IntroductionThe Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Unit (FCCU) is theeconomic heart of a modern refinery. Even small increases in its yield can bring about significant overall gains inproductivity and revenue.
Tracerco is a world leading industrial technology
company providing unique and specialized detection,
diagnostic and measurement solutions.
A TRACERCO Diagnostics™ FCCU Study will provide youwith the information you need to optimize or troubleshootyour specific process:
� All testing is performed while the FCCU is online.
� There is no interference with normal unit operations orproduction scheduling.
� Data collected can be used to identify operatingparameter changes to improve unit productivity or gaugethe accuracy of process modeling and simulation.
� Tracerco’s experience involves numerous studiesperformed on units worldwide.
A typical study may employ upwards of 75 detectors,measuring almost the entire system from a commoninjection point. The tagged process stream can be followedcompletely through either the Reactor or the Regenerator.
For example, tracer material injected into the riser canprovide:
� Catalyst and vapor traffic velocities and slip ratio throughthe riser
� Determination of efficiency of the riser termination device
� Flow distribution through the reactor and stripper
� Cyclone distribution/operating characteristics
� Reactor/stripper residence times
Vapor traffic is tagged using an inert gas. The catalyst trafficmay be tagged using system native catalyst – E-Cat, Fines,or any specific particle size distribution – which has beenactivated by Tracerco.
TRACERCO Diagnostics™ FCCU Studies utilize bothsealed source and tracer technologies. A typical study willuse these technologies to measure the density of thecatalyst/vapor mixture, and the velocity, distribution, andresidence time of the catalyst and vapor through each partof the FCC including:
� Reactor Riser
� Reactor
� Reactor Stripping Section
� Regenerator
� Spent Catalyst & Regenerated Catalyst Standpipes
The operation of the associated downstream MainFractionator column can also be investigated using Tracerco’s TRU-SCAN® technology.
In order to offer our customers a rapid response we operatefrom a number of regional bases strategically close to majorindustrial centers.
TRACERCO Diagnostics™FCCU Study
2 TRACERCO Diagnostics™
Reactor
Cyclone Operation and Distribution Study
Catalyst Bed Level Measurement
Efficiency of Riser Termination Device
Residence Time
TRACERCO Diagnostics™FCCU Study
FCCU Study 3
Spent Catalyst & RegeneratedCatalyst Standpipes
Catalyst Slugging Study
Catalyst Density Profile
Regenerator
Cyclone Operation
Cyclone Distribution Study
Catalyst Bed Level Measurementand Extent of Bed Dilute - Phase
Catalyst and Air Distribution Study
Residence Time
Stripping Section
Density Profile
Catalyst and VaporFlow Distribution &Residence Time
Reactor Riser
Riser Density Profile
Catalyst and VaporDistribution
Catalyst and VaporVelocities (Slip Ratio)
Riser Density Profile: TRU-SCAN®
Poor fluidization or poor mixing of catalyst and oil causeslocalized variances in the oil-to-catalyst ratio and crackingreactions. The over-cracked portion of the feed generateslow-value light components, while at the same time theunder-cracked portion produces more residue.
A TRU-SCAN® of the riser provides the catalyst densityprofile up the length of the riser. Results illustrated inFigure 1 show the density profiles at high and low steamrates. In this example, the aerated catalyst density in theriser feed zone at scan elevation 13-18 ft. decreases withthe higher steam rate. The scan also indicated that thefeed expansion zone covered approximately 8 ft. from thefeed nozzles.
Catalyst and Vapor Distribution:Tru-CAT™ ScanThis method generates a detailed cross-sectional densityprofile of the reactor riser at a fixed elevation or riser cross section.
The information is used to determine the uniformity ofdistribution between the catalyst and feed and to identifyflow inefficiencies, such as catalyst mal-distribution. A Tru-CAT™ Scan is often used to evaluate changes indesign and operation of feed injection or lift steam nozzles.An example of this is shown in Figure 2, where two Tru-CAT™ Scans were performed, one with all six feednozzles open and another with one of the nozzles shut(nozzle #3) to simulate a plugged or fouled nozzle.
Reactor Riser: ScanningDensity Profile and Flow Distribution
Gamma Source
Radiation Detector
Feed
Catalyst Particles
Feed
TRU-SCAN® of FCC Riser
Figure 1: TRU-SCAN® detector placement and density profile. Figure 2: Tru-CAT™ Scan simulated plugged nozzle.
Tru-CAT™ Scan scanline orientation.
4 TRACERCO Diagnostics™
One common application applied to an FCCU ismeasurement of stream velocities. Ideally, catalyst andvapor should be in plug flow condition to eliminate back-mixing, which can produce undesirable secondaryreactions. However, because of its greater density, thecatalyst always flows up the riser at a lower velocity thanthe vapor. This phenomenon is known as “catalyst slip”.An ideal plug flow riser should have a slip ratio of 1.0.
Discrepancy from 1.0 or design expectation is often used as a measure of the fluidization performance. The slip factor can be determined by measuring thevelocities of the vapor and catalyst via a TRACERCODiagnostics™ Flow study. Figure 4 represents test resultsthat involve two tracer injections, one for the oil vaporphase and the other for the catalyst phase. The velocitiesof the vapor phase and catalyst phase are measured overthe same section of the riser.
Reactor Riser: Tracer
TO FRACTIONATOR
RE
AC
TO
R R
ISE
R
Radiation DetectorNumber 2
Radiation DetectorNumber 1
RadiotaggedFeed
Catalyst
Distance X
Pulsed Injection
Injection DetectorRiser DetectorInjection DetectorRiser Detector
Catalyst Slip Factor = 1.80
42.2 ft/s 23.5 ft/s
-5 5 15 25Time In Seconds
Radi
atio
n In
tens
ity
Figure 3: Riser trafficvelocity tracer testdetector positions.
Flowrate of Catalyst and Vapor Phases
Figure 4: Riser traffic velocity.
FCCU Study 5
Cyclone Operation: TRU-SCAN®
The loss of catalyst through the reactor cyclones is a fairlycommon problem. Identifying the reason for the loss isoften difficult. TRU-SCAN® gamma scans can be apowerful tool for gathering essential information about theproblem. In Figure 5, four TRU-SCAN® gamma scanswere performed to obtain a density profile of each reactorcyclone. The scans identified that there was one pluggedcyclone and a dipleg that was full of catalyst.
Catalyst Bed Level MeasurementTRU-SCAN® gamma scans can be performed to obtaininformation on the reactor or regenerator bed levels. In the example below, operations personnel were suspiciousof the calibration of the level gauge. Results from the threescans performed (Figure 6) found that when the instrumentreading was 100" pressure (the normal level reading untilrecently), the bed was too low and the diplegs wereuncovered. The TRU-SCAN® results helped recalibrate thelevel instrument and avoid a shutdown.
Reactor: Scanning
West Secondary Cyclone
South Primary Cyclone
East Secondary Cyclone
North Primary Cyclone
1000 10000
Plugged Cyclone Dipleg
BRACING
MANWAY
FLAPPER VALVE
2'
4'
6'
8'
10'
12'
14'
16'
18'
20'
22'
24'
26'
28'
30'
Catalyst
EX
TE
RN
AL L
ININ
G
N
Figure 6: Tru-Scan® results assist with level instrument calibration.Figure 5: Reactor cyclones distribution study.
Flooded Cyclones @ 125" PressureUnsealed Diplegs @ 100" PressureNormal Operations @ 112" Pressure
100 1000
BRACING
CYCLONES
BRACING
2'
4'
6'
8'
10'
12'
14'
16'
18'
20'
22'
24'
26'
28'
30'
32'
SECONDARY CYCLONE DIPLEGS
FR
EE
BO
AR
D IN
TE
NS
ITY
PRIMARY CYCLONE DIPLEGS
6 TRACERCO Diagnostics™
Cyclone Distribution StudySince FCCU’s have been modified to achieve thecracking reaction in the riser instead of the reactor, the reactor’s present-day role is to minimize post riserreactions by providing efficient catalyst/hydrocarbondisengagement.
A TRACERCO Diagnostics™ Distribution study is used to determine relative amounts of vapor or catalyst trafficentering the primary reactor cyclones. A group ofradiation detectors are placed at the cyclone inlets andoutlets (Figure 7). Usually only the primary cyclone inletand the secondary cyclone outlets can be monitored,because the cyclone pairs are internally coupled. For anormal cyclone system, each of the primary cyclonesshould receive the same amount of vapor and catalysttraffic, so all of the detectors should receive the sameamount of tracer radiation response. Comparing theintegration of the areas beneath each of the distributiondetector responses allows identification of flow mal-distribution (Figure 8).
Reactor: Tracer
Outlet Detector
Secondary Cyclone Outlet
Ring of Detectors
Primary Cyclone InletRing of Detectors
Bed LevelRing of Detectors
6 Detectors ateach elevation
Injection Detector
Vapor Distribution at Cyclone Inlets
Time (seconds)
Ra
dia
tio
n I
nte
nsit
y
Figure 8: The TRACERCO Diagnostics™ Distribution study illustrated is an example of a typical distribution profile exhibiting mal-distribution at theReactor cyclone inlets.
Figure 7: Illustrated above is a typical set-up showing the placement ofradiation detectors used in a TRACERCO Diagnostics™ Distribution study.
FCCU Study 7
Density ProfileThe Spent Catalyst Stripper is designed to preventhydrocarbon from being carried from the reactor to theregenerator with the catalyst. Steam is injected countercurrent to the flow of catalyst to strip the hydrocarbonadsorbed onto the catalyst.
A Tru-Grid™ Scan of the reactor stripping section canidentify differences in the density of the aerated catalyst toshow if mal-distribution of the stripping steam is occurring, ifexcessive catalyst hold-up is occurring on any of the traysand if the trays are in place. In a Tru-Grid™ Scan, fourscans are performed through the stripper in an orthogonalgrid pattern (Figure 9).
When the results of the four scans are overlaid on a singleplot (Figure 10), areas where the scan results do not overlayare areas of the stripper where the aerated catalyst densityis different. The absence of low density areas under eachtray is an indication of flooded trays.
Stripping Section: Scanning
West Scanline
North Scanline
100 1000 10000
MANWAY
STEAM NOZZLES
BOTTOM TANGENT
MANWAY
Tray 5
2'
4'
6'
8'
10'
12'
14'
16'
East ScanlineSouth Scanline
Tray 3
Tray 1
Figure 9: Tru-Grid™ Scan detector placement.
Figure 10: Response profiles.
8 TRACERCO Diagnostics™
In the stripping section, trays or packing, are installed toimprove the stripping efficiency. Steam/catalyst distributioncan be inferred from the Stripper Tru-Grid™ Scan resultspreviously described. However, if superficial velocities andmean residence times are to be measured, then the relativesteam/catalyst distribution can be measured using a tracerinjection technique. Uniform distribution of catalyst andsteam in the stripper is critical to achieve high strippingefficiency (less carry-down of the hydrocarbon productsfrom reactor to regenerator).
A TRACERCO Diagnostics™ Distribution study of thestripping section of an FCCU requires two groups ofradiation detectors (four or more detectors for each group),placed respectively at the top and bottom of the stripper(Figure 11). The steam and catalyst response profiles can be overlaid and interpreted for superficial velocity anddistribution (Figures 12 and 13).
Stripping Section: Tracer
18000
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
030 7050 90 190170150130110 230210 250 270 290 310 330
Time (seconds)
Inte
nsi
ty
North Top- 27%
East Top- 32%
South Top- 20%
West Top- 21%
North Bottom- 62%
East Bottom- 10%
South Bottom- 20%
West Bottom- 7%
Figure 11: Detector placement.
Figure 12: Catalyst flow and distribution.
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
070 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130
Time (seconds)
Inte
nsi
ty
North Top- 28%
East Top- 34%
South Top- 18%
West Top- 20%
North Bottom- 19%
East Bottom- 20%
South Bottom- 25%
West Bottom- 36%
Figure 13: Steam distribution.
Figure 12 and 13: Study of the catalyst and steam flow requires two tracers injected separately, one for tracing the catalyst and one for tracing the steam.
Catalyst/Vapor Flow Distribution
FCCU Study 9
Catalyst Bed Level MeasurementThe dense bed level elevation in a Regenerator can bedetermined with the sealed source TRU-SCAN® and Tru-Grid™ Scan technology (Figure 14). The TRU-SCAN®
will produce a density profile at the catalyst bed level areathat will indicate dense phase and dilute phase levels. It canbe performed over varying operational conditions to assessthe changes in level and help calibrate level control.
By using four scan lines in a grid arrangement (Figure 14), a more accurate indication of the Regenerator’s catalyst bed level can be determined. Overlaying the four scan lineswill identify the dense and dilute phase catalyst levels anddetermine if the levels are uneven which may be indicativeof air mal-distribution and air grid problems (Figure 15).
Cyclone Density StudyAs with Reactor Cyclones, a TRU-SCAN® can beperformed on each Regenerator Cyclone to search forhigh catalyst levels in diplegs or plugged Cyclones that will explain high catalyst loss.
Regenerator: Scanning
Northwest ScanlineSouthwest Scanline
100
FCC REGENERATORX-Axis: 50 - 20000
1000 10000
Cyclones
Upper Set of Detectors
Bracing Level B
DenseCatalyst
ManwayLower Set of Detectors
(Top Tangent)
Weld
Bracing Level C
Primary Dipleg Valve ElevationSecondary Depleg Valve Elevation (Bottom Tangent)
Dilute PhaseCatalyst
2'
4'
6'
8'
10'
12'
14'
16'
18'
20'
22'
24'
26'
28'
30'
32'
34'
36'
Southeast ScanlineNortheast Scanline
Figure 15: Tru-Grid™ Scan results to determine the Regenerator catalystbed level.
Figure 14: Illustration of a Tru-Grid™ Scan orientation used on aRegenerator.
10 TRACERCO Diagnostics™
Air Flow and Distribution StudyA TRACERCO Diagnostics™ Flow study can measureseveral flow parameters around the Regenerator with asingle injection of radiotracer. For example, both the air rate and flue gas rate can be determined simultaneouslywith a study of the air distribution from the air grid and/or the vapor distribution to the cyclones.
This is accomplished by placing a group of detectors at a known distance apart on the air supply line to theRegenerator and another set on the flue gas line leaving theRegenerator (Figure 16). The flow rates will be calculated byconverting the measured velocities to volumetric flow withrespect to line diameter, process pressure and temperature.
Figures 17 and 18 illustrate vapor distribution test resultsfrom when eight detectors were positioned near the eightprimary cyclone inlets (Figure 17) and twelve detectors werepositioned in a ring just above the upper air ring (Figure 18).Test results showed that some detectors had much largerresponses than others, indicating mal-distribution.
Regenerator: Tracer
Y1: N CycloneY1: S CycloneY1: Overhead Line
200
150
RA
DIA
TIO
N I
NT
EN
SIT
Y
TIME (seconds)
100
50
0470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560
Y1: NE CycloneY1: SW Cyclone
Y1: E CycloneY1: W Cyclone
Y1: SE CycloneY1: NW Cyclone
N Cyclone
NE Cyclone
E Cyclone
SE Cyclone
S Cyclone
SW CycloneW Cyclone
NW Cyclone
30.8%
23.6%
6.9%
2.5%
3.7%
3.4%
5.0%
24.1%
Percent
Area
Position
Y1: Air 1
Y1: Air 5
Y1: Air 9
220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
TIME (seconds)
0135 145 155 165 175 185 195 205
Y1: Air 2Y1: Air 6Y1: Air 10
Y1: Air 3Y1: Air 7Y1: Air 11
Y1: Air 4Y1: Air 8Y1: Air 12
Air 1
Air 2
Air 3
Air 4
Air 5
Air 6Air 7
Air 8
Air 9
Air 10
Air 11
Air 12
14.4%
13.4%
4.0%
6.0%
10.5%
5.3%
7.4%
10.6%
5.3%
10.0%
5.8%
7.3%
Percent
Area
Position
RA
DIA
TIO
N I
NT
EN
SIT
Y
Figure 16: Detector placement.
Figure 17: Vapor distribution at cyclone inlets.
Figure 18: Vapor distribution above air grids.
FCCU Study 11
Catalyst Stationary MonitoringSlugging StudyThis test uses TRU-SCAN® technology designed tomeasure density variations over time as the catalystcirculates. A small source and detector are positionedvertically on the standpipe being inspected and thetransmitted radiation is continuously monitored (Figure 19).Fluctuations in the transmitted radiation are recorded andprovide a relative measurement of the fluid densityvariations within the pipeline over time (Figure 20).
The case study illustrated in Figure 20 was performedbecause of catalyst circulation problems. A TRU-SCAN®
stationary monitoring test was designed to observe andrecord density fluctuations. The sources and detectorswere positioned and connected to a computer to collectdata over time. These results justified a short outage wherea hole was found in the overflow well. The hole allowed airto leak into the downward flowing catalyst and beentrained into the standpipe. Operations can also makechanges to the re-circulation rate to see the effect of thefluidized flow density profile in the standpipes.
Spent & Regenerated Catalyst Standpipes: Scanning
Figure 20: TRU-SCAN® stationary monitoring test results justified a shortoutage where a hole was found in the overflow well
Actual Time
12:4
9:13
12:5
0:13
12:5
1:13
12:5
2:13
12:5
3:13
12:5
4:13
12:5
5:13
12:5
6:13
12:5
7:13
12:5
8:13
12:5
9:13
100
1000
10000
Tran
smis
sion
TOPMIDDLEBOTTOM
12 TRACERCO Diagnostics™
Figure 19: Set-up for slugging study.
Catalyst Density ProfileA TRU-SCAN® of the spent catalyst standpipe can beperformed to investigate the cause of circulationproblems. Scan results from two scans of a spent catstandpipe showed an increase in density in the standpipe,but the red scan (N-S vertical scan, Figure 21) showed anarea of very low density below the area of high density.This was theorized to be a blockage that caused thecatalyst to flow to one side of the standpipe, leaving thearea under the blockage clear of catalyst. With thisinformation, a shutdown was authorized and a large pieceof refractory was found to be causing the blockage.
Spent & Regenerated Catalyst Standpipes: Scanning
NW-SE Vertical
1000
Ring
Ring
Ring
Ring
Area of High Densityin Both Scans -Probable Blockage
Area of Lower thanNormal Density
Area of Much Lower thanNormal Density -Probably Void Space
5m
6m
7m
8m
9m
10m
11m
N-S Vertical
Figure 21: A TRU-SCAN® of the spent cat standpipe can be performed toinvestigate the cause of circulation problems.
FCCU Study 13
Tracerco has provided gamma scanning services worldwideto evaluate trayed and packed towers to identify damage,fouling, flooding, mal-distribution and many other problemsthat can exist inside of the tower. This service is providedonline, externally to the column, with no interference tonormal plant operations. The ability to accurately determinewhat is happening inside the column, without having to shutit down for a visual inspection, effectively provides ourcustomers with ‘insight onsite’.
A Main Fractionator was not operating properly at normalcapacity and was showing symptoms of flooding from tray 2 (red curve, Figure 22). Tracerco’s TRU-SCAN® applicationpinpointed the location of flooding that was probably due tofouling (coking).
After the Main Fractionator was cleaned, a baseline scan(blue curve) was performed to use for future diagnosis ofcoking problems at an earlier stage before the floodingreached such a severe condition.
A scan a few months later (green curve) showed that Tray 2was again starting to show the same problem with cokingand the subsequent liquid hold-up and flooding. Using thisdata, plant operations and maintenance were able todetermine where the limitation in the column was occurringand prepare corrective action.
Main Fractionator Scan: TRU-SCAN®
Figure 22: TRU-SCAN® baseline and troubleshooting results providedoperations and maintenance personnel advance warnings of approachingproblems so they could prepare for corrective action.
14 TRACERCO Diagnostics™
FCCU Study 15
Main Fractionator: TRACERCO™
LevelFinderPlusTracerco provides a range ofspecialist measurement solutions tothe process industry, measuring key parameters such as level, densityand interface. These instruments areall non-wetted devices, allowingthem to be used in the harshest ofprocess conditions such as hightemperatures, slurries and corrosive materials.
TRACERCO™ LevelFinderPlusThe TRACERCO™ LevelFinderPlus,which provides real time measure-ments, has been applied to FCCMain Frac towers to measure thebottom liquids level. The gauge is mounted externally onthe tower for easy retrofit or new build installation. Thereare no moving parts, which eliminates the possibility ofmechanical failure or fouling by debris such as coke.
The inaccurate measurement of a tower’s base liquidlevel is one of the most problematic causes of towermalfunctions. In an industry survey problems with the
tower base and reboiler return was the number 2 causeof tower malfunctions. Tracerco, relying on its developedexpertise in radiation detection instruments has a rangeof reliable nuclear instruments including liquid levelinstruments. If you have a particularly challenging ortroublesome base liquid measurement application,contact a Tracerco Technical Advisor in your area.
www.tracerco.com [email protected]
North American Headquarters:4106 New West DrivePasadena, TX 77507 USATel: 281 291 7769Fax: 281 291 7709Toll Free: 800 288 8970
Field Office Locations:Corpus Christi, TX 78408 USATel: 361 888 8233
Concord, CA 94520 USATel: 925 687 0900
Paramount, CA 90723 USATel: 562 633 8800
Newark, DE 19702 USATel: 302 454 1109
Merrillville, IN 46410 USATel: 219 945 0400
Baton Rouge, LA 70820 USATel: 225 761 0621
West Valley City, UT 84119 USATel: 801 478 0736
Edmonton, AB, T6E 6A6 CANADATel: 780 469 0055
Calgary, AB, T2Y 2Z7 CANADATel: 403 931 6705
Sarnia, ON, N7S 5G5 CANADATel: 519 332 6160
Rio de Janerio, RJ, Brasil, CEP 22775-044Tel: +55 21 3535 7600
© 2012 Johnson Matthey Group
XM0075/0/D
TRACERCO and The TRACERCO Profiler are trademarks of the Johnson Matthey Group of companies.
Front cover image supplied by Praxis Technical Group www.praxistech.com
A worldwide network of agents and service partners enable Tracerco to deliver its products and services to ourcustomers anywhere in the world, while still retaining the important aspect of local service.
Tracerco’s operational offices across the world