20
A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure RITA ABDEL SATER & MARIA JOSE OSPINA FADUL, 2014

A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Barcelona GSE Master Project by Rita Abdel Sater and María José Ospina Fadul Master Program: Health Economics and Finance About Barcelona GSE master programs: http://j.mp/MastersBarcelonaGSE

Citation preview

Page 1: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

A bullet a day keeps the doctor away:

the effect of war over health expenditure

RITA ABDEL SATER & MARIA JOSE OSPINA FADUL, 2014

Page 2: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure
Page 3: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Average Domestic per Capita Health Expenditure ( at average exchange rate)

Page 4: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure
Page 5: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Introduction

• Our article examines if conflict affects the overall level of healthcare expenditure and itscomposition, as we would expect changes in the behavior of the main funders of health (public andprivate sector as well as third parties), and examine whether this effect is different with differentintensities of war.

Page 6: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Theoretical Framework 1

H1: In countries exposed to high intensity of conflict, war spells decrease overall domestic Health Expenditure but this will not happen

countries with a low intensity of conflict.

• Economic Growth and GDP

Private sector: increased uncertainty and chaos inhibits investments and there is relocation of most

productive facilities.

Public sector: erosion of the tax base and, additionally, due to a decrease in the efficiency of tax

administration that is caused by the political distress.

• Human and fixed capital of the health system

• BUT although the effect on economic growth and activity would still be persistent in mild wars because of the

increased uncertainty and instability in the country, the destructive effect would be somewhat absent and public

spending may still be able to compensate the decrease.

Page 7: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Theoretical Framework 2

H2: Government health expenditure as percentage of total health expenditure decreases when the country is exposed to a war, in

countries with both in high and low intensity of conflict, but the effect is lower in the case of the latter

• Crowding out effect within the public budget

- Increase in military and security expenditure (nearly 2 %)

- 10% increase in the risk of conflict0.4% increase in military spending

• Crowding out effects of the public resources by third parties:

- By the private sector

- By Foreign Aid

$1 of aid $0·46 decrease in government health expenditure

Page 8: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Methods

Data

1. Information on conflict for every country from the Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO): conflicts of low intensity (less than 1000 fatal victims) and high intensity (more than 1000 fatal victims) from 1946 until 2008.

2. Data for health expenditure and its composition was obtained from the WHO, as reported in the National Health Accounts from 1995 to 2011.

3. Data on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita was obtained from the World Bank for the same period of time.

4. Intersection of available data: from 1995 to 2008

Page 9: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Methods

War spells

• Two or more consecutive years with a registration of conflict

• Recodification of the war registers for smooth war spells (started from 1992)

0.5

1

1995 2000 2005 2010

congo

Con

flic

t R

ep

ort

yearGraphs by Country

0.5

1

1995 2000 2005 2010

congo

Wars

pell

Re

cod

e

yearGraphs by Country

Page 10: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Methods

Sample and intensity classification0

.51

1.5

20

.51

1.5

20

.51

1.5

2

1990 1995 2000 2005 20101990 1995 2000 2005 2010

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Congo Eritrea Indonesia

Nepal Rwanda Senegal

Sierra Leone

Type

of w

ar

YearGraphs by Country

0.5

11.5

20

.51

1.5

20

.51

1.5

20

.51

1.5

2

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

C?te d'Ivoire Cambodia Central African Republic Croatia Djibouti

Egypt Georgia Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau

Iraq Liberia Niger Pakistan Papua New Guinea

Peru Somalia Tajikistan Thailand Uzbekistan

Type

of w

ar

YearGraphs by Country

High-Intensity Cluster Low-Intensity Cluster

Page 11: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Overall levels of health expenditure

Statistical model 2

Methods

Per capita government health expenditure (current US)

Per capita domestic health expenditure (current US)

Page 12: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Changes in the composition of the health expenditure and percentage within

the public budget

Statistical model 2

Methods

Government health expenditure as % of total health expenditure

Government health expenditure as % of total government expenditure

Page 13: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Results

Estimation issues

• Fixed vs. Random Effects: Hausman test (p<0.05 for all models)

• Presence of serial autocorrelation of first order: Wooldrigde test (p<0.05for all models)

• Arellano Bond GMM estimator, robust to heterosckedasticity

Page 14: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Results: overall levels of expenditure

Per capita health expenditure

Per capita government health

expenditure

Pc health expenditure (lag instrumented)

0.563***

Pc government health expenditure (lag instrumented)

0.737***

GDP per capita lag 0.0434*** 0.0357***

Foreign aid for health lag -0.045 -0.808

War (High Intensity Cluster) 3.288 6.712*

War (Low Intensity Cluster) -5.290** -1.223

Constant-17.48*** -22.88**

Page 15: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Results: percentages and composition

VARIABLES GHE/ THE GHE/ TGE

GHE/ THE(lag instrumented)

0.391***

GHE/ TGE(lag instrumented)

0.520***

GDP per capita lag -0.023 -0.0126

Foreign aid for health lag3.975* 1.199*

War (High Intensity Cluster)-1.76 -1.039

War (Low Intensity Cluster)-0.148 -0.731**

Constant0.519 -2.707

Page 16: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

• High-intensity: No apparent effect on THE , GHE PHE

No apparent effect on GHE / TGE No crowding out effect

Total Government Expenditure

• Low-intensity: THE , no apparent effect on GHE PHE

GHE / TGE crowding out effect TGE

Discussion

Page 17: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

• Measurement of war

• Civil conflicts → clear ending date? comparison of conflicts across

countries?

• Relatively large sample and applying clustering

Main limitations

Page 18: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Conclusions and further developments

• Our empirical findings disagree with our hypothesis; nevertheless they do show a change in thepatterns of health expenditure.

• In countries with low intensity of conflict:

A disruption in the growth of health expenditure + long terms effects of these kind of wars on publichealth = increased negative effect over health status

• For future assessments:

Type of war

Lingering effect

Time series

Page 19: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Chen S., Loayza N., Reynal-Querol M. (2008), The Aftermath of war , World Bank Economic Review, 2008

Collier P., Hoeffler A., (2002), Military Expenditure: Threats, Aid and Arms Races, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2927, November 2002

Day K. and Tousignant J. (2005), Health Spending, Health Outcomes, and Per Capita Income in Canada: A Dynamic Analysis, Working Paper 2005-

07, Canada Ministry of Finance, June 2005.

Devarajan, Shantayanan; Miller, Margaret J.; Swanson, Eric V. (2002). Goals for Development : History, Prospects, and Costs. World Bank,

Washington, D.C.. World Bank.

Easterbrook, P. (1990), The Health Impact of "Low Intensity Conflict, Journal of Public Health Policy, Vol. 11, No. 3 (Autumn, 1990), pp. 277-280

Edwards, Sebastian and Guido Tabellini (1991) Explaining Fiscal Policies and Inflation in Developing Countries. Journal of International Money and

Finance, vol. 10.

Evans, David B., Ajay Tandon, Christopher J.L. Murray, and Jeremy A. Lauder, (2002) The Comparative Efficiency of National Health Systems in

Producing Health: An Analysis of 191 Countries, GPE Discussion Paper No. 29. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Fearson, J. (2002) Why Do Some Civil Wars Last So Much Longer Than Others?Department of Political Science, Stanford University, CA 94305-2044,

July 12, 2002

Ghobarah, H., P. Huth, and B. Russett. (2002), The Post-War Effects of Civil Conflict, in Alex Mintz and Bruce Russett eds., New Directions for

International Relations (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books

Grundy J., Leslie P. and Mihrshahi S. (2008), “Balancing National Security with Human Security – A Call for Comprehensive Pre-Event Public Health

Analysis of War and Defence Policy”, Journal of Peace, Conflict and Development, Issue 12, May.

Page 20: A bullet a day keeps the doctor away: the effect of war over health expenditure

Gupta, J., Clemens, B., Bhattacharya, R., Chakravarti S., (2002), Fiscal Consequences of Armed Conflict and Terrorism in Low- and Middle- Income

Countries. International Monetary Fund.

Gupta, Sanjeev; Marijn Verhoeven & Erwin Tiongson (2003).Public spending in health care and the poor. Health Economics 12 (8): 685-696.

Knight M., Loayza N., and Villanueva D. (1996) The Peace Dividend: Military Spending Cuts and Economic Growth. IMF Staff Papers 43 (1): 1–37.

Kruk, M., Rockers P., Williams T., Varpilah, T. (2009), “Availability of essential health services in post-conflict Liberia”, Bulletin of the World Health

Organization 2010;88:527-534. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.071068

Lu C., Schneider M.T., Gubbins P., Leach-Kemon K., Jamison D., Murray C.J. (2010), “Public financing of health in developing countries: a cross-

national systematic analysis”,The Lancet, 375 (9723), , pp. 1375-1387.

Murdoch, J. and Sandler, T. (2002), “Economic Growth, Civil Wars, and Spatial Spillovers”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 46(1): 91-110.

Nouriddin, Irfan & Joel W Simmons (2006). The politics of hard choices: IMF programs and government spending. International Organization 60(4):

1001–1033

Peacock, A. T., & Wiseman, J., (1961) The growth of public expenditures in the United Kingdom. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Sheieh, Lai and Chang (2002), Endogenous Growth and Defense expenditures: A New Explanation of the Benoit Hypothesis, Defense and Peace

Economics, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.179-186

Stewart, F. (1993), War and Underdevelopment: Can Economic Analysis Help Reduce the Costs? Journal of International Development 5(4): 357-80.

Sweeney N., (2009), Private sector development in post-conflict countries A review of current literature and practice, The Donor Committee for

Enterprise Development, Jim Tanburn : 12-24