The Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology
Hilton AustinAustin, Texas
3-7 January 2014
Final Program
Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology with the
Animal Behavior Society
American Microscopical Society
The Crustacean Society
1
Table of ContentsOfficers/Co-Sponsoring Societies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3Meeting Highlights/Social Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5SICB and Divisional Business Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6Special Lectures/Special Events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7Symposia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9Workshops and Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10General Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
Speaker Ready Room . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12Business Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12Coffee Breaks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12Committee and Business Meetings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12Employment Opportunities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12Registration Location/Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12
Exhibitor Listing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13Scientific Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .19Keyword Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .126Author Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .136Floor Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .150
Future Meeting DatesWest Palm Beach, Florida, 3-7 January 2015
Portland, Oregon, 3-7 January 2016
New Orleans, Louisiana, 3-7 January 2017
The Society for Integrative & Comparative Biology1313 Dolley Madison Blvd .
Suite 402McLean, VA 22101
Phone: 703-790-1745 - 800-955-1236FAX: 703-790-2672
Email: SICB@BurkInc .comWeb: www .SICB .org
75
SICB Posters - Sunday 5 January 2014
P2.133 DCPB Akuma DC, Piermarini PM, Gillen CM; Ke-nyon College, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center
Tissue and developmental expression of three putative Na-coupled cation-chloride cotransporters in Aedes aegypti
P2.134 DCPB Lovett DL, Williams M, Pulido S, Goldfarb AM; The College of New Jersey, Ewing
Effect of salinity on gene expression for enzymes in the methyl farnesoate synthesis pathway in the green crab Carcinus maenas
P2.135 DCPB Mitchell RT, Henry RP; Auburn University Functional evidence for neuroendocrine regulation of car-bonic anhydrase in the blue crab Callinectes sapidus
P2.136 Bollinger RJ, Bujak JK, Madsen SS, Tips-mark CK; University of Arkansas, Fay-etteville, University of Southern Denmark, Odense
Vivo-morpholino induced knock-down of gill Na,K-ATPase impairs seawater acclimation in rainbow trout
P2.137 Zajic DE, Cramb G, Gotz M, Villasenor A, Yancey PH; Whitman College, University of St. Andrews
Novel osmolyte in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) as a po-tential biomarker of freshwater-seawater transition
P2.138 DCPB Tipsmark CK, Breves JP, Rabeneck DB, Trubitt RT, Lerner DT, Grau EG; University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, University of Masse-chusetts, Amherst, University of Hawaii, Kaneohe
Effects of salinity and cortisol on gill claudin-10c, -10e, -28a, -30 and occludin in tilapia
P2.139 DCE McCormick SD, Regish AM, O’Dea MF; USGS, Conte Anadromous Fish Research Center
The evolutionary consequences of staying in freshwater: seawater performance, physiological and endocrine differ-ences between landlocked and anadromous salmon
P2.140 Mascarenhas FE, Mallery Jr. CS, Dzialowski EM; University of North Texas, Denton
Physiology of the Pekin duck (Anas pekin) ductus arterio-sus
P2.141 DCPB Hedrick MS, McNew KA; University of North Texas
Does baroreflex gain vary with habitat in anuran amphib-ians?
P2.142 DCPB Slay CE, Hicks JW; University of California, Irvine
Cardioventilatory responses to digestion in anemic Ameri-can alligators (Alligator mississippiensis)
P2.143 DCPB Wehrle BA, Herrel A, Tadic Z, German DP;University of California, Irvine
Testing the adaptive modulation hypothesis: physiological changes in in a newly herbivorous lizard
P2.144 Chamberlain JD, Gifford ME; University of Arkansas, Little Rock
The influence of prey size and abundance on patterns of energy allocation in watersnakes
P2.145 DCPB Wiessner G, Stewart JR, Heulin B, Ecay TW; East Tennessee State University, John-son City, Station Biologique de Paimpont, France
Developmental calcium uptake and chorioallantoic mem-brane expression of calbindin-D28K by viviparous Zootoca vivipara embryos under manipulated ex utero calcium pro-vision
P2.146 Hobensack MJ, Hood WR; Auburn Univer-sity
Increasing mechanical strain on the skeleton during repro-duction does not reduce bone mobilization during repro-duction in the mouse
P2.147 Karratti-Abordo J, Nerurkar P; University of Hawaii at Manoa
Anti-inflammatory mechanisms of tropical foods
P2.148 Rodriguez LM, Aguilar AC, Castillo AO*; University del Valle, Cali - Colombia
Leptin’s promoter methylated in pregnant women with a low flow-mediated vasodilation
Reproduction and Sexual SelectionP2.149 DAB McKee A, Newton S, Carter A; California
State University, Long BeachInfluence of inbreeding on female mate choice in two spe-cies of Drosophila
P2.150 DVM Morris JS, Carrier DR; University of Utah Specialization for aggression in sexually dimorphic skeletal morphology in Carnivora
P2.151 Donoviel ZS, Sirman AE, Hood WR; Auburn University
Maternal dietary effects and age at first reproduction in the house mouse
P2.152 Panhuis TM, Kwan L, Fris M, Tuhela-Re-uning L, Rodd FH, Rowe L; Ohio Wesleyan University, University of Toronto
Structural characterizations of the Poeciliopsis fish pla-centa
27.2 WEBSTER, M.R.*; SOCHA, J.J.; DE VITA, R.; Virginia Tech;[email protected] Elasticity of Tracheal Tubes in the American CockroachIn some insect species, diffusion−based respiration is supplementedwith convection. For insects that use rhythmic tracheal compression,convective ventilation is produced by the periodic collapse andre−inflation of various tracheae in the respiratory system, aphenomenon that is dependent on the unique structure and materialproperties of the tracheal tissue. To understand the underlyingmechanics of this method of gas transport, we are studying themicrostructure and material properties of the primary thoracictracheal tubes in American cockroaches. In previous tensile tests, wefound that these tracheae sustain large strains and exhibit a nonlinearelastic behavior. Although these tests provided crucial informationabout the mechanical behavior of the tracheal tubes, they wereinsufficient to fully describe the complex three−dimensional loadingconditions experienced in vivo by these tubes. Inflation−extensiontests, in which the trachea is pressurized while being stretched in thelongitudinal direction, provide mechanical data that are morephysiologically relevant. For this reason, we design and built aninflation−extension testing system that is able to measure low axialforces, internal pressures, and surface deformations of tracheal tubesof ~500 µm diameter. Images collected with two synchronized CCDcameras were analyzed using the digital image correlation method tocompute the strain field. In addition, we also developed a constitutiveequation that can capture the finite strains and nonlinear elasticity ofthe t rachea l tubes . Our u l t imate goa l i s to fo rmu la te athree−dimensional model that can be implemented into finite elementmethods to reproduce the complex mechanical response of trachealtubes under in vivo loading conditions. Supported by NSF 0938047.
P2.18 WEDEMEYER, KR*; BERNARDO, J; PLOTKIN, PT; TexasA and M University; [email protected] niches as underlying mechanisms of L. olivacea femalealternative reproductive tacticsAlternative reproductive tactics are well studied in males, but poorlyknown in females. An important but understudied question is: Whatselection pressures cause divergent female behavior and/ormorphology? We hypothesize that Lepidochelys olivacea (oliveridley sea turtles) female alternative reproductive tactics (solitary vs.mass−nesting behaviors) relate to an ecological dimorphism −differential foraging strategies (neritic vs. pelagic). We areinvestigating this idea using morphometrics, stable isotopes andsatellite tracking.
P2.143 WEHRLE, BA*; GERMAN, DP; Univ. of California, Irvine;[email protected] the Adaptive Modulation Hypothesis: PhysiologicalChanges in in a Newly Herbivorous LizardFew studies of diet incorporate analyses of what an animal is actuallydigesting. Knowing what an animal digests (as opposed to only whatit ingests) allows us to understand if its physiology and morphologyare optimized for its nutritional source. According to the AdaptiveModulation Hypothesis, dietary specialization should lead to gutspecialization. We investigated potential digestive specializations ina lizard species that has shown rapid evolution of feeding anddigestive tract morphology. A population of the Italian Wall Lizard(Podarcis sicula) in Croatia has become primarily herbivorous andmorphologically distinct from its insectivorous source population in<30 generations. Though some morphological changes have beendocumented, it is unknown if gut function has shifted with this dietchange. We compared the gross morphology of the intestines of bothgroups of lizards, compared their diets, and measured performancesusing digestive enzyme activities and concentrations of fermentationend products (short chain fatty acids, SCFAs). In a common gardenexperiment, we measured digestive efficiency of lizards from theherbivorous and source populations on different diets. Experimentsare in progress, but we expected that the plant−eating populationwould have more plant material in their guts and a hindgut chamberin their distal intestines. Moreover, we expected to find differences inenzymatic activities among the populations, with the herbivoresshowing elevated carbohydrase activities. We also anticipated thatthe plant−eating population will have slower food transit times,increased microbial fermentation, and increased digestibility of aplant diet than the insectivorous population. Overall, this study willtest whether rapidly evolving morphological features can translateinto changes in animal performance.
S7.1−1 WEINERSMITH, K.L.*; HANNINEN, A.F.; SIH, A.;EARLEY, R.L.; University of California Davis, University ofVirginia, University of Alabama; [email protected] californiensis, a brain−infecting trematode parasite,is associated with changes in physiology and behavior in its killifishsecond intermediate hostThe trematode parasites Euhaplorchis californiensis (EUHA) andRenicola buchanani (RENB) infect California killifish (Fundulusparvipinnis) as second intermediate host. Infected killifish exhibitconspicuous behaviors, and infection is associated with a 10−30times increase in predation rates by birds, the parasites' shareddefini t ive host. EUHA is also associated with changes inneurotransmitter activity, which could result in downstream changesin steroid hormone release rates. In this study we explore associationsbe tween s t ress ho rmones ( co r t i so l ) and sex ho rmones(11−ketotestosterone and estradiol) and EUHA and RENB density inwild−caught California killifish. We find that the interaction betweenduration of handling stress and the density of EUHA influencesrelease rates of cortisol and 11−ketotestosterone. We discuss theimplications of these findings, and plans to further explore theserelationships using controlled infections.
SICB 2014 Annual Meeting Abstracts
January 3−7, 2014, Austin, TX 363
QUICK START (cont.)
How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme of your choice. You can also create your own color theme. You can also manually change the color of your background by going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue working on your poster.
How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-formatted placeholders for headers and text blocks. You can add more blocks by copying and pasting the existing ones or by adding a text box from the HOME menu.
Text size Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you have to present. The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow the conference requirements.
How to add Tables To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you select rows and columns.
You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins.
Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on how the original document has been created.
How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see the column options available for this template. The poster columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW > MASTER.
How to remove the info bars
If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished your poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be included. You can also delete them by going to VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide Master.
Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing, save as PowerPoint of “Print-quality” PDF.
Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.
© 2013 PosterPresenta/ons.com
2117 Fourth Street , Unit C
Berkeley CA 94710
(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) DESIGN GUIDE
This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 36”x60” presentation poster. You can use it to create your research poster and save valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics.
We provide a series of online answer your poster production questions. To view our template tutorials, go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK.
When you are ready to print your poster, go online to PosterPresentations.com
Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001
QUICK START
Zoom in and out As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level that is more comfortable to you. Go to VIEW > ZOOM.
Title, Authors, and Affiliations Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text into the provided boxes. The template will automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box. You can manually override this feature and change the size of your text. TIP: The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s) and institution name(s).
Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert a logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when printed. Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like on the final poster and make any necessary adjustments. TIP: See if your company’s logo is available on our free poster templates page.
Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-looking poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them disproportionally.
Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look good they will print well.
ORIGINAL DISTORTED
Corner handles
Good
prin
/ng qu
ality
Bad prin/n
g qu
ality
present
Introduction