Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Blended Learning: Making Sense of All the Options
Kelvin Thompson, Ed.D.
University of Central Florida
@kthompso #OLCcollaborate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Sharealike 3.0 UnportedLicense. Portions of this work are the intellectual property of others and are attributed appropriately in context.
http://bit.ly/thompson_collaborate2016Pre-Reading Read More About It Resources
http://bit.ly/resources_collaborate
Primitive audio recording of the session: http://bit.ly/audio_thompsoncollaborate2016
“Bedhead” by Mark_Wheadonon Flickr under terms of
CC BY-SA 2.0 Licensehttps://www.flickr.com/photos/
mark_wheadon/5356353811
Multiple Approaches
Tech Enabled
F2F + Online
Web Enhanced
Flip Class
Reduced Seat TimeMandated “Recipes”
Understanding “Blended”
+
+
-
-
Faculty Preferences Institutional Goals
6
AY 2014-2015
• 37.79% of total university SCH
• 77.7% of all students took at least one online course (W, M, V, RV)• 80.19% of all undergraduates (47,116)
• 61.13% of all graduate students (6,469)
NOTE:W = fully onlineM = blendedV/RV = video lecture capture
88 9187 88 91 8890
94 91 9195 9289 91 89 90 92 91
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Spring 14 Sum 14 Fall 14 Spring 15 Sum 15 Fall 15
F2F (n=581,010) Blended (n=75,684) Fully Online (n=199,787)
Student success (A, B, or C grade)
Used with permission. UCF Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness
4 3 4 4 3 44 2 3 3 2 35 4 5 4 3 4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Spring 14 Sum 14 Fall 14 Spring 15 Sum 15 Fall 15
F2F (n=655,631) Blended (n=81,091) Fully Online (n=200,095)
Student withdrawal
Used with permission. UCF Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness
Overall Student “Excellent” Ratings
Blended Learning 56%
Fully Online 55%
Face-to-Face 53%
Video (fully online) 47%
Video (blended) 45%
N = 756,445
Used with permission. UCF Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness
But…
Spring 2016
Students fully online: 25,675 (42.71%)
Students in blended courses: 14,710 (24.47%)
Values Value Proposition Clarification
Cost Access Quality
Small Public
Medium Public
Large Public
Small Private
Medium Private
Large Private
Large Public 3 1 2
Just an Example…
Sample Institutional Goals
• Increase enrollment (recruit new students)oBlended as gateway to online for faculty
• “Better serve” existing studentso Increase “success” (institutional, course, etc.)o Increase satisfaction
• Enhance “quality” of student experienceoAdd strategic f2f opportunities to online courseworkoGive every a student a “voice” online (adding online to f2f coursework)
• Solve a logistical problemoParking and printing
+
+
-
-
Faculty Preferences Institutional Goals
Sample Faculty Preferences
• Make more time for what “needs” to be f2foMore hands-on/discussion/etc. f2f
oMore time to treat difficult concepts in content f2f
• Give students “more time” through re-playable content
• Foster more student engagement through tech tools
• Streamline the grading process for assignments
Content
Interaction
Assessment
Some Principles
• Blended learning should be about the learning, not the tech
• Even when it is about the tech, it’s not just about the tech
• Good course design doesn’t happen by accident
• Integration of f2f+online is the biggest design challenge for blended
• You can’t be clear enough with students (in course or institution)
• Systems can support or stymie the blended successes of faculty
Blended is hard.But worthwhile.
Where Are You with Blended Learning?
• Non-existent
• A few experimenting faculty
• Wide-spread faculty experimentation
• Faculty development/support for blended learning is in place
• Student support for blended learning is in place
• Blended learning (or similar label) is a defined delivery option in course scheduling system
• Responsible party(ies) for blended success identified
• Institutional plan/strategy for blended learning exists
“IMG_8847” by tompagenet on Flickr under terms of CC BY-SA 2.0 License
https://www.flickr.com/photos/tompagenet/15404658875
Resources
• TOPcast: The Teaching Online Podcasthttp://topcast.online.ucf.edu
• The Teaching Online Pedagogical Repository (TOPR)http://topr.online.ucf.edu
• The Blended Learning Toolkithttp://blendedlearningtoolkit.org
• OLC Blended Quality Scorecardhttp://bit.ly/blendedquality
• The BlendKit Coursehttp://bit.ly/blendkit
• BlendKit2016 (global cohort)http://bit.ly/go_blendkit2016
Thanks and Please Follow-Up
Dr. Kelvin Thompson
http://linkedin.com/in/drkelvinthompson
http://bit.ly/thompson_collaborate2016
