1CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
Part B #1
ITEC 7500
Stephen Rahn
Summer 2017
Steven Wilson
2CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
Description of the Capstone Experience
The Capstone Experience was based on the needs of my school, Griffin Middle School,
for using technology as a differentiation tool in the mathematics classroom. With the transition
into a BYOD school and the need more innovative math practices in a technology driven world,
it was my goal to host professional development classes for the staff to educate on best practices
for differentiating in the math classroom. With students being constantly connected to
technology by cell phones, tablets, gaming devices, etc., I found it necessary and beneficial to
fuse learning with technology and I believe we can see the most growth in the mathematics
classroom.
With the Milestone test scores at Griffin being the lowest in mathematics and coming up
short in both state and local comparisons, I found it necessary to open the door to the exploration
of new practices, especially with the use of technology, and to pass this knowledge on to my
colleagues to improve overall morale in the mathematics department. Parents, students and even
teachers have become increasingly frustrated with mathematics programs in public schools and
by the assessments that gauge their learning. Last year about 60,000 parents nationwide held
back their child from taking the end of the year math test because of a frustration on how the
subject is taught and assessed (TimesUnion, 2015).
To start the process of providing an informative and beneficial professional development
course, I first asked the mathematics staff to complete a needs assessment based on their current
implementation of technology in their classrooms. This was done by providing a link to a survey
to the entire mathematics department and asked questions based on digital landscape, teacher
perception, school climate, standards-based instruction, and use of resources in the classroom
(Appendix A). Once I received the survey from the mathematics department, I began to analyze
3CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
the data and determine areas that needed to be addressed. This was done by looking at areas of
common concerns, which was overwhelming the absences of resources that can be used in the
classroom to differentiate instruction and assessment for the students. Once the topic for the
professional development was narrowed down to “technology tools used to differentiate
mathematical instruction” I began to research and plan the development course. From the
research, I determined that there would be three resources that teachers would enjoy using and
also would be beneficial to differentiate instruction and assessment and ultimately increase
student scores. Those resources were: Promethean Planet software, Khan Academy, and IXL
which differed from my proposal. Originally Khan Academy was the only resources I was
providing professional development for but after completing the research I found many useful
resources and narrowed it down to three.
Once the needs had been determined and the content of the professional development
decided on, I began the development process. During this process I designed learning materials
and collected resources to distribute during the presentations. It was also during this phase that I
decided on having three separate professional developments, one for each resource, which would
last 45 minutes a piece. Once approved by the principal, a date was arranged and an invitation to
the math department was sent out. This was a mandatory professional development decided on
by me and the principal. This differs from the original plan of providing one professional
development course that addressed just one resources. Because of the variety of great resources,
we found it necessary to have several professional developments.
The next step was to conduct the professional development courses. Each course was 45
minutes long and allowed the participants the opportunity to gain hands-on experience with each
resource. I provided handouts the outlined step-by-step directions on how to operate and
4CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
troubleshoot each program (Appendix B,C,D). I then gave a brief tutorial, followed by allowing
the teachers to setup their accounts and play around with each program.
As a follow up to the Professional Development teachers were encouraged to use any and
all of the programs that were offered. I acted as a technology coach and would model, facilitate,
or observe implementation when asked. To evaluate and monitor progress I used data from
student scores and mastery of standards. With both IXL and Khan Academy the student’s scores
will show progress and mastery from beginning to end. These numbers were used to determine
the effectiveness and growth for each student. To monitor teacher effectiveness, we provided a
post survey at the end of the school year. This survey was similar to the first one and was used to
observe teacher growth. The majority of the teachers who participated were satisfied with the
results of the professional development and believed it helped them differentiate instruction in
their math classroom.
Overall the Capstone went to plan, with a few exceptions of adding additional material to
my presentation. The biggest challenge I found was teacher participation. Although, they
identified having a need for resources that could be used to differentiate instruction, I still found
some pushback on wanting to attend the PL and wanted to change practices that they have
become comfortable with in their classroom. I believe this is because of the negative connotation
that surrounds Professional Development within my school. Teachers feel like they are
continually being forced to implement programs that they do not feel comfortable with. Once the
math team attend my professional development, I think the overall attitude changed. Teachers
began to see that these programs were resources that could really help them and their students.
Also providing that assistance and support of a technology coach which could assist and model
for them helped them become more comfortable and willing to participate in the new programs.
5CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
Appendix
A. Technology Needs Assessment
Technology QuestionnaireDigital Landscape1.How frequently do you use technology to enhance student’s education (PowerPoint or similar presentation software is not included).
a) A few times a month because technology is unavailable b) A few time a month because I am unfamiliar with my options for using technologyc) A few times a monthd) Once a weeke) Twice a weekf) 3 or more times a week
2. Which statement describes your technology skills? a. I am very good at using many technology toolsb. I am aware of technology tools that could benefit my class, but have not learned to use
themc. I am unaware of technology tools that could benefit my class, and I am unsure how to
use technologyd. I have a few worthwhile technology tools/skills that I use well. Please
list______________
Teacher Perception3. I am comfortable using data to modify my technology integration in the classroom based off of individual students’ needs.
a. Strongly Agreeb. Agreec. No Opinion d. Disagreee. Strongly Disagree
School Climate
4. I feel like my voice is heard and respected in terms often decision-making process when choosing technology for instructional use.
a. Strongly Agree b. Agreec. No Opiniond. Disagree
6CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
e. Strongly Disagree
School Climate5. The technology mission statement is well known and utilized at my school by all teachers
a.Strongly Agreeb. AgreeC. No OpinionD. DisagreeE. Strongly Disagree
Standards Based Instruction6. My lessons and assessments are designed to teach and evaluate student mastery of the the Georgia Performance Standards for my course.
a.Strongly Agreeb. AgreeC. No OpinionD. DisagreeE. Strongly Disagree
Use of Resources and Classroom Practices7. My students use digital resources to remember, understand, or apply the content taught in my classroom.
a. Dailyb. Weeklyc. Monthlyd. Never
8. My students use digital resources to analyze or evaluate information related to the content they learn in my classroom.
a. Dailyb. Weeklyc. Monthlyd. Never
9. My students use digital resources to create content that demonstrates their mastery of the content they learn in my classroom.
a. Dailyb. Weeklyc. Monthlyd. Never
10. I use digital content to demonstrate, present, or reinforce content in my classroom.
a. Dailyb. Weeklyc. Monthlyd. Never
7CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
Teacher Adopter Category Survey1. I am generally uncomfortable using new technologies
a. Alwaysb. Oftenc. Sometimesd. Rarelye. Never
2. How frequently do you use social media (personal/professional)?a. Alwaysb. Oftenc. Sometimesd. Rarelye. Never
3. How comfortable are you with Online Assessment, Web-Based Presentation Tools, and Instructional Webpages?
a. Very comfortable, I am excellent at using all these toolsb. somewhat comfortable, I can use most of these tools wellc. uncomfortable, I only use these tools when I have to
4. How comfortable are you trying new devices as part of your instruction (iPads, iRespond units, smart phone apps)
a. very comfortable, I try new devices oftenb. somewhat comfortable, I try new devices when I see their benefit in other teacher’s instructionc. uncomfortable, I rarely try new devices unless it is mandated
5. How comfortable are you trying new software as part of your instruction (Kahoo, Socrative, NearPod, Flocabulary, USA TestPrep)
a. very comfortable, I try new software oftenb. somewhat comfortable, I try new software when I see their benefit in other teacher’s instructionc. uncomfortable, I rarely try new software unless it is mandated
6. How would you describe yourself in terms of lesson planning? a. I am an innovatorb. I am cautious
8CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
c. I am fairly adventurous d. I have plans that work, so I tend to stick with them
7. Which of the following best describes the way you identify new technology tools to use with your existing lesson plans?
a. I read peer-reviewed literature related to technology toolsb. I ask for recommendations from peers who I observe using technology tools I am not
familiar withc. I use links from educators that I follow on social mediad. I use resources presented during professional learning sessions
8. Which of the following are you most likely to use to teach your students to use a new technology tool?
a. Whole group instructionb. Station instructionc. Blended instructiond. Peer-to-Peer instruction
9. Which of the following describes the way that you are most likely to determine if a new technology tool is an effective addition to your teaching routine?
a. Student Surveyb. Teacher Reflectionc. Peer or Administrator Observationd. Class Discussion or Written Student Observation
10. How often do you add new technology tools to your instructional routine?a. Weeklyb. Monthlyc. Each Semesterd. Each School Year
B. Promethean Planet (eBeam) Directions
9CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
C. Khan Academy Directions
10CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
D. IXL Directions
11CAPSTONE REPORT OUTLINE AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA