Upload
ajai-singh
View
2.164
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
AsokaGreat Indian
Management System(Application of Oriental Indian Management System in Modern
Management)
Dr. Siba Prasad Rath2012
Contents
1. Asoka - Great Indian Management System 1
The Maurya Rulers Succession 5
Asoka the Great – Career Path 6
2. Asoka- Winning the Race Strategies 9
Advanced Corporate Governance Model of Maurya Phase 11
Empire Governance through Zero-Failure Alternative Mechanism 11
Garrisoned Strategic Townships 12
Confederacy Governing Mechanisms & Successful Management 15
Asoka’s Economics of Public Life – Commerce & Trade (Model) 17
High Traffic and High Trade Routes – Effective Management 18
Highway Mainland Roads – Trade and Logistics Management 19
Industry and Production Control Management 20
Asoka’s Economics of Public Life – Industry (Model) 22
Strategic Alliance with Ceylon and Custodian of Buddhist
and Hindu Holy Sites – Supreme Tact in Management 22
3. Military Organization Management – Second to None 24
Military System Supply Chain Management
(Zero-Failure & Zero-Defect) of Asokan Army 28
Supply Chain Management of Asoka’s Maurya Empire 30
4. Management of Finance, Agriculture, Judiciary,
Welfare State & Social Order by Asoka the Great 31
Financial Management 32
Agriculture Productivity and Infrastructure Management 34
Asoka’s Economics of Public Life – Agriculture (Model) 36
Judiciary and Welfare State Management 37
Social Order Management of the Empire 38
5. Revolutionary Change Management – Kalinga War 40
Historical Links of Odisha & Sri Lanka 40
Culture Transmission 42
Kinship Relationship of Kalinga with Sri Lanka (Vijayan) 44
Aftermath Effects of Kalinga War – The Stronger Sri Lanka Link 45
Revolutionary Change Management - KALINGA War &
Establishment of Corporate Benevolence Governance 48
Asoka’s Communication Management Model of
Philosophy, Mission & Goals 53
Management of Strategic International Trade
Relations through 3rd Buddhist Council - Asoka 54
6. Management of Life Excellence- the World of the Great 59
Third Buddhist Council – A Stepping Stone 60
Dhamma – The Inclusion and Management of Life Excellence 62
7. Asokan Management Theorization 66
Military Management 67
Public Administration & Corporate Governance 68
Welfare System Management 68
Agriculture, Industry & Trade Management System 68
Efficient Financial Control and Treasury Management 69
Human Resource Management & Development 79
Corporate Governance Model 70
Revolutionary Change Management 74
Acknowledgement
I strongly acknowledge the critics, commentators, friends, scholars,
colleagues and students who have shared their valuable time and energy in
understanding and interpreting the works and actions of Asoka the Great.
Management Gurus like Dr. Biswajit Das, Dr. Shivshankar Mishra,
colleagues & friends like Dr. S. K. Baral, Prof. Archana Chaudhury, Prof.
S.P. Kabi Satpathy, Prof. L. N. Das, Prof. A.K. Shaw, Prof. Meena Sinha,
Prof. Priya Puthan, Prof. Gerard D’Souza and students deserves special
thanks. In the attempt of researching and producing Indian Management
System a step further is this book – Asoka – Great Indian ManagementSystem (Application of Oriental Indian Management System in Modernmanagement). Aditya and Siddharth (sons) & Ranjita (wife) have a special
mention owing to their patience, support and encouragement in producing
this manuscript.
Dr. Siba Prasad Rath
PrefaceModern management has its roots of origin in the military science &
management. World’s greatest management principles are derived from
the techniques and tact of wars. Great rulers of the world are known for
their management achievements. Only a few figures have qualified to the
list of the “the Great” rulers of the world like Alexander the Great, Asoka the
Great, Julius Caesar the Great. Amongst them the last was Napoleon the
Great of the 19th century. India has produced two the Great emperors –
Asoka the Great and Akbar the Great; one from the Maurya dynasty and
the other from the Mughal dynasty. Asoka was the Great ruler of the 3rd
century B.C. with unique achievements to exceed any other great ruler of
the world. Historically Asoka used the most advanced techniques and
applications of Chanakya or Kautilya - the greatest philosopher and the
pragmatic management philosopher of the world, who created the Mauryan
Empire under his philosophy of the Unitary India, the first empire of India.
Under the pragmatic management application Chanakya designed and
developed a third party army and defeated the Greek generals of
Alexander the Great at several battlefronts. Chandragupta Maurya the first
emperor of the Maurya Empire was the disciple of Chanakya. From
Chandragupta his able son Bindusara succeeded the throne of the Maurya
Empire. Asoka was the son of Bindusara and occupied the throne of the
Magadh the capital of the Maurya Empire through power struggle.
Chanakya had made the empire – a large corporation with a King, who was
a C.E.O. (Chief Operating Officer). Chanakya can be claimed as the
“Modern Management Guru” due to his excellent management strategies of
winning any problems of empire management and management of life and
society. Before Asoka, Mauryan Empire was governed for more than 53
years by the scientific and advanced management principles of Chanakya.
The size of the Maurya Empire by demography was the world’s largest and
by the 2nd largest by the land mass size. Asoka was trained to be the Prime
Minister of the Maurya Empire, with the prevalence and disorder in the
ruling system he proceeded to occupy the throne as the emperor for which
it is evident that he had to assassinate his 99 brothers. Asoka at every
stage wanted to excel in the existing systems of management. His phase of
conquests ended with Kalinga War, which happened in the first decade of
his career. The outcomes of this war made him a Great ruler and he proved
his stride with achievements in almost every field of the empire
management. Asoka the Great championed the management applications
in the areas of – Corporate Governance, Supply Chain Management,
International Business, HRM of the empire employees and the subjects /
citizens of the empire, Welfare Management, Corporate Communication
Management, Safety and Security Management on the Wealth and Life of
the citizens, Production and Operations Management, Public Relations,
Life Excellence Management, Revolutionary Change Management etc. No
wonder his achievements at many stages exceeded the prescribed limits
by the definitions of Chanakya. Zero failure and Zero defect management
in the army supply chain management and cross docking system of
operation with alternative back up mechanism has not yet been achieved
by the modern management of the 21st century in any operational activities,
which Asokan army practiced in the 3rd century B.C.
The world of the modern corporations has a lot to borrow and practice from
the Asokan management practices to achieve excellence. Military
management of Asoka can be claimed as above the standards of Six
Sigma. Asoka proved the concept of Corporate Benevolence Management
by practice when the world of 21st century corporate management is trying
to achieve the corporate excellence management two steps below the
Asokan corporate management. Asokan management is one of the most
significant chapters of the Indian Management System. Indian
management has the opportunity and excellence to be the new world
management practice in the 21st century with revival as a concept that has
the greatest human touch with the pragmatic application. Asoka the Great
will be recorded for the management practices of Indian System.
This book attempts to bring the historical facts of Asoka the Great with
management applications for the readers and professionals of
management to apply in the real life corporate management. Asoka’s
management system and mechanisms are analyzed in the context of the
modern management for the convenience and understanding of the
readers with care. A practical approach is followed much away from the
historical analysis and orthodoxy for the scholars and professionals of
corporate management for application orientations in this book.
Dr. Siba Prasad Rath
1
1Asoka - Great IndianManagement System
The 21st century management principles and practices have gone through
a sea change in comparison to the 19th and 20th century. This new
millennium looks for concerns of human beings and greater interests. All
those management practices of European model and American model
have started clearing up of the black spots of industrialization from the
corporate governance and system practices. Japanese management
practices have started delivering the value base management principles for
the greater world with high level of quantification for quality improvisation
by borrowing the concepts from the oriental principles and practices with
revival and new coinage methods. As a matter of fact the oriental practices
of management principles with human touch and greater social concern are
the driving forces of change in the modern management. Indian
management practices, principles, doctrines and arguments are in the store
house of the history. It’s the right time for revival of the management
practices for application in the modern methods and philosophy of
management. India in its oriental texts has the treasury of knowledge
wealth for rephrasing and moderation as per the disciplinary streams needs
for application.
2
This in fact is one of the most advanced pragmatic philosophies for revival
and reapplication for the benefits of the governance mechanisms of
corporations and non commercial corporations of the 21st century. Maurya
phase of the Indian history was the most pragmatic phase of 136 years of
governance. Chanakya, the man, created the applied philosophy and the
first empire. Asoka the Great (C 268 – 233 B.C.) championed the
application beyond the texts that defined the future trends and both
Chanakya and Asoka made the history that the world remembers as the
excellent governance. Management is being re-searched in this book from
the Asokan governance mechanisms and applications of principles, that’s
the great management system for the greater world.
Emperor Asoka is one of the Great rulers of the world history and the first
Indian ruler to be counted in the list of the Great rulers of the world. The
first Indian Empire credit goes to the Mauryan dynasty founded by the
grandfather of Chandragupta Maurys by the strategic plan of the world’s
greatest pragmatic philosopher Chanakya. Chanakya designed and
developed the establishment and the future of an empire in India to unite
the nation under unitary provisions with federal character aiming to provide
prosperity and power to defend the civilization against the foreign
invasions. Chanakya had faced the invasion of the Greeks under the
generalship of Alexander the Great. Taxila the stand alone University of
India in the North Western front of the nation with high level influence over
all the provinces, kingdoms and settlements was governing the
philosophical wave of Indian statesmen. The university with its intellectual
capital and knowledge management was the training ground of the
statesmen, kings, ministers and high level officials of the kingdoms and the
3
great scholars of the Indian subcontinent. Chanakya was the professor of
Political Science, Economics and Strategic Diplomacy of the university. The
invasion of Alexander to the subcontinent especially the kingdom which
housed the university was under the clutch of war experience. The
intellectual community agitated to such military intervention of a foreign
power and Chanakya devised the doctrine of Unitary India – “Akhand
Bharat” to defeat the foreign power and raised a third party army and
defeated the Greek army in many battle fronts. The third party army was
under the commandership of his disciple Chandragupta Maurya. Chanakya
had differences with the ruling principles of the Nand rulers of Magadh –
the central India, due to unethical practices and opposition to the doctrine
of Unitary India of Chanakya. India was divided in to Janapadas –
“Provinces” & Kingdoms and cities, under the governorship of kings,
chieftains, and public rulers i.e. a crude form of republican governorships.
Every independent unit of the governed territories was against a common
ruling code and a common army and police system due to the vested
economic and social interests. To counter the political instability Chanakya
designed the first Indian Empire and implemented his governing system
through force and diplomacy by establishing Maurya Empire. Asoka was
the third ruler of the Maurya Empire not by succession but by power
struggle. He was one of the highly qualified rulers of the Indian history.
Asoka inherited a large empire with stable foundations led by
Chandragupta and his father Bindusara under the guidelines of applied
strategy of Chanakya.
Asoka always exceeded the end quality of the governing system of the
Mauryan administration and management. As a war veteran he had the
4
complete knowledge of the empire geography and demography. His search
for excellence to exceed the best practices of Mauryan Management made
him the great ruler. Asoka maintained the biggest army of the subcontinent
and maintained the best management practices for the welfare, benefits of
the empire in industry, trade, taxation, police system, international
business, education system and institutions etc. with steps forward as
defined by Chanakya in his texts and guidelines for excellent governance.
In the modern management scales if his activities to be measured, Asoka
has exceeded the Six Sigma in quality and operation practice of his army,
established the corporate benevolence governance – which modern
management has not been able to achieve, used the disaster management
preparedness with alternative strategies to sustain and counter at any
extreme stage, used one of the most powerful navy for peace keeping in
the high seas for high traffic naval trade in international exports and
imports, as a reformer devised the code of conduct and implemented in his
empire governance with success, used the best knowledge management
practice by conducting the 3rd Buddhist council in Pataliputra. He received
prominence in managing post war crisis and through welfare measures
after the Kalinga War that defines him as the great manager of the human
civilization. He was an enigma of the modern management by his actions
and success. His greatness lies in his great management system.
History repeats in itself, Asokan history was never repeated in the last two
thousand two hundred years plus time. Many great rulers delivered
wonderful mechanisms of management, Asoka exceeded the highest
orders of management practices of the 21st century in the areas of
governance, supply-chain management, quality control system, operations
5
management, etc. Perhaps it will not be wrong to say that he was above
the great rulers of the world in the holistic achievements of the best
management practices, which the modern world is yet to practice and
implement with the help of the advanced technology and super
computerization and communication equipment.
The Maurya Rulers Succession
Chandragupta C 321 – 298 B.C.
Bindusara C 297 – 272 B.C.
Asoka the Graet C 268 – 233 B.C.
Kunal (Blind Emperor) 8 Years
Dasaratha C 232 – 224 B.C.
Samprati C 224 – 215 B.C.
Salisuka C 215 – 195 B.C.
Devavarman C 202 – 195 B.C.
Satadhanvan C 195 – 187 B.C.
Brhadratha C 185 B.C.
6
Asoka the Great – Career Path
Year After Coronation Sri Lankan Pali Sources
Asokan Inscription
4th Year Conversion by Nyagrodha 5th – 7th Year Construction of 84,000
Viharas6th Year Mahinda becomes a monk
under Moggaliputta TissaandSanun.
suspensionof ecclesiastic actions of theSa gha.
8th Year Kalinga War followed byremorseand repentance (RE XIII).
9th Year Lay follower of the Buddhabut without much exertion(MRE I).
10th Year Pilgrimage to sacred Bodhi‘ Tree(RE VIII). Begins teaching theDharma tothe people (Greek /Aramaicversionsof MRE IV). Provides in borderingterritories(Cho a, Pa ya,
i, Greekkingdomof Antiyoka and territoriesadjoining it), medicaltreatment for human beings andanimals;grows medicinal herbsthere; digs
7
wells and plants trees alongthe road (RE IV).
10th – 11th Year Sa closeassociationwith the Sa gha (MRE I), Tourof the empire lasting 256days(MRE I).
12th Year Beginning of the practice of inscribing edicts for thepropagationof Dharma. Orders Rajjukas
out on circuits every fiveyearsboth for inspection and forthespecial purpose of preaching theDharma (RE III).
13th Year Creates the post of
(REV). 14th Year
of Buddha Kanakamuni (PI II).
17th Year Gets concerned overindisciplineand laxity in the Sa gha; commences the purificationof the Sa gha, which resultsinthe Third Buddhist Councilat
aliputra under thepresidencyof Moggaliputta Tissa.
18th Year Buddhism: Mahinda to SriLanka, Majjhantika toKashmir
to Mahisama ala(Mysore?);
8
Dhammarakkhita the GreektoAparantaka (i.e. WesternIndia);
Greek country; Majjhima totheHimalayas;. So a andUttara toSuvaBurmaand Thailand?).
19th Year Sa sent to SriLankawith a sampling of sacredBodhiTree to found the Order of Nuns
Donates the Khalatika Caveto asceticsto enable them to liveabovethe flood level during rainyseason.
20th Year placewhere the Buddha wasborn(PI I). Pilgrimage to the
Buddha Kanakamuni (PI II).26th – 27th Year Moggaliputta Tissa’s death. Writing of Pillar Edict IV and
V, Pillar Inscription I. Writing of Pillar Edict IV (the lastof his dated inscriptions).
29th Year Queendeath.
32nd Yearrankof Queen.
34th YearsacredBodhi Tree at Buddha Gayato bedestroyed on account of jealousy.
37th Year Death of Asoka
9
2Asoka- Winning the Race
StrategiesIn the World of History King Asoka is known for his veteran management &
dynamism of change. The drive for change or the revolution for change in
any management order is fire. Managing change and surviving with change
of socio-political & economic order is not a difficult task rather impossible if
reviewed the pages of the history. Few philosophers have been able to
define and redefine time. Asoka is one among them, that’s why the world
conferred on him “the Great” title. Out of the great rulers of the world,
Asoka is regarded as the top of the list by his contributions to the society
and mankind. Chandragupta Maurya, who founded the Mauryan dynasty
and the first empire about 324 B.C.E., Asoka being the grandson inherited
the empire about 268 B.C.E. after a four year power struggle. Asoka
extended the Maurya Empire further south of India by defeating many
kingdoms including the arch rival Kalinga. This empire was second in the
history of the world, after the Mongol Empire. The Mauryan Empire was a
political unit of a new order of magnitude in India, the first of its kind, for
example, in which there were speakers of Indo – Aryan languages
(derivatives of Sanskrit language) so far apart that their dialects must have
been mutually incomprehensible. Asoka ruled almost 30 years (268 – 239
B.C.E.) on the Indian subcontinent with towering achievements. Mighty
10
military system with excellent supply chain management he maintained the
successful empire structure.
Asoka at the age of eighteen was appointed as the viceroy of Avnti Rashtra
with its capital Ujjayini. When Bindusara died in 272 B.C.E. Asoka captured
the throne with the help of ministers headed by Khallataka or Radhagupta.
That led to a war of succession for the throne of the empire between
Susima and Asoka. Susima was helped by his 98 brothers except Tishya.
Asoka defeated his brothers and occupied the throne, that’s why he was
titled as Chandasoka. Contest for the throne delayed his coronation for four
years after the death of Bindusara. There is no independent historical
evidence for such a struggle and bloodshed except some literature of the
nearby period. During the first thirteen years of his reign he carried out
traditional policy of expire expansion within India and friendly relations with
foreign powers. He was aggressive at home and passive abroad. The last
battle he fought was Kalinga war on the thirteenth year of his reign as per
his rock edict XIII, i.e., B.C.E. 261, with the Kalinga war his era of military
conquest or Digvijaya was over and the era of spiritual conquest or Dharm
Vijay was about to begin. Kalinga war opened a new epoch in the history of
India. As an emperor he was able to balance such an opposite change in
the management of the empire. As an able ruler he was great in managing
control over all the parts of the empire. Many historians argue in favour of
his foresight and knowledge. Management scholars of Indian management
system very well see the knowledge management excellence of Asoka the
Great. As per some historical evidences Asoka was trained to be a Minister
of the Mauryan Empire with adequate master level qualifications for the
11
purpose. His management excellence reflects his knowledge in geography,
economics, philosophy and military science in the empire management.
Advanced Corporate Governance Model ofMaurya Phase
Source: Conceptualized Model through Research (2012)
Empire Governance through Zero-Failure AlternativeMechanism
The world has experienced the dynamic management characteristics of the
Mauryan Empire, Chanakyas strategies, the scholastic contribution of the
Governance System- (Working
Governance)
Re-Modelling withApplied Philosophy- (Corporate Good
Governance)
Re-Shaping withPhilosophical
Heights -Elimination ofVices & Virtue
Rules for GreatestSocial Benefits
Re-Designing withGreater Degree of
Application -(CorporateExcellent
Governance)
Nand –
Dhananand
Chanakya&
Chandragupta
Asoka, Upagupta &
KingMahendra
Asoka
12
prominent scholars of the ancient India especially that of the Maurya
period, Asoka and his conquests of wars and annexations. Asoka had a
distinct advantage out of the prominent Mauryan rulers as management
scholars see through. Asoka used the doctrines of Chanakya to the end
limits and experimented with his prescribed theories to win success and he
did it. Some of the Chanakya’s doctrines none of the Mauryan Emperors
dared to attempt before Asoka, which Asoka used to its end limit.
Garrisoned Strategic Townships
Maurya Empire during the reign of Asoka was a full proof through
garrisoned strategic townships. Frontiers were chosen with geopolitical
strategies with adequate communication links or roads, ports, river ports
and large human settlements. Every strategic location to check foreign
invasion was garrisoned with military forces, such townships were backed
by human settlements to support the army needs by agrarian and
metallurgical productions. In the time of need during the war the agrarian
community was trained for policing, paramilitary and army services.
Provinces were equipped to support the army camps in materials and
manpower. Banking on Mandala theory each provinces were well equipped
to extend immediate support to military stations in the time of war and
emergencies. Federalist character of provinces with unitary empire system
were the military hegemony strategies for the protection of the frontier
Himalayan and mountain range passes in the North, North-West and North-
East parts of the empire. Strategic locations in the mainland of the empire
were developed with military hubs through navigation and roadways
connectivity for the efficient movement of the army for support of any
13
battlefield and war locations. Every military station was backed by civilian
settlements and skilled community for self sustainability of the garrisoned
towns. Army townships were also in-charge of trade ports and trade town’s
protection, security and policing. Geopolitical army stations were
permanent in nature with activity supports by civilian settlements, agrarian
community and industrial villages, trade towns and province capitals. Army
intelligence, highway patrolling were the activities of large army camps
garrisoned towns. Navy was a part of the Asokan military system to protect
the coastal territory and maritime traders’ ships and properties. Routine
transfers of army officials and regular inspections were keeping the army
with wartime readiness.
15
Confederacy Governing Mechanisms & Successful Management
Political character of the empire was federal with unitary approach. Many
kingdoms were also part of the confederacy for greater strengths and
security. Foreign kingdoms like Ceylon (island), hinterland Himalayan
kingdom like Tibet, Nepal, Burmese forest kingdoms, South Indian
kingdoms Cholas, Pandyas, Keralaputras and Satyaputras were
independent but parts of the confederacy of Asokan Empire. Asoka was
pacific in the foreign relations. Confederacy was designed by Chanakya for
the Mauryan Empire for long term delivery of good and effective
governance. Chandragupta and Bindusara had established the Chanakya’s
model of confederacy and Asoka added the extra life by establishing
garrisoned towns. Asoka had a movable army of huge size under his
command. Asoka was aggressive at home and was able to crush and
suppress any revolution against the empire. Confederacy used to
command an army of twenty two Lakhs, more than two Lakhs of cavalry,
more than twenty thousand elephants and nearly twenty thousand camel
army and navy was of nearly two Lakhs soldiers as per some estimations.
These military strengths were supported by more than the army size
service personnel, who were equipped to join the army at the time of need.
Army was under regular and routine mobility to gain expertise in
geopolitical strategic warfare. With good agrarian and industrial production
in the empire with high volume international trade in the forms of exports
were contributing for high per-capita income and national income.
Provinces of confederacy had a uniform revenue sharing by unitary
mechanism controlled at the center in Pataliputra. Regulatory provisions
16
including taxation structure were controlled by the center, that’s how
governing system was in the order.
Sea Trade Routes and Connectivity of India with Ancient Western &Eastern Centers
17
Asoka’s Economics of Public Life – Commerce& Trade (Model)
COMMERCE AND TRADE BASE SUPPORT SYSTEM
Source: Conceptualized Modeling through Research (2012)
QualityManagement
• (A) Consumer Goods *(B) Consumer Durables• (C) Industrial Goods *(D) Services Products
TechnologyManagement
• (A) Industrial Equipment *(B) Consumer Equipment *(C) Transport Equipment
• (D) Infrastructure Equipment *(E) Military Equipment
Price &Regulatory
System
• (A) Uniform Pricing with Profitability * (B) Controled Weights& Measures * (C) Fraudulance Prevention * (D) Guilds forFunding Business * (E) State Controlled Interest rates of 2% to12% Per Annum * (F) Transit Damage and Lost Insurance * (G) Goods Guarding and Protection System * (H) UniformTaxation
Transportation &
Infrastructure System
• (A) Highways and Main Roads to Ports & Trade Cities * (B) Urbanisation for Trade * (C) River Ports & Sea Ports * (D)Army Protection of Trade Routes * (E) Transport Caravans andCarriage Services * (F) Garrisoned Towns for Trade CenterSafeguarding * (G) Empire Services Against Taxes * (H) International Trede control through Foreign Policy
18
High Traffic and High Trade Routes – Effective Management
During the reign of Asoka many trade towns of the empire were at the peak
of trade activities and links were largely with the international market. Cities
had international reputation with specialized trade and manufacturing
activities. The famous cities like Saravasti, Varanasi, Champa, Rajagriha,
Ujjayin, Kosmabi, Kusinara, Saket, etc. grew around market places and
attracted artisans from far and near with the allurement of easy availability
of raw materials and easy market for the disposal of their products. With
the consolidation disposal of markets, cities multiplied in number and
became the storehouse of wealth. These cities (Kubernagari) were so
much coveted and prized by the adventuring spirits that they became the
capitals of new states. Archeological data shows that many townships were
built according to a certain plan. Sea trade and maritime trade were linked
to different destinations outside India like Ceylon, Java, Borneo, Angkor,
Aden, Kisanmyu, Kilwa, Sofala, Siam, etc. covering South Asia, Africa, and
Middle East countries. Ships of Kalinga were dominating the Bay of Bengal
and Ceylon destinations, Keralaputras and Pandyas were on high trades
with Africa and Middle East Asia. Mauryas were in good trade links with all
the independent kingdoms. More than 60 sea ports were busy on the East
and West coasts of India. River ports were used for transportation to
different cities in the empire. Roadways were widely connected to every
city in the empire. Mountain passes were used for international trade with
China, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Egypt, Greece and Rome. Maurya phase
experienced huge commercial international traffic. Mauryan Empire was
receiving huge Buddhist pilgrimage traffic. Muryan Empire was the
custodian of the Buddhist relics and holy places. All the trade routes by sea
19
and land were safeguarded by the empire officials and army. Sea trade
routes and ports were guarded by the royal navy of the empire. Trade and
commercial activities were large revenue generators for the empire.
Highway Mainland Roads – Trade and Logistics Management
Mauryan Empire was well known for its road connectivity inside the empire.
National highways and trade highways were the roads of wealth of the
empire. Trade routes were marked by convenient stages and served as
links up to the most distant parts of the country with one another. One trade
route was from the Eastern part to the western part. This ran principally
along the great rivers. From Champa, bats and river ships plied to Banaras.
From Banaras they led up the Ganges as far as Sahajati and up the Jumna
as far as Kausambi, further west, the route led by land tracts to Sindhu.
The second route was from the North to South-West. This route extended
from Saravasti, the capital of Kosala, to Pratishthana on the Godavari and
the stations lying on it in the reverse direction included Ujjayini, Vidisa and
Kausambi. The third rote was from North to South-East. This route was
engaged from Saravasti to Rajagriha and had a number of stations
including Kapilavastu, Vaisali, Pataliputra and Nalanda. The fourth trade
route stretched along the land of the five rivers (Punjab) to the great
highways of Central and Western Asia. There are references to merchants
travelling from Kashmir and Gandhar to Videha, from Banaras to Ujjayini,
from Magadh to Sauvira etc. A lot of wealth came from inland trade. The
trading connections of Anathapindika of Saravasti extended to Rajagriha on
the one side and Kasi on the other. Forest guards were hired by the
merchants to protect the wealth from the robbers and forest tribes. Deserts
were crossed at night with the help of land-pilots guiding the caravans by
20
the stars. Some of the roads were called royal roads (Rajpath or
Mahamagga). There are references to merchants travelling from Banaras
to Baveru (Babylon). The Conquest of Kalinga by Asoka destroyed the only
possible rival for the mastery of the Eastern trade. The Mauryan Empire
maintained a special department for the construction of roads. At every ten
stadia the empire set up a pillar to show the bye-road & distance. The most
famous road of that time was the Royal Road connecting the North – West
frontier with Pataliputra and leading thence to the mouth of the Ganges.
Roman writer Pliny in his work called “Natural History” discussed the
distance and stages of this road. The state controlled foreign trade licenses
were given to the merchants of sea trade and caravan trade. External trade
was carried with Syria, Egypt, Greece, etc. in the west. Principal articles of
export were spices, pearls, diamonds, sandal wood, ivory, cotton cloth, silk
yarn, muslin, etc.
Industry and Production Control Management
Mauryan state exercised a rigid control overall trade and industry which
yielded profit. Prices of commodities were fixed and state intervened
wherever there was a glut of any commodity. The superintendent of
weights and measures enforced the standards of weights and measures.
Markets were safeguarded against the fraudulent practices of the trading
class. Ships were regulated in the river traffic and ferry charges were
collected by the state. The state regulated the industry through its
superintendents. The state was the biggest owner of the industry. Both the
state servants and private traders were delt with the goods produced by
the state. Mauryan economy was the state monopoly of mining and
metallurgy. It was a source of a great income. The state enjoyed
21
unrestricted monopoly in the trade of salt and rock salt mines. The silver
mines were worked becomes clear from the large number of silver punch-
marked coins assignable to the Mauryan period. There was a
superintendent of iron and he looked after the manufacture of things from
iron. The state controlled prices and protected the public, customers and
consumers against unauthorized prices and fraudulent transactions.
Severe punishment was given to those who were guilty of smuggling and
adulteration of goods. Strikes by workers for an increase in salaries and
wages were declared illegal because the state was monitoring adequate
minimum wages system. Mauryan industrialization may be claimed as
primitive industry by modern management scholars. Production control
system during the period of Asoka was at its excellent craftsmanship.
Timber and wood works in the structure building and ship building was one
of the primary large industries in the empire. Quality control processes
were of higher standards, even those quality marketing systems can be
compared with any industrial procedures in modern period without
robotics, automation and computerization.
22
Asoka’s Economics of Public Life – Industry (Model)
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION
Source: Conceptualized M odeling through Research (2012)
Strategic Alliance with Ceylon and Custodian of Buddhistand Hindu Holy Sites – Supreme Tact in Management
Strategic alliance theory propagated and practiced by Chanakya was
championed by Asoka by maintaining the finest and friendly relations with
Agrobase Production
* Domestic Market Goods* International MarketGoods
* Disaster ManagementReserves* Lifesaving Products
Minebase Production &Metallurgy
* Equipment for Public Life* Equipment forInternational Trade(Exports)
* Equipment for MilitaryUesand War Gears forInternational Trade* Luxury Goods forDomestic Market andExport
23
Ceylon. Asoka as one of the wisest emperor of the world managed the
aftermath effect of the Kalinga war through revolutionary change
management i.e., war widows remarriage and resettlement in Ceylon. He
literally converted Ceylon as a Buddhist state. Asoka always expected an
arm revolution or a silent war to bring to an end to the Mauryan dynasty
after the Kalinga war. With his foresight he maintained the extraordinary
friendly and family relations with Ceylon. Ceylon in fact parted with
Mauryan family by allowing King Mahendra and Sanghamitra to spend
their life in Ceylon. Third Buddhist council at Pataliputra was a landmark in
his strategic management of a possible revolution. This in return,
established Asoka as a democratic ruler and assured the army generals of
no war after Kalinga war. Third Buddhist council assured Asoka of a
protégé status in Sri Lanka with power. Asoka himself adopted Buddhism
in his personal life and turned as the custodian of Buddhist relics, holy
places and Hindu holy places. He maintained high satisfaction Buddhist
and Hindu community in his region in and outside the empire. His status of
Devanampiya or Piyadasi was a supreme management strategy of
managing dissatisfaction and possible revolutions. Similar strategy was
adopted by Akbar of Mughal dynasty in mediaeval period, which also
made him Akbar the Great. Asoka had very strong strategic alliances with
Cholas, Pandyas and Keralaputras in India and outside India with Greeks,
Persian, Siam kingdoms too. None of the great emperors of the world had
managed so successfully different religions in their empire in the world;
this makes Asoka the Great with a great difference.
25
3
Military OrganizationManagement – Second to None
Asoka the Great in Military Management of the history was an enigma. He
was an able general & efficient commander of war successes. Under his
individual command he use to march across the empire with fighting forces
of 6 Lakhs infantry, 30 thousand cavalry, 9 thousand elephants, 20
thousand camel fighters and 2 Lakhs army support service staff. The
Mauryan army consisted of four limbs viz., the infantry, the cavalry, the
elephants, and chariots having mobility across the empire. North – Western
mountain forces were maintained to safeguard the mountain passes and
trade routes. Navy was deployed in the ports, sea ports & maritime coastal
trade routes. In addition to this the army was having compliments of
laborers, transport workers, scouts & sappers & miners. The ambulance
corps with doctors carrying their medicines & surgeons their instruments
helped by bands of nurses carrying balms & bandages is also referred in
the texts of contemporary Maurya period.
Asoka maintained a large efficient and well equipped army which was
composed of six sections those were, the hereditary army which was most
loyal, reliable and composed mainly of the fighting classes, the hired army
consisting of mercenaries who were recruited from various countries, the
army formed of corporations of people (Sreni) or Guild of Levies consisting
26
of soldiers provided by trade and craft guilds for short expeditions, the army
of the king’s friend (Mitra), the army belonging to an enemy (Amitra),
obviously deserters and the army composed of wild tribes (Atavi Balanam)
whose business was to distract or detain the enemy. There were details
regarding the procedures of deployment of different kinds of army in the
Mauryan battles of Asoka.
The military administration of the army was looked after by the war office
comprising of thirty members who were divided in to six divisions of five
members each. The first division was in-charge of the navy, coast guards,
river route guards and high sea naval forces. The second division was
concerned with transport, commissariat and army services including the
provision of drummers, grooms and mechanics and grass cutters. The third
division was to deal with the infantry. The fourth division was concerned
with cavalry. The fifth division was in-charge of elephants. The Asokan
army had four arms (Chaturangi Sena). The addition of coordinate supply
and Admirality of departments appears to be an innovation due to the
genius of Asoka. The army had a separate espionage system which was
intended for military intelligence.
Asokan army had a very efficient and specialized supply chain
management and logistics system. Movement of the army was cleared by
the pilot service and parallel back up of the navy through rover ways and
maritime system. Army was supplied with food, accommodations, cloth,
tenting equipment, and special carpenters and metal workers through navy.
Navy was involved in maintaining logistics. Army movements were
supported with by garrisoned towns and army stations. Different army
stations were available to increase the army strengths by double. In the
27
time of war emergencies, army support service staffs were well equipped to
join the army immediately. The concept of paramilitary force system was
another innovation of Asoka’s military organization management.
Professors of military strategy and warfare, diplomacy, politics and policy
matters were the parts of army in think tank. Think tank of Asoka’s Mauryan
army was highly effective in crucial war decision makings. The available
and unavailable sources of information justifies the cross docking system of
Asoka’s military system.
The army was constituted mostly by the Kshatriyas community. To say the
army was in the hands of the Kshatriyas. Meghasthenes writes “The fifth
class, among Indians, consists of the warriors who were second in point of
numbers to the herdsmen, but had a life of supreme freedom and
enjoyment during the reign of Chandragupta Maurya. They had only
military duties to perform. Asokan period witnessed high involvement of the
army in structured duties and responsibilities. Army was widely used in
policing and patrolling duties of the infrastructure and trade activities of the
empire. Army jobs were lucrative and honourable during Asoka’s reign.
Asoka had meticulously structured the army functioning. Comparatively,
Asoka had a superior military organization than that of the Greeks, Romans
etc. who maintained huge and large armies. Military strength of Asoka’s
army was larger than any great emperors of the world starting from
Alexander to Napoleon the Great. Asoka’s army was governed by stringent
moral code of conduct and regulations to deliver high ethical values. It’s
logically argued that, the army compelled Asoka to end his war policy after
Kalinga war. Some military scholars argue that Asoka was made as a
democratic ruler after Kalinga war by the army of his empire. As Asoka is
28
known for his great military management skills, his army is also known for
high ethical value mechanisms delivery. Many strong views support the
argument that Asokan army delivered the high moral value by conducting
the mass war widows remarriage of one hundred fifty thousand numbers
and their resettlement in Tamraparni (Sri Lanka). Army supported Asoka in
the social system change and made Asoka successful in his drive for
Dharmasoka which ultimately made Asoka the Great. Such great
constructive role of army history has never repeated in this world in the last
2250 years after Asoka’s reign.
29
Military System Supply Chain Management (Zero-Failure & Zero-Defect) of Asokan Army
Source: Conceptualized M odeling through Research (2012)
• Extra LogisticsSupportfrom Hub Stations
• Uninterrupted SupplyChain to Royal Army
throughCross-Docking• Extra Ordinary Backup of
Logistics& (SCM) toattain Zero-Defect
Mechanism
• Multiple LogisticsConnectivity between
Hub Stations• Multiple Connectivity to
attain Zero - Failure(SCM) by Internet &
Intranet
• Defined StrategicArmyMovement
MightyMilitary Force
of AsokanArmy
DifferentLines of
Logistics -Roadways &Waterways
DifferentHubs of
LogisticsSupport and
Supply
Multiple Linesof Sources
and Supply toHub Stations
31
Supply Chain Management of Asoka’s Maurya Empire
Source: Conceptualized Modeling through Research (2012)
Supply Chain ManagementEconomics of Public
Life(Agriculture, Industry ,
Trade & Commerce)
S.C.M.Military System(Zero-Failure & Zero-
Defect)
S.C.M.Sustainable Chain
(Maintenance,Degradation Preventation,Recovery & Preparedness)
ASOKA’S
EMPIREMANAGEMENT
- (S. C. M.)
33
4Management of Finance,
Agriculture, Judiciary, WelfareState & Social Order by Asoka
the GreatCorporate Governance and Corporate Good Governance is comparatively
a modern concept with its impacts and forces on companies from 1980s
and onward. Mauryan Empire had established corporate good governance
in the period of Chandragupta Maurya and Asoka enhanced this to the
level of corporate excellent governance. Such concepts were utopian as
was proposed by Greek Philosophers, where as Chanakya had
conceptualized it as practical and the adoption was carried forward by
Chandragupta to Bindusara and Asoka further. Asoka’s son King Mahinda
(Mahendra) to it to the level which can be called as Corporate Benevolence
Governance (C.B.G.) perhaps, it will not be wrong to claim that no one has
achieved till 21st century. Asoka can be regarded as the champion follower
of Chanakya, who applied good governance management beyond
expectations. That’s how the great ruler who devised excellent
management practices for the greater world. Empire or the state used to
act as a corporation in the Asokan reign. Employee numbers of the Maurya
Empire was exceeding forty Lakhs. Huge infrastructure, maintenance and
34
safeguarding were the state responsibility. State was managing many non-
profit organizations and departments to achieve welfare state status.
Financial Management
Kautilya had designed the financial management system of the Mauryan
Empire. Great emphasis was given on fiscal matters because the Mauryan
state maintained a large army which had to be paid in cash. Mauryan
Empire put emphasis not only on collection of revenue but also on the
management of finance. The government was very cautious so that the
money collected was not embezzled by its officials. History is evident,
many great empires of the world were destroyed by the corruption and
manipulation practices by its officials. Chanakya in his doctrine has argued
that as with fish moving in water it is impossible to know when they are
drinking water, so it is impossible to know when they take money for
themselves. Asoka had revenue intelligence and vigilance department to
restrict financial corruption. Primary sources of income for the state were
land revenue. The royal share of the produce of the soil called the Bhaga
generally amounted to one sixth, but it differed also and ranged from one
fourth to one eighth. It was based on the land used by each individual
cultivator, not on the village as a whole, and also in accordance with the
quality and fertility of land. Such a scientific land revenue policy was used
till the Gupta period in the Indian history. After that the British government
used such a land revenue policy in India with structured taxation system.
There were various other sources of income of the state. The state was
engaged in huge livestock trading internationally, shepherds and livestock
breeders were taxed on the number of produce of the animals. The empire
charged toll tax and trade tax on the articles sold. There were other taxes
35
like forest tax, tax on intoxicants, mine tax, fish tax, irrigation tax, license
tax etc. the state managed and owned vast estates and forests. Empire
had monopoly of mines and traded on mineral products. The empire had its
own factories managed through cooperative management of all sorts of
articles. Manufacturing of cotton and silk cloths were high revenue
generating products due o very large export trade. Silk yarn and silk cloth
was a very high priced and profitable article during Asoka’s period. The
mountain trade passes were named in the geography as “Silk Route” due
to the export of silk from India to other countries. Trade by waterways was
controlled by the empire. River and sea ports were owned by the state and
state was investing in construction, maintenance and safeguarding of the
ports. State was directly participating in the organization and development
of agriculture, industry and trade. State enterprises were provided with
additional income. During Asoka’s reign state was earning huge revenue
and profit from industry and trade at domestic and international fronts.
State treasury had provisions and reserves of funds for the purpose of
different contingencies and emergencies like natural calamities, disaster
and famines. Cash reserves were maintained for war time situations and
for the purpose of war. A separate provision of cash reserves were
maintained for any kind of extra ordinary disasters. Welfare state functions
like infrastructure development, education, public health and charity to the
needy people were parts of the book of account. Such a scientific financial
management of Asoka was few steps ahead of Chanakya’s financial
management provisions. Maurya period was marked by administrative
change and innovations. Within this period, Asoka’s reign saw an important
shift in the priorities of governance.
36
Agriculture Productivity and Infrastructure Management
Excellent management procedures were followed during the ruling of the
Asoka in Maurya period. The lifeline of the empire being agriculture, it was
the responsibility of the state was undertake the irrigation projects and also
to construct and maintain public highways. Large river ports were
constructed and maintained by the empire governance. Large numbers of
river canals projects were undertaken and maintained in the empire.
Monsoon dependence was shifted to round the year agriculture activities by
three and four types of cropping patterns per year. Agriculture products
were large parts of inland trade practices. Agrarian produce commodities
prices were controlled by the state to ensure substantial profit to the
producers, that’s how large agricultural villages were set up on the river
banks. Grass route economy being agriculture in the empire, several
departments were engaged to assure higher productivity and good
economic conditions of the farmers. To maintain the public economics
balance state was taking care of the agricultural commodities transportation
to distant market places and ports. Megasthenes has described the
highway which ran from the North-West to Pataliputra and beyond towards
East, it was 1150 miles and quite wide. Trees were planted on the
roadsides and milestones and direction posts were erected along that road.
Arrangements were made for its proper maintenance. A governor of the
empire was responsible for building a dam across a river near Girnar in
Western India. State bureaucracy had twenty six departmental
superintendents to monitor the functional activities. Universities, Gurukuls
and colleges of education were part of state infrastructure development.
Urbanization was very high in the Mauryan Empire. The fortified capital was
37
a prime element of the state was to protect the urban settlements. There
seems to have four provinces in the empire under governors to look after
administration and development activities – a Southern one with its center
at Suvarnagiri, a Northern with its headquarters at Taxila, a Western one
with its headquarters at Ujjayini and Eastern one with its center at Toshali.
Pataliputra was the biggest city in the empire; even its size was larger than
the Rome. The state took general care of the health of the people.
Hospitals were built and maintained not only for human beings but also for
animals and birds. There was a separate department for public census. A
record of births and deaths were kept at every place.
38
Asoka’s Economics of Public Life – Agriculture (Model)
AGRARIAN PRODUCTION
Source: Conceptualized Modeling through Research (2012)
Food Production
* Food Grainsproduction*1/4th to 1/8th - EmpireReserves*1/8th DomesticConsumption
*1/th Domestic sale forWealth Generation*1/8th DomesticEmergency Provisions*1/8th Reinvestment inAgriculture
Cash Crop Production
*Consumable &Tradable Cropping*1/4th to 1/8th StateCooperative IndustryConsumption*1/10th DomesticConsumption
*1/4th DomesticCommerce for WealthGeneration*1/8th International Commerce for WealthGeneration*1/4th National Industry for WealthGeneration
39
Judiciary and Welfare State Management
Mauryan state was very particular about delivering impartial justice.
Recognized courts for the administration of justice were available
throughout the Empire. The highest court of appeal was the King in the
Council and not the King alone. There were two types of courts –
Dharmasthiya courts or Civil Courts to decide cases relating to contracts,
agreements, gifts, sales, marriages, inheritances, boundary disputes etc.
and Kanatakasodhana courts or Criminal Courts to decide cases of thefts,
robbery, murder, sex offences etc. The Supreme Court was at the capital
Pataliputra presides over by the King or the chief justice. Villages were
having popular courts consisting of village elders and representatives to try
minor cases. The Maurya penal code was very severe. It used to order for
torture, trial ob ordeal, mutilations of limbs etc. Jails were under the
management of department of justice. Pardoning criminals and reduction of
penalties and punishments were in the hands of Asoka. As per the justice
and order system the royal family members even the emperor’s family
members were tried by the courts of justice and penalized. Asoka’s son
Kunal was blinded by force as per the justice delivery mechanism, who also
ruled Magadh as an emperor. Welfare state system was monitored by the
legal system and judiciary was delivering prompt and quick justice. The
state regarded itself as trustee of the people. It maintained a structured
salary system of different skilled and unskilled labourers. State had
regulations to take care of the employee and the emperor interests. It
protected the consumer by preventing the merchants from cornering
commodities and raising their prices. Prices of articles were regulated in
the interests of the general consumers. Fraud on customers was minimized
40
by making the use of the standardized and stamped weights and measures
compulsory. Adulterations of goods were minimized through severe
punishments. Merchants were compensated for articles lost through any
theft in transit. State recognized its responsibility to the destitute and
diseased. Public hygiene was paid full attention by the state. Adequate
measures were taken against epidemics. At the time of famine state was
providing relief from state reserves and which was structurally provisioned
in the state budget and adequate grains were store in the state
warehouses. The government looked after the moral welfare of the people
by keeping gambling, drinking and prostitution under strict control. All these
large public welfare measures with negligible failures in delivery make
Asokan management as “Corporate Excellent Governance”. Asoka
maintained an empire which was neither unitary nor federal in character.
Social Order Management of the Empire
Varna was the basis of the Mauryan social order and social organizations
of the empire. The four Varnas became endogamous with their traditional
rigidity. Brahminical system and Vedic way of life was dominating Mauryan
social conditions. The society was divided in to four categories of traditional
status, Brahmanas, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas and Sudras. Megasthenes refers
to seven casts or classes functionally; Philosophers, Farmers, Soldiers,
Herdsmen, Artisans, Magistrates and Councilors. Eventually he confused
caste with occupations. There was the prevalence of mixed caste system in
Mauryan Empire. Marriage between the members of the same caste was
preferred through intermarriage between different castes were prevalent.
Remarriage was followed by the rules of the Dharmasatra. Marriage on
contract and divorce was permitted. Women were educated. Participation
41
in social and religious functions was the rights of the women. They were
also employed as spies and bodyguards. However, those privileges were
restricted only to upper strata of society. The murder of a woman was
regarded as equal to the murder of a Brahman. Ganikas or courtesans
enjoyed a good social standing. There was a superintendent to look after
prostitutes. Women were permitted to convert religion, Buddhism was
accepting nuns also.
43
5
Revolutionary Change
Management – Kalinga War
Historical Links of Odisha & Sri Lanka
There are number of traditional sources of history which helps to study the
relationship between Odisha and Sri Lanka and in connection with the
introduction of Buddhism to Sri Lanka. These sources are of two origins,
Indian and Sri Lankan. Sri Lankan historical sources are; the Dipavarmsa
(4th Century AD), the Mahavamsa (5th Century AD), the Samantapasadika,
the commentary to the Vinaya Pitaka by Achraya Buddhaghosa (5th
Century AD), the Vamsatthappakasini, the commentary to the Mahavamsa
(9th Century AD), the Mahabodhivamsa (10th & 11th Century), the
Thupavamsa (13th Century AD), the Dhatuvamsa (14th Century AD) and the
historians texts of 19th & 20th century. In the Indian sources the most useful
are the Asokavadana (2nd Century AD), the Asokasutra, the pillar and rock
edicts of Asoka, the account found in A-yu-Wang-Chuan, the Chinese
version of the Asokavadana is also important. The Sri Lankan sources are
dominated and are the product of Theravada School and Indian Sources
except Asokan inscriptions, are the product of other Buddhist schools of
Northern tradition that includes the two leading Buddhist universities of
44
Kalinga. The Sri Lankan Pali sources, the Dipavamsa, Mahavamsa,
Samantapasadika, and Vamsatthappakasini are heavily dependent on the
single source: Sihalattakatha, the Sinhalese commentaries. A number of
oriental scholars like Oldenberg, Geigre, Bechert, Malalasekera Mendis
and Godakumbura have different opinions about identification of the
sources of the early chronicles. Despite all these differences, all the
scholars and historians on the early historiography of Sri Lanka agree that
the early sources have common theme. Sri Lanka is the Land of Buddhism
(Dhammadipa).
Kalinga Monks on Buddhist Missions through Sea Trade Routes B.C.E. 200 -200 A.D.
45
In the Buddhist missions the Kalinga monks played the lead role in
spreading Buddhism in Sri Lanka.
Culture Transmission
Kalinga from 5th century B.C.E. has established its supremacy in naval
trade through the sea routes to East Asia and Sri Lanka. Number of
prosperous sea ports for trade and commerce on the coast line were
engaged in handling sea traffic. Lake Chilika was the big hub of anchoring
of wooden ships, repairing and dry docking. The Buddhist scripture Seuki
mentions a number of ports on the Utkal coast. Greek geographer Plolemy
has mentioned some other ports on the Kalinga Coast such as Pitundra
(Pithunda), Ganje (Ganjam district), Tamalites (Tamralipti) as prime ports
through which Kalinga intercourse with outside world culturally and
commercially. Other prime ports of Kalinga coastline were Konark, Chilika,
Kalinganagara, Chelitalo, Harispur, Sambha Dipa etc. Archeological
excavations have established Manikapatana as an international sea port of
Kalinga and Utkal.
47
Kinship Relationship of Kalinga with Sri Lanka
(Vijayan)
Sri Lanka in the ancient history was known as Tamaraprani. Kalinga had
cultural and commercial relationship with Singhal (Sri Lanka) much before
the Kalinga War. The relationship dates back to B.C.E. 500 as per historical
evidences. As per record of Mahavamsa, Vijay was the first king of Singhal
(Ceylon) migrated from Kalinga. Paurani tradition holds that Vijay was the
son of Simhabahu of Simhapur. Vijay was banished from the kingdom by
his father due to misconduct & was set afloat on a wooden ship with his
700 companion. They landed near the Puttalam on the North West coast of
Sri Lanka. With the passage of the time he colonized the island. The newly
occupied island was called Singhal Dipa after the name of Simhabahu, the
father of Vijay. That’s how the Vijayan dynasty was in Singhal. The names
like, Vijaya, Simhabahu & Simhapura seemed legendary but were from
Kalinga, Simhapura was a historical city from pre-Christ time to Ganga
dynasty. The episode of Vijay cannot be separated from Sri Lankan history,
so is his ancestry inseparable from Kalinga. The Dathavamsa a Buddhist
work depicts the friendly relations between King Guhasiba of Kalinga &
Mahadisena (277-304 A.D.) of Sri Lanka. Trade, commerce, matrimonial
alliances between Kalinga & Sri Lanka was at a slow pace before Kalinga
War.
48
Aftermath Effects of Kalinga War – The
Stronger Sri Lanka Link
History as recorded by epoch making Kalinga war happened in B.C.E.
260-261 on the bank of River Daya, the present City Bhubaneswar. The
outcome of this eventful war, which brought death and destruction to
thousands of people, filled the king with remorse. In the words of the
Maurya Emperor: “A hundred and fifty thousand people were deported and
hundred thousand were killed and many times that number perished in
other ways” as per the XIII rock edict of Asoka. As believed, deep
sensitivity to the cruel consequences of war worked a revolution in the
character of Asoka. As per Professor Radhakumud Mookerjee, that the
violence of war seen in all its nakedness made Asoka turn completely
towards non-violence (Ahmisa) as his creed. He changed his personal
religion and definitely adopted Buddhism, which of all the then prevailing
religions of India stood most clearly for the principle of non-violence. Many
other variations on the theme of Asoka’s conversion are found in the
Asokavadana and Divyavadana. In other logical argument, bloodshed and
war victory was so frequent in the Asokan army that a silent revolution was
getting prepared by the army commanders to engulf the Maurya dynasty
and dethroning Asoka. As Chanakya had warned and restricted Magadh to
have any war with the republican democratic state Kalinga. Philosophy of
democracy had enough power to destroy any monarchical empire. The loss
of life was so huge in the Kalinga war that the Asokan generals were in
arms against the emperor by keeping two end line options – “repair the war
damage & deliver democracy” to Magadh. As one of the most qualified
49
emperor of the world, Asoka applied the “Revolutionary Change
Management” to control the rebellion. The wisdom of Asoka delivered the
third path to satisfy the both parties of the war. War damage was repaired
and democracy was delivered by the king. As the brilliant emperor he
consulted scholars for widow remarriage. Buddhist scholar and monk
Upagupta permitted widow remarriage under Buddhism provisions and
Hinduism veterans refused the social system change. As the emperor
Asoka managed the war widows for conversion in to Buddhism and
arranged unmarried male youth from the community for remarriage after
conversion of religion. Such amass remarriage event happened in Kalinga.
Remarried widows settlement either in Kalinga or in Magadh was
vehemently opposed by the existing society, so Asoka decided to resettle
them in Singhal (Sri Lanka) by deputing his son Mahinda (Mahendra) as
the royal representative and later on his daughter Sanghamitra as the royal
representative of the women community. Asoka initiated the process by
converting himself as a Buddhist. More than two Lakhs of families were
transported from Kalinga to Sri Lanka for resettlement. Buddhist mission
spread in Sri Lanka in a large scale in the aftermath stage of Kalinga war.
Tamralipti was the principal port and was an important place in this mission
and Jambukola – Gokanna ports in Sri Lanka were at the receiving ends.
Mauryan power in South India is identified by the presence of Asokan
inscriptions not far from South Mysore. Cholas, Pandiyas, Satyaputras and
Keralaputras maintained friendly terms with Asoka. This attitude made
Asoka as “Dhammasoka” especially when he was dealing with Sri Lanka,
which was outside his dominion (Vijita). Another argument that depicts in
the post Kalinga war by resettlement drive nearly six Lakhs of people
50
migrated from Kalinga to Sri Lanka. Such a revolutionary change in the
social system made Asoka the great a demi-God.
Empire of Asoka and Sites of Rock Edicts & Buddhist Sites
51
Revolutionary Change Management – Kalinga War &Establishment of Corporate Benevolence Governance
Mauryan Empire achieved excellence in governance mechanism because
the empire was not inherited; it was created by pragmatic philosophy of
Chanakya which was strategically designed and drafted by the world’s
greatest strategist. The system and administration mechanism was
followed without failures. Asoka being the grand disciple of Chanakya
modified and upgraded many Chanakya’s doctrines and strategies.
Akhand Bharat doctrine of Chanakya was almost achieved by Asoka.
Factoral improvements and experience of zero failures in wars in India
was instigating factor of Asoka to conquer the neighbouring state Kalinga
(Modern Odisha). Chandragupta and Bindusara never attempted to invade
Kalinga by violating Chanakya’s philosophy of keeping democracy away
from monarchy in any form of conflict. Democracy speaks the language of
the masses and comes from the heart of the masses. Democracy may not
deliver the best in the public interest but guarantees that worst are never
delivered. Kalinga was a crude republican democracy of that time and was
delivering the best in governance and public wealth generation through
trade, commerce, industry and agriculture. Kalinga was dominating the
Bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean through its well established trade links
with Burma, Ceylon, Java, Sumatra, Borneo, Thailand and other island
countries. Many of the economics historians argue that Kalinga was the
largest trade economy of India and used to dictate the commodity trading
price to Mauryan Empire. Per-capita income was to somewhat four times
higher than the Magadh. Public rich wealth and huge buying power of
52
Kalinga was diverting the high priced commodities of Mauryan Empire to
go international through the trading community of Kalinga. At the same
time Kalinga was maintaining a large army of more than three Lakhs of
soldiers to safeguard its territory and maritime trade routes. Mauryan
Empire sea trades through Bay of Bengal in the East Asian countries were
negligible. Kalinga had community and matrimonial alliances with Ceylon
and a parallel economy was growing in Sri Lanka. In the matter of
international relations Kalinga was at a dictating position to Mauryan
Empire through any negotiations. With the advantage of the republican
democratic structure Kalinga was not in favour of territorial expansion.
Chanakya as a strategist had well measured the political ambitions of
Kalinga and never considered it a threat to Mauryan territorial expansion
drive. In his doctrine Chanakya had explained the wealth as the greatest
interest of any state, so far Kalinga’s wealth generation mechanism is not
disturbed it will never raise any conflict with Magadh. That’s why Mauryan
Empire was conducting international trade with the East through Silk Trade
Routes.
On the eighth year after coronation Asoka waged Kalinga war in B.C.E.
261. A detailed enumeration of this was gleaned from rock edict XIII found
at Sahabazgarh in Pakistan near Pak-Afghan border. During Asoka’s
period Magadh Empire had surrounded Kalinga in the north, west and
south. The existence of Kalinga on the border of Magadh was definitely a
threat to the power and potentiality of the later. Asoka with a superior and
mighty military force supported with a zero-failure supply chain
management won the Kalinga war on the battle ground near river Daya in
the present Bhubaneswar. Rock edict XIII describes the horrors of Kalinga
53
war. In this war, 150,000 thousand soldiers from the Kalinga side were
taken as captives by Asoka, 1000,000 were slain and as many as that
number (150,000 + 100,000 = 250,000) died of injuries and pestilence in
the aftermath of the war. The war brought miseries not only to these who
took to arms but also to a large number of civil population including
Brahmanas, Sarmanas, their relatives and friends. As believed the
sanguinary Kalinga war changed Asoka’s mind. Management scholars
argue that Asoka gained the wealth of this war was that of more than the
double of total wealth of the Mauryan Empire. By the war economics
Kalinga war was the biggest financial war business for Asoka to gain out of
victory. Asoka was a warrior, and to the extent he slain his 99 brothers for
the throne of Magadh. Management research has a different view of the
aftermath effects of Kalinga war. In the war more than 450,000 people
from the side of Kalinga died by the war at the same rate of war reverse
effect Magadh had lost nothing less than 200,000 soldiers. Kalinga was
maintaining a large elephant battalion to contest Magadh in any battle
field. Asoka almost used his total army strength to conquer Kalinga. War
reactions estimations of Asoka failed to measure his own army and army
commanders’ reactions after Kalinga war. Asokan army challenged the
emperor to dethrone the Mauryan dynasty. Asoka reused Chanakya’s
principles to handle this revolution of his gallant army. As per some literary
sources Asoka asked for 22 days lead time to replace and repair the war
casualties and damages. Chanakya’s doctrine that a revolution can be
diverted by another revolution, a change can be conquered by another
change, a nail can be removed by another nail – Asoka used the doctrine
to change the Mauryan army revolution by another revolutionary change
management. Soldiers are society members, restructuring the social order
54
can change the cause of their revolution. Asoka as a great scholar used
Chanakya’s theories for diverting his army revolution. The aftermath
effects of Kalinga war are evident in the history with Asoka’s policy
changes to restore Mauryan dynasty back to its power and position. War
victims were young and soldiers who left behind war widows and the
family in grief. Asoka decided to change the war effect by changing the
social order. Repairing and reversing the war damage possible through
social system change. Asoka decided to be a democratic monarch and
declared himself as the Dharmasoka. After Kalinga war, he converted to
Buddhism by Upagupta, a Buddhist top order monk. Upagupta permitted
for widow remarriages for greater social benefits. Asoka organized widow
remarriage by converting the widows and agreed youth to be Buddhist. He
also declared Kalinga war as the last war of his conquests. Social system
of Kalinga and Magadh rejected the appeal of Asoka for their resettlement
in either of the kingdoms. Such a huge resettlement was agreed by the
Ceylon on its land. Asoka deployed his son King Mahinda (Mahendra) and
after sometime his daughter Sanghamita to Ceylon with a plant of the holy
tree for the spreading of Buddhism and representative head of the
resettled families. In this connection he brought some changes in the
Mauryan penal code by eliminating the death penalty and royal pardon to
convicts after conversion to Buddhism in selected cases. Mauryan dynasty
adorned Buddhism after Kalinga war and Asoka declared himself as
Devanampiya and Piyadasi – the servant of the God to take care of the
subjects of the empire. Combined exercise of power and wisdom Asoka
applied Chanakya’s doctrines of diverting an arm revolution by bringing a
revolutionary change movement in the society. Buddhism acted as the
instrument to help Asoka for his Dhammavijay. Asoka declared to conduct
55
the 3rd Buddhist Council in Pataliputra & invited the King of Ceylon
(Tamrapani) Megaliputtatissa as the President of the third Buddhist
Council. Asoka is regarded as the only emperor of India who applied
Chanakya’s doctrines the most to its best. Revolutionary Change
Management by Asoka paved his path to greater heights of Corporate
Governance. From Corporate excellent governance, Devanpiya or
Piyadasi Asoka moved towards “Benevolence Corporate Governance”.
This in fact was achieved by his by his son King Mahendra in Ceylon- the
standing epitome is the temple of King Mahendra in Colombo, who
excelled his father Asoka the great to the status of a God by the public
through “Corporate Benevolence Governance”.
56
Asoka’s Communication Management Model of Philosophy, Mission & Goals
Source: Conceptualized Model through Research (2012)
Application of CommonLanaguage for
Information - PrakritLanguage in Brahmi, Pali
& Kalinga Scripts
Rules of Management, Codeof Conduct, Details of
Regulations(Reference Text and UniformSourcing for Elimination of
Misinterpretation and WrongInterpretation)
Defined CorporatePhilosophy -
(All are Equal, Rights forEveryone, Duties of
Everyone)
Structured Mission Plan& Mission
Accomplishment(Subjects are Children,
Ruler and the King is theTrustee and Custodian ofPublic Happiness, Life to
be Lived in Harmony)
Defined Goals forContinuous Attainment -
(Public Wealth & Life i Protected by Empire
Officials, Justice Delivered, Moral Values Carried on by
Subjects, Empire andEmperor are at your Service -
Dharmevijaya)Excellent Corporate
Governance AttainedContinuously
UniformCommunication
Model ofPhilosophy,Mission &
Goals – Asoka’sRock Edicts
57
Management of Strategic International Trade Relationsthrough 3rd Buddhist Council – Asoka
Maurya Empire by the time of Asokan reign had accumulated the cultural
change from a feudatory system to a progressive culture. The conceptual
framework and the applied practice of Chanakya – King a C.E.O. had its
strongest impact on the empire management system. The disastrous
consequences of Kalinga war in the context of the war damages so far lives
of the human beings are concerned was one of the biggest war event in the
history of India. Asoka with his champion management skills adapted the
revolutionary change management to control the aftermath effects of
Kalinga war. Inheriting the trade contacts from Kalinga was the prime motto
of the war. Magadh trade guilds were not competent to take over the
massive international trade operations and networks of Kalinga merchants
successfully. Prior to Kalinga war, Kalinga had seven hundred years of
international trade activities. The business goodwill and corporate
commitments established by Kalinga in other countries were stumbling
blocks for Maurya Empire trade guilds. International acceptance of
products and brands with made in Magadh identity were finding tough
competitions distributor process rejections. Kalinga’s foreign goodwill
networks were over weights to Maurya activities. In addition, Maurya
Empire was looking out for an economic system that will enhance the
national income and increase the per-capita income of the country. In the
order of the large corporation style and system of operation Maurya Empire
was banking on wealth management. Asokan regime had well understood
the need of prosperity of the empire to safeguard the interest of the empire
and the Maurya dynasty in future. Prosperity was in the wealth generation
58
activities. War business is one time wealth generation action and the same
is a future liability. Neglecting the liability brings uprisings and revolutions
within the empire, which finally results in building up of new and
independent kingdoms. Wealth generation as a continuous activity was
only possible through wide network of international trade and commerce.
The Kalinga war was an initiative of the Asokan administration to gain a
continuous access to the international market and trade activity. With the
war effects and resistance of Kalinga army, Asoka measured and realized
the power of wealth. A second war alike the Kalinga war will happen if he
will invade the territories of the other trade powers of the down South India
– Cholas, Pandiyas, Satyaputras & Keralaputras, so he decided to find a
new avenue without incurring war coasts and damages. Vic versa though
strategic management methods it can be argued that such a war after
Kalinga war would have destroyed the Maurya Empire immediately. These
three powers of South India were involved in large international trade
activity through sea routes like Kalinga. The impacts of trade powers were
felt by the Mauryan administration after the Kalinga war. Maurya traders
were almost facing a boycott and in some part an embargo in international
overseas trade due to occupation Kalinga. A complete of the damaged
international relationas was inevitable for the Maurya Empire.
Buddhism was gaining grounds in the overseas destinations of the Asia
continent as a religion, cult and a new philosophy. Asoka had sought the
help of Buddhism for his strategic revolutionary change management for
resettlement of the war affected kin and families of Kalinga. As the emperor
he deputed his son Mahendra and daughter Sanghamitta to Sri Lanka to
manage the revolutionary and progressive group under the cloak of
59
Buddhism. Asoka strategically segregated the powerful revolutionary group
of Kalinga and resettled them in Sri Lanka – at the far off overseas location
to safeguard the Mauryan territorial interests. As Buddhism preaching are
non-violence (Ahimsa) became their religion to pacify their wills and
interests. The fire brand community was taken out of Kalinga to reduce the
risk of an immediate revolution or a war for Magadh. It was obvious,
Kalinga with its wealth power and supports of the other kingdoms could
have revenged against Maurya Empire. As veteran of military management
Asoka pushed the chance of an immediate war far off. A return war by
Kalinga would have resulted in the destruction of the Maurya Empire
completely. In history, such a chance was only avoided for 200 years.
Kalinga under the governorship of Kharavela revenged and attacked
Magadh after 200 years.
In the international business front Asoka organized the 3rd Buddhist Council
under the convener of Moggaliputta Tissa and patronage of Ajatasttu in
Rajagriha and Pataliputra for a balance of power of Mauryas in the
overseas and establishment of political hegemony to permit Maurya trade
guilds open access and up lift of embargos in the overseas markets.
Territories like Java, Sumatra, Bali, Siam, Burma, Tamraparni (Sri Lanka),
China, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand where Kalinga had
operated for 700 years through international trade and commerce, were big
markets for Mauryan products. Sri Lanka being the biggest supporter of
Kalinga due to trade and kinship received the priority of the convener. Third
Buddhist council had lots of political agenda and trade agenda apart from
the religious and philosophical conferencing. More than 60,000 delegates
from all sections of the society and profession from international territories
60
participated in the great council. Representations from the ruling families,
courtiers, trade guilds, religious groups, Buddhism, intellectual community
were made to the forum of the council at two venues. The council exposed
the delegates to the industrial products, equipment, raw materials of mines
and metallurgy, silk and textile, agriculture and forest products,
craftsmanship in jewellary etc. and many trade negotiations were
conducted. At the royal official fronts many diplomatic ties, secret deals and
alliances were organized. Opposing nations of Maurya trade activities were
exposed to military strength of Asokan army and Maurysn supremacy was
imposed to provide free passage to Mauryan trade. International tourism,
especially Buddhism holy places passage permission and pilgrimage
facilities with tourists’ life and security provisions were granted by the
custodian of the holy shrines – Asoka the great. Pilgrimage facilities to
Buddhist religious sites were a trade deal for Mauryan trade guilds. Mighty
military power and huge industrial production capacity for international
trade were used for the purpose of ‘Balance of Power’ with Siam, Bali, and
Sumatra etc. countries in exchange to receive unrestricted trade access to
Mauryan ships. As per historical records some 60,000 high power
delegates from 72 countries were invited to this 3rd Buddhist Council to
guarantee unrestricted trade access to the Kalinga’s international trade
markets. This council provided the platform to establish Mauryan military
hegemony and use of Balance of Power tact to lift all the embargos on the
Mauryan ships, products and commerce guild and opening up of Maurya
Empire market for the reciprocation overseas trade. The outcome of the
council was recorded as successful from both religious and political
grounds. The event that led to the Third Council are important since the
Buddhist monks of Sri Lanka gave credit to emperor Asoka for supporting
61
the Theraveda School, there by preserving the orthodox form of Buddhism.
After the council held at Pataliputra, the elder Mahinda, the son of Asoka,
was sent to Sri Lanka to head Buddhist mission, followed later by
Sanghamitta. Political grounds were used for international relations and
international trade. This council set the backbone of Maurya Empire right
through agreed trade negotiations. Extra pampered support to Sri Lanka
pacified the rebel interests of Kalinga. Cholas, Pandiyas, Satyaputras &
Keralaputras joined hands with Mauryan trade guilds in providing support in
their existing international trade markets apart from accepting memberships
of the Mauryan trade guilds.
63
6Management of Life Excellence-
the World of the GreatMauryan period had witnessed and experienced the excellent
management application in the empire administration in the regime of
Asoka. The creation to the phase of glory of the empire was designed by
the veteran strategist Chanakya. Able generalship of Chandragupta and
Bindusara established the vast and first empire by his expansion drive.
Asoka added extra glory to the empire by his expansion drive and the last
battle of Kalinga war. Asoka, in fact, the man who knows the most,
Chanakya and his management doctrines and he had gone beyond in
applying Chanakya’s theories. Chanakya was a strategist and pragmatic
philosopher; his views are not untrue that religion opiates people.
Chanakya maintained a secular part in his theories and proposed to use
superstitions in the the benefit of the state and empire management.
Asoka very well examined Chanakya’s doctrine of revolutionary change
management in which he had to take shelter in Budddhism. Soon after
Kalinga war Asoka attempted to achieve “Management of Life Excellence”-
all his patronage and governance modifications are vivid examples of it.
Asoka added value, virtues and extraordinary good will to the
management and corporate governance. Buddhist traditions consider
Asoka as an exemplary king and Upasaka. He had a close connection with
64
the Sangha and the leading monks of his time such as Upagupta. His
generosity as a patron of the Sangha is reflected in many legends.
Third Buddhist Council – A Stepping Stone
In a comparative analysis it can be claimed that Asoka attempted to bring
out a new cult of philosophy and human values with highest of its order to
the corporate governance. He identified the very high ethical values as
suitable for incorporation to Maurya management system. Asoka’s
conversion to Buddhism was sudden transformative event. The Pali
Chronicles asserts that Asoka convened a great Buddhist council at
Pataliputra, presided over by Mogaliputta Tissa, in order to purge the
Sangha of certain unacceptable practices - which was accepted as the third
Buddhist council. Asoka is supposed to have built 84,000 Stupas &
Viharas. Prior to Pataliputra 3rd Buddhist council two other Buddhist
councils were held at Rajagriha and Vaishali. Soon after the Buddha’s
death at the 1st Buddhist Council in Rajagriha Upali, one of the chief
disciples, recited the Vinaya Pitaka or rules of the order. A second general
council is said to have been held at Vaisahali, one hundred years after
Buddha’s death. Numerous such differences appeared at the 3rd great
council, held at Pataliputra under the patronage of Asoka, which resulted in
the expulsion of many heretics and the establishments of the Sathviravada
School as orthodox. At this council it is said that the last section was added
to the Pali scriptures, the Kathavatthu of the Abhidhamma Pitaka, dealing
with psychology and metaphysics. Asoka classified all the religions of his
empire under five heads: The (Buddhist) Sangha, the Brahmanas, the
Ajivikas, the Nirganthas (or Jainas), and other sects. He further declared
65
that, while gave his chief patronage to the Buddhists, he honoured and
respected them all, and called on his subjects to do likewise.
The Spread of Buddhism in Asia, 400 B.C.E. – 600 C.E.
The Mahavamsa mentions a number of Buddhist missions dispatched by
Asoka at the conclusion of the 3rd council – Himalayan region, Yona (in the
North-West), Western Malwa, Varanasi, Maharrattha (Western Deccan),
Suvarnabhumi (perhaps Myanmar or South East Asia), Sri Lanka. Other
records and cannons confirm that missions were sent to Greece, Babylon,
Syria, Egypt, Arab, Afghanistan, Indonesia and coastal China. Third
66
Buddhist council strengthened Asoka’s international relations and most
favoured nation status with Sri Lanka. Since Sri Lanka turned a Buddhist
nation. That justifies Asoka’s Dhammavijaya over Sri Lanka. Secondly, the
removal and reduction of orthodox school influence on Buddhism provided
Asoka an upper hand in the religious sect and community. Asoka’s
intentions of virtue induction for the common masses in Buddhism were
fulfilled. Asoka received a change in the image of the emperor from the war
veteran status to knowledge veteran. Wide spread social acceptance of his
Dhamma was possible by the preaching of a knowledge master. Third
Buddhist council conveyed and established Asoka as a knowledge master
internationally and also with his subjects. At the same time the feel good
factor enhanced within his army, which may have brought a revolution to
dethrone the Maurya dynasty during his life time. This council endorsed his
preaching of virtue in to the Mauryan administration. The retaliation by
Kalinga in the near future was avoided. To keep Kalinga in good will he
appointed a governor and a Dhamma monitor in Tosali of Kalinga. Sri
Lanka was in a special status of most favoured nation of Asoka with utmost
care, financial grants and developmental activities to pacify the anguish
and anger of Kalinga, in which he succeeded for some time but Kalinga
retaliated under the ruling of Kharavela.
Dhamma – The Inclusion and Management of LifeExcellence
Most of Asoka’s inscriptions are about Dhamma (the Prakrit form of
Dhamma). Pillar edict VI reveals that the practice of having inscriptions on
Dhamma (Dhamma Lipi) inscribed in various parts of the empire began 12
(expired years) after his coronation. The theme of Ahimsa (non-injury) is an
67
important aspect of Asoka’s Dhamma and his frequently mentioned and
emphasized in his rock edicts. It bans animal sacrifices and killing of
animals. The good conduct and social responsibilities that were part of
Dhamma were anchored to certain key relationships. The ceremony of
Dhamma is described as consisting in proper courtesy to slaves and
servants, respectful behaviour to towards elders, restraint in one’s dealings
with all living beings, and liberally to Sharmanas and Brahmanas. Even
Asoka declares the gift of Dhamma is best of all gifts. Pillar edict –II
describes Dhamma as consisting of the least amount of sin, performing
many virtuous deeds, compassion, liberality, truthfulness and purity. The
Asokan edict presents the king as exemplifying Dhamma in his ideas and
actions. As the patriarch of his empire, Asoka projected himself as the
proclaimer and teacher of Dhamma par excellence. One of the most
remarkable innovative aspects of Asoka’s idea of his own Dhamma and
Dhamma of a king was his renunciation of warfare and his re-definition of
righteous conquests, the Dhamma – Vijaya of Arthasastra. Asoka seems to
have taken the Buddhist idea of Dharma – Vijaya one step further, with
Dhamma missionaries replacing the king and his army. Dhamma- Vijay is
described as the best kind of conquest, and the king claims to have
achieved it over the Yavans, Kambojas, Nabhakas, Nabhapankits, Bhojas,
Pitinikas, Andhras, Cholas and Pandyas. Outside the subcontinent, he
claims to have attained Dhamma – Vijaya in the dominions of Antiochus II,
Ptolemy II, Philadelphus of Egypt, Megas of Cyrene (in North-Africa),
Antigonus Gonatas of Macedonia, and Alexander of Epirus or Corinth. The
XIII major rock edict ends with Asoka expressing the hope that his
successors would not embark on any fresh conquest by arms, and if they
could not avoid it, they should at least not be harsh to conquered people.
68
Asoka created a special cadre of Dhamma-Mahamattas 13 years of his
coronationto spread Dhamma within the kingdom and among the border
people. Dhamma was an ideological tool used by Asoka to weld and
consolidate his far-flung empire that focused on the relationship between
the individual and society; however it failed as a unifying strategy in the
rulership of future emperors. Dhamma was one step further to Buddhism
and was borrowing the principles of virtue from Hinduism. Dhamma had a
holistic and welfare approach to empire management as was conceived,
designed and strategized by Chanakya. Asoka attempted and to a great
extent delivered his Dhamma principles.
As observed through management analytical techniques, Asoka’s
achievements were far superior and much ahead of time and period.
Highest quality governance mechanism was adopted by Asoka and
excellent governance was delivered to the empire. Life Excellence
Management may not be utopian but ultimately demands an environment
an environment at global level, simply which was missing in his period.
Asoka devised the principles of Dhamma without empirical strategies to
control the malfunctioning. Achieving life excellence management under
dynastic monarchical order is impossible for a long run. Chanakya always
followed counter strategies and alternative strategies with legal
enforcements for large corporate governance, which Asoka missed out.
Asoka delivered life excellence management for duration of two decades
under his governorship of the empire. If Dhamma would have been
followed for more than two hundred years in India, arguably it can be said
that sufficient to eliminate any religion of that time. Dhamma application in
its totality is beyond “Benevolence Corporate Governance”, perhaps,
69
Dhamma was applied more in Sri Lnaka than in India as history recognized
King Mahinda’s governance mechanisms and practices. Comparatively
none of the Great rulers of the world history had ever attempted such a
noble practice its true sense. The second Great ruler of India, Akbar the
Great attempted a similar tact to unify the empire and to gain confidence of
the subjects. Asoka in fact a true secular ruler and practiced the life
excellence to the height of virtues.
71
7Asokan Management Theorization
Achievements of three decades of Asoka can be theorized in to different
management concepts and systems. Contributions of his period are
superior management theories of attainment that needs revival
management research for the strong hold of the Indian Management
System (I.M.S.). As Indian management begins from the Pre-Vedic period
till the end of 11th century A.D., Mauryan period has championed many
theories system. Asoka had taken up many management theories to the
height of its order. Eventually Asoka was the only personality who
experienced most of the doctrines of Chanakya. In the period of before
Christ the technology, environment, scientific developments etc., were
nothing more than the primitive methods. It sounds very difficult to compare
the modern management of 20th & 21st century with Mauryan period of
Asoka. In comparative methods when the applications of dynamism are
compared it astonishes that with limited resources and technology the
Mauryan army had achieved Zero-Defect and Zero-Failure Supply Chain
Management. International trade with more than 18 countries through sea
route on wooden ships were frequent, more than 6000 K.M. long national
highway was maintained, metallurgy and steel making were achieved –
2250 years old Asokan metal pillars are available rust free for our
references, unbelievable scientific progression are available in the Mauryan
texts, quality engineering and quality management were industrial
72
production norms, disaster management preparedness and adequate
financial planning and reserves of Mauryan period were even more
advanced than many of the developed countries of the world today. HRM
and Corporate Governance mechanism had excelled many steps ahead of
the contemporary world in delivering corporate good governance,
Corporate Excellent Governance & Corporate Benevolent Governance,
what the present world has failed to deliver. In a broad spectrum of
management theorization of Asokan phase seven headlines are provided
here with brief divisions of achievements and comparison with modern
management of today’s world. These are; (1) Military Management, (2)
Public Administration & Corporate Governance, (3) Welfare System
Management, (4) Agriculture, Industry & Trade Management System, (5)
Efficient Financial Control & Treasury Management, (6) Human Resource
Management & Development, (7) Corporate Governance Model etc.
(I) Military Management
(a) Zero – Failure Supply Chain Management of the army
(b) Zero – Defect army Supply Chain Management at war
(c) Cross Docking Supply Chain Management at war
(d) Contingency and Extra Ordinary requirements meeting supply chainmanagement
(e) Alternative strategies and alternative positioning system
(f) Over flow and Super flow strategic arrangements for winning positioningsystem
(g) Internetworking & Intranetworking of army supply chain management
73
(h) Knowledge Management & Intellectual Capital Management of armyand war time decision making
(II) Public Administration & Corporate Governance
(a) Public – Private – Partnership in Agriculture, Industry, Trade &Commerce
(b) Guilds and Banking System for trade and commerce finance
(c) International trade to more than 18 countries
(d) State trade and Industry support – Infrastructure support management, insurance coverage, commercial hub & ware-housing, roadways andwaterways safeguarding & surveillance system
(e) Trade facilities taxes for security, price control, weights & measurescontrol, fraudulence and adulteration control, diplomatic envoys for healthyinternational trade facilities
(III) Welfare System Management
(a) Provision of CSR – Corporate Social Responsibility – health care, education, old age care, social care
(b) Corruption control and anti corruption vigilance mechanism
(c) Natural disaster mitigation and preparedness
(d) Natural calamities handling, shifting and demand management
(e) Social courts, social justice & social policing
(IV) Agriculture, Industry & Trade Management System
(a) Surplus agrarian production of 3 to 4 times more per year
(b) Contingency agricultural products reserves
(c) Domestic and international trade for Demand – Supply control
(d) Fair pricing for adequate profitability
74
(e) Cash cropping for national cooperative industry – international anddomestic trade for market control
(f) Agro-base industry for domestic and foreign markets
(g) Life saving products for domestic markets
(h) Mine base production and metallurgy for public life use equipment, military equipment and war-gears, luxury goods for domestic andinternational markets
(i) Quality management of consumer goods, consumer durables &industrial goods
(j) Technology management for industrial equipment, military equipment, transport equipment, consumer equipment, infrastructure equipment, etc.
(k) Transportation and infrastructure system maintenance, management and upgradation of roadways and waterways
(V) Efficient Financial Control and Treasury Management
(a) Scientific budgeting with provisions of reserves for disaster, famine, warrecoveries
(b) Currency circulation and defined salary systems for all services
(c) Cross coordination between departments of administration andregulations
(d) Adequate documentation for decision making, sourcing and referencing
(e) Uniform and defined tax structure
(VI) Human Resource Management & Development
(a) Public census and citizen identification for national policy making
(b) Awards, rewards and promotion system in work
(c) Defined wage and salary system with limited minimum wage system
75
(d) Prompt and efficient civil, criminal and social court justice deliverysystem
(e) Human capital retention and intellectual capital management system
(f) Public institutions & universities of education & specialized skills training
(VII) Corporate Governance Model
(a) Working Governance
(b) Corporate Good Governance
(c) Corporate Excellent Governance
(d) Corporate Benevolent Governance
(e) Management of Life Excellence
In the late 20th century and 21st century, in the world of management,
Japanese theories and concepts are dominating the world of industry.
Japanese management concepts are admired as the best applications in
production, quality engineering and management, quality control, cost
minimization, value for money, continuous improvement, etc., by the world.
These concepts are revival of oriental management practices of Samurai
cult with new coins of modern management. Indian Management System
(I.M.S.) has started gaining little attention in the 21st century for a revival of
modern management applications. Mauryan phase especially Asokan
period had achieved excellence in application. Mauryan period has a lot in
its store house to offer dynamism to Modern Management in practice and
application. Asoka the great as had applied the theories and doctrines of
the Maurya period scholars and schools in his governance and
management mechanism of the empire. Empire was managed as a
76
corporation to achieve the excellence in management and at some points
had exceeded the limits. Indian philosophies in the forms and features of
religions and cults were dominating the social order and the social
practices. Asoka used the religious philosophies and ethics in the empire
administration through the officials in charge of Dhamma application, which
are evident in his rock edicts. As a ruler he is the first emperor who had
gone beyond human consideration of declaring all his subjects as his
children. Asoka had taken care of the best of the human values by
eliminating the sacrifice of the animals in the social practice for the
betterment of the ethical practices and high order social system in the later
part of governance. As an emperor he was not defeated in any front of the
war – war of aggression or the war of the social values and ethics. Kalinga
war was a land mark event in his empire administration and soon after it he
acclaimed as a benevolent ruler in order and practice. In the leadership
standards and values he acted as the Demi-God and delivered the finest
social peace and tranquility in the subcontinent. His involvement in the Sri
Lanka as a reformer of social order and system are astonishing factors of
change process. In compensating the Kalinga war victims Asoka set the
order to have the public title of Dharnasoka. His action processes in
safeguarding the interests of the resettled Kalinga war affected families in
Sri Lanka as a welfare measure of any administration is of the highest
order and the best output if examined from the effective management
evaluation scales of the modern management. Welfare measures of the
subjects of the empire in the reign of Asoka if compared with the modern
management practices of any large corporation will find little significance. In
the philosophy and possible achievement practices of employee welfare
measures Asoka had exceeded the any limit, that none of the corporations
77
of the modern world can achieve. This kind of public welfare perhaps
caused the Maurya Empire to decline after the Asokan reign. As a matter of
learning, Chanakya had set many limitations for the empire management of
the Mauryan period with the last notes of not going beyond. Emperors like
Chandragupta and Bindusara never crossed the limits to maintain the
perfect order of management in the empire. Asoka with achievements
experimented the beyond philosophies for delivering the last best order of
any emperor. Maurya Empire period in India is considered as the phase
that set the best management order for the subcontinent. Before Maurya
period the Vedic and Pre-Vedic periods were of high significance in
delivering the best practices of life and social management system with
confinements and limitations. The management of the large nation, public
of different cultures, class, clan, creed and social beliefs and the
management of the empire with the available best system of governance
and representation was first devised in the Maurya period and practiced.
The Maurya period was a phase where the scholars and schools of
management were available for evaluation, examination and
recommendation of the best management practices for the empire
administration as corporation with nation participation directly and
indirectly. The King of the Maurya period was a C.E.O. as per the
Chanakya’s definition and action. The empire was a large corporation.
Asoka had the credit of ruling the world’s second biggest empire in land
mass size and the biggest empire in the demography. Asoka maintained
the conquests in two methods – wars and aggressions and peace through
religious practices. Dharmavijaya of Asoka is well recognized by his actions
in the aftermath of the Kalinga war. He conquered the world – the
78
subcontinent through force and peace. That’s an unique achievement by
any great ruler of the world.
After Asoka the Indian subcontinent during the periods of the eminent
dynasties and governance followed his mechanism to deliver the best
systems in managing the empires. Kusan period of Kaniska, Gupta period
of Chandragupta II or Vikramaditya, period of Harshavardhan, Kharavela
period of Kalinga, many periods of the Chalukyas, Cholas, Pandyas,
Satvahanas, were highly indebted to the management practices of Asoka
the great. The Mughal period of the India in the medieval time under the
emperorship of Akbar the great followed many of the basic principles of
Asoka’s management and governorship for the Mughal Empire. Akbar also
followed the Asokan method in public welfare, secularism, religious policy,
taxation structure, judiciary management etc. to make the Mughal Empire a
great phase in the history of India. Mughal phase had acquired a big
landmass of for the empire as big as Asoka with high enmity with the
neighbouring kingdoms. Asoka during his time had great friendship with
neighbouring kingdoms and also with Sri Lanka. In the international
relations front Asoka was a champion in maintaining the finest trade and
political relations with the neighbouring and far off countries. Rather
Mauryan Empire was dominating the international trade for with products of
industrial application, mine products, metallurgy, textiles, books and
learning stationary, agricultural outputs, forest products, animals’ trade etc.
Mauryan navy was the custodian of the safe sea route for the traders and
pilgrims of Buddhism. Asoka’s international diplomatic relations with China,
Sri Lanka, Greek territories, Egypt, Africa were one of the finest to augment
79
the international trade of the empire. Maurya period was with one of the
highest per-capita income during the Asokan reign.
VIII. Revolutionary Change Management
One of the finest and dynamic concept practices of Asoka was his
Revolutionary Change Management. He successfully used the doctrine of
Chanakya and managed meritoriously for the resettlement of the Kalinga
war affected victims’ families in Sri Lanka after addressing many social
resistances. This movement of Asoka was to eliminate a possible armed
revolution by the royal army against the emperor due to his conquests and
aggression policies of annexing the independent kingdoms or the republics
who were potential threats to Magadh politically or economically. Kalinga
the province, by its community and trade excellence was dominating the
international trade of India with the Far East and Asia Pacific region of
greater Asia in the time of Chandragupta and Bindusara. Kalinga being an
independent republic state with democratic patterns of operation was able
to dominate the maritime trade routes in the Bay of Bengal, which was
called as the Kalinga Sea those days. Industrial production, large
shipbuilding industries, large numbers of sea and river ports, shipping hub
in the Lake Chilika, professional seafarers villages for voyages of trade,
strong army of the ruling class to safeguard the merchants wealth and
properties were contributing factors of high per-capita income of the
general masses of Kalinga. On the main land trade and hinterland trade
system Kalinga was able to dominate the transactions heavily and had the
economic power to decide the buying price and trade prices, which affected
the interests of the merchants of Magadh. In the matters of bulk buying and
bargain buying Kalinga was eating out the margins of the Mauryan Empire
80
trade activities. The economic super power position of Kalinga in the Indian
subcontinent was against the greater interests of Mauryan Empire. Kalinga
was able to maintain a very large army considering its size and was
capable of sabotaging Mauryan supremacy both politically and
diplomatically. Magadh had a tough time with the rising activities of
Kalinaga in the business. Mauryan Empire was depending on the trade
economy for the enrichment of the kingdom treasury and local public. In
many fronts Asoka was unable to sidetrack the dominations and influences
of Kalinga through diplomacy. Kalinga at the same time had supported
many rebellion forces of the Magadh Empire. Some of the scholars
estimate that Kalinga was enjoying the per-capita income to an extent of
four times more than the Magadh during the period of Asoka. With the
power of trade and distribution, investment and overseas operations the
branding of rich and luxury was coming from Kalinga. Land masses like
China, Indonesia, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Siam etc. in Asia and the other parts
of North Africa and East Europe were having huge markets of Kalinga
brands in luxury and expensive life style products. Magadh had mastered
the mining, metallurgy, fine crafts and fine textile products but trading
channels were through the hands of the merchants of Kalinga. Business
monopoly of Kalinga in international and national market was the major key
factors of the Kalinga war. Chankay had strategically measure the
potentiality of Kalinga, that’s why never initiated any war against it. Asoka
had a different vision and decided to wage a war against Kalinga for the
political and economic benefit of the Maurya Empire. Winning the territory
of Kalinga was most expensive for Asoka. Kalinga war created an untold
revolution in the Asokan army that forced Asoka to be a democratic ruler
and to go beyond in delivering the public welfare. Welfare measures at that
81
time were almost impossible for Asoka; with the application of high caliber
intelligence and Chanakyan doctrine he de-routed the possible revolution
and diverted the mass attention to a greater social change i.e. widows’
remarriage and resettlement. With noble initiatives and attainment of the
noble cause Asoka was able to divert the mass attention from the core to
the decided center by the emperor. To change a revolution another
revolution is the method. A greater revolutionary idea and action can only
change the course of a revolution. Revolutionary change dominates the
revolution. Managing a revolutionary change has more with the skills and
knowledge rather with the operation and power. Asoka used the wisdom
and portrayed himself as a common man for the causes of the common
men and acted immediately for the change course and process. His man
management skills were used in the application of Chanakya’s doctrine of
revolutionary change management to control the aftermath situations of the
Kalinga war. Such a dynamic management technique and mechanism was
never used in any period of the history by any ruler or emperor.
Revolutionary change management is seen nowhere in any corporation.
Revolutionary change management is more of technological changes in the
modern management rather than in the human management. Such a
strategy may never be used in any corporate management in future. This
clearly signifies the great Indian management system of Asoka.
83
Further Readings & References:
Barua, B.M., (1946) 1955, 2nd Edition, Asoka and his times, New AgePublications, Calcutta. Chakravarti, D.K., (1995), The archeology of ancient Indian cities,Oxford university press, New Delhi. Hultzsch, E., (1925) 1969, Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum, Vol.1., Inscription of Asoka, Rep. Edn., Indological Book House, New DelhiHuntington, S., (1985), The Art of Ancient India, Buddhist, Hindu, Jain, Yokyo Weather Hill, New YorkJayaswal, V., (1998), From stone quarry to sculpting workshop: Areport on archeological investigations around Chunar, Varanasi andSarnath, Agam Kala Prakasan, New DelhiRay. N., (1975), Maurya and post Maurya art: A study on social andformal contacts, Indian council of Historical research, New DelhiSingh, U., (1998), Texts on Stone : Understanding Asoka’s epigraph– monuments and their contexts, Indian Historical Review, New DelhiChandra, M., (1977), Trade and trade routes in ancient India, AbhinavPublications, New DelhiGethin, R., (1998), The foundations of Buddhism, Oxford universitypress, New YorkWarmigton, E.H., (9128), Commerce between the Roman Empire andIndia, Cambridge University Press, U.K. Wheeler, R.E.M., (1951), Rome beyond imperial frontiers, Pellican, London. Rhys Davids, T.W., (1923), Buddhism, its history and literature, LondonMajumdar, R.C., (1918), Corporate life in Ancient India, CalcuttaNath, P., (1929), a study in Economic Conditions of Ancient India, LondonAdhya, G.L., (1965), Economics of ancient India (C.200 B.C. – A.D. 300), BombayRawlinson, H.G., (1916), Intercourse between India and the Westernworld, Cambridge university press, U.K.
84
Mookerji, R.K., (1912), History of Indian Shipping, LondonRenou, L., (1953), Religions of Ancient India, LondonDas Gupta, S. N., (1923 – 49), History of Indian Philosophy, 4 Vols., Cambridge University Press, U.K. Chattopadhaya, D.P., (1959), Lokayata: A study in ancient Indianmaterialism, New DelhiJairazbhoy, R.A., (1963), Foreign influence in ancient India, BombaySuzuki, D.T., (1932), (trn.), The Lankavaratara Sutras, LondonSir Leigh Ashton and others, (1950), The art of India and Pakistan, LondonAchrya, p.K., (1921), Indian Architecture according to Manasara, oxford university press, U.K. Adikaram, E.W., (1953), Early History of Buddhism in Ceylon, Colombo. Beal, Samuel, (1985), Buddhist Records of Western World, Boston. Bhasam, A. L., “Prince Vijaya and Aryanisation of Ceylon”, CeylonHistorical Journal, Vol.1, 1951, University of Ceylon. Cowell & Neil, eds., (1986), Divyavadana, Cambridge Universitypress, pp. 370-409. Dipavamsa XIII, 5ff. Eggermont, P.H.L., (1956), The Chronology of the Asoka Moriya, Leiden. Eggermont, P.H.L., (1966), New Notes on Asoka and HisSuccessors, Persica, Leiden. Epigraphia Zeylanica, London, (1921 – 1927). Faruwallner, E., (1956), The earliest Vinaya and the Beginning of Buddhist Literature, Rome. Geigre, Wilhelm, trans., (1960), Mahavamsa (Mhv.). Colombo. Jayawickrema, N.A., trans. & ed., (1986), The Inception of Disciplineand the Vinaya Nidana, London, PP. 40-43. Karunaratna, T.B., (1988), The Symbols of Royal Authority of EarlySinhalese Kings, JRAS (CB), Colombo. Kiribamuna, S., “The Kalinga Period of Ceylon History”, (M.A. Thesis;University of Ceylon, 1956).
85
Kosam, Sanchi & Sarnath. Lokuliyana, Lionel., ed. (1970), Sinhala Bodhivamsaya, Colombo. Malalasekera, G.P., (1935), eds., Vamsatthapakasini (Vmp.), London. Mishra, P.K., (1997), Ed., Comprehensive History and Culture of Orissa, (Vol. 1), New Delhi. Mookerjee, R., (1962), Asoka, Delhi. Nicholas, C.W., (1961), A Concise History of Ceylon, Colombo. Nigalisagar Inscription. Norman, K.R., Pillar edict (P.E.) IV, Asoka and Capital Punishment, Journal of Royal Asiatic Society, No. 1. Oldenberg, Hermann, ed. Dipavamsa, (Dpv.), VI; Mhv. V, 37-72. Panigrahi, K.C., (1981), History of Orissa Hindu Period, Cuttack. Paranavitana, S., “The Kalinga Dynasty of Ceylon”, Journal of theGreater Indian Society, Vol. III, 1956. Pillar Edict VII. Rahula, W., (1956), History of Buddhism in Ceylone: TheAnuradhapura Period, Colombo. Rock Edict I. Rock Edict II. Rock Edict III. Rock Edict IX. Rock Edict No. XIII Rock Edict V. Rock Edict V. Rock Edict VI. Rock Edict VII. Rock Edict VIII. Rummindei Inscription. Saddhatissa, H., (1970), Buddhist Ethics, London. Sarkisyanz, E., (1965), Buddhist Background of Burmese Revolution, The Hague. Sastri, K.A.N., (1957), A Comprehensive History of India, (Vol. II), Calcutta.
86
Sauraweera, A.V., (1967), ed., Rajavaliya, Colombo. Sirisena, W.M., “The Kalinga Dynasty of Ceylon and the theory of itsSouth East Asia Origin”, Ceylon Journal of Historical and SocialStudies, Vol. 1, No.1, 1971Strong, John, (1983), Legend of King Asoka, Princeton UniversityPress, USA. Thapar, R., (1961), Asoka and the decline of the Mauryas, OxfordUniversity Press, New Delhi. Thapar, R., (1984), From Lineage to state, Oxford University Press,New Delhi. Thera, Welivitiye Sorata, (1960), Amavatura, Colombo.
Buy your books fast and straightforward online - at one of world’s
fastest growing online book stores! Environmentally sound due to
Print-on-Demand technologies.
Buy your books online at
www.get-morebooks.com
Kaufen Sie Ihre Bücher schnell und unkompliziert online – auf einer
der am schnellsten wachsenden Buchhandelsplattformen weltweit!
Dank Print-On-Demand umwelt- und ressourcenschonend produzi-
ert.
Bücher schneller online kaufen
www.morebooks.deVDM Verlagsservicegesellschaft mbH
Heinrich-Böcking-Str. 6-8 Telefon: +49 681 3720 174 [email protected] - 66121 Saarbrücken Telefax: +49 681 3720 1749 www.vdm-vsg.de