Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Business Intelligence Solutions
Daniel Lynch, BI Solutions Manager, Business Intelligence, Americas
2016 | SWIFT | Business Intelligence | Portfolio
Business Intelligence: Regional Insights
LARC 2016
Disclaimer: The BI report is confidential to the LARC attendees. The
LARC attendees may share the report with its own staff on a need-to-
know basis. The LARC attendees may not share the report externally
without SWIFT’s prior consent.
SWIFT Usage
LARC 2016
LARC 2016
World Regional FIN Traffic
Live total traffic in 2015
82%
73%
62%
53%
45%
39%
45%
15%
19%
35%
37%
50%
59%
47%
2%
4%
1%
3%
2%
5%
2%
7%
4%
2%
8%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Central & Latin America
Middle East
Africa
Asia-Pacific
North America
Europe - Euro Zone
Europe - Non Euro Zone
Payments
Securities
Trade Finance
Treasury
Europe - Non Euro
Zone 31%
Europe - Euro Zone
29%
North America
22%
Asia-Pacific 13%
Africa 3%
Middle East 1%
Central & Latin
America 1%
FIN traffic by regions
Source: SWIFT Watch Analytics
LARC 2016
Top Countries with Highest FIN Traffic in Central & Latin America
Live traffic in 2015
Ranking Country Total Traffic in 2015 Weight in Central
& Latin America Growth (2015 vs
2014)
1 Mexico 33,417,070 23.6% 18.3%
2 Brazil 26,981,377 19.1% -2.4%
3 Chile 22,611,708 16.0% 6.5%
4 Venezuela 5,712,896 4.0% 44.0%
5 Dominican Rep. 5,529,109 3.9% 48.5%
Others 47,236,303 33.4% -7.0%
Total Central & Latin
Americas 141,488,463 4.3%
Source: SWIFT Watch Analytics
LARC 2016
Top Countries with Highest FIN Traffic in Central & Latin America
Live international traffic in 2015
Ranking Country Total Traffic in 2015 Weight in Central
& Latin America Growth (2015 vs
2014)
1 Mexico* 30,195,946 27.8% 17.9%
2 Brazil 26,305,771 24.2% 2.3%
3 Chile 8,926,219 8.2% 10.2%
4 Colombia 4,471,819 4.1% -2.5%
5 Argentina 4,404,581 4.1% 10%
Others 34,367,196 31.6% -7.1%
Total Central & Latin
Americas 108,671,532 3.5%
Source: SWIFT Watch Analytics
*Number 2 last year
Payments and Corridors
LARC 2016
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Millio
n
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Millio
n
Source: SWIFT Watch Analytics
LARC 2016
LATAM - World Top 10 Payments Counterparty Countries Live traffic of MT 103s and MT 202s in 2011 & 2015
65% of the total
payment messages
sent to US
2011 2015
62% of the total
payment messages
sent to US
LARC 2016
Regional overview: To Eurozone, United States and China 2011 vs 2015, Live and Delivered, MT103s and MT202, Volume
To US:
2011: 13 Mmsg
2015: 16 Mmsg
To Euro Zone:
2011: 1,927 Kmsg
2015: 2,813 Kmsg
To China:
2011: 18 Kmsg
2015: 15 Kmsg
Latin America sent messages
LARC 2016
Regional overview: To Eurozone, United States and China 2011 vs 2015, Live and Delivered, MT103s and MT202, Value
To US:
2011: USD 27,241 bil
2015: USD 28,548 bil
To Euro Zone:
2011: USD 1,797 bil
2015: USD 811 bil
To China:
2011: USD 4,021 mil
2015: USD 8,186 mil Latin America sent messages
(Amount)
LARC 2016
Top LATAM End Beneficiary Countries of Transactions Sent to US
Live international MT 103s and MT 202s in 2015
End Beneficiary Countries (EBC)
Panama
325 kmsgs
Mexico
748 kmsgs
Source: SWIFT Watch Analytics
Chile
334 kmsgs
Sent to United States
16.5 mmsgs
Brazil
423 kmsgs
LARC 2016
Top End Beneficiary Countries of Transactions Sent to US (Non-LATAM)
Live international MT 103s and MT 202s from in 2015
End Beneficiary Countries (EBC)
Stay in United States
4 mmsgs
China
1.1 mmsgs
Hong Kong
530 kmsgs
Source: SWIFT Watch Analytics
Spain
241 kmsgs Sent to United States
16.5 mmsgs
United Kingdom
362 kmsgs
Trade
LARC 2016
LARC 2016
Regional overview: From Eurozone, United States and China (Export) 2011 vs 2015, Live and Delivered, MT400 and MT700, Volume
From US:
2011: 34 Kmsg
2015: 25 Kmsg
From Euro Zone:
2011: 39 Kmsg
2015: 28 Kmsg
From China:
2011: 6 Kmsg
2015: 9 Kmsg
Latin America received
messages
LARC 2016
Regional overview: From Eurozone, United States and China (Export) 2011 vs 2015, Live and Delivered, MT400 and MT700, Value
From US:
2011: USD 7,762 mil
2015: USD 5,686 mil
From Euro Zone:
2011: USD 10,116 mil
2015: USD 5,493 mil
From China:
2011: USD 16,710 mil
2015: USD 4,816 mil Latin America received
messages (Amount)
LARC 2016
Top 15 LATAM countries receiving trade finance messages (Export)
2011 vs 2015, Live and Delivered, MT400 and MT700, Value
Colombia
-89.44%
-69.22%
-7.76%
-41.71%
Uruguay
+70.94%
-25.41%
-32.31%
-19.66%
Mexico
Peru
Cuba
Panama
Chile
Brazil
-43.05%
-8.35%
Cayman Islands
Argentina
2011
2015
LARC 2016
Regional overview: To Eurozone, United States and China (Import) 2011 vs 2015, Live and Delivered, MT400 and MT700, Volume
To US:
2011: 18 Kmsg
2015: 10 Kmsg
To Euro Zone:
2011: 24 Kmsg
2015: 20 Kmsg
To China:
2011: 36Kmsg
2015: 35 Kmsg
Latin America sent messages
LARC 2016
Regional overview: To Eurozone, United States and China (Import) 2011 vs 2015, Live and Delivered, MT400 and MT700, Value
To US:
2011: USD 8,437 mil
2015: USD 8,939 mil
To Euro Zone:
2011: USD 10,459 mil
2015: USD 7,610 mil
To China:
2011: USD 5,564 mil
2015: USD 6,056 mil Latin America sent messages
(Amount)
Corporate Connectivity
LARC 2016
Central and LatAm’s corporate connectivity figures
31 Connected via FileAct December 2015
7 New Corporates December 2015 vs December 2014
58 Connected via FIN December 2015
59 Corporates connected in C&Latam December 2015
Industry Breakdown
• 21 Industries in 2015 vs 17 in 2013
• 60% growth in just 2 years
(37 vs 59 corporates)
LARC 2016
Central & LatAm vs Worldwide
• Only 1 corporate in Personal Goods and Software
compared to 70 Worldwide
• Presence in only 21 industry compared to 40
worldwide
• Huge potential to growth
Central & Latam
Worldwide
Corporates breakdown by Industry
LARC 2016
LARC 2016
Colombia 68
Mexico 31
Brasil 157
Argentina 37
LATAM 244
Costa Rica 16
Multinational Corporate Connectivity by LATAM Bank Countries (as of Dec 2015)
Business Intelligence Porftolio
LARC 2016
Watch Banking Analytics
LARC 2016
From operational to ‘Premium’ business offering
Business focus Operational
Traffic
Analytics
WHAT:
Operational analysis
WHY:
• Efficiency and quality gains
• Cost reduction
Operational
Banking
Value
Analytics
WHAT:
Value & Currency flows
WHY:
• Correspondent insights
• New market
opportunities
• Activity share and benchmark
Operational & Business
Next
Generation Banking
Analytics
Premium
Business & Strategy
WHAT:
More granularity
WHY:
• New business opportunities
• Strategic and competitive analysis
• Focused sales force
• Insightful market practices
Watch Insights
WHAT:
Pre-Defined Dashboards
WHY:
• Monitor Evolution
• Easy access
Business & Operational
LARC 2016
Watch Insights
LARC 2016
LARC 2016
Rankings and High Level Overview .
LARC 2016
How can I measure reciprocity with my correspondents?
LARC 2016
Investigate share of volume or value for any message or
counterparty country. .
LARC 2016
What’s my share of 103s sent to the United States? .
LARC 2016
How has my share of value received from Brazil changed Y/Y? .
LARC 2016
Track message and currency use as well as top counterparty
countries. .
Watch Banking Analytics Premium
LARC 2016
Visual dashboards
LARC 2016
Visual dashboards
Map your clearing business and
investigate intermediation of your
payments business
Benchmark your payments charges
to market practices
Visualise the market of confirmed
LCs and track your dedicated activity
share
Compare your LC tenors length to
market standards
Discover your activity share in high
value payments
Rank your activities and track the
evolution over time
LARC 2016
Payments dashboards – Payment Corridors
LARC 2016
Develop business in new markets
or through new payment corridors
Payments dashboards – Payment Corridors
LARC 2016
Identify End Beneficiary/Initial
Ordering Country flows worth
investigation
Payments dashboards – charge details dashboard
LARC 2016
Overview
Counterparty countries
Benchmark your payments charges
to market practices
Trade Finance dashboards – confirmation instructions
LARC 2016
Visualise the market of confirmed
LCs and track your dedicated
activity share
Overview
Counterparty countries
Trade Finance dashboards – value buckets and tenor length buckets
LARC 2016
Value buckets
Tenor buckets
Ranking against the market
Global
ranking Global
Ranking
Ranking per MT
Ranking per
country
Ranking per geo-region
Ranking per
market
Ranking per
country per MT
Ranking per
country per
market
Ranking per
country per
currency
Improved competitive analysis
Track sales performance
LARC 2016
Consulting Services
LARC 2016
Business Intelligence Services
A competitive advantage
by getting deeper
analyses and expert
insights on your traffic and
market practices
Ordering option Top 10 Ordering Country Ordering option Top 10 Ordering Country
Initial ordering Initial ordering
4%
81%
15%
Blank
Option A
Other options
27%
22%
15%
8%
6%
5%
5%
5%4% 3%
United Arab Emirates Russia United States
Ukraine Turkey Kazakhstan
United Kingdom Poland Tajikistan
Uzbekistan
18%
55%
27%Blank
Option A
Other options
28%
24%23%
11%
5%
3%3%1%1%1%
United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Russia
Cyprus Azerbaijan Armenia
Switzerland Kyrgyzstan Czech Republic
TajikistanTenor Length in 2013 Tenor Length with preferred correspondents in 2013
Tenor Length Tenor Length
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Correspondent E
Correspondent D
Correspondent C
Correspondent B
Correspondent A
0-30 days
31-60 days
61-90 days
91-180 days
> 180 days
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Correspondent E
Correspondent D
Correspondent C
Correspondent B
Correspondent A
0-30 days
31-60 days
61-90 days
91-180 days
> 180 days
List of corporates
connected to SWIFT, your
payment or reporting
business activity compared
to market or peers
Your position and growth in
the market compared to
peers
Help you boost the
performance and
efficiency of your SWIFT
infrastructure and
messaging
Payments Charge details:
BEN/ OUR/ SHA
LC Confirmation
Tenor Length
Peer
Benchmarking
Strategic
Engagement
Corporates Business
Development
Operational
Excellence
LARC 2016
Peer benchmarking Understand your position and growth in the market
compared to peers
Peer benchmarking
Consulting services helping you to
leverage the full potential of WATCH
products
Consulting services providing
more in-depth data
Business Intelligence
Services
LARC 2016
Peer benchmarking Uncover where most profitable business sits for your
Trade Finance business Consulting services helping you to
leverage the full potential of WATCH
products
Consulting services providing
more in-depth data
Business Intelligence
Services
Asia-PacificEurope - Non Euro Zone
Middle EastAfrica
Europe - Euro ZoneCentral & Latin America
North America
179,308,347
615,055,445
149,466,580 238,833,249
54,476,035 21,542,637
7,301,735
1,277,927,352
307,538,918 535,691,128
199,272,534 148,477,033
17,980,134 18,884,017
Enriched data
Example: LC’s sent from the world to Denmark per georegion – confirmed (orange) / non-
confirmed (grey)
LARC 2016
BI solutions for banks Example analyses for operational excellence
NACK analysis Free text message type RMA analysis
What’s the ratio of NACK messages?
How does that compare to the market?
What’s the reason for the NACK?
STP!
How many free text messages are used?
What type?
How does that compare to the market?
Who sends you most?
Operational excellence
Consulting services helping you to
leverage the full potential of WATCH
products
Consulting services providing
more in-depth data
Business Intelligence
Services
LARC 2016
Fully understand your banking
relationships, following the historical
exchange of Swift RMA keys, identifying
active/dormant/inactive relationships.
Based upon this, an RMA clean-up can
be run for you.
Questions?
Your BI expert in the region:
• AME: Daniel Lynch ([email protected])
The BI marketing team:
• Henrique Teixeira ([email protected])
Que Significa: “Reference data”?
HKICL: 402001
CHIPS UID: 437346
BBDEARBA
SOGEFRPP
Codigo ABA BOFAUS3N
IBAN: GB23BARC20675966936633
BWP (Botswana Pula)
IBAN: CY58002001950000357006666677
Horas bancarias por país
Días feriados por país
Bancos corresponsales
Reference Data es cualquier tipo de
información relacionada con las
transacciones financieras que no se
modifica en tiempo real.
USD
JPY
Motivadores de negocio Pagos STP
Experiencia del Cliente
Data Management
Cumplimiento
(EMIR, Dodd Frank, FATCA,
KYC
Eficiencia
Ahorro en Costos
¿ Cuál es BIC del
Banco Real?
Es un día festivo
(holiday) en el país de
destinación
¿ CuáI es el IBAN y el
BIC correspondiente a
la cuenta local de mis
proveedores?
¿ Dónde puedo encontrar
información actualizada de
los identificadores de cada
banco para construir mi
propio Bank master file?
¿ Qué código BIC
le corresponde a
determinado
código IBAN?
Instrucción de iniciación Pago
¿Cuál es el código de
compensación nacional
de Santander? SSI?
¿ Cuál es el CHIPS,
BIC, IBAN, .... Código
nacional del banco
beneficiario?
Usted Su Banco
¿Dispongo de toda las instrucciones e información requerida para
hacer pagos internacionales?
SWIFTRef – el concepto
Todos los datos de referencia que necesites
a nivel mundial, precisos y actualizados, a cualquier momento y en
un solo lugar!
ISO
Banco
corresponsales
ABA MT670
SSI
SWIFT
IBAN
Target2
Bancos con
licencia
mensajes
MT094s
SWIFTRef
Datos
bacarios
Identificaciones
nacionales
SWIFTRef y sus canales de distribución
Manual file
download
internet
Manual query tool
(BWO)
internet
APIs
(web services)
internet
SWIFTNet FileAct
(automated)
Automated file
download
(API)
internet
TXT
XML
Formatos Monthly
Daily
Frecuencia
SWIFTRef
utilidad
¿Por qué es importante que los datos de
referencia sean precisos?
• Identificación exacta de la entidad
BIC, IBAN, LEI
Requisitos de información comercial y regulatorio para SEPA,
EMIR, Dodd-Frank, y más.
Regulación y
Cumplimiento
Ahorro en
Costos
• La eficiencia operativa (Automación)
• Para evitar cargos adicionales de proveedores de servicios
• Para no perder recursos y tiempo en investigaciones y
reparaciones de pago
Riesgo
Administrativo
• Para evitar retrasos en los pagos y los riesgos financieros
relacionados al mismo.
• Para no perder la oportunidad de descuentos por pronto pago
• Para mantener su reputación con proveedores / clientes
Quien usa SWIFTRef hoy?
Más de 6000 instituciones financieras
Más de 600 corporaciones
404 clientes en
América Latina
LARC 2016
Preguntas?
LARC 2016
www.swift.com
LARC 2016
