Upload
arlington-public-library
View
1.423
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
As Arlington’s Center for Learning, the Central Library offers a Unique Facility where Learning for All Ages, Family Enrichment, and Civic Interaction Come Alive!
Citation preview
11
Arlington Central LibraryRecommended Plan of Service
and Facility Options for Consideration
Arlington City CouncilAfternoon Work Session
December 6, 2011
22
Review of the Process
Visioning Process Jan. – Dec. 2010
Physical assessment of existing Jan. – Apr. 2010building
Development of Plan of Service May 2010 – Feb.
2011
Facility Cost Estimates Mar. - Sept. 2011
Facility Options Review Oct. – Dec. 2011
Finalized Consultant’s Plan Jan. 2012
33
Planning for the future of the Central Library meets City Council
Priorities:Vibrant Downtown
Provide Quality Cultural, Recreational and Learning Opportunities
Grow & Diversify the Economy Utilizing Redevelopment Efforts
Create and Coordinate Effective Regional and Community Partnerships
Coordinate Programs to Support Youth, Seniors and Families
44
As Arlington’s Center for Learning, the Central Library
offers a Unique Facility where Learning for All Ages,
Family Enrichment, and Civic Interaction Come Alive!
Central Library Vision
55
Review of Central Library Usage:
66
Central Library Usage FY 2011
Patron Visits: 373,010
Circulation of Material: 569,467
Program Attendance: 23,117
Meetings Booked: 1,538
Computer Sessions: 120,552
Registered Cardholders: 37,453
7
Who Uses The Central Library (By Zip Code)
Zip Code Visits* %Computer Sessions* %
76001 1,181 2% 2,405 1%76002 886 2% 2,140 1%76006 2,945 5% 11,853 6%76010 8,439 15% 45,603 22%76011 7,561 14% 47,654 23%76012 9,745 18% 23,901 12%76013 6,551 12% 14,864 7%76014 3,828 7% 12,966 6%76015 2,595 5% 6,357 3%76016 1,650 3% 2,337 1%76017 1,818 3% 5,177 3%76018 1,344 2% 4,557 2%Other 76--- 3,004 5% 12,668 6%Other 75--- 3,297 6% 9,356 5%Other 40 0% 1,494 1%
54,884 100% 203,332 100%
* Data collected between 4/1/2011 and 8/30/2011 ** Data collected between 5/1/2009 and 8/1/2011
8
Who Uses The Central Library (Patron Visits By Area)
South of I-20 (76017, 76018, 76001, 7600210%
North Arlington (76006, 76011,
76012)37%
Central Arlington (76010, 76013)
27%
South-Central Ar-lington (76014, 76015, 76016)
15%
Other 11%
Survey Respondents: Use of Central Library, May, 2010
9
Who Uses The Central Library (Computer Sessions By Area)
South of I-20 (76017, 76018, 76001, 76002
7%
North Ar-lington (76006, 76011, 76012)
41%
Central Ar-lington (76010, 76013)
30%
South-Cen-tral Arling-ton (76014,
76015, 76016)
11% Other 12%
Survey Respondents: Use of Central Library, May, 2010
1010
Review of Facility Assessment & Options:
1111
Facility Assessment Methodology
Visual observations by the consultant team
Review of previous studies
Review of available drawings (both original and renovation sets)
Building elements were graded (excellent, good, average,
deficient or very deficient)
1212
Critical Findings
Roof
Elevator
Plumbing
ACMs (asbestos-containing materials)
1313
Size of Facility Needed to Support Plan of Service
Estimated size 85,000* to 100,000 BGSF
Current Facility (63,575) BGSF
Additional SF Required 21,000* to 36,000 BGSF
*Smaller size based on locating selected support services off-site in leased office/warehouse space
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2323
Review Public Input Regarding Facility Options:
2424
Facility Options Survey
Celebrate the Central Library event kicked off the public input process on November 5
Survey offered online and on paper from November 5 through November 23
Over 30,000 library cardholders received an initial email and additional reminder emails to complete the survey
Notice of the survey was sent to the City’s Neighborhood Network
Almost 1300 responses were collected
2525
Survey Questions
Indicate either Very Desirable, Acceptable, Neutral, or Not Acceptable to the three optionsIf Option 3 was either Very Desirable or Acceptable, indicate which part of Arlington you would like to see a new building constructedOther comments regarding Central Library services/facilitiesZip code
26
Completed Survey Responses by Zip Code
Survey Respondents: Facility Options Survey, Nov. 2011
North 26%
Central 23%
South Central18%
South 27%
Other6%
Completed Survey Responses
North (76006, 76011, 76012)
Central (76010, 76013)
South Central (76014, 76015, 76016)
South (76017, 76018, 76001, 76002)
Other
27
Option 1 – Renovate & Expand
Survey Respondents: Facility Options Survey, Nov. 2011
VERY Desir-able46%
An Ac-ceptable Option
31%
Neutral/No Answer15%
NOT Acceptable8%
28
Option 2 – Same Site, New Building
Survey Respondents: Facility Options Survey, Nov. 2011
VERY Desirable22%
An Acceptable Option
30%
Neutral29%
NOT Acceptable18%
29
Option 3 – New Site, New Building
Survey Respondents: Facility Options Survey, Nov. 2011
VERY
De-sir-able15%
An Ac-ceptable Op-tion20%
Neutral28%
NOT Ac-ceptable37%
30
Very Desirable/Acceptable Responses By Option
Survey Respondents: Facility Options Survey, Nov. 2011
Option 1 Option 2 Option 30
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Very Desirable Acceptable
31
Very Desirable/Acceptable Responses by ZIP
Survey Respondents: Facility Options Survey, Nov. 2011
North (76006, 76011, 76012)
Central (76010, 76013)
South Central (76014, 76015,
76016)
South (76017, 76018, 76001,
76002)
Other0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
32
Location Preference for Option 3
Survey Respondents: Facility Options Survey, Nov. 2011
If you felt that Option 3 was an acceptable or desirable option, what would be an suitable location for the new facility? (check as many as are applicable)
Downtown Arlington (between Cooper, Collins, Division & Park Row)
Nearer to the "true" geographic Center of Arlington
North of I-30
South of I-20
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
391
205
35
106
3333
Next StepsIssues for Council Consideration:
Preferred options to move forward with
Ratio of private to public funding desired
Possible collaborative opportunities with private developers or other educational institutions
Providence/Perkins+Will Prepare:
Final Cost Estimates to Address Questions/Suggestions from Council and from Public Input Sessions conducted in November 2011
Recommendations for Public/Private Funding Plan
Final Plan of Services/Facility Plan – Estimated for January 2012