WOMAN AS ROLE MODEL IN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
IICIES – 26 June 2012 – Ciputra, Surabaya
Lenny Martini, Surna Tjahja Djajadiningrat, Anggara Wisesa
School of Business and Management-ITB
Abstract
Three essential concepts in community development process are changing process, resource utilization and community capacity development (Soetomo, 2006). To fulfill these basic elements, Wisesa (2010) proposed to apply the role model method. Based on the case study of Social Enterprise for Economic Development (SEED) in Cisondari, West Java, Indonesia, woman was the ideal figure to be the role model in the community development. This paper purposes to elaborate more on woman characteristics that fits the requirement for the ideal role model in community development, answering the three basic elements in community development program (change process, resource utilization and community capacity development).
Key words: Woman, Role Model, Community Development
Introduction
Adaptation ability of human, as individual and community
Community development as form of change
External support can help community’s problem with limited
access
Measurement of successful community development
program: sustainability & continuity of the changes
Constraint from knowledge sharing process from external to
community as the implementer
Solved by looking for right role model, function as connector
Evalution of SEED 2010 in Cisondary –West Java
Literature Review (1)
Community Development Programprocess in which community in a specific location for social action, build initiatives - either with or without intervention - to change their economic, social, and cultural, and or environment situation (Christenson, Fendley, and Robinson ,1989)
Systematic, planned, and directed activity which is intended to expand public access to achieve a better quality of life (Budimanta, 2002) 3 Fundamental Elements
change process, resource utilizationcommunity capacity
building(Soetomo, 2006)
Self Help ApproachCommunity as main actor
Controller of change processBasically, every community has ability and potential to
grow on its own strength
(Soetomo, 2006; Green & Haines, 2008; Green, 2008)
External party involvement is required only as far as the catalyst for the change
process (Combs & Ahmed, 1980)
Literature Review (2)
Challenge in Community Development Program To find what is really needed and not what is merely desirable
(Gilbert & Specht, 1977) Resistance, greater when change comes from outside and
seems forced Time factor : influence researcher’s intensity of interaction
with the community, determines how external intervention affects the goal in implementation
Role Model Acts as an example in performing a specific behavior so the others can copy
the behavior. In performing a role, a model should be able to inform, motivate, and
encourage others to follow what he does This role model encouragers others to adopt new practice by illustrating the
benefits of the new method, thus accelerating the rate of acceptance (Brown & White, 2009).
Pilot project by right role model
Literature Review (3)
Criteria for Role Model (Wisesa, 2010)1. A model should be well known person is by others in the
community as someone who has innovation particularly in order to improve people's lives
2. The person should be friendly, sociable, has good relationships with others, and can influence - in terms of motivating – others
3. The model is person who is persistent and works hard in trying new things
4. The person has commitment to implement the program, teaches others, and motivates others to apply the knowledge they acquireBenefits of Applying the role-model method in self-help
approach 1. The method does not require continuous external
intervention2. Takes a relatively short period of time of external
intervention, especially in the implementation phase3. Role method models serve as bridge in the knowledge
transfer inside the community
SEED
Cross-cultural learning program conducted jointly by SBM-ITB Indonesia and University of St.Gallen, Switzerland, Chair for International Management (South East Asia) Asia Learning Network, 2 week, students participants
Objectives:1. to promote economic development in a target village2. cross cultural learning in real life of Asian context
Human Resources
Social Capital
Natural
Resources
Implementable Business Plan to
Enhance People’s Capability
Sustainable Development
Autonomous Community
The Case Study – SEED 2010
Day- ActivitiesDay 1 Program Opening
Short lecture and briefing about the program, Team grouping
Day 2 Audience Session with the Chief of the Village
Day 3-7 Village Familiarization
Day 8 Focus Group Discussion with villagers
Day 9 Idea Presentation PreparationDay 10 Idea Presentation
Day 11-12
Final presentation Preparation
Day 13 Final presentation
Day 14 Program Closing:
31 October 2010 – 12 November 2010, Cisondari Village, West Java, Indonesia
20 participant from St. Gallen, 5 participant from SBM-ITB = 5 groups
The Case Study – SEED 2010
Group Location Business Plan Status1 Kampong Ciaul,
RW 14Pasteurized milk and yoghurt
Unimplemented
2 Kampong Ciaul, RW 13
Mawar cookies and ranginang
Unimplemented
3 Kampong Pasir Awi, RW 08
Mushroom plantation Unimplemented
4 Kampong Pasir Awi, RW 09
Customized Sandal Unimplemented
5 Kampong Pangkalan, RW 17
Caramel candy cutting tool
Implemented
The Case Study – SEED 2010
Kampung Gambung Pangkalan: 120 familes, more than 300 residents, 35% high school graduates, 65% junior high school graduates, main occupations are farmer and stock breeder, additional incomes from caramel candies and milk cracker production.
Ideas:1. Organic Food (high price, high
demand vs conflictive views on farming and absence of responsible person in the organic plantation)
2. Natural Fertilizer (high investment)
3. Caramel Candy
The team developed new cutting tools for caramel candy production that can saves 2 hours of processing time and increase production from 400 to 800 piece a day
The Case Study – SEED 2010
After Action Review observations and interviews with local community, most of
them were the same people that had worked with the participants two years ago
Findings: the caramel candy business was the only business that conducted by woman among other business plans
Hypothesized that gender might be the key success factor in this kind of social development
Group discussion with the former participants from SEED 2010 from both countries
The gender factor really determine the success of the business plan. From the very first day of the activities in the SEED Program, this group of woman seen more open with the new information and knowledge that was shared by the participants. Also in the process of business plan development, they were more actively involved with the participant and had higher willingness to really implement the business plan
Woman as Role Model
Women are successfully being the role model for their community development because they can fulfill all the criteria to be an ideal role mode
Criteria Explanation
A model should be well known person is by others in the community as someone who has innovation particularly in order to improve people's lives
The chief of the caramel candy business is the wife of the Rukun Tetangga, chief of the neighborhood. She is the one who always think about her neighborhood and how to improve their life.
The person should be friendly, sociable, has good relationships with others, and can influence - in terms of motivating – others
Seen from the nature of organic community of the rural areas that they have very close relationship with one another, these woman also able to influence their neighborhood easily
The model is person who is persistent and works hard in trying new things
They were very open to the new method and actively participate in the development of business plan report by the participants
The person has commitment to implement the program, teaches others, and motivates others to apply the knowledge they acquire
women who are running this caramel candy business have real commitment to implement the program. They also teach others and motivate others to apply the knowledge they acquire from the SEED participants
Conclusion
Women are successfully being the role model for their community development because they can fulfill all the criteria to be an ideal role mode
The result of this research can be an important consideration in implementing community development programs which is in the same context with this research.Also this research contributes to future research development in other community development topics.
AcknowledgementThe authors would like to give high appreciation for all the SEED Participants 2010 who had been involved in the after action review process and to all the local community in the Cisondari Village, West Java, Indonesia
References
llen, T. J., (1966),; “Studies of problem-solving process in engineering design,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Management, vol.13, pp. 72-83.
Ewton, S.; “E-Business Strategies,” unpublished. Ghisi, F. A., A. B. Noronha and T. Pimenta, Jr., “The information technology and
the critical success factors”, Retrieved 2/15/03 World Wide Web, http://www.picmet.org/bulletin.pdf
Iyengar, B.C. and A.D. Harris, (1999),"Innovative approaches to the management of software development projects," in Papers presented at PICMET'99 [CD-ROM], eds.: D.F. Kocaoglu, T.R. Anderson, D.Z. Milosevic, K. Niwa and H. Tschirky, Portland, OR: PICMET.
Nicole, R.; “European and Asian approaches to technology management: A comparative analysis ,” Intl. J. of Technol. Mgmt., in press.
Palmer, I., Dunford, R., and Akin, G. (2006) Managing Organizational Change, Mc. Graw Hill International Ed., Singapore.
Pinto, J. K. and D. P. Slevin, (1989)“Critical success factors in R&D projects,” Res. Technol. Management, pp. 30-35.
Sanderson, S. and V. Uzumeri,(1990), “Strategies for new product development and renewal: design-based incrementalism,” Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., Center for Sci. and Technol. Policy, working paper.
USAID (2006) After Action Review: Technical Guidance. Young, M., (1989),;The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA: University
Science.
Thank you..