To Bond or Not to Bond…
Entry Bonds, Liquidated Damages and 10+2
Roanoke Trade Services, Inc. presents
David F. Jordan, CHB, CPCU, CCS
Vice President, Surety Compliance & Liaison
Customs Bonds & 10+2
• Bonds/liquidated damages in 10+2 – If or when? – CBP consulted many trade groups when
planning• Did not mention bonds or LD
– Spoke only of “no-load messages”
• Did not consult sureties/surety associations whatsoever
– Many trade groups oppose bonding of ISFs• Some (including all sureties commenting)
oppose all bonds in 10+2 context• Some oppose bonding of filers only
– Why the opposition?• LD or any other monetary assessment does not
accomplish the purposes of the SAFE Port Act of 2006
– Keep dangerous materiel from our shores
• Can drive up bond costs & complicate underwriting
Customs Bonds & 10+2
In light of broad opposition, will bonds/LD be a part of the final
rules or will they not?
Customs Bonds & 10+2
• Questions/what to expect if CBP goes ahead and makes Customs Bonds part of 10+2– How will bond Activity Code 1 Continuous Bond
(CB) amounts be set?• Right now, LD exposure is not addressed in setting CB
amounts• Will the basic 10% formula be changed?• With or without value reporting in ISF, how will
sufficiency be determined?
Customs Bonds & 10+2
– How will bond Activity Code 1 Continuous Bond (CB) amounts be set? (Continued)
• What about “Importer” CB amounts vs. “Filer CB amounts?
• Will a CHB (or another type of “Filer”) have to report aggregate client values to establish the amount of its own “Filer Bond”?
Customs Bonds & 10+2
• What about STBs?– With new, additional, LD exposures, will the formulae
go up?
– If value is not part of ISF reporting, how will bond sufficiency be determined?
– Exactly how does a paper STB work with an Electronic ISF filing requirement?
• eBond presently scheduled for ACE/ESAR 3.4, some time in 2011
– Will STBs become too cumbersome to remain viable in the entry environment?
– What are CHB revenue implications if STBs go away?
Customs Bonds & 10+2
• Liquidated Damages (LD) – how much/ against whom?
– Consequence of violation – LD equal to “value” of goods
– As proposed, while the “Importer” is responsible for ISF, both bonds (“Importers” & “Filers”) contain precisely the same LD provisions
• Note that requirement of “Filer Bond” is new
– Proposed rules don’t spell out how decision to assess LD against one party vs. the other
– Proposed rules don’t preclude assessing LD against both
Customs Bonds & 10+2
• Whatever happened to “no-load” messages?
– Not mentioned in NPRM
– Nothing in NPRM says no-load messages many not be transmitted
– Nothing in NPRM guarantees that the transmission of a no-load message makes Importers or Filers “LD-proof”
Customs Bonds & 10+2
• Just who is the “Importer”?
– Per proposed 19 C.F.R. § 149.1(a), etc., “the party causing goods to arrive within the limits of a port in the United States”
• Will probably (usually) also be “importer of record” but how many other interpretations can there be?
– Could more than one entity meeting this description be liable for LD?
• What if CBP feels that a party other than the importer of record is culpable in some way?
Customs Bonds & 10+2
– What about mitigation guidelines?• Required by Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of
1988, but cannot be published in advance of the rule to which they apply
– Will LD for simple clerical error be the same as for a fraudulent transmission?
– Penalties vs. LD• Activity Code 1 bonds do not now cover penalties – prime
example 19 U.S.C. § 1592(a)
• Even if CBP feels a monetary assessment scheme is needed in addition to no-load, un-bonded assessments would make more sense
Customs Bonds & 10+2
• Underwriting and rating implications
– Percentage of bonds (STB or CB) currently requiring surety/surety agent approval
– How will a surety/surety agent quickly/efficiently qualify “Importers”?
– If a surety/surety agent cannot underwrite each ocean importer, how will it cope with a significant increase in LD exposure?
Customs Bonds & 10+2
• Who will the filers be?
– Mostly CHBs, presumably
• What about the others?
– NCBFAA and others want restrictions
– How will non-CHBs be qualified?
Customs Bonds & 10+2
• How will this affect Carnets?– “Ocean only” for now, but what about later?
– Carnets that are ocean tend to be large, complicated moves (symphony orchestras, circuses, large shows, etc.)
• How difficult to come with all 10 elements (including HTSUS subheading to at least the six digit level)?
• By the way, is or isn’t classification “customs business”?
Customs Bonds & 10+2
• What about the “2” in 10+2?– Information under more direct control of Filers
(carriers)?– Fewer players– Activity Code 3 bonds (international carrier bonds)
already have penalty bonding provisions
Customs Bonds & 10+2
About Roanoke Trade
• Baltimore• Boston• Charleston• Chicago• Houston• Los Angeles
• Miami• New York• St. Louis• San Francisco• Seattle• Tampa
Roanoke Trade…In 12 Cities with a Network of Agents in Over 120 Countries
Over 70 years experience in managing the risks associated with global trade and transportation.