Upload
uttam-pudasaini
View
390
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This Project analyses the locations which are assumed to be provided by a shopping mall which is trying to extend its network at Banepa. We are provided with three areas of Banepa whose topographical information is to be collected and among these areas we have selected a working site and based on certain parameters we have divided this site into a number of appropriate locations. This presentation was given at Kathmandu University during 3rd year Engineering Project of Geomatics Engineering study.
Citation preview
ANALYSIS OF SUGGESTED SITE FOR CONSTRUCTIONG OF A SHOPPING MALL AT
BANEPA,KAVRE
Department of Civil and Geomatics EngineeringKathmandu University
Dhulikhel,Kavre
Project MembersTina BaidarArchana KecySuresh ManandharUttam PudasainiKamal Shahi Thakuri
Project SupervisorEr.Subash GhimireEr.Ganesh Dhakal
Project InchargeProf.Dr.Ramesh Kumar Maskey
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
Introduction Rationale Scope of work Objectives Resources Used Methodology Outcomes Conclusion Project Schedule References
2
INTRODUCTION
Shopping Mall Place to purchase daily requirements of every individual A single location with multiple advantage
Site Selection Appropriate location from given areas
Selection based on analysis of data collected from surveying
RATIONALE
Banepa is overcrowded with street markets
Decrease in the beauty of city
Need of organized shopping trend
To help the business agency of
Kathmandu in selecting a site for construction of Shopping Mall
4
Fig: Organized Shopping inside a Shopping Mall
SCOPE OF WORK
Preparation of a map showing the possible locations in the selected area
Constructional and structural aspect of the building are out of scope
Main Objective To analyze the suggested sites and propose a location
for construction of shopping mall
Sub Objectives To map and analyze the data using GIS
To gain knowledge about site selection procedure
6
RESOURCES USED
Instruments Used
7
Measuring Tape
Theodolite
Staff
Softwares Used• Microsoft office Package• ArcGIS• Google Earth
METHODOLOGY
Desk study
Literature review
Coordinate Computations
and Error Adjustment
Mapping and Data analysis
Field works
Traverse and Tacheometry
8
DS
9
Site near to water resource ,No
discharge data
Selected as working siteFar from
settlement areas
Source: Google Earth,2012-07-24,5:55pm
Working Area
Source :Google earth,7/24/2012;6:44PM
FILED WORKS
Closed Traverse 7 traverse stations and a BM Took coordinate of BM and station(T1) using GPS Relative Accuracy of Traverse::1:9000
Tacheometry
T2 Theodolite with a stadia Diaphragm was used for detailing
Source:Google Earth(2012-07-02,5:55pm)
Closed Traverse
COORDINATE COMPUTATION AND ERROR ADJUSTMENT
Took coordinate of BM and station(T1) using GPS
Error adjustment using Bowditch rule
Relative Accuracy of Traverse 1:9000
COORDINATES OF TRAVERSE STATIONS
SN Easting(m) Northing(m) Elevation(m)
1 355784.000 3056589.000 1470.000
2 355837.344 3056604.336 1477.286
3 355899.526 3056659.384 1480.924
4 355893.009 3056721.580 1483.501
5 355822.875 3056737.559 1483.720
6 355777.835 3056686.583 1479.099
7 355773.441 3056645.795 1473.844
BM 355776.000 3056602.000 1470.5
MAPPING AND DATA ANALYSIS
15
Plot Detail Points
Topographical Map Preparation
Buffer of Road Network
Buffer of Transmission Line
DEM Generation
Slope Model Map
Appropriate Location Selection
DATA PLOTTING
PREPARATION OF TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP
Scale: 1:1200
Total Area: 37,224 sq.m.
Projection System Everest-
Bangladesh Transverse Mercator
BUFFER CREATION
A type of proximity computation in GIS
35 m buffer of Araniko Highway
10m Buffer of high voltage Transmission line
Fig:Buffer of 500 m around a road
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL
Digital representation of ground surface topography
Includes modeling of terrain parameters(slope, aspect, gradient)
Description of shape of ground surface in terms of
elevation
A continuous raster representation
No. of columns, rows=251,290
Cell size=1.0036148
OUTCOMES
A Map showing appropriate locations within the suggested area
A Topographical map of the suitable working site at a scale 1:1200
A continuous raster representation as Digital Elevation Model of the area
CONCLUSION
Rejected two sites because of specified reasons
Third site at Budol, Banepa was selected as working site
Three Locations were selected as appropriate locations
Map prepared by us are useful documents for the concerned authority
PROJECT SCHEDULES.N Weeks
Activities
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1 Project title selection
2 Desk study and supervisor consultancy
3 Proposal defense
4 Reccee
5 Surveying and data collection
6 Computation and plotting
7 Topographical map and DEM preparation
8 Mid term presentation
9 Analysis on prepared map and location selection
10 Final report preparation
11 Final presentation
REFERENCES
Arora,K.R.(2008) “Surveying Volume-1”,Rajsons Publication Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi
Chang,Kang-tsung (2008)”Introduction to GIS” ,Tata McGraw Hill Education Pvt. Ltd.New Delhi
Michigan gov.(2010),’I’nformation about site selection considerations.pdf’’
Gomarasca, Maria (2010),”Major factors in Industrial location.pdf”, Springer publication, London
27
28
29
QUERIES?