VCAA Exam Advice
Andrew R. HansenAssistant Chief Assessor
The Assessment Team
• Chief Assessor: – Bruce Walsh (Xavier).
• Assistant Chief Assessors:– Andrew Hansen (Ringwood SC).– Nicholas Howes (Caulfield Grammar).– Dan O’Keeffe (AIP).
• Senior markers:– Around 10-12 for resolution marking.– Drawn from general markers.
• General markers:– Around 100 practicing or retired Physics
teachers.
The assessment process
• Prior to the exam the assessors are appointed and informed of training day and deadlines.
• On the day of the exam the paper is emailed to assessors.
• At ~4:00pm on exam day the CAG meets with reps from setting panel.– The draft marking scheme is
discussed.
The assessment process
• The setting panel decide the marks per question.
• The CAG decides (initially) how the marks are to be allocated.
Mark allocation• In General:• 1 mark questions:– Mark for correct answer.
• 2 mark questions:– 1 mark for correct answer.– 1 mark for correct formula & substitution.
• 3 mark questions:– 1 mark for correct answer.– 1 mark for final formula and substitution.– 1 mark for initial derivation or conversion
of info.
Prior to Assessors meeting
• The CAG meets for a day prior to Assessors meeting.
• An initial 250 scripts is reviewed.
• Two training papers and 4 trial papers are produced.
• Six validity items per question are selected and annotated.
The Assessors meeting
• Occurs the Saturday following the exam.
• The marking scheme is discussed and the training papers are completed.
• The marking scheme is amended.• The four trial papers are completed.• The marking scheme is finalised
and printed.
The marking process• Each question is marked (initially) by two
markers.• Discrepancy results in a third marker.
– Two most concordant results are used provided they are not still discrepant.
– This marking is done by CAG and senior markers.
• Marks that are still discrepant go to adjudication.– Done by CAG.
• Most concordant two marks are used and added for final mark.
The marking process• Each set of scores is summed and
totals that are discrepant go to 3rd round of marking.– Done by CAG.
• Final grades that are more than 1 (or 1.5) grades from teacher’s indicative grades are declared anomalous.– Anomalous grade marking.– Done by CAG
The marking process• Papers that have images
problems or where students wrote where they should not have go to pulled paper marking.– Done by CAG.
The marking process• ~7300 students and 59 markable
items = 430,700 items to mark.• Two initial markings = 861,400
markings.• ~25% of item go to resolution =
969,000 marking.• ~ 5000 items go to adjudication =
974,000 markings• ~ 150 papers referred to AGM =
983,000 items marked.
The marking process• Over 900,000 items marked.• ~100 markers
• Over 9000 questions marked per person.
• In 14 days!!!
u
v
t
Now, the area under a vt graph yields disp.
So:
Finally, from (1):
Sub into (3):
THIS IS NOT MATHS
General advice• Always show working.– Allow markers to exercise “reward
good physics” clause.• Avoid algebraic rearrangement.–Make it easier for markers to award
the “formula & substitution” mark(s).• Answers in decimals with
appropriate sig figs.– No surds and no excessive decimal
places.
General advice• Changing units.– Students can usually cross out the
units provided and respond in units of choice.
• Layout & legibility.–Markers are not obliged to mark
illegible responses.• Calculators.– Use the exponent key.– Check mode (degrees, not radians).
Short answer questions
• Keep them short!!!– Stay within the space provided.
• Use dot points.• Clause, because. vs. Clause.• Supporting equations.• Avoid verbal diarrhea.–Marks can be deducted for
contradictions.
Past paper examples
June 2008
June 2009
Fc
June 2010
Correct solution
Fc
Nmg
θ
Incorrect solution
Fc
N
mg
θ
Nov 2013
June 2009
Lower temp means higher Rth.
Ratio Rv:Rth must stay constant.
Therefore Rv must increase.
INCREASE
June 2011
Nov 2010
Lines must travel from R to L inside solenoid.
Lines must not touch or cross.
Nov 2010
Nov 2011
As the magnet moves away the loop experiences a decrease in flux to the left.
Lenz’s law states that the induced current will give rise to a change in flux that opposes the change in flux that induced it.
Therefore the induced current will cause an increase in flux to the left,
Using the right hand grip rule an anticlockwise current will cause a flux to the left.
Nov 2011
Young’s experiment demonstrated an interference pattern.
Interference is a wave phenomenon.
Einstein concluded that light is made up of photons with energy proportional to their frequency.
The existence of a cutoff frequency showed that photons with low frequencies did not have enough energy to produce photoelectrons.
Advice about PE effect
• Know what the wave predictions of the PE effect are:– All light is energy therefore all frequencies
should be able to produce photoelectrons.– Increasing the intensity of the incident
light increases the delivered energy and should increase the energy of the photoelectrons.
– Decreasing the intensity of the incident light decreases the rate at which the energy is delivered and should result in a time delay.
Things I have not discussed
• Elastic collisions.• Apparent weightlessness.• Projectiles.• Diodes.• Amplifiers.• Modulation / demodulation.• Forces on current carrying wires.• Faraday’s law.• Transformers.• Diffraction and the ratio λ:a.• Constructive / destructive interference and path
difference.• Planck’s constant as grad of Ek vs f graph.
Final words• Read the Chief Examiner’s
Report’s.• Know where the opposition is
weak.• Do lots of practice papers.• Keep an eye on the time.• Have a strategy for catching
silly mistakes.
VCAA Exam Advice
Andrew R. HansenAssistant Chief Assessor