13
The Military’s The Military’s Growing Role in Growing Role in Development Development Dr. Reuben E. Brigety, II Center for American Progress Presentation at The Stimpson Center June 30, 2008

Three D Security

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Three D Security

The Military’s The Military’s Growing Role in Growing Role in

DevelopmentDevelopment

Dr. Reuben E. Brigety, IICenter for American Progress

Presentation at The Stimpson Center

June 30, 2008

Page 2: Three D Security

Introduction

• January 2007-January 2008, CFR IAF at USAID working on civil-military issues

• June 2007 conducted three-country tour (Kenya, Djibouti and Ethiopia)

• Over 100 interviews• Three US Ambassadors• Senior and field-grade US military officers• USAID field staff• NGOs• Host nation officials• Aid beneficiaries

• Dozens of site visits• Well digging projects, refugee camps, school projects, housing for IDPs,

food distributions, agricultural and veterinary development, etc.

Page 3: Three D Security

Shidley

“We’ll keep drilling ‘til we run outta steel.”$250,000 vs. $10,000

Winning hearts and minds with an ear to the ground – The new American “Way of War”

Page 4: Three D Security

OVERLAY CLASSIFICATION MARKING HERE

OVERLAY CLASSIFICATIONMARKING HEREUNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIEDDATE UPDATED: 02 Apr 07 POC: CJ-5

TENSIONS

SUDAN

ETHIOPIA

YEMEN

SOMALIA

UGANDA KENYA

TANZANIA

DJIBOUTI

E2 Border conflict

AIAI and ONLF

Al Qaida (E. Africa), AIAI, and Al-Shabab

Eastern FrontAl Houthi

OLF

Darfur (SLA, G19,JEM and

Janjaweed)

SPLM/A and SSDF

Dispute (Somaliland/Puntland)

Religion Tribes / Clans

LRA

ADF

Karamajo Cluster

Page 5: Three D Security

Threat Analysis and Sustainable Security

• Failed and Fragile States• NSS 2002• USAID Failed and Fragile States Strategy• NMS

• Limited utility of conventional military force• Three-D Security Paradigm• Sustainable Security as alternative/addendum

• Development Assistance as instrument of national power

Page 6: Three D Security

The State Department operates U.S. Embassies and Consulates. Two main Embassy focus areas are formulating U.S. foreign policy and strengthening ties between the U.S. and the host country. - Governmental relations - Public diplomacy - Opening markets for trade

To be successful, the U.S. Government implements the combined power of three main foreign policy institutions.

CJTF-HOA’s MissionPrevent ConflictPromote Regional StabilityProtect Coalition Interests in order toPrevail Against Extremism

What Are The Three D’s?

USAID is the primary U.S. developmental agency. USAID supports long-term and equitable economic growth to include agriculture, trade, global health, democracy, conflict prevention and humanitarian assistance.

SuccessfulU.S. Foreign Policy

Development

Defense

CJTF-HOA is DOD’s member of the team. Two main concerns for DOD are security and stability. Security and stability reduce the specter of conflict, war and terrorism. - Civil military operations - Military training - Foreign military sales

CJTF-HOA’s Area of Operations

Comoros DjiboutiEthiopia EritreaKenya MadagascarSeychelles Somalia Sudan Tanzania Uganda Yemen

U.S. foreign policy seeks to expand democracy, open free markets and improve lives of people around the world. The Defense Department, State Department and Agency for International Development play key roles. Each organization has different missions but all are aligned in common purpose.

Diplomacy

Page 7: Three D Security

Military and Development:Definitions

• Military vs. Civilian conceptions of “humanitarian”• Civilian:

• Emergency, life-saving assistance immediately following a natural disaster or complex emergency

• Military• “Assistance to the local populace provided by predominately

U.S. forces in conjunction with military operations and exercises”

• Civilian “humanitarian” = Foreign Disaster Relief/Emergency Response

Page 8: Three D Security

Military and Development: Doctrine

• Sea-change in military approach to non-kinetic instruments and missions• DOD 3000.05• EUCOM “Active Security”• Navy Operating Concept

• “Organic” rather than “directed” change

Page 9: Three D Security

Isolate the Enemy

Increase Friendly Freedom

of Action / Reduce Enemy

Freedom of Action

DOD GWOTDOD GWOT CampaignCampaign ConceptConcept

FRIENDLY

FRIENDLY

Critical Capability

Indirect Approach

ENVIRONMENTINFLUENCING THE

ENVIRONMENT

Stabilize

Shape

Lines of Operation

Increase Friendly Freedom of Action /

Reduce Enemy Freedom of Action

Enable Partners to Combat VEOs

Deter Tacit and Active Support for VEOs

Erode Support for Extremist Ideologies

Disrupt Violent Extremist Orgs. (VEOs)

Deny access and use of WMD/E by VEOsIsolate the Threat

Strategic Aims

ENEMY

Defeat the Isolated Threat

Isolate the Threat

Prevent

Em

erge

nce

Re-

Constitution

Direct

Ap

pro

ach

Global CombatingTerrorism Network

Page 10: Three D Security

Military and Development: Organization, Operations, Funding

• ORGANIZATION: Changes in organization reflect change in doctrine and approach• In Washington:

• OSD/DGP• USAID/OMA• USAID/CMM• S/CRS

• Regional HQs: • AFRICOM• SOUTHCOM

• OPERATIONS: Shifts in military practice• PRTs (Afghanistan and Iraq)• Africa Partnership Station – Gulf of Guinea• Pacific Partnership 2008• CJTF-HOA

• FUNDING: Almost 22% of US ODA channeled through military• Approximately $67 million for OHDACA in FY07• Request total of $1 billion in CERP for FY 2008• USAID about $9.2 billion in programs in FY 2007• Real issue is flexibility, authority, and politics of both, with local military

commanders generally have more flexibility in dispersal of funds than USAID missions

Page 11: Three D Security

Analysis:Rationale for MHA

• Controversy of military involvement is mainly in Phase Zero “shaping” ops, not disaster assistance

• Relevant question regards comparative advantage• “Security perspective” is unique adv of military• “Humanitarian paradox” is a problem

• Controversy of military involvement is mainly in Phase Zero “shaping” ops, not disaster assistance

• Leads to “second order” problem• How to move beyond causally linking resources to

human improvement, and link human improvement to strategic success

Page 12: Three D Security

Implications• National Development Consensus

• Must be grassroots and broad bi-partisan agreement in Congress on the role of development in national security

• National Development Strategy• Overarching framework necessary for linking development activities to other

instruments of national power• Process is as important as the product

• Instrumental vs. Fundamental Assistance:• Threat analysis suggests strategic value of development assistance as means

(instrumental) and ends (fundamental)• US budgets and bureaucracies must protect and coordinate both missions

• Appropriate congressional oversight• Grand bargain on legislative restrictions

• Disperse development experts in NSC, OSD, and AUS/USMC deployable combat brigades

• Assessment is vital• Establishing causal link between development assistance and strategic

objectives/outcomes is the most important aspect of this activity, and also the most difficult

• Task should be partnership of DOD, State, USAID, and academia• Results must be transparent

Page 13: Three D Security

QuestionsQuestions