41
ASSESING THE CURRICULUMLESSON 2 Criteria for Curriculum Assessment THOMAS C. IRINGAN, Ph.D ASSESING THE CURRICULUM

Assesing the curriculum

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Assesing the curriculum

ASSESING THE CURRICULUMLESSON 2

Criteria for Curriculum Assessment

THOMAS C. IRINGAN, Ph.D

ASSESING THE CURRICULUM

Page 2: Assesing the curriculum

CRITERIA FOR CURRICULUM ASSESSMENT DEFINEDCRITERIA• Are set of standards to be

followed in assessment ,• Set of standards upon diff.

elements of the curriculum are being tested,• Will determine the diff. levels of

competencies or proficiency of acceptable task performance.

Page 3: Assesing the curriculum

CRITERIA FOR GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES• Statements of curricular expectations.• Sets of learning outcomes specifically

designed for students.• Indicates clearly what the students will

learn.• Must reflect the tasks ,skills , content

behavior and thought processes that make up curricular domains.

• Must match the students needs.

Page 4: Assesing the curriculum

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ARE FORMULATED AND SPECIFIED FOR THE FF. PURPOSES:to have focus on curriculum and instruction which give

direction to where students need to go.To meet the requirements specified in the policies and

standards of curriculum instruction.To provide the students the best possible education

and describe their level of performance.To monitor the progress of students based on the goals

set.To motivate students to learn and the teachers to be

able to feel a sense of competence when goals are attained.

Page 5: Assesing the curriculum

CRITERIA FOR GOALS AND OBJECTIVES -BY HOWELL AND NOLET (2000)

oCONTENToBEHAVIORoCRITERIONoCONDITION

Page 6: Assesing the curriculum

GENERAL CRITERIA FOR EFFECTIVE AND OBJECTIVES:

SYNTACTIC CORRECTNESS-includes the elements: CONTENT , BEHAVIOR , CRITERIA AND CONDITIONS. COMPLIANCE WITH LEGAL

REQUIREMENTS-there should be a direct relationship between the annual goals and the student’s present level of performance.

Page 7: Assesing the curriculum

THE ANNUAL GOALS SHOULD DESCRIBE WHAT THE LEARNERS SHOULD REASONABLYBE EXPECTED TO ACCOMPLISH WITHIN A GIVEN PERIOD AND APPROPRIATE INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURSES.

SHORT TERM INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES SHOULDBE STATED SO CLEARLYSO THAT IT IS OBVIOUS HOW WE WOULD MEASURE TO SEE IF THE OBJECTIVES ARE MET.

THE OBJECTIVES SHOULD DESCRIBE A SEQUENCE OF INTERMIDIATE STEPS BETWEEN A CHILD’S PRESENT LEVEL OF EDUCATIONAL PERFORMENCEAND THE ANNUAL GOALS THAT ARE ESTABLISHED.

Page 8: Assesing the curriculum

THE STRANGER TEST-reliability!-should write appropriate instructional plans and evaluate student’s progress.-the goals and objectives should be written in a sufficiently observable and specific form. The secret to stating something in observable form is using behaviors . (knowing the answer is hard to measure , because it is not directly observable but writing the answer is easy to measure because it is a behavior.)

Page 9: Assesing the curriculum

BOTH KNOWLEDGE AND BEHAVIOR ARE ADDRESSED.

-although it is knowledge ,that we are most trying to transmit, we need to see behaviors to know if we succeeded.-the statement of behavior must be in an objective to provide a measurable indicator of learning. (To tell the students to write the correct spelling of the science vocabulary not to teach how to write but to increase the knowledge in spelling.)-it is also a mistake to focus only to the behavior. (e.g. it would be a mistake to require writing to a student who can’t write , unless your objective is to produce writing.)

Page 10: Assesing the curriculum

THE SO-WHAT TEST-speaks of validity-because education is to prepare people to be socially competent, this test asks whether the goals and instructional objectives are important.-it involves value judgements and curriculum speculation on about the child’s long term needs.-an objective should act to develop , rather than to suppress , behavior.Perhaps if necessary , goals or objectives should include alternate positive behaviors.

Page 11: Assesing the curriculum

INDIVIDUALIZATION

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ARE DERIVED FROM ASSESSMENT DATA.

MUST BE ALIGNED WITH THE STUDENT’S LEVEL OF EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE AND GOALS.

Page 12: Assesing the curriculum

COMMON SENSE OBJECTIVES TELL WHAT THE

STUDENT WILL LEARN,NOT DESCRIPTIONS OF WHAT THE TEACHERS WILL DO OR WHAT THE STUDENTS WILL FOLLOW.

INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES DON’T HAVE TO FIT IN ONE SENTENCE,AND DOING SO CAN BE CONFUSING.

Page 13: Assesing the curriculum

GUIDELINES IN FORM OF QUESTIONAIRE;• Do the goals/objectives represent an important

learning outcome that is a priority for this student?

• Is there a goal written for each area of need stated in the present level of performance?

• Are the goals realistic in a sense that they can be accomplished in one year?

• Are the goals and objectives easily measured?• Are there multiple objectives representing

intermediate steps to each goal ?• Are the goals and objectives appropriately

calibrated?(too broad , or too narrow)• Are the goals and instructional objectives

useful for planning and evaluating instructional programs?

Page 14: Assesing the curriculum

CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT OF INSTRUCTIONINSTRUCTION-ANOTHER ELEMENT OF CURRICULUM WHICH NEEDS CRITERIA FOR ASSESSMENT.-REFERS TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OBJECTIVES.-CONCERNED WITH THE METHODOLOGIES OF THE STRATEGIES OF TEACHING.

Page 15: Assesing the curriculum

2 APPROACHES TO INSTRUCTION SUPPLANTIVE APPROACH -referred to as “DIRECT” instruction (ADAMS & ENGLEMANN , 1996).-the teacher attempts to promote learning by providing explicit directions and explanations regarding how to do a tank.-the teachers assume primary responsibility for linking new information with the student’s prior knowledge and ultimately whatever the student’s learn.Information is presented in an ordered sequence in w/c component subskills are thought directly or a foundation for later tasks.-this approach is highly teacher-directed.

Page 16: Assesing the curriculum

GENERATIVE APPROACH-referred to as “constructivist” or “developmental”.-in here the teachers function as facilitators who takes a less central role in a learning process that is student directed (esminger & dangel,1992).-the teachers provide opportunities for the students to make own linkages to prior knowledge and to devise her own strategies for work.-CONSTRUCTIVIST because much of its emphasis is on helping students to construct their goals , experiences and knowledge.

Page 17: Assesing the curriculum

-information is presented on a schedule determined by the students’ interest and goals.-sub-skilled could not be thought explicitly.-Pre-requisites are expected to be learned as a consequence of the larger understanding students would be guided to construct.-learning is assumed to be socially constructed out of the interaction between the student’s innate tendencies and predispositions and the social context in w/c the student lives(STONE,1996).-it’s advocates sometimes take a restrictive view of social context. They see teachers as unnatural or meaningless until Stone,1996 puts Developmentalism.

Page 18: Assesing the curriculum

WHAT ARE CURRICULUM CRITERIA?-GUIDELINES ON STANDARD FOR CURRICULUM DECISION MAKING.

-OBJECTIVES OF A CURRICULUM OR TEACHING PLAN ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT CURRICULUM CRITERIA,SINCE THEY SHOULD BE USED IN SELECTING LEARNING EXPERIENCES AND IN EVALUATING LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT.

Page 19: Assesing the curriculum

CRITERIAS;• Have the goals of the curriculum or

teaching plan been clearly stated; and are they used by teachers and students in choosing content , materials and activities for learning?

• Have teachers and students engaged in student-teacher planning in defining the goals and determining how will they be implemented?

• Do some of the planned goals relate to the society or the community in w/c the curriculum will be implemented or the teaching will be done?

Page 20: Assesing the curriculum

• Do some of the planned goals relate to the individual learner and his/her needs, purposes, interests and liabilities?

• Are planned goals used as criteria in selecting and developing learning materials for instruction?

• Are the planned goals used as criteria in evaluating learning achievement and in the further planning of learning and sub goals and activities?

Page 21: Assesing the curriculum

HASS AND PARAKAY(1993)-’Individual differences , flexibility and systematic planning are criteria that depend in part on knowledge of the different approaches of learning.-The CRITERION are as follows: Does the curriculum include

alternative approaches and activities for learning?

Have the different learning theories been considered in planning alternative learning approaches and activities?

Has the significance of rewarded responses , transfer ,generalization ,advance organizers , self-concept , meaningfulness of the whole ,personal meaning ,imitation, identification &socialization been considered in the planning?

Page 22: Assesing the curriculum

CHARACTERISTICS OF A GOOD CURRICULUM-Must posses a specific characteristics in the pursuit of the aims of education the schools are to pursue.

-a GOOD CURRICULUM includes the ff.: The curriculum is continuously evolving. -must have a continuous monitoring and evaluation. -must adapt its educational activities and services to meet the needs of a modern and dynamic community. -a good curriculum is a Progressive Curriculum

Page 23: Assesing the curriculum

THE CURRICULUM IS BASED ON THE NEEDS OF THE PEOPLE.

-developing begins with those that concern the people themselves.-reflects the needs of the individual and the society as a whole.-in proper shape in order to meet the challenges of times and make education more responsive to the client it serves.

Page 24: Assesing the curriculum

The curriculum is democratically conceived.

-developed through the efforts of a group of individuals from diff. sectors in the society.-a product of many minds and energies.The curriculum is a result of

a long term effort-is a product of long and tedious project.The curriculum is a complex

detail.-provides the proper instructional equipment-meeting places that are often most conducive to learning.

Page 25: Assesing the curriculum

The curriculum or the logical sequence of subject matter.

-Learning is DEVELOPMENTAL.-must be planned in order according to the development of the subject matter and the progress of the learner.-Must provide a continuity of experience. The curriculum complements and

cooperates with other programs in the community.

-must be responsive to the need of the community.-the school offers its assistance in the improvement and realization of on going programs of the community.-SCHOOL+COMMUNITY= GREATER PRODUCTIVITY

Page 26: Assesing the curriculum

THE CURRICULUM HAS EDUCATIONAL QUALITY.“Quality Education comes through the situation of the individual’s intellectual and creative capacities for social welfare and development.”-helps the learner to become the best he could possibly be.-its support system is secured to augment existing sources for its sufficient and effective implementation. The curriculum has administrative flexibility.-must be ready to incorporate changes whenever necessary.-open to revision and development to meet the demands of globalization and the digital age.

Page 27: Assesing the curriculum

MARKS OF GOOD CURRICULUM ( by: J. Galen Saylor )1. A good curriculum is

systematically planned and evaluated.

• A definite organization is responsible for coordinating , planning and evaluating.

• Steps in planning and evaluation are logically defined and taken.

• Ways or workings utilize the contributions of all concerned.

Page 28: Assesing the curriculum

2. A good curriculum reflects adequately the aims of the school.• The faculty has defined comprehensive

educational aim.• The scope of the curriculum includes areas

related to all stated aims.• Each curriculum opportunity is planned with

reference to one or more aims.• In planning opportunities from year to year and

in each area teachers consider the total scope of aims.

Page 29: Assesing the curriculum

3. A good curriculum maintains a balance among all aims of the school.• the curriculum pays attention to each aim

commensurate with its importance.• The total plan of curriculum opportunities in

basic areas, school activities and social interests reflects careful planning w/ respect to all aims.

• Guidance of each individuals helps provide him with a program w/c is well-balanced I terms of his needs and capacities.

• The school organization , schedule and facilities help in giving appropriate attention to each aim.

• Classroom activities and schedules are arranged so as to provide a balanced program of varied learning activities

Page 30: Assesing the curriculum

4.A good curriculum promotes continuity of experience.• Provisions are made for the smooth transition and

continuing achievement of pupils from one classroom ,grade or school to the other.

• Curriculum plan in areas w/c extend in over several years are developed vertically

• Classroom practices give attention to the maturity and learning problems of each student.

• Cooperative planning and teaching provide for exchange of info. About pupil’s learning experiences.

Page 31: Assesing the curriculum

5.A good curriculum arranges learning opportunities flexibly for adaptation to particular situations and individuals.• Curriculum guides encourage teachers to

make their own plans for specific learning situations.

• Cooperative teaching and planning utilize many opportunities as they arise to share learning resources and special talents.

• Time allotments and schedule s are modified as need justified.

• In accordance with their maturity , pupils participate in the planning of learning experiences.

• The selection of learning experiences reflects careful attention to the demands of the learning situation.

Page 32: Assesing the curriculum

6.A good curriculum utilizes the most effective learning experiences and resources available.• Learning experiences are developed so that

pupils see purpose , meaning and significance in each activity.

• Needed available resources are utilized at the time they are relevant and helpful.

• Use of the right learning resource for each pupil is encouraged.

• Teachers discriminate wisely between activities w/c pupils carryon independently and those w/in teacher-pupil interaction is desirable.

Page 33: Assesing the curriculum

7.A good curriculum makes maximum provision for the development of each learner.• The program provides a wide range of opportunities for

individuals of varying activities ,needs, and interests.• Extensive arrangements are made for the educational

diagnosis of individual learners.• Self-directed independent study is encouraged wherever

possible and advisable.• Self-motivation and self-evaluation are stimulated and

emphasized throughout the learning activities of the school• The curriculum promotes individual development rather than

conformity to some hypothetical standards• The school attempts to follow up its former students both at

service to them and for evaluative data.

Page 34: Assesing the curriculum

EVALUATION The process of determining the value

of something or the extent to w/c goals are being achieved.

A process of making decision or reading a conclusion.

Involves decision making about student performance based on information obtained from an assessment process.

ASSESSMENT-THE PROCESS OF COLLECTING INFORMATION BY REVIEWING THE PRODUCTS OF STUDENT WORK,INTERVIEWING,OBSERVING AND TESTING

Page 35: Assesing the curriculum

The process of using information that is collected through assessment.

Its purpose is to improve student learning.

Entails a reasoning process that is based on influence.

It is a thoughtful process. Core- the idea of comparison.

(drawing conclusions summarize the findings,note the diffrences)

Page 36: Assesing the curriculum

INFERENCE is the process of arriving at a logical conclusion from a body of elements.-refers to the process of developing a conclusion on the basis of some phenomenon that is not experienced or observed directly by the person drawing the inference.

Page 37: Assesing the curriculum

EVALUATION Is the judgement we make bout

assessments of the student learning based on a established criteria.

Involves a process of integrating assessment information from various sources and using this information to make inferences and judgements about how well students have achieved curriculum expectations.

Page 38: Assesing the curriculum

Involves placing a value on and determining the worth of a student assessment.

Usually made so that progress can be communicated to students and parents.

Evaluation provides information;a) Directly to the learnerb) Directly to the teacher for information

of the next instruction activities.c) Directly to external agencies for their

assessment of schools functioning in the light of national purpose.

Page 39: Assesing the curriculum

CURRICULUM EVALUATION• Is the process of obtaining info

for judging the worth of an educational program , product , procedure ,educational objectives or the potential utility of alternative approaches designed to attain specified objectives.

• Focuses in determining whether the curriculum as recorded in the master plan has been carried out in the classroom.

Page 40: Assesing the curriculum

SUMMATIVE EVALUATION• Takes place at the end of the unit or section of

instruction• Sums up the learning.FORMATIVE EVALUATION• Takes place during the lesson and tells the

evaluator what is happening.• On-going and yields information that can be

used to modify the program prior to termination.

Page 41: Assesing the curriculum

HAVE A NICE DAY!

STEFY-AN AGUIRRE