Upload
finance21
View
881
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
NYSE:FE
Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference
Washington, D.C. • June 5-6, 2008
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 2
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private SecuritiesLitigation Reform Act of 1995This presentation includes forward-looking statements based on information currently available to management. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. These statements include declarations regarding our, or our management’s, intents, beliefs and current expectations. These statements typically contain, but are not limited to, the terms “anticipate,” “potential,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate” and similar words. Forward-looking statements involve estimates, assumptions, known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially due to the speed and nature of increased competition in the electric utility industry and legislative and regulatory changes affecting how generation rates will be determined following the expiration of existing rate plans in Ohio and Pennsylvania, economic or weather conditions affecting future sales and margins, changes in markets for energy services, changing energy and commodity market prices, replacement power costs being higher than anticipated or inadequately hedged, the continued ability of FirstEnergy’s regulated utilities to collect transition and other charges or to recover increased transmission costs, maintenance costs being higher than anticipated, other legislative and regulatory changes including revised environmental requirements and possible greenhouse gas emissions regulation, the uncertainty of the timing and amounts of the capital expenditures needed to, among other things, implement the Air Quality Compliance Plan (including that such amounts could be higher than anticipated) or levels of emission reductions related to the Consent Decree resolving the New Source Review litigation or other potential regulatory initiatives, adverse regulatory or legal decisions and outcomes (including, but not limited to, the revocation of necessary licenses or operating permits and oversight by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission including, but not limited to, the Demand for Information issued to FENOC on May 14, 2007) as disclosed in our SEC filings, the timing and outcome of various proceedings before the PUCO (including, but not limited to, the Distribution Rate Cases and the generation supply plan filing for the Ohio Companies and the successful resolution of the issues remanded to the PUCO by the Supreme Court of Ohio regarding the Rate Stabilization Plan and the Rate Certainty Plan, including the deferral of fuel costs) and Met-Ed’s and Penelec’s transmission service charge filings with the PPUC as well as the resolution of the Petitions for Review filed with the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania with respect to the transition rate plan for Met-Ed and Penelec, the continuing availability of generating units and their ability to continue to operate at or near full capacity, the ability to comply with applicable state and federal reliability standards, the ability to accomplish or realize anticipated benefits from strategic goals (including employee workforce initiatives), the ability to improve electric commodity margins and to experience growth in the distribution business, changing market conditions that could affect the value of assets held in our nuclear decommissioning trust fund, pension fund and other trust funds, the ability to access the public securities and other capital markets and the cost of such capital, the risks and other factors discussed from time to time in our SEC filings, and other similar factors. The foregoing review of factors should not be construed as exhaustive. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all such factors, nor can we assess the impact of any such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Dividends declared from time to time on FirstEnergy's common stock during any annual period may in aggregate vary from the indicated amounts due to circumstances considered by FirstEnergy's Board of Directors at the time of the actual declarations. Also, a security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and it may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time and each such rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. We expressly disclaim any current intention to update any forward-looking statements contained herein as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 3
Corporate Profile
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 4
FirstEnergy Corporate Profile
Diversified energy company headquartered in Akron, Ohio
Involved in generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, as well as other energy-related services
Fifth largest investor-owned electric utility in U.S.– 4.5 million customers in Ohio, Pennsylvania and New Jersey
Controls over 14,000 MW of generating capacity
Approx. $13B in annual revenues and more than $32B in assets
Approx. $24B market capitalization
Investment grade credit ratings
OHPA
NJ
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 5
FirstEnergy Overview
FirstEnergy Solutions (FES), an unregulated subsidiary:
– Controls 14,000+ MW of FirstEnergy’s generation capacity
– Separate SEC Registrant
Strategic Focus– Expand generation output– Transition to market-based rates– Effectively hedge commodity exposures– Leverage proven skills to succeed in
competitive markets
Competitive
7 Regulated Utilities– Fifth largest investor-owned electric utility
in U.S. with 4.5 million customers in OH, PA and NJ
– Geographic and regulatory diversity
Strategic Focus– Enhance reliability and customer service– Invest in infrastructure – Pursue timely cost recovery – Control expenditures through continuous
improvement culture
Regulated
Balanced Integrated Approach
Objective: Maximize margins from each business
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 6
Annualized Total Shareholder Returns(Periods Ending December 31, 2007)
23.6%26.4%
21.3%
16.6% 17.8%19.9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
1 year 3 years 5 years
FE EEI Index
Financial Performance
Positioned for continued earnings growth
Strong operations with financial discipline
Integrated strategy that diversifies risks
Annualized Dividend Per Share
$2.00$1.80
$1.72
$1.50
$2.20
$1.00
$1.25
$1.50
$1.75
$2.00
$2.25
$2.50
YE 2004 YE 2005 YE 2006 YE 2007 Mar. 08
47% IncreaseSince End of 2004
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 7
Bottom Line –FirstEnergy is an attractive risk/reward opportunity
Managing transition to competitive markets
Continuing to mine our assets
Reinvesting for future growth
Minimizing financing risks
Deploying strong cash flow
Achieving continuous improvement
Maintaining strategic flexibility
Well-positioned for climate legislation
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 9
Generation
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 10
Akron
Toledo
Reading
Beaver Valley1,779 MW
Davis-Besse893 MW
Perry1,273 MW
R. E. Burger413 MW
W. H. Sammis2,233 MW
Bruce Mansfield2,490 MW
Eastlake1,262 MW
Ashtabula244 MW
Seneca451 MW
Edgewater48 MW
Richland432 MW
Stryker18 MW Yards Creek
200 MW
Mad River60 MW
West Lorain545 MW
Lake Shore249 MW
Sumpter340 MW
Erie
Ohio
Pennsylvania
NewJersey
Harrisburg
MorristownNewark
Allenhurst
Trenton
Bay Shore648 MW
Columbus
New Castle
Cleveland
Johnstown
Michigan
Baseload Load Following Peaking Units
Unit Mission Strategy
Towanda
MW MWMW
FirstEnergy Generation – Diversity & Scale
West Lorain 545Seneca 451Richland 432Sumpter 340Yards Creek 200Burger 3 & EMDs 101Mad River 60Edgewater 48Stryker 18Other 63
Total Peaking Units 2,258
Mansfield 1-3 2,490Beaver Valley 1,2 1,779Perry 1,273Sammis 6,7 1,200Davis-Besse 893Eastlake 5 597Bay Shore 1 136
Total Baseload 8,368
Sammis 1-5 1,020Eastlake 1-4 636Bay Shore 2-4 495Burger 4 -5 312Lake Shore 245Ashtabula 244
Total Load Following 2,952
OVEC 463Wind 145
Total 608
Other MW
FirstEnergy Power Sources*
C Coal 7,469 MWN Nuclear 3,945H Hydro 651 G Gas & O Oil 1,599
Other 522Total 14,186 MW
* Does not reflect the Fremont plant
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 11
FES Generation Fleet OverviewDiversified and cost-effective generating fleet
– Balanced fuel mix – Participates in both MISO and PJM markets
Mission-driven strategy– Each unit plays a specific role in fleet: baseload, load-following, or peaking– Strategy optimizes performance and reliability
Well-positioned for environmental regulations– CO2 control - over 35% of generation output is non-emitting
2007 Output Mix (MWh)
Fossil and Other
63%
Fossil and Other
63%
Nuclear37%
Nuclear37%
Generation Capacity (MW)*
Baseload 61%
Baseload 61%
Load-Following
22%
Load-Following
22%
Peaking17%
Peaking17%
* Based on May 2008 NDC
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 12
Generation Output*
0
20
40
60
80
100
(mill
ion
MW
h)
Nuclear 29.9 28.7 29.0 30.3 32.0 31.0 32.2 32.0Fossil 46.5 51.5 53.0 50.7 52.7 52.4 53.7 54.6
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008F 2009F 2010F 2011F
Realizing Full Potential of Generating Fleet
Significant scale: FirstEnergy Solutions (FES) controls over 14,000 MW
Fleet strategy optimizes performance and reliability– Each unit has a specific mission (baseload, load-following or peaking) – Increases efficiency and reduces wear and tear on baseload units
Nuclear fleet produced a record 30.3 million MWh in 2007
Fleet Characteristics and Mission-Driven Strategy
* Does not reflect the Fremont plant.
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 13
Realizing Full Potential of Generating Fleet
Mining Our Assets benefits:– ~$700/kW average capital cost is competitive vs. current market price of new capacity– Lower risk than large, long lead-time projects– Quicker to market
Factors impacting future generation asset decisions:– Capacity and ancillary services market structure– Technological advances– Environmental regulations
*Reflects elimination of seasonal reductions in output due to summer temperatures on peaking units** Reflects 45 MW baseload unit and 84 MW load-following unit efficiency and capacity factor improvements
16016Peaking unit uprates
713266447Total MW additions
278129**149* Efficiency and capacity factor improvements
24593152Nuclear baseload uprates
17444130Fossil baseload uprates
Cumulative MW2008F–2011F2005–2007Type of MW Addition
Mining Our Assets – incremental, low-risk investment approach to fleet expansion
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 14
564 GWh215 MWTotal:
180 GWh70 MWForecastedIn-service 2008
384 GWh145 MWIn-service 2007
RECs/YearCapacityStatus
FES Wind Energy Portfolio
Represents a minimal part of our renewable requirements
Will impact our renewable strategy
Drives our renewable strategy today
Overview
22.5% by 2020NJ
12.5% by 2025OH
18% by 2020PA
Renewable MandateState
Leading the Way in Procuring Renewable Energy to Meet Growing Demand
Leading wind energy supplier in PA
Evaluating expansion of current wind portfolio
Considering other renewable technologies:– Solar– Compressed air– Biomass– Land fill gas– Anaerobic digestion
Realizing Full Potential of Generating Fleet
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 15
Reinvesting in the Business
FirstEnergy Generation Corp. acquired partially complete 707-MW natural gas, combined-cycle generating plant in Fremont, Ohio
– Includes two combined-cycle combustion turbines and a steam turbine– 544 MW of load-following capacity and 163 MW of peaking capacity
– Purchased in bankruptcy auction from Calpine Corporation for $253.6M– Aggregate construction costs expended to date exceeded $300M– Calpine has estimated that the plant is 70% complete
– Based on this, FirstEnergy estimates cost to complete is approximately $150M - $200M* over 18-24 months
Key benefits to FirstEnergy:– Plant is connected to two RTOs – MISO & PJM – Expands fleet capacity and further diversifies generation mix– Low-emitting characteristics will further reduce our average CO2 emission rate
Enhancing Our Generation Portfolio for the Future
* Based on estimate from prior owner. Actual cost to complete subject to change following construction study.
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 16
90.787.280.4Capacity Factor (Baseload %)
54.652.750.7Total Generation (million MWh)
0.801.121.04OSHA Incident Rate (per 100 employees)
2011 Target*2008F2007Fossil
Fossil Operating Performance2007 Highlights
– Top-quartile safety performance – New monthly all time generation record
set Aug. 2007 (4.6 million MWh)– Environmental projects (AQC) on track– Outage performance improving– Implemented Fossil Excellence at
Bay Shore and Sammis (continuous improvement)
– On track for workforce replenishment– Improved performance accountability– Mansfield Unit 3 uprate (30 MW)
2008 Look Ahead– Achieve top-decile safety performance – Drive continuous improvement through
fleet standardization of best practices, benchmarking and Fossil Excellence annual diagnostics
– Continue to focus on transitioning workforce knowledge and skills to a new generation of employees
– Execute Mining Our Assets strategies– Develop and implement a full start-up
testing, training and operation strategy for AQC
* Does not reflect the Fremont plant.
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 17
Nuclear Operating Performance2007 Highlights
– Top-quartile safety performance– DB worked > 7.6 million hours without
a Lost Time Accident– Record Fleet Generation (30.3 million MWh) – BV1 uprate (43 MW); BV2 uprate (24 MW)– No forced losses at BV1; BV2 top quartile
(0.05%)– NRC accepted BV license renewal application– Successful NRC Security drills at PY and BV– Lowest BV dose during fall outage
2008 Look Ahead– Maintain top-quartile safety performance– Targeting record generation
(32.0 million MWh) – Two outages – DB (Completed 2/14/08)
and BV2 (Completed 5/22/08)– 15 MW uprate at PY effective 1/1/08– Additional 12 MW from DB Caldon
modification– Additional 45 MW from BV power uprate– NRC Emergency Preparedness
Evaluated Exercises at BV and PY – Dry Cask Fuel Storage underway at PY
92.492.988.8Capacity Factor (%)
32.032.030.3Total Generation (million MWh)
0.250.250.29OSHA Incident Rate (per 100 employees)
2011 Target2008F2007Nuclear
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 18
Top-Tier Operational Capability
Garnered significant nuclear reliability improvements during 2006–2007 outages
Fossil fleet expected to return to top-quartile performance in 2008 – AQC-related outages will lower capacity factors in 2009 and 2010– Expect to reach top-decile performance levels by 2011
Baseload Capability/Capacity Factors
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
Fact
ors
(%)
Fossil baseload 84.6% 86.9% 88.5% 80.4% 87.2% 90.7%
Nuclear 89.5% 86.2% 86.8% 88.8% 92.9% 92.4%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008F 2011 Target
Continued Improvement of Asset Utilization
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 19
Operational Performance Targets
92.492.988.886.886.289.5Capability Factor %
Nuclear Reliability
90.787.280.488.586.984.6Capacity Factor (Baseload %)
Fossil Reliability
86.684.781.082.080.276.4Total Generation (million MWh)
2011 Targets*2008F2007200620052004Operational Performance
* Does not reflect the Fremont plant.
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 20
Nuclear Generation
Refueling *In-vessel visual inspection (IVVI)Rewind Main GeneratorReinforce welds on plant equipment
CompleteDavis-Besse1R15
2008
Refueling*25Beaver Valley 2R14
Replace Low Pressure Turbines (2)*Reactor Coolant System Loop Stop Valves (2)Reactor Vessel Head Inspection
30Beaver Valley 1R19
Refueling*10-year IVVI / Bioshield In-service InspectionRecirc Pump Motor Replacement
35Perry 1R12
2009F
Split Pins*Low Pressre-2 Turbine Inspection*Reactor Vessel Head InspectionMain Cond Tube Replacement, Expansion Joints*Replace High Pressure Turbine*Type A Containment Pressurization Test
Complete Beaver Valley 2R13
Scope Driving Duration(Items with asterisk* denote duration drivers)
ExpectedOutage Duration
(days)PlantYear
Future Refueling Outages Focus on Reliability
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 21
Generation – Implementing Plans for the Future
Nuclear license renewal
Nuclear steam generator replacements– Davis-Besse in 2014– Beaver Valley Unit 2 in 2017
20472009Submitted 2007*2027Beaver Valley Unit 2
2037201220102017Davis-Besse
2046
2036
New Expiration
201520132026Perry
Submitted 2007*
Submit Request (NRC Docket)
20092016Beaver Valley Unit 1
Approval Expected
Current Expiration
* The NRC accepted the application for review.
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 22
Generation – Implementing Plans for the Future
Nuclear spent fuel storage– At the federal level, Yucca Mountain has been proposed as a site for
long-term storage and may be available as early as 2017 to receive used fuel, but this is not likely. If Yucca Mountain is available in 2017, FirstEnergy will be eligible to ship fuel starting in 2021.
Current ongoing criticality analysis will increase storage spaceRe-rack before 2011 to provide capacity through 2025 Dry storage could then be implemented
Beaver ValleyUnit 2
Continue with wet storage until 2021Switch back to dry storage in 2022
Davis-Besse
Implement dry storage before 2011Perry
Implement dry storage by the end of 2014Beaver ValleyUnit 1
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 23
Environmental Strategy
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 24
Longer-term environmental considerations:CO2 control – Over 35% of annual fleet output (MWh) is non-emitting
– Involved in CO2 capture and sequestration R&D
Mercury control – Excellent reduction through “co-benefits”– Participating in future mercury regulatory developments
Reinvesting in the Business
2010F*2007
81%62%9%9%
38%19%
34%34%
Fleet %Fleet %
Fleet Emission Control Status
11,0878,4901,1971,283Natural Gas Peaking
5,2372,626Coal Controlled(SO2/NOx – full control)
4,6534,581Non-Emitting
Capacity (MW)Capacity (MW)
Our Generation Fleet is Well-Positioned for the Future
* Does not reflect the Fremont plant.
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 25
AQC Construction OverviewReinvesting in the Business
Sammis Plant (2,233 MW) – $1.65B– SO2 control (scrubbers) all units– NOx control (SCRs) Units 6 & 7 (1,200 MW)
NOx control (SNCR) Units 1–5 (1,033 MW) completed
Mansfield Plant (2,490 MW) – $50MSO2 control (scrubber) upgrades completed
Burger Plant – $180M– NOx control (SNCR) and SO2 control
Electro-Catalytic Oxidation (ECO) Units 4 & 5 (312 MW)
Eastlake Plant – $6MNOx control (SNCR) Unit 5 (597 MW) completed
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 26
Sammis Plant with computer overlay of Wet Flue Gas Desulphurization (WFGD) equipment
AQC Upgrades – Sammis Plant
Flue Duct Work – 9,000 tons (9,000 ft.)
Electrical Cable – 9,120 circuits (530 miles)
Foundation Piles – 5,600 piles (445,000 LF)
Concrete – 51,000 cubic yards
Tons of Steel – 17,200 tons
DCS I/O Points – 8,200
Large Bore Pipe – 88,300 ft. (17 miles)
Small Bore Pipe – 13,000 ft. (2.5 miles)
Overland “Pipe” Conveyor – 3.0 miles long
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 27
Participating in Global Climate Change Policy• Global Roundtable on Climate Change• EPRI Global Climate Policy Costs & Benefits Research• EEI Climate Change Policy Subcommittee• NEI Climate Change Policy Subcommittee
GHG Reduction Technologies & Voluntary Actions• Asia-Pacific Partnership• EPA SF6 Reduction Partnership• EPRI GHG Reduction and Electric Transportation Research• Climate Vision• DOE 1605(b) Voluntary Reporting of GHGs Program• Powertree Carbon Company
Generation Initiatives• Fossil plant efficiencies • Nuclear plant uprates
CO2 Capture and Storage Technologies• MRCSP – R.E. Burger Plant Sequestration test well• ECO2 Carbon Capture – Powerspan• EPRI research• Power Partners• Oxy Fuel – B&W
End-user Energy Management• NJ Clean Energy Program• PA Sustainable Energy Fund• Ohio Energy-efficiency Programs
Renewables• 650 MWs Hydro• >200 MWs Wind Purchase Agreements
Renewal of Nuclear and Hydro Plant Operating Licenses
• Continued operation of non-emitting generation
Environmental StrategyFirstEnergy’s Climate Activities
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 28
FirstEnergy’s Position on Global Climate Change
Climate change is a global issue ultimately requiring a global solution
Technology development is key – Energy efficiency and demand-side management– Clean coal technologies– Carbon capture and sequestration
Significant future impact on price of electricity whether states are regulated or deregulated
– Be consistent over broad geographic region– Include reasonable compliance timeframes – Encourage new cost-effective technologies
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 29
Additional Key Technologies FirstEnergy is Actively Co-Funding
Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV)
– Considerably cleaner than internal combustion engine vehicle, including battery charging
– 30% less GHG– 15% less SO2 and NOx
– Provides largely off-peak demand, an opportunity for growth– Advanced meters are an enabling technology
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 31
Commodity Operations
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 32
Coal Commodity Position
Continue working to secure long-term fuel supply contracts
Actively testing alternate fuel blends at various plants to optimize plant economics and flexibility
Engaged in fuel flexibility initiative to expand margins and fuel choices
FirstEnergy is well positioned with respect to its total coal supply through 2010
Securing Open Coal Commodity Positions
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000
2010
2009
2008
Total Needed Tons Total Covered Tons
98%
100%
100%
As of May 13, 2008
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 33
Coal Transportation Position
All transportation positions including both rail and barge are closed thru 2010 year end
Continuing to evaluate additional delivery options to increase both capabilities and flexibility
Enhanced rail unloading capabilities in process at Ashtabula, Bay Shore and Lake Shore
In 2008, FES is managing PRB rail logistics previously outsourced
Securing Open Coal Transportation Positions
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000
2010
2009
2008
Total Needed Tons Total Covered Tons
100%
100%
100%
As of May 13, 2008
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 34
Emission Allowance Position
Based on projected generation:– Latest fuel assumptions for 2008 &
2009 have further solidified our SO2length
– 2010 SO2 position was closed early to mitigate potential scrubber projects completion risks
– Seasonal NOx is covered for 2008 & 2009; 2008 & 2009 length will secure a portion of the 2010 position; 2010 is expected to be covered by the end of Q1 2009
– Majority of 2009 – 2010 annual NOx requirements are covered from allocations made by states
SO2 Position
0
90,000
180,000
270,000
2008 2009 2010
(ton
s)
Needed Covered Position
Seasonal NOx Position
-10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
2008 2009 2010
(ton
s)
Needed Covered Position
As of May 13, 2008
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 35
Fuel Flexibility Creates Margin & Fuel Choices
Enhanced systems, tools and processes providing the ability to react and adjust blends quickly to match market prices
“Fuel Flex” creates value by continuously increasing fuel blend choices– Maximize revenues when real-time market prices are favorable– Minimize costs when market prices are low
The Right Fuel at the
Right Time
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 36
Expected Total Supply
020406080
100120
(mill
ion
MW
h)
Forward / Spot Purchases 12 7 9Nuclear 32 31 32Fossil, Hydro, Wind 53 52 53
2008F 2009F 2010F
Supply numbers exclude JCP&L and firm contract portion of ME/PN
Managing Commodity Positions
Significant reductions in mostly on-peak energy purchases
97 90 94
•*Assumes move to open market in Ohio in 2009 and beyond. Does not reflect the Fremont plant.
Expected Supply Portfolio for FES*
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 37
Expected Total Sales
020406080
100120
(mill
ion
MW
h)
Retail Auction 1 31 29Competitive Retail 12 20 24Forward / Spot Sales 18 20 21ME/PN PRA Obligations 14 19 20OH PSA Obligations 52 0 0
2008F 2009F 2010F
Sales numbers exclude JCP&L and f irm contract portion of ME/PN
Managing Commodity Positions
Transition from Power Supply Agreement (PSA) obligations to higher margin sales
97 90 94
•* Assumes move to open market in Ohio in 2009 and beyond. Does not reflect the Fremont plant.•PRA- Partial Requirements Agreement•NOTE: Supply includes generation output and forward/spot purchases
Expected Sales Portfolio for FES*
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 38
PJM Net Capacity
(3500)
(2500)
(1500)
(500)
500
1500
2500
3500
MW
2008 20102009
Includes Beaver Valley, Forked River, and Seneca
PJM Capacity PositionME and PN have long-term capacity contracts
Beaver Valley nuclear plant (1,779 MW) committed in PJM to cover capacity position
Covered capacity prior to RPM auction for planning year 2008-2009 to replace long-term contracts
Committed Seneca pumped storage (451 MW) to PJM as a capacity resource for planning year 2009 (commencing in June 2009)
FES View (continuing to serve ME and PN PRA)
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 39
Energy Delivery
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 40
FirstEnergy Utilities
Large and balanced sales mix – 35% residential, 32% commercial, 33% industrial
Constructive regulatory environments– Achieve timely and full recovery of costs– Distribution rate cases pending for all three Ohio utilities
– Requested $332M revenue increase (including $120M of deferred cost recovery)– PUCO Staff recommended $114M-$132M increase (including $46M of deferred
cost recovery)– PUCO Staff recommended $115M be addressed in subsequent cases
T&D infrastructure being upgraded to enhance system reliability and customer service
Distribution outage duration reduced by 31% over past two years
Strong and Stable Cash Flows
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 41
FirstEnergy Service Areas
Toledo Edison 313,000 2,300
Ohio Edison 1,040,000 7,000
The Illuminating Company 756,000 1,600
Penelec 589,000 17,600
Penn Power 159,000 1,100
Met-Ed 542,000 3,300
Jersey Central Power & Light 1,087,000 3,200
Total 4,490,000 36,100
Customers Square Miles
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 42
Financial Performance
$277$272$273Total Cost Per CustomerAchieve top-quartile total spend per customer
0.630.690.72 TOF (per circuit) *
107 128 131 Distribution SAIDI (minutes)Top-quartile performance SAIDI and TOF
Reliability
2011 Target2008F2007Key MetricsFocus Area
* TOF has been revised to include all circuits 69KV and above (previously 230KV and above)
Reinvesting in the Business
Total Direct Cost per Customer
$150$180$210$240$270$300
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Tota
l Dire
ct C
PC
ED&CS Top Quartile
Energy Delivery – Striving to Achieve Top-Quartile Performance
SAIDI Performance
104070
100130160190220
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
SAID
I (M
inut
es)
ED&CS Top Quartile
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 43
Regulated Rate Base and Sales Growth
$330$365Capital Expenditures, Net of Depreciation
$11,000
2011 Target
$10,100Net Plant for Rate Base
2008FProjected Rate Base –Regulated Companies (T&D)($ millions)
$3,000$3,290$4,420Net Plant for Rate Base ($ millions)
1.1
2.2%
NJ
2.1
0.9%
OH
1.3# of Customers (millions)
1.7%Growth Rate (kWh)
PAAverage Annual (2009F – 2011F)
Projected Annual Growth
Growing asset base and increased distribution throughput
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 44
Capital Planning Enhancements
Benchmarked leading performers in the area of capital allocation
Selected Navigant to help develop capital allocation tool based on fundamental engineering economics (quantified benefits)
E-CAT provides the granularity which drives our ability to prioritize thousands of projects based on predicted benefits
Energy Delivery Capital Allocation Tool (E-CAT)
Game Plan:
Target spend with an emphasis on improving reliability
Continued focus on operational improvements
Capital planning has undergone a fundamental change to enhance our financial discipline
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 45
Workforce Management
Power Systems Institute (PSI)– Started in 2000; partnered with two colleges in Ohio to offer
lineworker training– Currently, partnerships with 11 local community colleges
and universities across OH, PA and NJ
296323386Total
8287110Substation Electricians
214236276Line Workers
HiredGraduatedStarted Program
Enrollment/Hires 2000–2007
237154
6031
177123
2009F2008F
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 47
Regulatory / Legislative Matters
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 48
Retail Regulatory Structure
1 CEI fixed through April 2009.2 NUG recovery thru 2020.
CEI
MTC thru 2018No restrictionBGS SupplyJCP&L
CTC thru 20092
Pass thruPJM costsPenelec
CTC thru 20102
No restrictionPOLR ratesthru 2010
Met-Ed
CTC endedJan. 2006No restrictionIn
GenerationMarket in
2007Penn Power
Toledo Edison
RTC thru:2008 – OE, TE
2010 – CEI
Fixed ratesthru 20081
Pass thru MISO costs
Stable rates thru 2008 “g + RSC”
Ohio Edison
Transition CostsDistributionTransmissionGeneration
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 49
Transitioning Generation to Market Prices
New Jersey– Competitive generation service with market-based pricing in effect
(Basic Generation Service auction process began in 2002)
Pennsylvania– Transition to market-based pricing partially implemented
– Penn Power transitioned to market-based pricing in Jan. 2007
– Met-Ed (ME) and Penelec (PN) maintain POLR obligations at fixed rates through year-end 2010
– ME and PN scheduled to transition to market-based pricing in Jan. 2011
Ohio– Utilities transferred generation assets to competitive affiliate FES in 2005– Utilities maintain POLR obligations at fixed rates through year-end 2008– Utilities scheduled to transition to market-based pricing in Jan. 2009
Industry Restructuring Status
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 50
Transitioning Generation to Market Prices
Existing S.B. 3 – Enacted 1999– Generation rates to be market-based on Jan. 1, 2009
Amended Sub. S.B. 221 – Signed by Governor on May 1, 2008– Requires all utilities to file an electric security plan (ESP)– Could also file a market rate offer (MRO) with the following criteria:
– Belongs to a FERC-approved RTO – RTO has a market-monitor function and the ability to mitigate market power– A published source exists that identifies information for traded electricity and energy
products scheduled for delivery two years into the future
– The Commission would test the ESP (pricing and all other terms and conditions) against the MRO and may only approve the ESP if it is more favorable to customers
– Bill also contains advanced and renewable energy standards and energy efficiency – Requires annual progress toward 2025 goal of 25% alternative energy– Requires energy efficiency programs to achieve annual progress toward 2025 goal of
cumulative energy usage reduction of 22%– Expect to file an ESP in the 2nd or 3rd quarter of 2008
Ohio Legislative Update
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 51
Ohio Regulatory Update
Ohio Edison, CEI and Toledo Edison– Case detail (as filed)
– Request: $332M increase (7% on overall rates)– Distribution revenue requirements: $212M– Deferral recovery: $120M
– Case schedule– Filed June 2007, with 2008 test period and date certain of May 31, 2007– PUCO Staff report issued Dec. 4, 2007– Evidentiary hearings held Jan. 29, 2008 – Feb. 25, 2008– Public hearings held Mar. 5 – Mar. 24– Main briefs filed Mar. 28; reply briefs filed Apr. 18– Rates to be effective Jan. 2009 (CEI in May 2009)– Expect PUCO Order in the 2nd or 3rd quarter of 2008
Distribution Rate Requests
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 52
Ohio Regulatory Update
* Assumes current Generation & Transmission rates
Proposed Changes in Revenues ($ millions) TotalCurrent "Distribution" Revenues $1,118Requested Increase:
Associated with RCP Fuel Expense Deferrals 34Associated with RCP Infrastructure Expense Deferrals 40Associated with RCP DSM Deferrals (through a rider) 4Associated with ETP & Ohio Line Extension Deferrals 42"Base" Revenue Requirement Increases 212
Total Requested Increase to "Distribution" Revenues $332Proposed "Distribution" Revenues $1,450Offsetting RTC Decrease ($594)Net Decrease, Including Offsets * ($262)% Decrease, Including Offsets to Total Current Revenues * -5.7%
Distribution Rate Requests (as filed)
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 53
$114 – $132$332Total requested increase to "distribution" revenues46120Recovery of costs deferred under prior rate plans
$68 – $86$212Traditional distribution costs
PUCO Staff Testimony
Company Filing
Requested Increase in Revenues ($ Millions)To be effective 1/09 for OE & TE 1/09; 5/09 for CEI
Ohio Regulatory UpdateDistribution Rate Requests (as filed)
($68)Other issues (net)($35) – ($16)ROE @ 10 to 11% (vs. Co. @ 11.75%)
($115)*Matters to be considered in other cases
Key PUCO Staff Testimony Differences
Expect PUCO Order in the 2nd or 3rd quarter of 2008
Timing of requested distribution rate increases coincides with reduction/ elimination of regulatory transition revenues and amortization expenses
* $52M related to expenses in distribution case amount, $63M related to recovery of costs deferred for fuel and post date certain
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 54
Ohio Regulatory Update
Rate Certainty Plan provided for the deferral of 2006 – 2008 incremental fuel costs
– Recovery was planned to occur in distribution rates over 25 years, but Supreme Court of Ohio remanded the recovery mechanism to PUCO
– On Jan. 9, 2008, the PUCO:– Authorized concurrent recovery of actual 2008 fuel costs via a fuel generation
rider commencing Jan. 1, 2008 (currently projected at approx. $189M)– Directed the Companies to file an alternative recovery mechanism to collect the
2006-2007 deferred fuel costs ($220M) and carrying charges ($6M)
– On Feb. 8, 2008, the Companies filed a separate fuel cost recovery rider for the 2006-2007 fuel and carrying charge deferrals
– Proposed recovery periods ranging from 5 and 25 years– Evidentiary hearing scheduled for July 15, 2008
Supreme Court of Ohio Remand on Deferred Fuel Recovery
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 55
Ohio Regulatory Update
Ohio Edison, CEI and Toledo Edison– On July 10, 2007, filed a comprehensive supply plan for competitively
priced generation service to implement market provisions of S.B. 3 effective Jan. 1, 2009
– Proposal includes:– Option to phase in generation price increases for residential tariff groups that
experience > 15% increase in avg. total price– Time-of-day and hourly pricing options– Renewable energy component
– Competitive bid process (CBP) alternatives– By Customer Class, or– Slice of System
Competitive Generation Procurement Proposal
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 56
Ohio Regulatory Update
CBP process– Descending clock bidding format– Full requirements product (energy, capacity, transmission)– Individual bidders limited to 75% of total customer load– Multiple solicitations; three-year ladder
Bids secured in 2008 would be for service beginning Jan. 1, 2009, and ending:
– May 31, 2010 (17-month)– May 31, 2011 (29-month)– May 31, 2012 (41-month)
Subsequent annual bids for 1/3 of load (3-year supply)
Competitive Generation Procurement Proposal (continued)
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 57
Pennsylvania Regulatory Update
Met-Ed (ME) and Penelec (PN)
Commonwealth Court appeals of rate cases– $109M net increase effective Jan. 2007– Pending appeals to Commonwealth Court
– ME & PN – denial of generation relief and tax expense adjustment– Industrials & OCA – transmission recovery– Oral arguments before panel of judges scheduled for September 2008
Generation procurement filing plan– ME and PN transition to competitive generation market prices on
Jan. 1, 2011– Plan to submit generation procurement proposal in 2008
Commonwealth Court Appeals & Generation Procurement Filing
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 58
Penn Power POLR II CasePennsylvania Regulatory Update
Penn Power successfully transitioned to competitive generation market prices on Jan. 1, 2007
POLR I RFPs implemented for Jan. 2007 – May 2008
POLR II (June 2008 – May 2011)– Multiple RFPs for residential and small commercial customers– Hourly pricing for large commercial and industrial customers
0
2
2
May 08
0
2
2
Apr 08
4343431 yearSmall Commercial
0022002 yearResidential
2200001 yearResidential
Jan 10Oct 09Jan 09Oct 08Mar 08Feb 08
RFP Tranches (50 MW)TermGroup
Small Commercial■ RFPs held on Feb. 20 and Mar. 18 for June 2008 – May 2009 ■ Average price of winning bids was $80.49/ MWH (before line
losses, administration fees, and gross receipt taxes)
Residential■ RFPs held on Apr. 14 and May 14 for June 2008 – May 2010 ■ Average price of winning bids was $80.48/ MWH (before line
losses, administration fees, and gross receipt taxes)
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 59
New Jersey Regulatory Matters
Draft New Jersey Energy Master Plan (Apr. 17, 2008)– Plan goals
– Maximize energy conservation and energy efficiency– Reduce peak electricity demand– Meet 22.5% of the State’s electricity needs from renewable resources– Develop new low carbon emitting, efficient power plants to help close the gap
between supply and demand of electricity– Invest in innovative clean energy technologies and businesses to stimulate the
industry’s growth in New Jersey
– Public meetings held Apr. 28 and May 1– Public roundtable discussions with state and national energy experts
tentatively scheduled for late June– Public hearings to be held in July
JCP&L focus: Peak demand management and cost recovery
Jersey Central Power & Light
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 61
Financial Matters
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 62
$1,223$1,389Subtotal without AQC66
168259
$730
2009F – 2012F Average**
173Corporate/ Other
$2,038
354132
$730
2008F**
Fossil
Total with AQC
NuclearEnergy Delivery
($ millions)
($145)$11
2011F
($7)$4
2012F
$263$649
2008F
($149)$500
2009F
($344)$156
2010F
Change from Prior YearAir Quality Control (AQC)($ millions)
Reinvesting in the BusinessProjected 2008 – 2012 Capital Expenditures*
* Per 2007 10-K**Reflects Fremont plant purchase price of $253.6 million in 2008, but does not yet reflect additional construction costs under study to complete the facility.
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 63
$1,391$2,038$1,496$1,170$1,144$731Total
$168***$649$386$136$54$0Compliance strategy totals - Sammis, Burger Units, Mansfield and Eastlake Unit 5
AQC
$1,223$1,389$1,110$1,034$1,090$731Sub-Total
$66$173$108$39$45$29– Information Technology, etc.Corporate
$259$132$150$229$173$141– Availability improvements– Dry fuel storage / license renewal– Materials issues
Nuclear
$168**$354**$106$116$148$106– Improve managing operating risk– Upgrade aged equipment– Environmental / fuel enhancements
Fossil
$730$730$746$650$724$445– Aged infrastructure rebuild– Pockets of load growth– Reliability improvements
Energy Delivery
2009F-2012F Average**2008F**2007200620052004
Capital Expenditures ($ millions)Project AreaBusiness
Unit
Reinvesting in the BusinessCapital Expenditure Forecast*
* Per 2007 10-K** Reflects Fremont plant purchase price of $253.6 million in 2008, but does not yet reflect additional construction costs under study to complete the facility.*** AQC annual expenditures include $500M (2009), $156M (2010), $11M (2011), $4M (2012).
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 64
Conversion of Auction Rate Bonds
In early 2008, FirstEnergy’s debt portfolio included $530M of long-term debt sold at auction rates Auction rate market severely impacted by loss of liquidity and weak investor demand
– Resulted in higher auction rate resets and failed auctions
Securities were repurchased and are currently held in Treasury– Initially funded with short-term facilities– Exposure capped at short-term borrowing rate, currently around 3%
On Apr. 22, Met-Ed ($28.5M) and Penelec ($45M) remarketed their former auction-rate bonds into a variable-rate mode supported by an LOCSubject to market conditions, plan to refinance remainder of these securities over the balance of the year in either a fixed-rate or variable-rate mode
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 65
Acquiring Additional 18.26% Equity Interest in Beaver Valley 2
On Mar. 3, 2008, notice of intent was given that FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation Corp. (NGC) would acquire ownership of an additional 18.26% undivided interest in Beaver Valley Unit 2 (BV2)
– NGC is exercising an early purchase option under certain existing BV2 leases originally entered into in 1987
– Purchase price is higher of specified lease casualty values (approx. $239M for equity portion of all nine leases) or fair market value of such interests.
– Proposed structure: NGC purchases equity portion from current owners/lessors and becomes the new lessor. The lessor notes of the nine owner trusts that secure lease obligation bonds associated with the debt portion of the original sale and leaseback transactions would remain in place.
– Alternative structure: NGC would purchase the equity and terminate the lease. Would require an additional payment of approx. $236M to prepay the outstanding principal of the lessor notes. The bonds are not subject to prepayment. If prepayment of the notes is insufficient to pay the bonds when due, NGC would provide a mechanism to address any such potential shortfall in a timely manner.
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 66
Achieving Targeted Growth
$3.50
$4.00
$4.50
$5.00
Midpoint 2007 Non-GAAP
EPS Guidance
Midpoint 2008Non-GAAP
EPS Guidance
* See GAAP to Non-GAAP reconciliations in the Appendix. 2008 EPS guidance, excluding special items, is $4.15 to $4.35. On a GAAP basis, 2008 EPS is expected to be $4.23 to $4.43 reflecting $0.08 of special items.
$4.20*$0.04
$0.06 $0.03
$0.14
($0.13)
($0.10)
$4.25*Financing
Costs
GenerationOutput
WiresSales
Growth
2007Share
Buyback
OhioTransition
CostAmortization
Depreciation &General Taxes
OutageO&MCosts
$0.05 Other
($0.04)
2008 Earnings Guidance
Issued on Dec. 5, 2007
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 67
2008 Non-GAAP Earnings Per Share GuidanceReconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP
As of May 1, 2008
2008 EPS
Basic EPS (GAAP basis) $4.18 – $4.38Gain on Sale of Non-Core Assets 0.06Trust Securities Impairment (0.03)
Basic EPS (Non-GAAP basis) $4.15 – $4.35
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 68
2007 Non-GAAP Earnings Per ShareReconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP
2007 EPS
Basic EPS (GAAP basis) $4.27Excluding Special Items:
New Regulatory AssetAuthorized by PPUC (0.05)Gain on sale of non-core assets (0.04)Trust Securities Impairment 0.05
Basic EPS (Non-GAAP basis) $4.23
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 69
Distribution rate case in OH effective 2009
Market generation prices in OH in 2009
Market generation prices in PA in 2011
Asset mining / realizing full potential of generation assets
Further operational enhancements
Timely recovery of regulated costs and capital investments
Achieving Targeted GrowthMajor Earnings Drivers 2009 – 2011
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 70
Declining margin from OH transition plans
Impact of expiring Met-Ed/Penelec third-party power contract in 2009
Increasing fuel and purchased power costs
Increasing O&M costs
Higher depreciation expenses (non-cash)
Achieving Targeted Growth (continued)Major Earnings Drivers 2009 – 2011
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 71
FirstEnergy Credit Ratings
On Oct. 18, 2007, S&P revised the outlook of FE and its subsidiaries to negative from stable
On Nov. 2, 2007, Moody’s revised the outlook of FE and its subsidiaries to stable from positive
Corporate Credit Rating (S&P) / Issuer Rating
(Moody's)
Senior Secured Senior Unsecured
S&P Moodys S&P Moodys S&P MoodysFirstEnergy Corp. BBB Baa3 - - BBB- Baa3
FirstEnergy Solutions BBB Baa2 - - BBB Baa2
Ohio Edison BBB Baa2 BBB+ Baa1 BBB- Baa2
Cleveland Electric Illuminating BBB Baa3 BBB+ Baa2 BBB- Baa3
Toledo Edison BBB Baa3 BBB Baa2 BBB- Baa3
Pennsylvania Power BBB Baa2 A- Baa1 BBB- Baa2
Jersey Central Power & Light BBB Baa2 BBB+ Baa1 BBB Baa2
Metropolitan Edison BBB Baa2 BBB+ Baa1 BBB Baa2
Pennsylvania Electric BBB Baa2 BBB+ Baa1 BBB Baa2
As of December 6, 2007As of May 13, 2008
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 72
Strong Liquidity Position
$ 3,420**
550
120
$ 2,750
Amount ($M)
Total
Various
Various
Aug. 2012
Maturity
1-yearA/R Fin.OH & PA Utilities
VariousBank LinesFirstEnergy Corp.
5-yearRCA*FirstEnergy Corp.
TermTypeCompany
* Revolving Credit Agreement
** As of March 31, 2008
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 73
Deploying Cash Effectively
Potential uses of free cash following completion of AQC projects– Dividend growth– Invest for future growth– Potential for share repurchases– Ability to take advantage of strategic opportunities
Available Cash Forecast*
$130
(132)
(2,038)
$2,300
2008F*
$27
(37)
(542)
$606
Change
$103
(95)
(1,496)
$1,694
2007
Capital Expenditures
Nuclear Fuel Fabrication
Available Cash before Dividends
Net Cash from Operating Activities
($ millions)
* Reflects Fremont plant purchase price of $253.6 million in 2008, but does not yet reflect additional construction costs under study to complete the facility.
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 74
Deploying Cash Effectively
At its Dec. 18, 2007, meeting, the Board of Directors declared aquarterly dividend of $0.55 per share, payable Mar. 1, 2008
Dividend Increases:
$2.2010.00%55.00¢1Q 2008
$1.50
$1.65
$1.72
$1.80
$2.00
AnnualizedRate
–37.50¢4Q 2004
10.00%41.25¢1Q 2005
4.24%43.00¢4Q 2005
4.65%45.00¢1Q 2006
11.10%50.00¢1Q 2007
Change fromPrior Period
QuarterlyRate
PaymentDate
Common Dividend
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 75
Share Repurchase Summary
$0.35$0.22$0.13Annual EPS Benefit
$62.68$65.54$58.99Avg. Price per Share
$1,567$942$627Cost ($ millions)
7.7%4.5%3.2%% Reduction
304.8304.8319.2Ending Shares
25.014.410.6Shares Repurchased
329.8319.2329.8Beginning Shares
Cumulative20072006(Shares in millions)
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 76
Finance Plans: 2008 and Beyond
Maintain financial flexibility– Investment grade credit metrics at all entities
– Metrics maintained over near-term – Metrics improved as AQC capital spend winds down post-2009
– Maintain substantial liquidity– $3.4B total capacity
Reduce holding company debt while appropriately capitalizing operating companies and FirstEnergy Solutions
– Utility debt maturities of only $685M over 2008 – 2011 period– Opportunistically transfer remaining $263M of utility tax-exempt debt to
Generating Companies– $1.9B already transferred
– $1.5B, 6.45% Series B FE Notes due Nov. 2011
June 5-6, 2008Citi Investment Research Power, Gas and Utilities Conference 77
Finance Plans: 2008 and Beyond (continued)
Efficient funding of capital program – Capital expenditures financed largely through internal cash flow, even
during peak AQC spend– New tax-exempt financings of approximately $200M planned to support
Sammis AQC project
Potential uses of substantial growth in free cash following completion of AQC projects
– Dividend growth– Invest for future growth– Potential for share repurchases– Ability to take advantage of strategic opportunities