45
MOOC to Blended Pedagogies & Personalising Learning Inge (Ignatia) de Waard

2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

MOOC to Blended Pedagogies

& Personalising LearningInge (Ignatia) de Waard

Page 2: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

2

MOOC experiences differ: what’s yours?

Which platform?How much content did you cover?What did you like the most? What did you hate?

Page 3: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Natural learning …

=> Social component: social & individual learning=> Individual preferences: content, context and familiarity=> Motivation translates in EmotionsÞChallenges to reach a mental state of accomplishment

Learning is in our genes

Page 4: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

What is a MOOC?SPOC

• Massive: no limits for enrolment (Small)• Open: publicly accessible (Private) • Online: all the content and discussions shared online• Course: a stand-alone or part of training/curriculum,

certificates or not…

Page 6: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

MOOC as mandatory curriculum

Page 7: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Why do learners enrol?

More committed enrolment: personal or professional need Less committed enrolment: Leisure learners, unclear expectations, loosely interested (format or content)

Page 8: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Practical guidelines we use

Page 9: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Free versus paid

• Same learning preference• Different expectations ROE => paid must meet expectations• Quality Assured courses => different contexts, different needs

Page 10: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Golden rules

• Simple to complex• Start with a simple exercise to boost confidence• Create for complexity (= personalisable tasks) to ensure ROE

Page 11: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Feedback frequent & meaningful

• Learners choose what to learn: feedback must be efficient = where to find answers within or outside course• Feedback needs to be specific: add to knowledge gap

Page 12: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

LMS – Cohort Learning – Open Learning

• LMS: learning path => step by step content release• Cohort Learning => weekly content release• Open Learning: content free and accessible at all times.

Page 13: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Individual learning

• Most common type of learning. Reflection, critical selection of information, based on preferred actions. Quickest in terms of information absorption. • But limited to the learner’s views and actions to reach solutions.

Limited to their own experiences, capacities.

Page 14: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Social learning enriches

• Authentic experiences• Latest information from authentic environments• Multiple solutions depending on contexts• Additional reflections on the learners own experience & why they solved

something their way.

Page 15: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

iMinds approach: Increased specialized learning

MOOC & SPOC• Basic content

Blended• WS, context

specific

1 on 1• Specialised

Page 16: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Theoretical frames on which we build

Page 17: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Personalised learning

Page 18: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

MOOC learning = Informal, Personal Learning

Personal learning?• Learning goals• (Intrinsic) motivation

Page 19: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Learner retention?

Valued learner outcomesFunctional assessments, quizzes & tasksPersonalized content and tasksChallenging material, clear learning

goals

Page 20: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Keeping learners engaged?

Personal learning goals & needs are met :• Continuity throughout a course• Clear descriptions• Relevant feedback • Personalized tasks/assignments • Learning from fellow learners/peers/tutors

Page 21: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

21

Self-directed learning

Self-directed learning (SDL) e.g. in professional MOOCs Milligan, LittleJohn, 2014), self-esteem, motivation & ‘Big 5 traits’ paper , Furnham, Monsen, Ahmetaglu, 2010)• Give clear instructions and descriptions • High expectations (Meece, Anderman & Anderman, 2006): e.g. multiple tests, big

overview (cut off certificate: 85%)• Use social cognitive constructs

Page 22: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Social and individual learning

• Social learning increases understanding of content: multiple viewpoints, related contexts• Individual learning is reoccurring: starting point (prior knowledge),

mid-point (reflection), final conclusion (rational & interpretation)

Page 23: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Social learning & serendipity

21th century learning is social and collaborative, trust: existing knowledge resides in all adult learners: many experts strengthen each otherLet the learners come up with ideas that help them.

Page 24: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

24

MOOC & Blended learning skills

Digital & communicative skills, self-regulated / self-determined learning

Page 25: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Useful contemporary pedagogy

Page 26: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction

• Demonstrate new information

• Encourage learners to practice skills

• Connect to prior knowledge

• Integrate newly acquired knowledge in their context

Integration Activation

DemonstrationApplication

Problem to be addressed

Page 27: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Align learning objectives & assessment

Meaningful learning outcomes

Assignments & feedback

Content

Learning objectives

Page 28: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

28

Course design: evaluate knowledge

Page 29: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

29

Assessment & certification

• Certificate or not? • Self-assessment options: highest score, how many

times can they take a test?• Uploading documents/groupwork ?

Understanding new

information

Test scores: +85%

Taking part in discussions

Page 30: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Certification?

Credits are an option (based on face-to-face assignments, study hours…). Job options: Nano degrees. Higher Ed initiative: Global Freshman Academy. Or group various MOOCs: EdX XSeries Programs

Page 31: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Balancing Complexity and Capacity

Juggling: personal needs, preferences, assessments, goals…. Complex

Page 32: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Learning: different speeds according to learning needs & complexity

Known paradigms• Simply providing content through a MOOC does not work (just like eLearning: “we built it,

but no one comes”• Wikipedia is good for content only, learning demands active complexity increase

Page 33: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Old school:Bloom’s taxonomy

Course goal = mix & match of relevant tasks

Page 34: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Learner retention = providing growth

We learn because we like to solve problems = grow• The Flow: Mihaly Csikszentmihaly• Directed Motivational Currents: Zoltan Dornyei

Page 35: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

The Flow

Page 36: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Directed Motivational Currents

Page 37: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

MOOC distinctions in Learning

Page 38: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Key enablers/inhibitors for Learning:Motivation & learning goals

• Intrinsic motivation: content relevancy increases retention• If personal/professional learning goals are met, learner is willing to

move forward in the MOOC

Page 39: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Enabling personalised learning

• Increase ease of organising the learning experience• Provide transparent learning analytics (learner dashboard)• Design for personalised action (learner characteristics)

Page 41: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Learning analytics & MOOC

LAK conference and research (2016 info)Learning analytics necessities paper here

Page 42: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Learner characteristics

Self-esteem, confidence, socially or individually inclined, perseverance…

Page 43: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

Concluding: Knowledge sticks if…

• We acknowledge expertise• We provide links our own learning needs• It resonates with prior experiences (people & content)• It gives us a thrill to learn it (the Flow)• It challenges us (Directed Motivational Currents)

Page 44: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

The learner must get something out of it

• Every learning journey is personal• Everyone has a specific learning need (professional/personal)• Everyone has expectations before joining a course/class/workshop• You are the enabler => use generic assignments

Page 45: 2016 MOOC to Blended; pedagogies & personalised learning

45

Contact …E-mail: ingedewaard (at) gmail.com

Blog: ignatiawebs.blogspot.com

Twitter: http://twitter.com/Ignatia

Publications: http://www.ingedewaard.net/pubconsulpres.htm Presentations: http://www.slideshare.net/ignatia

linkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ingedewaard