57
Audience Taste? #mac201 1

Audiences, taste, tastemakers

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

MAC201 lecture slides

Citation preview

Page 1: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

1

Audience Taste?#mac201

Page 2: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

2

Page 3: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

3

Harold Bloom

Page 4: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

4

American literary criticSterling Professor of Humanities at Yale University

Page 5: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

5

Frank Kermode (2002):‘probably the most celebrated literary critic in the United States’

Page 6: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

6

Stephen KingAuthor of contemporary horrorNational Book Foundation (2003):Award for distinguished contribution to American Letters

Page 7: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

7

‘another low in the shocking process of dumbing down our cultural life. I've described King in the past as a writer of penny dreadfuls, but perhaps even that is too kind. He shares nothing with Edgar Allan Poe. What he is is an immensely inadequate writer on a sentence-by-sentence, paragraph-by-paragraph, book-by-book basis’

Page 8: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

8

Page 9: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

9

Page 12: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

12

Page 13: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

13

Page 14: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

14

‘Her prose style, heavy on cliché, makes no demands upon her readers [...] How to read ‘Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone’? Why, very quickly, to begin with, perhaps also to make an end. Why read it? Presumably, if you cannot be persuaded to read anything better, Rowling will have to do […] Why read, if what you read will not enrich mind or spirit or personality?’

Page 15: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

15

‘Can more than 35 million book buyers, and their offspring, be wrong? Yes, they have been, and will continue to be for as long as they persevere with Potter.’

Page 16: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

16

Page 17: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

17

What are now called ‘Departments of English’ will be renamed departments of ‘Cultural Studies’ where Batman comics, Mormon theme parks, television, movies and rock will replace Chaucer, Shakespeare, Milton, Wordsworth and Wallace Stevens- (Bloom, 1995: 519)

Page 18: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

18

Pierre Bourdieu

1930-2002

École Normale Supérieure (Paris)

1964: University of Paris Director of Studies at the École Pratique des Hautes Études

1968: took over the Centre de Sociologie Européenne

1981: Chair of Sociology at the Collège de France

Page 19: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

19

Page 20: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

20

Research: 1963-19681200 quantitative surveys, interviews and photographs.

Cross-referenced with national trends and government data

The things you prefer correspond tightly to defining measures of social class: your profession, your highest degree and your father’s profession.

Page 21: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

21

"Taste classifies, and it classifies the classifier. Social subjects, classified by their

classifications, distinguish themselves by the distinctions they make, between the beautiful

and the ugly, the distinguished and the vulgar, in which their position in the objective

classifications is expressed or betrayed."- Bourdieu, 1984: 6

Page 22: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

22

Art?

Page 23: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

23

‘The very title Distinction serves as a reminder that what is commonly called

distinction, that is, a certain quality of bearing and manners, most often considered innate

[…], is nothing other than difference, a gap, a distinctive feature, in short, a relational

property existing only in and through its relation with other properties’

- Bourdieu, 1994/1998: 20

Page 24: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

24

Power and social space

A geographical/mathematical metaphor for how people are arranged in society.

It’s a (multi dimensional) space constructed on the basis of principles of differentiation or distribution constituted by the set of properties under consideration

Page 25: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

25

Capital:

Economic capital - how much money

Cultural capital the systems of value and meaning a person can draw on

Social capital the sets of relations one can draw on

Symbolic capital power to NAME. Symbolic power rests on RECOGNITION

Page 26: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

26

Page 27: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

27

‘differences in cultural capital mark the differences between the classes’

- Bourdieu, 1984: 69

Page 28: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

28

‘differences in cultural capital mark the differences between the classes’

- Bourdieu, 1984: 69

Page 29: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

29

Page 30: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

30

Page 31: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

31

Page 32: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

32

I was there. I was the first guy playing Daft Punk to the rock kids.

I played it at CBGB's. Everybody thought I was

crazy. We all know. I was there. I was there.

I've never been wrong.

I used to work in the record store.

I had everything before anyone

Page 34: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

34

Page 35: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

35

“It took a great deal of evidence to allow me to transcend my own cultural assumptions and accept the fact that Shakespeare actually was popular culture in nineteenth-century America” (Levine 1988: 4).

Page 36: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

36

“Shakespeare was performed not merely alongside popular entertainment as an elite supplement to it; Shakespeare was performed as an integral part of it. Shakespeare was popular entertainment in nineteenth-century America”. (Levine, 1988: 21)

Page 37: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

37

Page 38: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

38

Page 39: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

39

“If Shakespeare had been an integral part of mainstream culture in the nineteenth century, in the twentieth he had become part of ‘polite’ culture – an essential ingredient in a complex we call, significantly, ‘legitimate’ theatre. He had become the possession of the educated portions of society who disseminated his plays for the enlightenment of the average folk who were to swallow him not for their entertainment but for their education, as a respite from – not as a normal part of – their usual cultural diet”. (Levine, 1988: 31 – emphasis added)

Page 40: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

40

Culture and the Legitimisation of Power

Culture as right of birth

Difference shifted from economic field to field of culture

Power as a result of cultural difference, for example Brian Sewell on the Cobra exhibition at the Baltic

Page 41: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

41

Page 42: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

42

‘London has for centuries been the centre of the art world in

Britain…By the very nature of the audience in London it is exposed to very much more

art and culture and is therefore more sophisticated.

There is no doubt about it.’- Sewell, 2003

Page 43: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

43

Distinction – Pierre Bourdieu

Patron versus consumerAficionado versus fan

“the making, marking and maintaining of cultural difference” (Storey, 1996: 116)

Putting taste on display – becoming part of, or apart from, a particular group

Page 44: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

44

Taste not fixed – changes through history

Consider the following: • Brown bread• Opera• Sun tan • Burberry

Music – from exclusivity to abundance?Everyone’s an expert in the internet age?

Page 45: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

45

The changing ‘tastes’ for Brown Bread

- Associated with working class originally, using whole-grain flour-White flour had previously been more expensive (coloured with alum)

This reversed – brown bread now seen as middle class consumable

Hovis – images of working class life

Page 46: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

46

From brown bread to ‘brown’ skin

The sun tan

Now seen as vulgar- it had been a status symbol – a marker of wealth

However, trends keep changing as do cultural responses to the sun tan. Royalty would associate tans with the working class – labourers who work the fields. Aristocracy would keep out of the sun or use white face paint to remove any trace of tanning.

Page 47: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

47

Healthy?Wealthy?

Page 48: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

48

The ‘Sad’ Fate of Burberry

Founded in 1856Outdoors attire – supplier to royaltyThe Burberry Check (1924)

1970s - Burberry linked to football casuals

1990s - Association with chavs and football firms

2000s - Burberry attempt rebrand; advertise in high-end lifestyle magazines

Page 49: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

49

Page 50: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

50

Page 51: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

51

Page 52: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

52

The fan as fanatic?

“fans are the most visible part

of the audience for popular

cultural texts and practices”

“Fandom is what ‘other people’

do, ‘we’ always pursue

interests, exhibit tastes and

preferences”

- Storey, 1996: 123-125

Page 53: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

53

The acceptable face of fandom?

Page 54: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

54

“Fans, when insistently characterized as ‘them’, can be distinguished from ‘people like us’ (students, professors and social critics) as well as from (the more reputable) patrons or afficionados or collectors”

Jenson in Lewis, 1992:9

Page 55: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

55

Summary

Taste is a battleground of ideology, marked by distinction and difference.

It’s inadequate to say that people merely have different tastes – these tastes are the product of intersecting power relations that seek to valorise those that articulate them.

Worth thinking about this in terms of fan culture and their tastes. Have the geeks inherited the earth?

Page 56: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

56

Page 57: Audiences, taste, tastemakers

57

SourcesHoward Bloom (1995) The Western Canon, Harmondsworth: Penguin

Howard Bloom (2000) How to Read and Why, New York: Touchstone

Pierre Bourdieu (1979/1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, (translated by R. Nice), London: Routledge,

Pierre Bourdieu (1994/1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action, Oxford: Polity Press.

Lawrence Levine (1988) Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America, Harvard: Harvard University Press