What’s New in CISE:Status Report and
Reflections
Gregory R. AndrewsProfessor, Computer Science, Univ. of Arizona
Former Division Director, Computer and Network Systems, National Science Foundation
February 2005
2
Outline
• NSF context • The CISE Directorate• Programs, trends, and plans• Reflections and lessons learned
3
National Science Foundation (NSF)
• Created in 1950“to promote the progress of science; to
advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense; and for other purposes”
• Roles– Support basic research– Train the next generation– Educate the public– Advise the government on science policy
4
Federal Support for Research
• National Science Foundation (NSF)– Curiosity-driven basic research– Long term
• National Institutes of Health (NIH)– Use-inspired basic research– Long term
• Mission Agencies: DARPA, DOE, NASA, etc.– Applied research– Shorter term
5
Pasteur’s Quadrant
Basic research (Bohr) NSF 1950 … 2005
Use-inspired basic research (Pasteur)
NIH
Applied research (Edison)
Mission Agencies
6
NSF Organization
Directorate for BiologicalSciences
Directorate for Mathem atical& Physical Sciences
Directorate for Computer &Information Science and Engineering
Directorate for Social, Behvioral& Econom ic Sciences
Directorate for Education& Human Resources
Directorate for Geosciences
Directorate for Engineering Office of Polar Programs
Office of Integrative Activities
Office of the Director
National ScienceBoard
Administrative Offices
7
NSF Crosscutting Initiatives for 2005
• Biocomplexity in the Environment• Nanoscale Science and Engineering• Mathematical Sciences• Human and Social Dynamics
• Information Technology Research - ended as an initiative in 2004
8
Computer and Information Science and Engineering
(CISE)
• Created in 1985 (out of MPS)– Three research divisions– Two infrastructure divisions:
supercomputing and networking– Office of cross-disciplinary activities
• Minor reorganization in 1997– 5 Divisions: CCR, EIA, IIS, ACIR, ANIR
• Major reorganization in 2003– 4 Divisions: CCF, CNS, IIS, SCI
9
CISE Responsibilities
• Support basic research and education in computer and information science and engineering
• Support a shared cyberinfrastructure for all of science and engineering
10
New CISE Organization
C om puting andC om m unica tions
Foundations(C C F)
C om puter andN etw orkSystem s
(C N S)
In form ation andIn te lligentSystem s
(IIS )
SharedC yberin frastructure
(SC I)
O fficeof the
AssistantD irector
11
Key Concept: Cluster
• Comprehensive activity in a coherent area of research and education
• Team of program officers and staff working closely with the community
• Initially: group of existing programs• By end of FY05: one program per cluster
12
Computing and Communication
Foundations (CCF)• Formal and Mathematical Foundations
– Computer science theory; numerical computing; computational algebra and geometry; signal processing and communication
• Foundations of Computing Processes and Artifacts– Software engineering; software tools for HPC; programming
languages; compilers; computer architecture; graphics and visualization
• Emerging Models for Technology and Computation– Computational biology; quantum computing; nano-scale
computing; biologically inspired computing
13
CCF Competitions
• FY 2004– Responsible for about 2030 proposals– Heavy mortgages and NSF-wide commitments– Decent success rates for CAREER (15%) but terrible
success rates for clusters (6%)
• FY 2005 – Theoretical Foundations: January 2005– Emerging Models for Technology and Computation:
February 2005– Foundations of Computing Processes and Artifacts: May
2005 with awards in fall from FY 2006 budget
• FY 2006 and 2007– Possibly no competitions in FY 2006– Fall deadlines for all three clusters in FY 2007
14
Computer and Network Systems (CNS)
• Computer Systems– Distributed systems; embedded and hybrid systems; next-
generation software; parallel systems
• Network Systems– Networking research broadly defined plus focus areas in
programmable wireless networks and networks of sensor systems
• Computing Research Infrastructure– Research infrastructure; minority institutional
infrastructure; research resources
• Education and Workforce– Curriculum development/educational innovation; IT
workforce; special projects; cross-directorate activities (e.g., REU sites)
15
CNS Competitions
• FY 2004– Responsible for about 2035 proposals– Good success rates for CAREER and infrastructure (30%)– Fair success rates for research programs (18-20%)
• FY 2005 — One solicitation per cluster– Computer Systems: November 2004– Network Systems: January 2005– Computing Research Infrastructure: July 2005– Education and Workforce: Education with research
programs; workforce subsumed by Broadening Participation emphasis area
• FY 2006– Same deadlines as in FY 2005, but Networking in December
16
Information and Intelligent Systems (IIS)
• Systems in Context– Human computer interaction; educational technology;
robotics; computer-supported cooperative work; digital government
• Understanding, Inference, and Data– Databases; artificial intelligence; text, image, speech, and
video analysis; information retrieval; knowledge systems
• Science & Engineering Informatics/Information Integration– Bioinformatics; geoinformatics; cognitive neuroscience;
data-driven science
17
IIS Competitions
• FY 2004– Responsible for about 2590 proposals– Success rates 17% CAREER, 6% regular.
• FY 2005– Raise success rate of 2004 to 12-15%– Science & Engineering Informatics/Information Integration
and Universal Access: December 2004– Data, Inference, and Understanding and Systems in
Context: May 2005 with awards in fall from FY 2006 funds
• FY 2006– Same deadlines as in FY 2005
18
Shared Cyberinfrastructure (SCI)
Cyberinfrastructure: computational engines, storage, networking, data, sensors, software, and services to support advances in science and engineering
• Infrastructure Deployment– Planning, construction, commissioning, and
operations
• Infrastructure Development– Creating, testing, and hardening next-generation
deployed systems
19
History of NSF CI Investments
PACI NPACI and Alliance
Terascale TCS, DTF, ETF
Cyberinfrastructure
Supercomputer Centers
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
| | | | | |
SDSC, NCSA, PSC, CTC
Prior Computing Investments
NSF Networking
NMINSF Middleware Initiative
ITRInformation Technology Research
20
SCI Competitions
• FY 2004– Core funding for the PACI centers and expansion of the
Extensible Terascale Facility (ETF)– NSF Middleware Initiative (NMI): 141 proposals; 20 awards– International Network Connections: recently decided
• FY 2005– Continuing support for PACI and ETF– Cyberinfrastructure Teaching, Education, Advancement,
and Mentoring (CI-TEAM): Spring 2005– NSF Middleware Initiative (NMI): Spring 2005– Leveraging and coordinating shared and domain-specific
cyberinfrastructure with other agencies and directorates
21
Key Concept: Emphasis Area
• Focused area of research that cuts across clusters and divisions
• Addresses a scientific and/or national priority
• Has program announcement and funds
22
FY 2004 Emphasis Areas
• Cyber Trust– Develop computing systems that operate securely
and protect sensitive information– Received 488 proposals; made 50 awards; got $5M
in co-funding from DARPA• Information Integration
– Integrate and “mine” large data repositories to support data-driven science
– Received 238 proposals; made 33 awards• Science of Design
– Develop a body of theoretical and empirical knowledge to facilitate creation of a science of software design
– Received 182 proposals; made 24 awards
23
FY 2005 Emphasis Areas
• Information Integration: December 2004• Cyber Trust: February 2005• Science of Design: Spring 2005
• Broadening Participation: June 2005– Support alliances and projects that have the
potential significantly to increase the number of underrepresented students achieving college and graduate degrees
• Probably one more on High-End Computing
24
NSF and CISE Annual Budgets ($M)Actuals
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Req
FY
NS
F B
ud
get
($M
)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
CIS
E B
ud
get
($M
)
NSF
CISE
25
Funding Rate for Competitive Awards in CISE
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Nu
mb
er o
f P
rop
osa
ls a
nd
Aw
ard
s
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Fu
nd
ing
Rat
e
Competitive Proposal Actions Competitive Awards Funding Rate
26
NSF and CISE Funding Rate Trends
0%5%
10%
15%20%25%30%
35%40%
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
FY
Fu
nd
ing
Rat
es
NSF
CISE
27
CISE FY 2005 BudgetRequest ($M)
CISE Budget Lines FY 2005
CCF $91.41
CNS $132.39
IIS $92.54
SCI $123.60
ITR (cross-CISE) $178.11
CISE Total $618.05
28
Reflections on Being at NSF
• My Duties– Represent CISE in NSF and Interagency settings– Help set CISE directions and policies– Manage the development and execution of CNS
programs and budget– Manage CNS staff: scientific and administrative
• Program Officer Duties– Represent their discipline within CISE and NSF– Interact with community to get input and provide
advice– Help define directions for their area of research– Manage competitions: core and cross-disciplinary
29
General Observations
• Science Policy and Government Agencies– There are lots of smart, hardworking government
employees– Each agency, including Congress, has its own point of view
and its own agenda– Budget size matters
• National Science Foundation– Widely respected throughout government, for good reason– There is an institutional ethic to provide service to the
scientific community– It’s lots more fun when the budget is rising (2003) than
when it is falling (2004 and 2005)
30
General Observations II
• CISE Directorate– The importance of CISE is recognized within NSF– Funding decisions truly are guided by NSF’s dual roles:
• Supporting good science • Training the next generation—throughout the
country– The rapid increase in proposals has put CISE under
tremendous pressure• The scientific staff is overworked• The peer review process is at the breaking point
– Despite the above, panels and program officers are making good recommendations
– However, few projects are adequately funded and lots of really good work is not getting funded
31
Advice
• Attributes of winning proposals– Address important problem and have novel idea(s)– Well written project description, good technical depth,
know the related work– Address broader impacts and describe (own) prior
work — and read the proposal submission instructions!
• Interact with program officers– Get feedback on proposals, ask for advice, provide
input– Volunteer to be a reviewer
• Consider working at NSF at some point
32
Conclusion
• NSF’s role is fundamental to all areas of society — the most basic future investment
• Computer science and related disciplines are hugely important in their own right and essential to advancement in all areas of S&E
• NSF and our field are facing unprecedented pressures that can only be overcome by concerted, cooperative action
33
Further Information
• CISE Web site: www.cise.nsf.gov
• Computing Research News bimonthly columns: www.cra.org
• Contact: [email protected]