16
9M 2012 IFRS Results Core business strength fully intact Conference Call November 21, 2012

9M 2012 IFRS Results

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

9M 2012 IFRS Results

Core business strength fully intact

Conference Call

November 21, 2012

Page 2: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

2

Assets up 5.9% YtD to RUB 194,709 mln

Corporate portfolio up 6.3% YtD to RUB 120,109 mln

Retail portfolio up 28.8% YtD to RUB 31,376 mln

Client funds up 4.0% YtD to RUB 150,982 mln

NPLs came to 9.41%

1day+ overdues covered by 101%, 90days+ overdues – by 153%

9M 2012 Highlights

Net income surged to RUB 1,787 mln, up 59,1% YoY

Net interest income was up 27,1% YoY to Rub 6,664 mln,

Net fees up 8,2% from 9М’11 to RUB 3 737,

NIM was up to 4,7% versus 4,0% in 9М’11

Cost to income decreased 876 b.p. to 56,4% for 9M’12

ROE improved to 12,3% up from 8,6% in 9М’11

Capital adequacy (tier 1 + tier 2) increased to14,2%, capital adequacy (tier 1) – 12,1%

Page 3: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

3

Macroeconomic tailwinds in Q3

Despite deterioration

of growth trends in

the economy…

…fortress balance

sheet provides

flexibility for decent

performance

GDP growth of just 2.9% YoY in Q3 versus 4% in Q2

Retail trade growth slowed to 4.4% YoY in September from 7.3% in H1’12

Inflation accelerated to 6.7-6.8% in October, but failed to support consumer

spending

Ruble exchange rate appreciated by 6% in Q3

Investments declined 1.3% YoY in September, given 7.2% fall in housing

construction

Capital outflow continued with $58 bln Ytd figure

Refinancing rate up 25 bps to 8.25% to cool down retail growth

Liquid assets maintained above 23%, while their structure shifted to more

profitable one

Corporate portfolio decline (-3% QoQ) offset by retail boost (+11% QoQ)

Balanced currency and maturity structure of assets and liabilities with prevailing

Rouble-nominated instruments

Net interest income flat QoQ at Rub 2.3 bln, but non-interest income up 7.3%

QoQ to Rub 1.6 bln, supporting revenue growth

Operating efficiency improved with expenses down by 4.1% QoQ amid tight

cost management

Page 4: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

4

Assets

RUB bln

137 137 144 152 151 138 145 143 152 151

99% 95%

101% 100% 100%

Q3'11 Q4'11 Q1'12 Q2'12 Q3'12

Gross loans

Customer funds

L/D ratio

RUB bln

5%

55% 16%

6%

0%

18%

Corporate loan

portfolio Retail loan

portfolio

Other assets

Due from other

banks

Cash and

equivalents

Securities

9 10 10 10 10

103 101 106 111 107

21 23 25 27 30

17 9 14

12 12 0 1

27 40 29 34 35

177 184 183 194 195

Q3'11 Q4'11 Q1'12 Q2'12 Q3'12

Cash andequivalents

Due frombanks

Securities

Retail loans

Corporateloans

Otherassets

6,7% 6,0%

9,5% 11,0%

6,0% 6,1%

22% 23%

Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Cash and Equivalents,

Obligatory Cash

Balances with the CBRF

Correspondent

accounts

Securities

Reliable assets structure…

IEA made up 77% of total assets

…with high level of liquid instruments

LTD ratio at optimal levels

Page 5: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

5

27 842

59 801

63 842

Loans

Moscow Oblast

(40%)

Moscow (18%)

Other

regions(42%)

*as of 30.09.2012

Rub bln

RUB

151,485

mln

27%

21%

1%

23%

1%

7%

6%

5% 9%

*as of 30.09.2012

Construction Manufacturing

Agriculture

Wholesale &

retail trade

Administrations

Other Transport

Individuals

RUB

151,485

mln

77,2 78,0 73,6 70,1 72,3

31,4 28,3 25,9 24,4 22,5

1,8 3,4 3,3 2,7 3,9

41,1 42,7 41,2

40,2 38,1

Q3'12Q2'12Q1'12Q4'11Q3'11

SME Individuals Administrations Large corporates

-0,5%

13,6 15,4 17,0 18,5 20,8

6,5 6,8

6,8 7,6

8,4

2,3 2,2

2,2 2,1

2,1

Q3'11 Q4'11 Q1'12 Q2'12 Q3'12

Mortgages Consumer and auto loans Credit cards

+10,8%

SMEs are key growth driver in corporates…

Balanced presence in all regions of interest

…consumer and mortgages – in retail

Breakdown by industry

+39,8%

+11%

Page 6: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

6

1 399 827 827 777 965

5,0% 4,4% 4,3%

3,6% 3,5%

6,2%

3,4% 3,2% 2,7%

3,1%

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Retail

8 464 7 769 8 263 8 120 7 841

11,3% 11,5% 11,1% 10,4% 10,5%

11,1% 10,7% 10,8% 10,0% 9,9%

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

SMEs

1 625 1 980 3 400 3 400

5 445

7,6% 8,7% 8,9%

10,1% 12,2%

4,3% 4,9%

8,3% 8,0%

13,2%

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Large corporates

NPLs, RUB mln Provisions, % of total portfolio NPLs, % of total portfolio

Credit quality management

15

* NPL includes the whole principal of loans at least one day overdue either on

principal or interest as well as not overdue loans with signs of impairment

2,86% 2,24%

1,02%

1,92% 2,14% 2,06%

1,65%

1,02%

1,77%

1,71%

Q3 2012 Q2 2012Q1 2012Q4 2011Q3 2011

Charges to provisions to avggross loans, QoQ

Charges to provisions to avggross loans, YtD

+ Rub 581 mln new NPLs

- Rub 860 mln recoveries + Rub 304 mln new NPLs

- Rub 116 mln recoveries

11 488 10 576 12 490 12 297 14 251

9,26%

9,44% 9,25% 9,09%

9,52%

8,40% 7,70%

8,68% 8,08%

9,41%

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

NPLs, RUB mln

Provisions, % of total portfolio

NPLs, % of total portfolio

*

RUB mln

+ Rub 2,156 mln new NPLs

- Rub 111 mln recoveries

NPLs categorization: deterioration in large corps, while absolute improvement in SME

Annualized cost of risk NPLs dynamics

Page 7: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

7

Credit quality

as of 30.09.2012 Large

corporates SMEs Mortgages Other

retail Total % of total

loans

Gross loans, including 41,116 78,993 20,807 10,569 151,485 100.0%

Current loans 35,671 71,152 20,363 10,048 137,234 90.6%

Past-due but not impaired, of them - 32 260 105 397 0.3%

Less than 90 days - 32 230 97 359 0.2%

Over 90 days - - 30 8 38 0.1%

Impaired, of them 5,445 7,809 184 416 13,854 9.1%

Less than 90 days 3,726 706 7 36 4,475 2.9%

Over 90 days 1,719 7,103 177 380 9,379 6.2%

Total NPLs 5,445 7,841 444 521 14,251 9.4%

Provisions (5,006) (8,321) (541) (554) (14,422) 9.5%

Net Loans 36,110 70,672 20,266 10,015 137,063

-

Provisions to

NPLs Ratio

NPL -

101%

Rescheduled

Loans

4.6%

the whole amount of loans with principal overdue for more than 1 day as well

as loans with any delay in interest payments.

Provisions to

90 days+

NPLs

153%

Page 8: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

8

19 20 22 24 25

71 72 72 77 78

16 20 18 19 18

32 33 31

32 30

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Corporate deposits Retail deposits Retail accounts Corporate accounts

Liabilities and capital

18 18 19 20 20 4 4 4 4 5 9 8 7 7 8 6 7 8 8 8

19 20 22 24 25

32 33 31 32 30 16 20 18 19 18

71 72 72

77 78

177 184 183 194 195

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Retail deposits

Retail accounts

Corp. accounts

Corp. deposits

Securities issued

Due to other banks

Other Liabilities Subordinatedloans Equity

RUB bln

11,6% 11,9% 11,8% 11,6% 12,1% 13,4% 13,8% 13,4% 13,2%

14,2%

11,6%

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2013 30.09.12

Tier 1 Tier 1 + Tier 2 CAR under CBR rules

(N1)

11%

MIN RUB 80%

USD 13%

EUR 7%

RUB80%

USD13%

EUR; 7%

Assets Liabilities

Data as of September 30, 2012

RUB bln

32%

… driven mostly by client funds Funding grows in line with assets…

Capital position exceeds the requirements FX structure matched

+9,2% -0,6%

Page 9: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

9

Financial highlights

9M’12 9M’11 Q3’12 Q2’12

Interest income 12 150 10 265 4 263 4 118

Interest expense (5 486) (5 022) (2 010) (1 856)

Fee and commission income 4 029 3 746 1 424 1 387

Fee and commission expense (292) (292) (104) (96)

Other operating income 649 433 302 220

Total operating income b.p. 11 050 9 130 3 875 3 773

Operating expenses (6 231) (5 948) (2 051) (2 138)

Provisions (2 271) (1 646) (1 083) (830)

Provisions on non-core assets (316) (133) (2) (1)

Tax (445) (280) (156) (126)

Net profit 1 787 1 123 583 678

Page 10: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

10

4,6% 4,9% 4,7% 4,8% 4,6%

Net interest income impacted by growth on both sides of the balance sheet

-1,6 -1,5 -1,6 -1,9 -2,0

3,6 3,7 3,8 4,1 4,3

Interest Expenses

Interest Income

Q2’12 Q3’11 Q4’11 Q1’12

+28.1%

Q3’12

+8.3%

6,38% 7,13% 6,93% 6,72% 6,69%

10,40% 10,74% 10,82% 11,16% 11,37%

4,02% 3,61% 3,88% 4,44% 4,68%

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Interest SpreadYield on earning assets (net)Cost of funds

NIM +3 bps

-16 bps

+18.7%

+3.5%

Q2’12 Q3’11 Q4’11 Q1’12 Q3’12

…with NIM slightly down due to higher base… Flat net interest income QoQ…

…amid surging interest rates environment

4,80%

0,30% 0,30% 0,01%

0,14%

4,64%

Q2 NIM Loanseffect

Depositseffect

Other Baseeffect

Q3 NIM

Page 11: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

11

25%

12% 13%

31%

42%

0,0% 1,0% 2,0% 3,0% 4,0%Net fee margin

vbank

peer 1

peer 2

peer 3

2,0 2,2 2,1 2,3 2,3

1,3 1,4

1,1 1,3 1,3

0,1 0,2

0,1 0,2 0,3

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Net interest income Net fees Other income

Decent operating results from strong non-interest

revenues

+13.1%

+2.7%

353 414 326 377 391

310 337

256 304 300

245 253

219 250 265

348 364

325 360 364

1 256 1 368

1 126

1 291 1 320

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Settlements Cash transactions Other CardsRUB mln

+2.2% +5.1%

Share of non-interest

income in total operating

income b.p.

* Vbank data as of 3Q’12, Peer1, Peer2, Peer 3, Peer 4 – 2Q’12

RUB bln

55%

18%

23%

4%

55%

17%

24%

4%

Cards

Other

Corporate

business Retail business

Cards

Other Corporate

business

Retail business

Q3 2012 Q2 2012

… supported by well-diversified net fees Solid operating revenues…

Segment breakdown of non-interest income Strongest net fee margin among peers

Page 12: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

12

Cost efficiency in focus

RUB mln

1 224 1 352 1 258 1 260 1 236

835

1 053 784 878 815

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Personnel expenses

Non-personnel expenses

-4.1%

-0.4%

24% 28% 23% 23% 21%

36% 36%

37% 34% 32%

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Personnel expensesOther expenses

-+7.2 pps

60% 64%

60%

53% 57%

Operating expenses were under strict control

throughout 2012, year-on-year dynamics of 4.6% was

below inflation growth

Decline in Q3’12 was partially attributable to cut in

staff costs and continued optimization of

administrative costs

Personnel expenses remained the key contributor

with the share of 60% in OPEX. Decrease in Q3 was

due to lower average headcount. Earned fees cover

staff costs by 107%

3. Application of new operating model for the whole bank Transfer of supporting processes to the centralized back-office from branches

Testing and launch of automated and centralized support systems

2.Preparative process and pilot project

Amendments to internal documents, launch of pilot

projects

Implementation of IT solutions for automation and

centralization

Staff coaching, KPIs introduction, working groups

of the project

1. Concept development of new operating model

Define format of branches, geography and headcount of

centralized back-office

IT requirements for centralization (systems,

processes, infrastructure)

New motivation system development

Key points Cost efficiency project

Consistent improvement of quarterly CIR Operating expenses breakdown

Page 13: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

13

Net profit affected by elevated provisioning

-0,7 -0,7 -0,4 -0,8 -1,1

1,4 1,4 1,4 1,6 1,8

Operating profit before provisions and taxes

Provisions

+33.4%

Q3’11 Q4’11 Q1’12 Q2’12

+11.6%

Q3’12

0,411 0,471 0,526 0,678

0,583

-14%

+41.8%

Q3’11 Q4’11 Q1’12 Q2’12 Q3’12

Net profit

30,8% 29,7% 29,0%

33,9% 36,6%

9,3% 10,4% 11,2% 14,0%

11,7%

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Operating profit before provisions and taxation/Average equity

ROE

3,12% 3,00% 2,96%

3,47% 3,75%

0,94% 1,05% 1,15% 1,44%

1,20%

Q3 2011 Q4 2011 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012

Operating profit before provisions and taxation / Assets

ROA

Net profit development High provisions partially offsets strong operating

performance

ROA, % ROE, %

Page 14: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

14

Liquid assets maintained above 23%

Good opportunities for growth in retail and SME

Improving yields across the portfolio

Key takeaways of Q3 2012

Increased funding costs are gradually passing

on to the borrowers

Strong non-interest income supports revenues

Key target – to maintain margins

Strengthened capital position due to

subordination

High share of interest-free funds

Limited exposure to market funding

Particular focus on efficiency improvement

lead to decline of Cost-to-Income ratio

Strict control over operating expenses

Project on operating efficiency is expected to

bring fruits going forward

…on the back of reliable funding Flexible assets structure…

…with all eyes on efficiency Solid core operating results …

Page 15: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

15

Questions and answers

[email protected] http://www.vbank.ru/en/investors

Elena Mironova

Deputy Head of IR

+7 495 620 90 71

[email protected]

Andrey Shalimov

Deputy Chairman of the Management

Board

[email protected]

Page 16: 9M 2012 IFRS Results

16

Disclaimer

Some of the information in this presentation may contain projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events or the

future financial performance of Bank Vozrozhdenie (the Bank). Such forward-looking statements are based on numerous assumptions

regarding the Bank’s present and future business strategies and the environment in which the Bank will operate in the future.

The Bank cautions you that these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and other important

factors that we cannot predict with certainty. Accordingly, our actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what we have

expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as at the date of this presentation

and are subject to change without notice. We do not intend to update these statements to make them conform with actual results.

The Bank is not responsible for statements and forward-looking statements including the following information:

- assessment of the Bank’s future operating and financial results as well as forecasts of the present value of future cash flows and related

factors;

- economic outlook and industry trends;

- the Bank’s anticipated capital expenditures and plans relating to expansion of the Bank’s network and development of the new services;

- the Bank’s expectations as to its position on the financial market and plans on development of the market segments within which the

Bank operates;

- the Bank’s expectations as to regulatory changes and assessment of impact of regulatory initiatives on the Bank’s activity.

Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially

from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include:

- risks relating to changes in political, economic and social conditions in Russia as well as changes in global economic conditions;

- risks related to Russian legislation, regulation and taxation;

- risks relating to the Bank’s activity, including the achievement of the anticipated results, levels of profitability and growth, ability to create

and meet demand for the Bank’s services including their promotion, and the ability of the Bank to remain competitive.

Many of these factors are beyond the Bank’s ability to control and predict. Given these and other uncertainties the Bank cautions not to

place undue reliance on any of the forward-looking statements contained herein or otherwise.

The Bank does not undertake any obligations to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or

circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable laws.