What New Scholars Want
California State University System
Cathy A. Trower, Ph.D.May 8, 2006
First Exercise
Please place an * by the five that you feel are most important to recent graduates of doctoral degree programs.
Then place an x by the next five most important.
Top 10 Factors from Survey
1. Institutional support for my research (# 6)2. Time for family/personal obligations (# 13)3. Quality of department (# 16)4. Number of courses/preps (# 2)5. Flexibility of work schedule (# 12)
6. Opportunity for collaboration (# 10)7. Content of courses I will teach (# 1)8. Opportunity to work independently (# 9)9. Geographic location of institution (# 18)10. Quality of the institution (# 17)
Importance to Students of Color
In making job choices, students of color placed significantly more importance than white students on:
1. Having institutional support for my research
2. Match between my research interests and those of others in my department
3. Opportunity to work with a leader in my field
4. Job security
Importance to Female Students
In making job choices, female students placed significantly more importance than male students on:
1. Flexibility of my work schedule
2. Time for family/personal obligations
3. Employment opportunities for my spouse/partner
4. Teaching load
5. Geographic location
Importance to Male Students
In making job choices, male students placed significantly more importance than female students on:
1. Opportunity for recognition
2. Quality of the department
3. Quality of the institution
4. Opportunity to work with a leader in my field
5. Level and quality of students
Choice CycleInside or Outside
Academe?
Pros
Salary/benefitsFacilities/support
Opportunities forspouse, promotion
Outside
Cons
Job securityPerks
The private sector competes to be a great place to work!
Choice Cycle
Inside or Outside Academe?
CommunityCollege
ResearchUniversity
Inside
Liberal ArtsCollege
Public Private
ComprehensiveUniversity
Key Factors in Job ChoiceInside the Academy
Whether the position is tenure-track or non-tenure-track
Contact length for non-tenure-track appointment Mix of teaching and research expected Salary Prospects of tenure or contract renewal Department quality/ranking Institutional prestige Geographic location of the institution
Factors influencing job choice
Of the 7 factors measured: Geographical location was always most
important. Mix of teaching and research always second. Salary almost always fifth. Institution prestige almost always last.
__________________________________
Discipline differences
75%69%
58%53%
65%
77%
29%
19%23%
29%
38%43%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Default Scenario1
Scenario2
Scenario3
Scenario4
Scenario5
TT
NTT
Neither
Default: Both offers match work preferences, 71-85% chance of tenure/contract renewal, location where comfortable living, dept ranked 11-20, institution ranked top 10, 3-year contract (NTT offer) Scenario 1. NTT: 10 year contract Scenario 2. TT: Satisfied living; NTT: Comfortable living Scenario 3. TT: Differs; NTT: Matches Scenario 4. TT: Don't like location; NTT: Comfortable living Scenario 5: TT: Don’t like location; NTT: Most preferred location
75%
66%
58%
52%48%
60%
48%
37%
23%
32%
40%44%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Default Scenario 6 Scenario 7 Scenario 8 Scenario 9 Scenario 10
TT
NTT
Neither
Default: Both offers match work preferences, 71-85% chance of tenure/contract renewal, location where comfortable living, dept ranked 11-20, institution ranked top 10, 3-year contract (NTT offer) Scenario 6. NTT: Top 10 department Scenario 7. NTT: Top 10 department and 10-year contract Scenario 8. TT: Differs; NTT: 110% salary; 3-year contract Scenario 9. TT: Differs; NTT: 125% salary; 5 year contract Scenario 10. TT: Differs; NTT: Top 10 department, 110% salary, 5 year
Women in Science
TTW TTM NTTW NTTM
Single, will relocate, no kids 65 71 29 23
Single, will relocate, kids 64 70 34 26
Single, will not relocate, no kids 59 66 35 27
Married, spouse not employed, will relocate, no kids
67 74 27 22
Married, spouse employed, not an academic, will not relocate, no kids
58 65 36 30
Married, spouse employed, an academic, not willing to relocate, no kids
56 63 37 31
Married, spouse employed, an academic, not willing to relocate, kids
55 62 40 33
The Big Considerations
Work: Meaningful work that fits the balance of teaching and research the faculty member desires – not the same for everyone
Location: Geographic fit (affordable housing, decent commute, good schools, a sense of community, safe, job for spouse/partner)
Quality of Life on the Job and Outside of Work: Time for family and other interests outside of work; a sense of colleagueship at work
Who is Gen X? Born between 1965 and 1980. Skeptical. Believe parents suffered VDD – vacation deficit disorder.
“Give me balance now, not when I’m 65.” “If they can’t understand that I want a kick-ass career and a kick-ass
life, then I don’t want to work here.” “Why does it matter when I come and go, as long as I get the work
done?”
Willing to work hard but wants to decide when, where, and how.
Lancaster & Stillman (2002). When Generations Collide.NY: HarperCollins Publishing Inc.
Traditionalist
1900-1945
Boomer
1946-1964
Gen X
1965-1980
Chain of command Change of commandSelf-command
Collaborate
Build a legacy Build a stellar career Build a portable career
Satisfaction of a job well-done
Money, title, recognition, corner office
Freedom
Job changing carries a stigma.
Job changing puts you behind.
Job changing is necessary.
If we give in to demands for flexibility, who will do the work?
I can’t believe the nerve of those X’ers – they want it all!
I’ll go where I can find the lifestyle I’m seeking.
If I’m not yelling at you, you’re doing fine.
Feedback once a year; well-documented.
Sorry to interrupt again, but how am I doing?
“Next Gen”
Format agnostic
Nomadic
Multitasking
Experiential
Collaborative
Integrated
Principled
Adaptive
Direct“Born with the Chip”Abram & Luther (2004)
Culture Shift on Campus
Permanence Solidity Solemnity Sacred Solitude Quiet Status Quo
Transience Flexibility Playfulness Profane Communal Noise Innovation
“There’s something happening here, what it is ain’t exactly clear.” [Buffalo Springfield]
Having said that…
Young, diverse -- these faculty are unique
Defy type-casting; despise labels
Most do not suffer silently; not afraid to speak up and ask for what they want
Diversity brings a variety of values and expectations about work and the workplace
Culture Clash
EmbeddedConfidentiality = candor = quality
Merit determined empirically and objective
Darwinian tenure process is good/competition improves individual performance
Research is an independent process; centered around disciplines
EmergentTransparency ensures equity
Merit socially constructed; subjective; contextual
Cooperation and collaboration are better for community and collegiality Research may be collaborative; centered around a problem
Culture Clash
Embedded
Quality and quantity of research matter most; heaviest weight
Serious scholars choose work over all else
Faculty thrive on autonomy
Emergent
Teaching, advising, service to the campus and community matter also
What people do outside of work matters also; dual careers/families happen
Faculty have a collective responsibility; autonomy can be isolating
Second Exercise
On one side of an index card:
1. What three issues do faculty recruits most often ask about?
On the other side: 2. What do you most hope they will not ask
about?
Collaborative On Academic Careers in
Higher Education
At the Harvard Graduate School of Education
COACHE Pilot:The Study of New Scholars
What? Gather satisfaction data by gender, race, and
field, in a standardized fashion so that it is comparable over time and across institutions.
Create a constructive competition among academic institutions to be a “great place to work” for all junior faculty.
Provide a diagnostic tool to aid in the recruitment and retention of junior faculty.
COACHE Pilot:The Study of New Scholars
Purpose Make the academy a more equitable and appealing
place for new faculty to work in order to recruit and retain top talent.
Increase the recruitment, retention, status, success, and satisfaction of faculty of color and white women.
Create a better informed doctoral student and early career faculty population.
Give voice to early career faculty. Ultimately, produce structural and cultural changes
on campuses.
COACHE Pilot:The Study of New Scholars
Why? Lack of improvement in the statistics for 30 years.
Increasing frustration about: The tenure process Difficulty finding career and life balance Lack of faculty diversity Cultural, generational clash between traditional and
emergent views/values (See Trower & Chait, Harvard Magazine, March-April 2002)
Lack of internal reform despite good intentions
We Found What You Found
Your survey of 213 probationary showed Most happy but… Lack time to conduct research, teach well and engage
in service Women and minorities more likely to indicate that
campus climate was not positive Two-thirds expressed concern about tenure process
and clarity of tenure criteria
Junn, Ellen N. and Margaret Atwell, 2004. “A campus-wide model for supportinguntenured faculty including women and minorities,” International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities, and Nations, Volume 4.
Focus Groups Conducted with Faculty At…
Amherst Bard Barnard Columbia Harvard Holy Cross
MIT Mount Holyoke NYU Sarah Lawrence Smith Williams
56 total: 23 males; 34 females32 white faculty; 24 faculty of color
Key components of faculty satisfaction (and ultimately success) are:
Clarity surrounding… Tenure process, criteria, standards, body of evidence Expectations for scholarship, teaching, advising, colleagueship,
campus citizenship Reasonable performance expectations Consistency of expectations and messages A climate and culture that support great work --
collegiality Quality of life on the job and off Workload equity Professional development and support
Pilot Study: Survey
Berkeley Brown Duke University of Arizona University of Illinois University of Washington
Carleton Morehouse Mt. Holyoke Oberlin Sarah Lawrence Smith
1,932 invited to participate; 1,149 completed (60%)Sample: 1,180 males; 752 females; 1,606 white faculty; 326 faculty of color
COACHE
A diagnostic management tool to aid in recruiting and retaining top junior faculty by examining the key components of their work life, including… Importance and effectiveness of policies (32) Tenure clarity and reasonableness of expectations (20) Work load, work environment (20) Climate, culture, collegiality, support (16) Global satisfaction (7) Best and worst aspects of the institution (2)
What the data tell us
• How does my institution compare to its peers?• What departments had the highest and lowest
ratings?• Are there significant differences by demographics?• Are there areas where, as a university, we do
especially well? Especially poorly?• What changes in policy or practice, either
university-wide or within a school, would yield the greatest increase in faculty satisfaction?
• What works well, where, and why?
COACHE allows you to…
Spot and reward success Detect and correct trouble spots Learn whether policies are working as intended Have data-driven dialogue rather than data-free
debates Place your faculty concerns in a comparative
context Gain an edge in recruiting by cultivating and
demonstrating a commitment to being a great place to work
All things considered, how satisfied are you with your institution as a place to work?
OVERALL
Your Institution
Peer 1
Peer 2
Peer 3
Peer 4
Peer 5
All COACHE Universities
Percent of Respondents
5 4 3 2 1 VS SS N SU VU
All things considered, how satisfied are you with your institution as a place to work?
BY GENDER
You
r in
stitu
tion
All
univ
ersi
ties
You
r pe
ers
Male
Female
Female
Male
Percent of Respondents
5 4 3 2 1
Female
Male
VS SS N SU VU
I find the tenure criteria to be…Very clear (5); Fairly clear (4); Neither clear nor unclear (3); Fairly unclear (2); Very unclear (1)
Your Institution
Peer 1
Peer 2
Peer 3
Peer 4
Peer 5
All COACHE Universities
Percent of Respondents
5 4 3 2 1 VC FC N FU VU
TENURE QUESTION, OVERALL
How satisfied are you with the amount of time you have to conduct research?
WORKLOAD QUESTION, BY GENDER
You
r in
stitu
tion
All
univ
ersi
ties
You
r pe
ers
Male
Female
Female
Male
Percent of Respondents
5 4 3 2 1
Female
Male
VS SS N SU VU
How satisfied are you with the amount of time you have to conduct research?
Within your institution, your male junior faculty were more satisfied than were your female junior faculty with the amount of time they have to conduct research.
Compared to female junior faculty at your peers, females at your institution were more than one standard deviation below the mean on satisfaction with the amount of time they have to conduct research.
Among male junior faculty at all universities, males at your institution ranked in the 65th percentile on satisfaction with the amount of time they have to conduct research.
Among female junior faculty at all universities, females at your institution ranked in the 54th percentile on satisfaction with the amount of time they have to conduct research.
Across all universities, male junior faculty were more satisfied than were female junior faculty with the amount of time they have to conduct research.
How satisfied are you with how well you fit (e.g., your sense of belonging, your comfort level)?
You
r In
stitu
tion
You
r P
eers
A
ll U
niv
ersi
ties
Faculty of Color
White Faculty
Faculty of Color
White Faculty
Faculty of Color
White Faculty
Percent of Respondents
5 4 3 2 1
CLIMATE QUESTION, BY RACE
VS SS N SU VU
I find the tenure process to be…Very clear (5); Fairly clear (4); Neither clear nor unclear (3); Fairly unclear (2); Very unclear (1)
Rank Academic Area Mean Rating
1 Humanities 4.963
2 Visual & Performing Arts 4.768
3 Social Sciences 4.521
4 Physical Sciences 4.431
5 Biological Sciences 4.345
6 Engineering/CompSci/Math/Stats 4.267
7 Health & Human Ecology 4.123
8 Agri/Nat Resources/Env Sciences 4.009
9 Business 3.213
10 Education 2.941
11 Medical / Health Professions 2.851
12 Other Professions 2.715
ACADEMIC AREA
I find the tenure process to be…Very clear (5); Fairly clear (4); Neither clear nor unclear (3); Fairly unclear (2); Very unclear (1)
Hu
ma
nitie
s
Vis
ua
l & P
erfo
rmin
g A
rts
So
cia
l Sc
ien
ce
s
Ph
ys
ica
l Sc
ien
ce
s
Bio
log
ica
l Sc
ien
ce
s
En
g/C
om
pS
ci/
Hlth
& H
um
Ec
olo
gy
Ag
ri/Na
t Re
s/E
nv
Sc
i
Bu
sin
es
s
Ed
uc
atio
n
Me
dic
al / H
ea
lth P
rof
Oth
er P
rofe
ss
ion
s
Rank among your peers
1 1 2 3 4 5 - 6 2 4 4 6
Percentile among all universities
100th 100th 84th 76th 68th 60th - 50th 40th 32nd 18th 10th
The five best aspects about working at your institution are:
Across all respondents:
1. Quality of colleagues (51%)
2. Quality of graduate students (30%)
3. Support for research (17%)
4. Quality of undergraduate students AND
4. Quality of facilities (13%)
For male junior faculty:
1. Quality of colleagues (51%)
2. Quality of graduate students (29%)
3. Support for research (18%)
4. Opportunities to collaborate with colleagues (14%)
5. Quality of undergraduate students (13%)
For white junior faculty:
1. Quality of colleagues (46%)
2. Quality of graduate students (32%)
3. Quality of facilities AND
3. Support for research AND
5. Quality of undergraduate students (15%)
For female junior faculty:
1. Quality of colleagues (52%)
2. Quality of graduate students (32%)
3. Quality of facilities (16%)
4. Support for research (15%)
5. Quality of undergraduate students (14%)
For junior faculty of color:
1. Quality of colleagues (67%)
2. Quality of graduate students (24%)
3. Support for research (20%)
4. Opportunities to collaborate with colleagues (15%)
5. Quality of undergraduate students (11%)
The five worst aspects about working at your institution are:
Across all respondents:
1. Cost of living (26%)
2. Tenure requirements in general (21%)
3. Unrelenting pressure to perform (20%)
4. Tenure criteria clarity (12%)
5. Tenure process clarity (11%)
For male junior faculty:
1. Cost of living (36%)
2. Tenure requirements in general (21%)
3. Unrelenting pressure to perform (18%)
4. Tenure criteria clarity (12%)
5. Compensation (11%)
For white junior faculty:
1. Cost of living (25%)
2. Unrelenting pressure to perform (24%)
3. Tenure requirements in general (22%)
4. Tenure criteria clarity (13%)
5. Tenure process clarity (12%)
For female junior faculty:
1. Tenure requirements in general AND
Unrelenting pressure to perform (24%)
2. Tenure process clarity (15%)
3. Tenure criteria clarity AND
Cost of living (14%)
For junior faculty of color:
1. Cost of living (27%)
2. Lack of support for research AND
Tenure requirements in general AND
Tenure process clarity AND
Unrelenting pressure to perform (13%)
Policies & Provisions:
The “Effectiveness Gap”Respondents identified these policies as “very or somewhat important” to their success, but as “very or somewhat ineffective” at their institution.
Would you recommend your department to a candidate?
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Females
Males
Females
Males
Females
Males
All u
niv
ers
itie
sY
our
peers
Your
institu
tion
Strongly recommend your department as a place to work
Recommend your department with reservations
Not recommend your department as a place to work
Cost and Deliverables
Package A (If 5 or more CSU’s join) $12,500 per campus, with an option to pay over three fiscal
years. Each enrolled campus receives their results; results from
their 5 selected CSU peers; and comparisons to all CSU’s as a group.
Package B (If fewer than 5 CSU’s join) $20,000 per campus, with an option to pay over three fiscal
years. Each enrolled campus receives their results; results from
their 5 selected COACHE peers; and comparisons to all COACHE universities as a group.