WELCOME!
Airport Master Plan Public MeetingNovember 13, 2013
Where are We In the Process
What the Plan Will Include
Master Plan Topics
• Community Process• Facility / Policy Inventory• Aviation Demand Forecasts• Facility Requirements• Alternatives Analysis• Implementation Plan
Meeting Objectives
• Bring you up to date on plan progress.
• Obtain specific feedback / support for new annoyance mitigation initiatives.
• Capture some plan highlights.
1998 Master Plan
Current Master Plan Concept
Plan Comparison
Then: Airport-Driven(1998)
Now: Community Driven(2013)
• Maximum Growth • Annoyance Mitigation• More Runways • Multi-Use Hangar• All-Weather Access • Non-Aviation Uses• More T-Hangars • Technology Upgrades• Non-Aviation Uses • Box Hangars
Annoyance Mitigation
• New Runway– To avoid / reduce residential overflights
• Changes to the Primary Runway– To increase the height of airplane overflights
• Changes to the Secondary Runway– To better balance runway utilization
• Off-Airport Alternatives– To increase the range of options.
Alternatives Considered
Alternatives Dismissed
New Runway• $27.4M• Wetlands
~ WETLANDS ~
Alternatives Dismissed
1A: Extend Runway 11-29 East and Displace Landings
1B: Extend Runway 11-29 East / Shorten West
• $6.5M• Limited Benefit
Alternative 1B: Airspace Impacts
Jet Departure Profile
Piaggio Departure Profile
Runway 29, Jet Departure - Existing
Runway 29, Jet Departure - RW Alt 1
Runway 29, P180 Departure - Existing
Runway 29, P180 Departure - Alt 1
Runway 29, C172 Departure - Existing
Runway 29, C172 Departure - Alt 1
Runway 11, Jet Arrival - Existing
Runway 11, Jet Arrival – Alt 1
Runway 11, P108 Arrival - Existing
Runway 11, P108 Arrival - Alt 1
OPINION
• No significant change to height or noise
• Dismiss from consideration
Alternative 1: Runway 11-29
Alternatives Dismissed
• Widen Runway 2-20– $3.5M– Minimal change in
runway utilization
• Extend North– $5M to $15M– Significant Fill or– Pylon-bridge
construction
Alternatives Retained
Widen and extend Runway 2-20 South• $6.9M• Greater dispersion of runway utilization
Runway Selection Factors• Wind direction and velocity• Runway length • Pavement strength• Local communication efforts• Taxi distance• On course / arrival direction• Glider activity • Runway width
Runway 2-20 Utilization
DEPARTURES ARRIVALS
Existing Alt 2A Existing Alt 2A
29Piston 77% 58% ↓ 66% 47% ↓Turboprop 88% 76% ↓ 82% 64% ↓Turbo Jet 96% 88% ↓ 94% 83% ↓
2Piston 8% 16% ↑ 8% 16% ↑Turboprop 2% 8% ↑ 2% 8% ↑Turbo Jet 0.5% 6% ↑ 1% 4% ↑
20Piston 11% 22%↑ 22% 33% ↑Turboprop 6% 12% ↑ 12% 24% ↑Turbo Jet 0.5% 3% ↑ 2% 10% ↑
Runway 2-20 Utilization
CA-267 Eastbound View to NE
Existing
With Extension
CA-267 Eastbound View to NE
Existing
CA-267 Westbound View to NW
With Extension
CA-267 Westbound View to NW
CA-267 Elevated View to NW
Existing
With Extension
CA-267 Elevated View to NW
Widen and Extend Runway 2-20
OPINION / RECOMMENDATION• Extending and widening will disperse operations more
effectively• Dispersion can be influenced by TTAD actions/policy• Views of Martis Valley not impacted significantly• Proceed with implementation planning
Alternatives Retained
OFF-AIRPORT MITIGATION• Annual Funding Allocation• Current models under consideration:– Expansion of Open Space Preservation Policy– Voluntary Home Improvement (Sound Insulation)– Voluntary Home Acquisition– Additional Possibilities– Flight Track Optimization– Requires Additional Community Outreach
Arrivals DeparturesOff-Airport Alternative
June 2012
Off-Airport Alternative
• 160 homes in Zone B1
• 70 homes in Zone C
Runway 29, Jet Departure - Existing
Runway 29, Jet Departure - Straight
Runway 29, C172 Departure - Existing
Runway 29, C172 Departure - Straight
Off-Airport Mitigation
OPINION/RECOMMENDATION• Increases Options Available to Residents and District• Proceed with Implementation Planning
ITEMS TO BE CLARIFIED• Funding Prioritization / Geographic Boundaries• Disposition of Acquired Property• Policy/Legal Implications
THANK YOU