Upload
ifpri-eptd
View
65
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Richard HowittSiwa Msangi
28 April – 2 May, 2014ICRAF Campus, Nairobi
Provide a survey of useful quantitative methods that can be applied to address important problems in agricultural and resource economics
Provide a “tool kit” of various models that can be adapted to address the issues of interest to researchers and other partners
Convey an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of various quantitative approaches, and the empirical challenges that are entailed in applying them to real-world problems
Help strengthen the quantitative skills of the participants and underline the economic foundations of the methods being applied
We will not be able to cover all 4 of these quadrants at the same level of detail – but we will provide a roadmap for how they are connected
Static Dynamic
Micro-level Farm production models
Resource extraction models
Macro-levelMulti-market partial- and
general-equilibrium models
Growth models
We will begin with the agricultural production problem at the farm level, and understand how to capture some key aspects of behavior --especially the decisions of the producer to adjust on either the intensive and extensive margins
We will explore the duality that underlies the production problem, and use it to derive the demand or key resources such as land and water
We will use these derived demands to define the behavioral equations that can be used in larger market models or to construct the benefit functions that drive resource extraction behavior
In all of the models that we will consider, we will assume that agents (producers or consumers) are optimizing with respect to preferences, defined objectives and under constraints of limited resources
In micro-level models, we can make the optimization explicit in the structure of the model
When moving to macro-level models, we have to make the optimization of agents implicit in reduced-form equations that represent the first-order conditions of optimizing behavior
Macro-models can sometimes contain the objective of the social planner who is hypothesized to maximize combined producer & consumer surplus -- although most do not make this explicit
Econometrics and programming approaches◦ Historically these approaches have been at odds,
but recent advances have started to close this gap
Where do we apply programming models?◦ Explain observed outcomes◦ Predict economic phenomena◦ Influence economic outcomes
Why a programming approach?
Day 1 NotesHowitt and Msangi 6
Econometric Models◦ Often more flexible and theoretically consistent, however
not often used with disaggregated empirical microeconomic policy models of agricultural production
Constrained Structural Optimization (Linear Programming)◦ Ability to reproduce detailed constrained output decisions
with minimal data requirements, at the cost of restrictive (and often unrealistic) constraints
Positive Mathematical Programming (PMP)◦ Uses the observed allocations of crops (or livestock and
other activities) to derive nonlinear cost functions that calibrate the model without adding unrealistic constraints
Day 1 NotesHowitt and Msangi 7
Computable General Equilibrium (CGE)◦ Used in macro-economic and sectoral applications,
represents markets across the entire economy Calibration using Entropy◦ Suitable for ill-posed problems. Enables consistent
reconstruction of detailed flexible form models or production functions on a disaggregate basis
So, what is the best economic model to use?
Day 1 NotesHowitt and Msangi 8
A better understanding of how various economic models are related to each other – and where to apply them
A strengthened understanding of the economic principles underlying these models
An appreciation for the empirical challenges in applying these models, and how they can be addressed
Some ideas for how your own research problems can addressed with the use of some of these models
An operational understanding of GAMS
Thank you!