18
Prepared by Ksenia Udovitskaya and HSE MIB students Solving challenges

Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

Prepared by Ksenia Udovitskaya and HSE MIB students

Solving challenges

Page 2: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

HALLIBURTON WORLDWIDE

• One of the world's largest oil field services & equipment companies

• Provides technical products and services for petroleum and natural gas exploration and production

• Has dual headquarters located in Houston and in Dubai

• Operations in more than 80 countries

• Employs approximately70,000 people

• Chairman and CEO David Lesar

Page 3: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

BALANCE SHEET (ASSETS)

Page 4: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

BALANCE SHEET (LIABILITIES)

Page 5: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

INCOME STATEMENTS

Page 6: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (1)

Page 7: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (2)

Page 8: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

RATIO ANALYSIS

Page 9: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

PROFITABILITY RATIO (1)

Net profit Margin (Net income/Sales): 7.2% (2013) Vs. 10.6% (2014)

Higher the ratio, higher will be the firm’s ability to pay its taxes. In the year 2013, the margin was low but in 2014 the margin increases by 3,4%.

Gross Profit Margin (Gross Profit/Sales): 21.7% (2013) Vs. 22.3% (2014)

This metric reveals the proportion of money left over from revenues after accounting for the cost of goods sold. Without an adequate gross margin, a company will be unable to pay its operating and other expenses and build for the future. It is a good indication of financial health.Indexes show that company's gross profit margin is stable. There is not fluctuating from 2013 to 2014.

Page 10: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

PROFITABILITY RATIO (2)• Operating Profit Margin (EBIT/Sales Revenue) =

10.7% (2013) vs 15.5% (2014)

Page 11: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

PROFITABILITY RATIO (3)• Return on Assets (ROA) (Net income/Total assets) = 7.28%

(2013) vs 10.8% (2014)

Increase in Return of assets indicates that the company is generating more profits from all of its recourses compared to last year.

• Return on Equity (ROE) (Net profit (Net Income)/Shareholders Equity) = 15.6% vs 21.4%

• ROCE (Return on Capital Employed) (Profit before Tax/Capital employed) = Operating Profit Margin*Asset Turnover = 12.8% (2013) vs 19.3% (2014)

Efficient use of capital increased in 6.5% compared to last year. This means that company started to use capital more efficient and generate shareholder value.

Page 12: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY RATIOS• Operating Expense Ratio (Operating Expenses/Total

Revenue) = 10.9% (2013) vs 6.7% (2014)

The figures indicating operating expenses dropped dramatically in 2014 year. The ratio, comparing expenses to revenue, shows that less ability to turn sales of company into cash.

• Total Asset Turnover (Revenue/Average Total Assets) = 100.6 (2013) vs 101.9% (2014)

These figures show how efficiently business generates sales on each dollar of assets. An increasing ratio indicates company uses its assets more productively.

Page 13: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

LIQUIDITY RATIOS

• Working capital ratio (also known as Current Ratio) = (Current assets/Current liabilities) = 2.73 (2013) vs 2.56 (2014)

In 2013, the firm’s ability to cover its current liabilities with its current assets was higher than in 2014. Today company has less ability of firm to pay its bills. Halliburton is not improving their liquidity and efficiency, because their current ratio is not improving.

Page 14: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

DEEPWATER HORIZON EXPLOSION

Page 15: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

LIQUIDITY RATIO• Quick Ratio (Cash +AR + Marketable

Securities)/Current Liabilities = 2.07 (2013) vs 1.95 (2014)

Page 16: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

COMPARISON WITH COMPETITORSQuick Ratio

Page 17: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

LEVERAGE RATIO• Debt-to-equity (Short Term Debt + Long Term

Debt/Total Equity) = 1.15 (2013) Vs. 0.98 (2014)

• Debt ratio (Total Debt/Total Assets): 43.9% (2013) Vs. 42.5% (2014)

Financial leverage ratio compares capital invested by owners/funders (including grants) and funds provided by lenders.The indexes show that company became more stable to handle its long term and short term obligations during this period.

Page 18: Financial Analysis of Halliburton, oil services company

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

Please contact me if you have any questions: [email protected]