3
www.futurumcorfinan.com Page 1 Cost Cost Cost: Keep It Simple Without business, there is no profit, and without profit, there is no businessDuring a financial due diligence, in addition to look at the revenue (we spent a lot of time on this), is cost. Some said, cost is the “enemy”. Not all people can explain away very well about the company’s cost and it always intrigued me. Cost, whatever it is, should be kept simple, even in its ‘account name’. As simple as it is. When I saw the company uses so many accounts to book its costs and using so many approaches to allocate its costs, I guess they want to confuse, instead of making it clearer, the readers of that financial statements. Talking with persons with different backgrounds in the company, especially the company with specialized industry and products, in many times, a bit confusing to me. The technical language will be very different. Take a sample of airline industry. Costs could be related to many different types of plane models, but at the end of the day, towards the end of the discussion, I could say, as an outsider (and somebody from finance background), I don’t know much the difference between one type of commercial airplane from the others (for example, Boeing commercial models, 707, 717, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, 787, and more to come). Yet, one thing I am Sukarnen DILARANG MENG-COPY, MENYALIN, ATAU MENDISTRIBUSIKAN SEBAGIAN ATAU SELURUH TULISAN INI TANPA PERSETUJUAN TERTULIS DARI PENULIS Untuk pertanyaan atau komentar bisa diposting melalui website www.futurumcorfinan.com

Cost cost cost - keep it simple

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

www.futurumcorfinan.com

Page 1

Cost Cost Cost: Keep It Simple

“Without business, there is no profit, and without profit, there is no business”

During a financial due diligence, in addition to look at the revenue (we spent a lot of time on

this), is cost. Some said, cost is the “enemy”. Not all people can explain away very well about

the company’s cost and it always intrigued me.

Cost, whatever it is, should be kept simple, even in its ‘account name’. As simple as it is. When I

saw the company uses so many accounts to book its costs and using so many approaches to

allocate its costs, I guess they want to confuse, instead of making it clearer, the readers of that

financial statements.

Talking with persons with different backgrounds in the company, especially the company with

specialized industry and products, in many times, a bit confusing to me. The technical language

will be very different. Take a sample of airline industry. Costs could be related to many different

types of plane models, but at the end of the day, towards the end of the discussion, I could say,

as an outsider (and somebody from finance background), I don’t know much the difference

between one type of commercial airplane from the others (for example, Boeing commercial

models, 707, 717, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, 787, and more to come). Yet, one thing I am

Sukarnen

DILARANG MENG-COPY, MENYALIN,

ATAU MENDISTRIBUSIKAN

SEBAGIAN ATAU SELURUH TULISAN

INI TANPA PERSETUJUAN TERTULIS

DARI PENULIS

Untuk pertanyaan atau komentar bisa

diposting melalui website

www.futurumcorfinan.com

www.futurumcorfinan.com

Page 2

pretty sure, they are all marginal costs, they are same like other costs, the difference is just,

they put “wings” on that cost.

Sometimes, as I joke, I will say to them, even I don’t know what the difference between “bolts

and nut”. To me, they are called “cost” and I prefer knowing them lesser than more.

Not all costs are the same, similar to not all revenues and cash flows are the same. The

certainty of costs in many cases are higher than the certainty of revenues and cash flows that

the company will be able to make, generate and sustain in the future.

Though per textbook in the university, costs are mostly segregated into fixed cost, variable costs

and semi-variable costs, and discretionary costs. Yet, I guess, we need to see ‘more costs” for

“keep the company having a competitive advantage” and lesser costs for “just being in the

market”. Competitive advantage is like a virginity, much easier to protect it than to get it back

once lost.

The company should focus on activities, that instead of whether they are “value added” or not

(as many MBA textbook teaching us), but I believe, it is easier, instead of arguing “value-added”

or not”, whether it is destroyer of company’s profit. Some people will argue that reducing cost

could hit the company in the long run, yet I believe, with now, the world becomes so “flat”, long

run could only mean as short as 1 year from now.

~~~~~~ ####### ~~~~~~

www.futurumcorfinan.com

Page 3

Disclaimer

This material was produced by and the opinions expressed are those of FUTURUM as of the date of

writing and are subject to change. The information and analysis contained in this publication have been

compiled or arrived at from sources believed to be reliable but FUTURUM does not make any

representation as to their accuracy or completeness and does not accept liability for any loss arising from

the use hereof. This material has been prepared for general informational purposes only and is not

intended to be relied upon as accounting, tax, or other professional advice. Please refer to your advisors

for specific advice.

This document may not be reproduced either in whole, or in part, without the written permission of the

authors and FUTURUM. For any questions or comments, please post it at www.futurumcorfinan.com

© FUTURUM. All Rights Reserved