14
A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies Plenary session: “Where are we going?” Karin Wahl-Jorgensen Cardiff University (@KarinWahlJ) MeCCSA 2014 Bournemouth University

A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Closing keynote delivered at the MeCCSA 2014 conference at Bournemouth University, January 10.

Citation preview

Page 1: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

Plenary session: “Where are we going?”Karin Wahl-Jorgensen

Cardiff University(@KarinWahlJ)MeCCSA 2014

Bournemouth University

Page 2: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

Introduction• Conference theme: “Media and

the margins”– Engagement of marginalised and

minority groups with the media• The margins of media practice:

Paying attention to the underdog• Journalism Studies: Focused on

elite media practices

Page 3: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

Cultural studies • Media, communication and cultural studies: Disciplinary ideological

commitment to the underdog• Emphasis on questions of power, hegemony and the politics of

signification– Class, gender– Popular culture– Lived experience

Page 4: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

The dominant paradigm and the political economy of academia

• Journalism studies: Tension between commitment to the margins and pressure to study privileged forms of practice

• The field of anthropology: “Studying down”• Journalism studies: “Studying up”

– Engaging in elite research (Conti and O’Neil 2007)

Page 5: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies
Page 6: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies
Page 7: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

Consequences: Emphasis on elite practices

• Newsroom-centricity: Focus on material space of media production

• Emphasis on the routines, cultures, and production processes of elite newsrooms: Ignoring less glamorous, marginalised but numerically dominant forms

• Universalising the experience of elite sites of practice

Page 8: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

Neglect of marginal practices outside the newsroom

• Westernised view of media practice.• Neglect of casualised and free-lance media work.

– E.g. 28% of journalists are now self-employed (Journalists at Work, NCTJ, 2012)

• Specialist work: E.g. arts, business, features• Focus on prestigious professional specialisations, e.g.

political journalists and foreign correspondents• BUT: Increasing work on alternative journalism

Page 9: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

Consequences: Neglect of local journalism

• Only 10% of journalists work in national newspapers; 5% in national TV (Journalists at Work, NCTJ, 2012).

• Work on regional and local media often focused on regional production sites of national news organisations (cf. Aldridge 2006)

• Small body of research on local media (e.g. Franklin 2006; Williams et al. 2013)– Hyperlocal blogs

Page 10: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

Emphasis on technological change and innovation

• Turn to questions of technological change and innovation (Cushion and Blumler 2013)

• Journalism and Journalism Studies: Most read and cited articles deal with convergence, technological change, social media and blogs.

• Broader trend across the field: Excitement over potential of new technologies to empower producers and audiences– E.g. MeCCSA presentations: How marginalised groups use new

technologies• Utopian tales in the face of depressing material circumstances

where “Survival is Success” (e.g. Bruno and Kleis Nielsen 2012; Ryfe 2012)

Page 11: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

Neglect of failure• Less interest in failure and resistance to

change and innovation• Less interest in structural inequality/”digital

divide” among news organisations • Media studies: Focus on successful, “cult”

or “quality” media texts• Social movements: Focus on national and

transnational movements of high visibility (e.g. Occupy) as opposed to local/unsuccessful/marginal activisms

Page 12: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

Sexing up scholarship? The political economy of the academy

• Researchers more likely to gain institutional approval and prestige, grant money, publications and promotions from a study of elite and innovative organisations and practices.

• Methodological and epistemological necessity for studying marginalised practices: It “no longer seems plausible to presume a generalised view of ‘journalism’ as an undifferentiated culture or shared professional canon” (Cottle 2000: 24).

• Pedagogical intervention: Training future media professionals.

Page 13: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies

Where are we going: De-centring research

• Overcoming newsroom-centricity: “Blowing up the newsroom” (Anderson 2011)

• Looking at systemic failure/breakdown: E.g. sociology of failure (Clarke and Perrow 1996)– Critical work on systemic failure of news organisations (e.g. Glasgow

Media Group)– Body of work on ethnography of journalism: failure of technological

change (e.g. Domingo and Paterson 2011; Ryfe 2012)– Ryfe, Can journalism survive: “A story of failures that anticipates the

slow demise of the model of journalism as mass communication” (Domingo 2013)

Page 14: A manifesto of failure for media, communication and cultural studies