a process for assessing emergent

Web Mapping TechnologiesRobert E. Roth

reroth@wisc.edu

Richard G. Donohue rgdonohue@wisc.edu

Carl M. Sack cmsack@wisc.edu

Timothy R. Wallace twallace2@wisc.edu

Tanya M.A. Buckingham tbuckingham@wisc.edu

Interactive by Rashauna Mead

introduction

Geography 575Interactive Cartography & Geovisualization

http://www.geography.wisc.edu/courses/geog575/

introduction

UW-MadisonCartography Lab

production services& research support

http://www.geography.wisc.edu/cartography/

method: discount process

1.competitive analysis ofexisting technologies

3.diary study with representativeweb mapping scenario

2. needs assessment survey with dev team

1. competitive analysis

Note: Coding Completed Spring 2012

Note: Coding Completed Spring 2012

Note: Coding Completed Spring 2012

Note: Coding Completed Spring 2012

[ Coding Completed Spring 2012]

2. needs assessment survey

21 expert responses

2. needs assessment survey

please rate the importance of the followingcharacteristics of web maps:

3. diary study

d3 Google Maps API

Leaflet OpenLayers

3. diary study

d3 Google Maps API

Leaflet OpenLayers

3. diary study

REPRESENTATION

INTERACTION

24 requirements total

40 hours maximum

8 web maps (2 per tech)

3. diary study

tutorials/examples OpenLayers

3. diary study

maintenance/stability Leaflet

3. diary study

d3 Google Maps API

LeafletOpenLayers

OVERALL

REPRESENTATION INTERACTION

d3 Google Maps API

Leaflet OpenLayers

conclusion

http://github.com/reroth/

Leaflet + d3

project team

Rob Roth@RobertERoth

Tanya Buckingham@tanmabuck

Rich Donohue@rgdonohue

Carl Sack @northlandiguana

Tim Wallace@wallacetim

FACULTY/STAFF

GRADUATE ASSISTANTSCART LAB INTERNS

John Czaplewski@JJCzaplewski

Isaac Dorsch

Sam Matthews@vancematthews