19
Why do I do what I do? Philanthropy Camp – Newport, Rhode Island Presented by Ken Berger President & Chief Executive Officer Charity Navigator August 5, 2010

Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

Why do I do what I do?

Philanthropy Camp –

Newport, Rhode IslandPresented by Ken Berger

President & Chief Executive OfficerCharity Navigator

August 5, 2010

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Thank you so much for having me here today –
Page 2: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010
Page 3: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

In The Beginning Was The Buddha

Page 4: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

More than 1 billion children suffer from a lack of; proper nutrition safe drinking water decent sanitation facilities health-care services shelter education and information

Poverty and Children

Page 5: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010
Page 7: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

Radical Son

Page 8: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

Charity Leader

Page 9: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

~30 Years Doing “the Work”

Page 10: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

The Logical Next Step

Presenter
Presentation Notes
People have asked me, why would you go from direct service to watch dog? The answer is very simple, I get to direct resources to the best organizations so that many, many more people and other societal problems can be addressed. Given my 30 years of experience in the trenches, I think it only deepens my understanding of the challenges that public charities face. I hope that will translate into our plans for evaluate program effectiveness, among other things. The good news is that 65% of the agencies we review are good to excellent. Helping them to get noticed and supported is a great opportunity to help more than ever! Also, I get to (hopefully) influence the thinking of nonprofit leaders and future leaders like yourselves. So, where else would I want to be?
Page 11: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

Charity Navigator’s Current Impact

Estimated 3+ million distinct visitors per year

92% say CN ratings affected their decision to support individual charities

CN ratings influence billions in donations each year

Growth In Website Usage

18,259225,295

661,945

1,240,095

2,707,0182,835,167

3,102,308 3,011,4233,316,587

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Years

Num

ber o

f Uni

que

Visi

t

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We influenced $10 billion in giving in 2007 alone. Although that is a ton of money, in the universe of $300 billion it is only about 3.5%. If you take out the unmonitored churches it goes up to 5%. Our dream is to make it 100% some day.
Page 12: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

The Explosive Growth of Nonprofits in the US

Page 13: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

$1.9 Trillion in Public Charity Revenues

~1.9 million Nonprofits

61% (1.2 million) are Public Charities (PCs)

**6% of PCs get 96% of Revenues = $1.86 million

*.2% of PCs get 59% of Revenues = $1.5 Trillion

* ~3,000 charities with annual revenues over $100 million

**~100,000 charities with annual revenues over $1 million

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Page 14: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

What is Meaningful for a Hi-Performing Charity?

Accountability & Transparency

Financial Health

• Positive, sustainable 

change• Independently 

evaluatedHIGHER RISK 

INVESTMENTLOWER RISK 

INVESTMENT

Page 15: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

Independent Evaluation is Critical to Ensure that Social Investing Keeps Pace with the

Growing Need for Nonprofit Programs

Charity Navigatorevaluates charities and

provides meaningful information

Social Investors use meaningful information to make better decisions

High-performing nonprofits get more money

Social Investors (donorsw/eyes open)

demand meaningful information

Page 16: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

Financial Health

Accountability/ Transparency

Effectiveness /Results

More Comprehensive Rating System

Introducing CN 2.0

Page 17: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

3 Golden Rules of Philanthropy

1. Giving using the heart w/o head is usually ineffective.

2. Giving using the head w/o heart is ultimately unsustainable & meaningless.

3. Giving using both is called social investing and can lead to real impact – meaningful and lasting change in communities and people’s lives.

Page 18: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

The Battle for the Soul of the Nonprofit Sector

Page 19: Philanthropy Camp - August 2010

Your Questions & Our Web Addresses

Website- www.charitynavigator.org

Blogs- www.kenscommentary.org

blog.charitynavigator.org

Twitter- kenscommentary