responsibility

Page 24: Business Law 3

24

Defenses/2Voluntarily assuming the risk

– a person who volunteers to enter a situation where the risk of injury is obvious cannot recover damages

– But must assume the legal risk as well Note Crocker v Sundance case (p 2 case

handout)

Page 25: Business Law 3

25

Occupiers Liability pg 26, 27Applies to owner or renterDuty of care owed by occupier to

– Visitors– Trespassers – adult, child

Applies to– Conditions, sidewalks, holes, floors, stairs– Activities, hot tubs– Conduct of third parties

Reduce risk – waivers, signs, safe practices

Page 26: Business Law 3

26

Alcohol related pg 27, 28Commercial hostsStewart v Pettie p 3 case handout

Employer partiesJacobsen v Nike Canada p 4 case handout

Page 27: Business Law 3

27

Other business torts pg 28Inducing breach

– Persuading person to breach contract (inducement)

– Enticement – competitorFraud – Vancouver used car dealers CTV

show W5 and APA found 60% of cars offered were odo rollbacks or wrecks welded together

Conversion – selling car don’t ownTrespass to chattels – damaging others

property

Page 28: Business Law 3

28

Other business torts ctd pg 29Passing off

– Product offered in misleading way– Mail scams– Advertising with misleading photos

Trade slander or defamation– Making false statements about plaintiff’s products

or services that hurt plaintiff

Page 29: Business Law 3

29

Discussion – Case StudyA 13 year-old defendant threw nitric acid at the 12

year-old plaintiff walking by his home. She suffered severe burns to the back of her right leg and required skin grafts. She has permanent cosmetic disfigurements. The boy hid the nitric acid from his parents. In an action for personal injuries, the plaintiff sues the boy in tort and his parents in negligence claiming they knowingly permitted their son to have a dangerous substance.

Issues: Is the boy liable for the injuries he caused? Is his infancy a defence?Are his parents liable in negligence for permitting him

to possess this substance?

Page 30: Business Law 3

30

Pollock et al. v. Lipkowitz et al. (1970), 17 D.L.R. (3d) 766 (Man. Q.B.)

Decision: Bastin J. concluded the boy was liable but his parents were not. This was not an appropriate case to award punitive damages

Reasons: Infancy is not a defence to a tort action. The boy must be responsible for the injuries he caused given that he was of normal intelligence, knew the dangers of nitric acid and had the antidote for nitric acid burns. It is not relevant whether he intended to throw the acid on the plaintiff or merely scare her since his actions caused the injuries.

Page 31: Business Law 3

31

Reasons ctdHis parents are not liable because it would not occur

to even the most conscientious parent that a child could obtain such a dangerous substance. There is a great deal of difference between a harmless chemical found in a child’s chemistry set and commercial nitric acid.

Further, the boy concealed the nitric acid from his parent. They were unaware of his possession of it. As such, they were not negligent and did not contribute to the injuries.

Page 32: Business Law 3

32

VIII Privacy Law pg 29, 30

Pragmatic solutionsHR IssuesGetting employee

buy-inLessons learned

Page 33: Business Law 3

33

Breach of Privacy pg 29Privacy legislation prohibits using another

person’s name or photograph without permission

Note application of Federal Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act

Page 34: Business Law 3

34

Security and PrivacyMisuse of private information growing

concernCare must be taken about giving personal

information over the internetUnauthorized interception of private

communications difficult to controlData stored on computers is vulnerable to

hackers

Page 35: Business Law 3

35

Employee Access

Ees have a right of access to their own information

They have the ability to request correction of errors

Should include access process in your policyWhen an organization collects personal

information from an individual, it must give notice of the purpose of collection and a contact for questions

Page 36: Business Law 3

36

Informal Openness

Employers should allow employees to access their own personal employee records without needing formal request for access under PIPA

A call to HR should permit the ee to obtain the information they need

Page 37: Business Law 3

37

Purpose of Privacy Policy Correct a situation Prevent a situation Outline rules or regulations Ensure consistency within the

organization Demonstrate due diligence Support privacy complaint

resolution Educate

Page 38: Business Law 3

38

HR PoliciesDon’t have any – get some

– Develop a team– Review– Revise– Keep current– Three ring binder

Integrate privacy policies into overall co policies

Page 39: Business Law 3

39

How to Involve Staff Since staff are most affected by

policy, it is wise to involve them

How much should staff be involved depends on how you want to spent the time

Time spent with staff in advance is inversely proportional to time spent fixing things

Page 40: Business Law 3

40

Build privacy policy from ground up

The worst situation is where consultants “hit & run”

Privacy policies should be developed by staff and managers who use them

They can reflect values the organization wants to exhibit

Ab reasonableness test

Page 41: Business Law 3

41

Privacy Gap Analysis

HR

Forms

Files

Gap Analysis

Standardized Forms

Awareness

Information Requests

Employee Driven

Employee

Practices

Payroll

Page 42: Business Law 3

42

Gap AnalysisWhat changes in your current policies,

procedures and practices will close any gaps?

Page 43: Business Law 3

43

HR Audit

Stop collecting personal data that is irrelevant or excessive

Ready - Ensure that workers are aware of their individual responsibility

Go – implement your information policy and review it on a regular basis

Conduct an information audit: who what, why,

where and how? Consider employee involvement or

their reps

Page 44: Business Law 3

44

Privacy Policy SummaryDeveloping policies, procedures and

practices is a practical way of minimizing employer risk of non-compliance

Policy should reflect values and direction of the organization

Should assist the organization, not hinder itLastly they are a guide for staff, not a

substitute for good privacy management

Page 45: Business Law 3

45

Privacy Officer

Privacy Coach

Responsible to assist individuals with concerns or requests regarding

Access, collection, use or disclosure of their own personal information, including personal employee information

Page 46: Business Law 3

46

Employee Information

The act specifically says that organizations may collect personal employee info without consent if the individual is an employee of the organization, or the info is for recruiting purposes

Orgs may not collect personal info unless the collection is for reasonable purposes and is related to the employment or volunteer work relationship

Page 47: Business Law 3

47

Recruiting Info Sources

Your notesOther peoples notesYour formsYour written commentsWho has accessYour policiesYour memos

Page 48: Business Law 3

48

Recruitment

Employers will be able to collect, use and disclose certain employee information without consent when it is reasonable to do so.

What is reasonable?Extension of existing Human Rights

legislation

Source OIPC

Page 49: Business Law 3

49

RecruitmentAt hire - opportunity to have

employee consent to use of their info while employed and after

If the employee is not hired, the org must destroy the info, or give it back to the individual, unless that individual consents otherwise

If keep resume on file, say for how long, then destroy

Source Bill 44

Page 50: Business Law 3

50

Definition of Employee

Includes apprentices, volunteers, participants, students, and individuals under contract to an organization

Your policy should include allMay wish to include your Board of

Directors as well

Page 51: Business Law 3

51

Employee calls in sick Er may ask for general information necessary for operation of the position

how long the employee is expected to be away from the workplace and an date of return to work

Doctor’s note No diagnostic info pls

Page 52: Business Law 3

52

Reference Checks Only an individual's name and title is

public, most other information requested for in a reference is considered personal

Many organizations have chosen not to provide references of any kind, even prior to privacy legislation concerns, due to the potential risk of litigation.

Page 53: Business Law 3

53

Little risk of privacy implications with this approach, however, it may not be in the best interest of your organization

The goodwill of your organization in the minds of former employees who left on good terms may suffer, as they may have difficulty securing employment without a reference

Morale – be reasonable, get consentRule of thumb – state facts not opinions, don’t

day anything you wouldn’t say to their faceTry to control ees providing references directly –

control info flow – tough to do, but worthwhile

Page 54: Business Law 3

54

You may wish to confirm employment dates, titles and salaries only, with the provision of a signed authorization by the former employee.

May be done at time of request or include at employee hire

Have departing employees complete a standard Reference Authorization Form detailing what specific information you can release, to whom you can release it and for what period of time.

Page 55: Business Law 3

55

You receive a call from a potential employer requesting a reference

Prudent to request that they provide you with authorization in writing from the former employee via fax, unless you have an auth on file

Compare signatures on file

Page 56: Business Law 3

56

EAP

Er should not get involved in EAPBe very careful about release of any infoEAP counsellor usually owns the info

under contract, and the employer should not have any access, except in very specific situations like return to work, or danger, or managed referrals

EAP counsellor should obtain consent from ee

Page 57: Business Law 3

57

“Mortgage” Letters

Information like status (full time or part-time), date of hire, salary is personal

The employee would specify exactly what information is to be released and to whom

Handle in hire letter

Page 58: Business Law 3

58

Duplicate Personnel FilesManagers often keep personal notes and

information about staff in duplicate corp filesRisky practice from more than just a privacy

perspectiveShould an ee file a complaint under Human

Rights, Employment Standards or launch a civil suit against an employer, documents contained in both the manager's file and the official file are subject to subpoena and disclosure

HR File Audit – Boy Scouts said it best “Be Prepared”

Page 59: Business Law 3

59

Access to ee info

Differing departments need different information about an employee

Not all need to see everythingSegregating certain types of employee

information as separate files or within the file with different access protocols would help

Page 60: Business Law 3

60

BenefitsHow does your carrier

measure up?You are responsibleWhat about employee

medical claim information?Pensions, RSP’s, who has

access to information

Page 61: Business Law 3

61

BenefitsCensus data for quotes

– No need to name names in lists of eesMedical info

– Try and have carrier deal direct with ees– Make experience info generic – no need to name

names– ie. LTD claim, position title, medical condition,

mo benefit amt, start and expected end date

Page 62: Business Law 3

62

When can opt-out consent be used (aka negative option)Notify the employee of the

purpose for which the information is being collected, used and disclosed

Allow the ee a reasonable period of time to decline or object to the proposed collection, use or disclosure

Page 63: Business Law 3

63

Home Address

Home address is personal information

Disclosure to third parties, must be authorized by the employee in writing

If your org has vendor arrangements, the best approach would be to have ees give consent at hire

Page 64: Business Law 3

64

Ees are responsible too

No ee should disclose personal info on staff, or use for their own personal purposes

Organization should have clear rules for itself and its ees

Education is key

Page 65: Business Law 3

65

Monitoring Ees at work• Monitoring, listening, tracking Ee activities is controversial

• Ers can do it, but tell people you are doing it or may be doing it

• Must have a reason – can’t go fishing

Page 66: Business Law 3

66

Privacy ReviewPut someone in chargeUnderstand the requirementsReview how you handle personal informationTest to see if you are compliantDevelop privacy policies and practicesDevelop access and complaints processesReview and revise formsReview and revise contracts with third partiesTrain staff

Page 67: Business Law 3

67

IX Charter & Human Rights pg 44When does it applyNot to private matters

Page 68: Business Law 3

68

What rights are covered? Pg 45Fundamental freedomsDemocraticMobilityLegalEqualityLanguage

Page 69: Business Law 3

69

Charter Limitations pg 46Reasonable limitsNotwithstanding clauseKeegstra p 6 case handout

Page 70: Business Law 3

70

Courts role pg 46, 47Judges can rule other laws invalid if they

violate the Charter Section 5224(1) Askimov case24(2) evidence obtained in violation of

Charter

Page 71: Business Law 3

71

Ab Human Rights pg 47Must fall in protected area and grounds

Who to complain to?Ab Human Rights & Citizenship CommissionWithin 12 mos

Page 72: Business Law 3

72

Process pg 48Officer will try to resolveInvestigatePanelEnforcement thru courts

Page 73: Business Law 3

73

Employment Practices – pg 49

Page 74: Business Law 3

74

Are there some questions I can’t ask in the interview?

Page 75: Business Law 3

75

Question Can’t ask Recommended

Gender, marital status, family status

Plans for marriage, family childcare, gender, marital status

Availability for work including shift work, travel

Languages Ability in languages not required for job

Ability in language required for job

Age Specific age Old enough to work legally in Alberta

Page 76: Business Law 3

76

Question Can’t ask Recommended

Name Maiden name, reference to name origin

Previous names, only if needed to verify past employment / education

Race, colour, ancestry place of origin

Place of birth, citizenship, racial origin, next of kin

Legally permitted to work in Canada

Page 77: Business Law 3

77

Question Can’t ask Recommended

Photo-graphs

For as they can reveal race, gender

In rare situations modelling, entertainment

Clubs or organiz- ations

Specific inquiries about memberships that would indicate race, religion….

In cases where the club or org are job related

Height & Weight

Min or max height weight norms

Describe job duties that require certain physical requirements

Page 78: Business Law 3

78

Question Can’t ask RecommendedDisability General disabilities,

present or past health, WCB history

Offer contingent upon satisfactory job related medical

Smoking Asthma, respiratory Working in Smoke free env

Source of income

Anything unrelated to job

Job related info about prev jobs

Education Religious or racial affiliation of Education

Religious beliefs

Holidays, customs Job related info about prev jobs

Page 79: Business Law 3

79

BFOR pg 49Bona fide occupational requirementMeiorin Case p 8 case handout

Page 80: Business Law 3

80

Harassment pg 50

Page 81: Business Law 3

81

Duty to accommodate pg 50

Page 82: Business Law 3

82

AgeCant make complaints

– Over age 45 for rental unit– Discounts for seniors

Page 83: Business Law 3

83

Vriend Charter Challenge pg 51Vriend case p 6 case handout

End section

Page 84: Business Law 3

84

S.W.O.T. Analysis (not in texts)

Strengths

Opportunities

Weakness

Threats

Factors Internal to Organization

Factors External to Organization

Page 85: Business Law 3

85

SWOT: DescriptionA SWOT analysis generates

information that is helpful in matching an organization’s goals, programs, and capacities to the environment in which it operates

It is an instrument within strategic planning

When combined with dialogue it is a participatory process

Page 86: Business Law 3

86

Simple Rules for SWOT AnalysisBe realistic about the strengths and weaknesses

of your organization or groupDistinguish between where your organization is

today, and where it could be in the futureBe specific: Avoid gray areasAlways analyze in relation to your core missionKeep your SWOT short and simpleAvoid complexity and over analysis

Page 87: Business Law 3

87

StrengthsConsider from both the view of the org as

well as customers, competitors and community members

Be realisticOne’s strength is another’s weaknessQuestions:

– What is org’s advantages over others?– What does the org do well?– What makes you stand out from your

competitors?

Page 88: Business Law 3

88

WeaknessesConsider from internal and external

viewpointBe truthful so that weaknesses may be

overcome as quickly as possibleOne’s strength is another’s weaknessQuestions.

– What is done poorly?– What can be improved?– What should be avoided?

Page 89: Business Law 3

89

Opportunities and ThreatsPrimarily external in natureRepresent characteristics of:

– the research environment– growth in potential markets– changes in the competitive, economic,

political/legal, technological, or socio-cultural environments

A threat to some is an opportunity to another

Page 90: Business Law 3

90

Questions on opportunities– Is there a product/service area that others have

not yet covered?– Are there emerging trends that fit with your

company's strengths?Questions on threats

– Are your competitors becoming stronger?– Are there emerging trends that amplify one of

your weaknesses?

Page 91: Business Law 3

91

For a company a strength could be:marketing expertiselocation of your businessinnovative productImageYour quality of serviceYour reputationany other aspect that adds value to your

product or service

Page 92: Business Law 3

92

For a company a weakness could be:lack of marketing expertiseundifferentiated products and service (i.e.

in relation to your competitors)location of your businessdamaged reputation

Page 93: Business Law 3

93

For a company an opportunity could be:a developing market such as the Internet. mergers, joint ventures or strategic

alliancesa new marketa market vacated by an ineffective

competitorany external factor that may create

demand or the possibility for increased profitability

Page 94: Business Law 3

94

For a company a threat could be:a new competitor in your marketprice wars with competitorsa competitor that has a new, innovative

product or servicecompetitors have superior access to

channels of distribution

Page 95: Business Law 3

95

Expanding Your SWOT AnalysisDelve deeper into the details Include more detailed competitor

informationTake a closer look at the business

environment.Expand the reach of a SWOT analysis

through surveys.Customer surveys

Page 96: Business Law 3

96

Word of Caution:– SWOT analysis can be very subjective.– Do not rely on it too much.– Two people rarely come-up with the same

final version of SWOT.

Page 97: Business Law 3

97

Review, Reasons for JV Failure P 9 JV booklet1. Cultural differences

– Cross cultural training– History of working together– Successes early on

Poor or unclear leadership– good communications– clear decision making roles– clear governance and accountability strategies

Poor integration process– Capital contribution (money at risk)– Clear dispute resolution process

Page 98: Business Law 3

98

Review Business Orgs 51, 52, 53TaxationSole prop – not taxed on communityPartnership – sameCorp – separate entity, therefore taxed unless owned

by band then treated as a municipality. Ees working for Corp on community are not taxed if Treaty

Name registration– Protects names from other use– Provides credibility and business number– Avoids conflict where another business is operating under

same name

Page 99: Business Law 3

99

Exam1. One mark for choice of ADR and 3 marks for

reason, total 10 marks. P 172. One mark for element and 1 mark for

description. Total 10 marks. P 313. A, B, C One mark for structure and one mark

for explanation/ description. One mark for choice and one mark for each reason. Total 10 marks p 52, 53, 54

4. One mark for each reason and one mark for each explanation. Total 10 marks. P 9.

Page 100: Business Law 3

Our offer to you

100

Please call if you have any HR, or workplace issue that you are overwhelmed with

We can help you

We also are pleased to do Free Workshops for your organization (some limits apply) Let us know what your needs are and we will make it happen!

Page 101: Business Law 3

CG Hylton - Services

HR Consulting Job DescriptionsSalary GridsWellness at WorkStaff MoraleTraining and Workshops

Benefits, Pensions, EAPStrategic PlanningDrug and Alcohol

programsDept re-orgsLeadership

compensation

101

Tel 403 264 [email protected]

Page 102: Business Law 3

102

Chris Hylton would like to thank you for your attention and time!

Questions?

Tel [email protected]