Upload
activatenetworks
View
418
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Measuring progress toward
accountable care: lessons from 59
pioneering hospitals
Keith J. Figlioli
SVP, Healthcare Informatics
Premier, Inc.
October 8, 2013
2 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Will vs. Preparation
“The key is not the will to win. Everybody has that.
It is the will to prepare to win that is important.”
~ Coach Bobby Knight, 1984 USA Men’s Olympic Basketball
Photo credit: usab.com
3 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Care Model
Organization Model
Payment Model
U.S. Healthcare Sector:
Three major transformations simultaneously
PAYMENT MODEL
End of Cross-
Subsidization
Shift to Voucher
Marketplace
Integrated vs. Fragmented
Personal Accountability
Assumption of Risk
Insurance exchanges
ORGANIZATION MODEL
End of Private
Practice Medicine
Consolidation of
Health Systems
Rise of Physician &
Clinical Leadership
Hospital Health System
CARE MODEL
Primary Care/PCMH
Hospitalists / Hospital-
based Medicine
Behavioral Health
Chronic Disease Focus
Social Science Tools
Shift from sick care system
to health system
4 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
And behaviors need to change
Protecting one’s “turf”
All ideas proprietary
Closed systems
Little transparency, no bias for sharing
Competition between providers, with others across healthcare
Spotty collaboration efforts
Data hoarding
Avoiding confrontation when things aren’t working
Few cross continuum partnerships
5 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
A framework for assessing readiness
• Participants
• Methods
Important attributes for readiness
• What mattered
• What didn’t matter
What we can do about it
• Challenges
• Successful strategies
Today’s discussion
Framework
7 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
252 Medicare ACOs
in 43 states
Over 430 Medicare and
Commercial ACOs
500 providers in CMS
Bundled Payment
initiative
Growing number of ACOs nationwide
8 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
The Network Effect – Premier PACT Collaborative
29 markets | 23 systems | 100+ hospitals | 5,000+
MDs, 1.5M accountable care covered lives
86 markets | 67 systems | 300+ hospitals | 12,000+
MDs
9 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Assessing readiness
10 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Accountable Care Core Components
People Centered
Foundation Health Home
High Value Network
Population Health Data
Management
ACO Leadership
Payor Partnerships
Foundational Philosophy: Triple Aim™
The Bridge from FFS to Accountable Care
What are the
underpinning
building blocks?
Current
FFS
System
Accountable
Care
Measurement
Readiness
12 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Overall Assessment by Component**
**Data from 59 assessments
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Patient Centered Foundation
Health Home
High Value Network
Population Health Data Management
ACO Leadership
Payor Partnership
Blue = Top Decile
Green = Median
Red = Bottom Decile
13 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Variation Among Organizations with High Component Scores
Organization (in
order of high to low
overall weighted
score)
Weighted Component Scores
Overall
Score PCF HH HVN PHDM ACOL PP
Organization 1
0.76
0.47
0.67 0.63 0.64
0.47 0.61
Organization 2
0.59
0.64
0.52 0.60 0.46
0.39 0.53
Organization 3
0.44
0.17
0.53 0.52 0.73
0.72 0.52
Organization 4
0.51
0.42
0.36 0.56 0.58
0.58 0.51
Organization 5
0.55
0.52
0.59 0.52 0.50
0.10 0.46
Organization 6
0.41
0.38
0.44 0.47 0.45
0.55 0.45
Organization 7
0.44
0.50
0.33 0.27 0.57
0.51 0.44
Organization 8
0.52
0.27
0.47 0.46 0.47
0.36 0.43
Organization 9
0.55
0.28
0.27 0.27 0.28
0.13 0.30
Organization 10
0.34
0.21
0.53 0.23 0.26
0.18 0.29
Scoring well in one component does not always translate to readiness in all components
Blue indicates higher scores Red indicates lower scores
14 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Top 5 and Bottom 5 – Lessons from Comparisons
Factors That Differentiate Organizations with High ACO Readiness
1. Full or partial ownership of a health plan with pop health mgt capabilities 2. Existing collaboration with other health systems in the community 3. Existing risk-based contracts with payers including bundled payments 4. A sophisticated EHR and HIE implementation strategy across the continuum of care 5. Clinical integration across the continuum of care 6. Patient-centered medical home with employed or community providers 7. Positive relationships with primary care and specialty care providers in the market 8. Active governance structures that include physician leadership (e.g. PHOs)
Factors That Do NOT Differentiate
1. Market share 2. Number of employed physicians 3. Disproportion of the market with government financed health services 4. Financial strength (strong for the entire group) 5. Medicare spending level – low cost areas are not further along 6. High proportion of commercially insured patients 7. Already in active execution of a clinical integration strategy across the system
Implications for future ACO development
16 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
White paper health systems
Fairview Health Services is a nonprofit healthcare system based in Minneapolis with more than 50% of its revenue under ACO payments.
AtlantiCare, in Southeastern New Jersey, is the region’s largest healthcare organization and largest non-casino employer .
Memorial Healthcare System is a public provider of healthcare services to South Florida. It is the 5th largest public system in the nation.
Presbyterian Healthcare Services serves Albuquerque and rural New Mexico with physician services at more than 30 different locations.
17 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Essential lessons learned
Managing populations requires fundamental health delivery change
Focus of primary transformation: Aligning clinical
w/payment
Physician leadership, engagement pivotal in
ACO shift
Critical success factors Care coordination
Executive leadership & governance support Comprehensive & coordinated primary care
services, integrated IT
Market pressures create opportunities for
mutually-beneficial partnerships
Pace of execution limited by payer/physician
readiness for value-based participation
18 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Challenges with physicians, local payers, infrastructure
investment, state/federal data regs slows execution
Payers should also support ACO participation in medical
home & bundled payment programs
Work needed with patient engagement, specialist and
post-acute care arrangements, and data exchange
Ideal pacing unclear: • Slow implementation leaks savings to non-participating
payers
• Rapid implementation increases risk
Challenges and policy implications
19 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Successful implementation strategies
20 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Target programs for top 5% utilizers - Atlanticare
Begin to change organizational construct - Presbyterian
Embedded care managers - Fairview
Start with small populations – Memorial
ED navigators – Presbyterian
Culture, culture, culture – All systems
Crawl, Walk, Run…But Start
21 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL – © 2013 PREMIER INC.
Bench or Game
Photo credit: nbaarena.com
No one has to change. Survival is optional. ~ W. Edwards Deming
Thank you…