Upload
margaretha-eva-saba
View
228
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
group presentation
Citation preview
BLENDED LEARNING
APPROACH
APPLICATION
PROSPECT
FACTORS PROMOTE
BLENDED LEARNING
APPROACH
USEFULNESS FOR STUDENTS
RATIONALE
Module or documents in electronic format is more effective to be keptRegular formative complete assessment Opportunities to learn collaborativelyElectronic personal development planningOpportunity to submit summative assessments electronicallyAll face-to-face learning is interactive
Access equally all learning contentGauge the progress of learning outcomesParticipate in, and engage with interactive learning opportunitiesUse synchronous collaborative learning
BLENDED LEARNING
APPLICATION
BLENDED E-LEARNING (BeL)
COOPERATIVE LEARNING (CL)
BLENDED E-LEARNING COOPERATIVE APPROACH (BeLCA)
Learning experience technology which
integrates some methods combining the utility of technology like DVD, TV, computer, website with
face-to-face learning
A learning process which students learn in pairs or groups in order to maximize students to communicate each other.
Combines face-to-face learning, the utilization of technology in learning, and learning activity in pairs or groups comprising three types of interaction: social, material, and teacher interaction
3 aspects:e-learning, face-to-face, cooperative
learning
BLENDED LEARNING
PROSPECT
Even Blended Learning promising many advantages, however it also offer disadvantages such as internet
cost, computer availability, human resources in technology, teachers’ and students’ readiness, institiution support, and internet abuse anxiety
Technology utilization in education is increasing and appreciated.
In higher education, students are required to have knowledge and competence in technology to support
their future profession in global workplaceThe government supports the utilization of technology
for the future
GOOD
BLENDED LEARNING
BeLCA
ANALYSISDESIGNPREPARATION AND DEVELOPMENTIMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATION (PRE-TEST)EVALUATIONFEEDBACK
ADDIE
BLENDED LEARNING
FACTORS PROMOTE
Institutional Success Factors
Regarding Teachers
Regarding Students
Developed organisational needs
Organisational readinessDeveloped their own meaningIntroduced as a scholary and
transformative designinstitutional practice to carry
out evaluationDeveloped professional
teachersOn-going pedagogical and
technical supportConsidering the teachers’
fears, lower student feedback
Students’ learning maturity and readiness
Students’ expectationsConsistent and transparent communication is needed
BLENDED LEARNING
PEER TEACHING
STEP 1 : EXPLANATION THE MATERIALS
DOING SOME EXERCISES OF THE GREATEST COMMON FACTOR (E-LEARNING)
EXP: TEACHER EXPLAINS ABOUT THE GRATEST COMMON FACTOR (FACE-TO-FACE LEARNING)
SUBJECT: MATHEMATICS CLASS 4 (THE GREATEST COMMON FACTOR)
STEP 2 : PRACTICE
FACTORS OF 12 ARE: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 AND 12
FACTORS OF 8 ARE: 1, 2, 4, AND 8
COMMON FACTORS BETWEEN 12 AND 8 ARE: 1, 2, AND 4
THE GREATEST COMMON FACTOR BETWEEN 12 AND 8 IS 4
IBT AND CBT
IBT
CBT
A form of competence, skill or knowledge assessment through computer or internet
A form of assessment or test which is carried out through electronic devices (electronic exam).
Electronic exam is a form of exam which is carried out using computer (PC) or other electronic devices in which response is recorded and assessed.
For example: TOEFL iBT or TOEF CBT
IBT AND CBT
POSITIVE CHARACTER
MORE FREQUENT USE OF ASSESSMENT
THE TEST RESULT IS MORE QUICKLY DISTRIBUTED TO
TEACHERSPROVIDES OPORTUNITIES
FOR STUDENTS TO TEST PERSONALLY
ABLE TO INCREASE STUDENTS’ SELF ESTEEM
PREFFERED BY STUDENTS RELATED TO THE FASTER
RESULT
MORE BETTER, EFFECTIVE, HIGHER
FLEXIBILITY, CHEAPER, FASTER, AND WIDER THAN
THE CONVENTIONAL
METHOD
IBT AND CBT
OBSTACLES
KNOWLEDGE AND MASTERY OF COMPUTER
USEBARRIERS COME FROM
HARDWAREBEHAVIOR AND ATTITUDE
OF TEST PARTICANTSTUDENTS’ ACADEMIC
ABILITY
KNOWLEDGE AND ABILITY OF
COMPUTERS’ USERS HAVE GREAT INFLUENCE IN IBT
AND CBT
IBT AND CBT
IBT & CBT
PBTCOMPARISON conducted in places where the
internet based tests are not available.
advised to register in advance for this format of test as the
seats are limited.recommended for people who
want a paper-pencil based test compared to a test on
computer screen.TOEFL PBT measures listening, structure (grammar), reading
and writing and takes approximately 3½ hours. It is
given using paper and pencil 6 times a year at test centers
where TOEFL iBT is not available.
to be more advantageous as the test is conducted more
number of times in this format. Note taking during
the test is also another advantage for the test
takers opting for internet based TOEFL.
TOEFL iBT measures reading, listening, speaking and writing skills and takes approximately 4½ hours. It is given on computer 30-40 times a year at test centers
throughout the world.
IBT AND CBT
IBT & CBT
PBTCOMPARISON
Basic Differences Between Paper based TOEFL And Internet Based TOEFL
Paper Based Test (PBT) Internet Based Test (iBT)
3 ½ hours long 4 ½ hours long
Cost - US $ 140The cost of internet based test differs from country to country from US $ 140 and US $ 185
The score scale for this test is between 310 to 677 points
The score scale for this test is between 0 to 120 points
The score sheet is mailed to the test takers 5 weeks after the test
The score sheet is mailed to the test takers in 15 working days after the test
There is no speaking section in the paper based test
There is speaking section in internet based test
There is structure section in paper based test
There is no structure section in internet based test
Paper based test is conducted 6 times in a year
Internet based test is conducted 30 to 40 times in a year
IBT AND CBT
IBT & CBT
PBTCOMPARISON
There are also differences in the section wise structure of Paper based TOEFL and internet Based TOEFL. The table below stresses on the differences:
Sections in TOEFL Paper Based TOEFL Internet Based TOEFL
Listening SectionNumber of Questions – 50Time Limit – 30 to 40 minutes
Number of Questions – 34 to 51Time Limit – 60 to 90 minutes
Writing SectionNumber of Questions – 1 topicTime Limit – 30 minutes
Number of Questions – 2 tasksTime Limit – 60 minutes
Structure SectionNumber of Questions – 40Time Limit – 25 minutes
There is no structure section in internet based test
Speaking SectionThere is no speaking section in paper based test
Number of Questions –6 tasksTime Limit – 20 minutes
IBT AND CBT
APPLICATION USING DRUPAL 6
PHP based CMS
Drupal usage in BL:www.hartoyomedia.000space.com
IBT AND CBT
CONCERNS
ADVANTAGES OF DRUPAL
OBSTACLES OF DRUPAL
Various quiz typesScoring flexibilityMultimedia compabalitySystematic database and administrationEase and secure usageStable, secure, and robust performance
In development:Internet connectionHuman resourceTime allocationHosting
In application:Notebook availabilityInternet connectionPower outletStudents’ honesty