Transcript
Page 1: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

The Population Trends That Are Reshaping Michigan

Reynolds FarleyPopulation Studies Center

Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of Michigan

[email protected]

Observations prepared for a conference organized by:GOVERNING and the American Association of Retired

PersonsLansing, Michigan

June 6, 2012

Page 2: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

Michigan’s Slow Population Growth

in Recent Decades

Low Fertility

Net loss of population in exchange with other states

Relatively few immigrants from abroad

Michigan loses the economic stimulus of population growth

Michigan loses political influence

Page 3: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Michigan Rest of the USA

FIGURE 1. Percent Change by Decade for Michigan’s Population and for the Nation’s Population, 1860 to 2010

Page 4: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 2. Michigan’s Share of the Nation’s Total Population, 1850 to 2010

2.0%

2.8%3.0%

3.3% 3.2% 3.2% 3.1%

3.5%

3.9% 4.0%4.2% 4.3% 4.4%

4.1%

3.7%3.5%

3.3%

0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

1850

1860

1870

1880

1890

1900

1910

1920

1930

1940

1950

1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

Page 5: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 3. Number of Congressional Seats Apportioned to Michigan after Each Census, 1850 to 2010

4

6

9

1112 12

13 13

17 1718

19 1918

1615

14

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

NU

MB

ER

OF

CO

NG

RE

SS

ION

AL

SE

AT

S

Page 6: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

MAP 1. Percent Change in Population of Michigan Counties, 2000 to 2011

Iron

Delta

LuceMarquette

Kent

AlgerGogebicChippewa

Huron

Baraga

Sanilac

Ontonagon

Lake

Ionia

Bay

Schoolcraft

Allegan

Mackinac

Clare

Oakland

Tuscola

Barry

Iosco

Alcona

Cass

Eaton

Saginaw

Lapeer

Newaygo

St. Clair

WayneJackson

AlpenaAntrim

Calhoun

Gratiot

Dickinson

ClintonOttawa

LenaweeBerrien

Mason

Oscoda

Monroe

Otsego

Isabella

Ingham

Montcalm

Emmet

Branch

Genesee

Osceola

Hillsdale

Wexford

Oceana MidlandMecosta

Gladwin

Ogemaw

Kalkaska Crawford

Manistee

WashtenawVan Buren

Presque Isle

Arenac

Benzie

Menominee

Houghton

Cheboygan

LivingstonMacomb

Missaukee

Kalamazoo

Muskegon

St. Joseph

Roscommon

Shiawassee

Montmorency

Leelanau

Charlevoix

Keweenaw

Grand Traverse

Houghton

Keweenaw

Chippewa

Legend

-2.6% and Below (Population Decline)

0% to -2.5% (Very Slow Loss)

1% to 2.5% (Very Slow Growth)

2.6% to 11.0% (Moderate Growth)

Over 11% (Grew Faster than the Nation)

Page 7: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 4. Population Change in Michigan Metropolitan Areas, 2000 to 2010

10.7%

6.8%

4.5%

4.2%

3.7%

3.6%

1.2%

-1.3%

-2.2%

-2.4%

-3.5%

-3.5%

-4.7%

0.4%

10.1%

-10% -5% 0% 5% 10% 15%

United States, Except Michigan

Non-metropolitan Michigan

Saginaw

Holland-Grand Haven

Detroit

Niles-Benton Harbor

Flint

Bay City

Battle Creek

Jackson

Lansing

Kalamazoo

Monroe

Grand Rapids

Ann Arbor

Page 8: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

TABLE 1. State Births Per 1,000 Women Ages 15 to 44 in 2010 State Births per 1,000 Women

States with Highest Birth Rates

Utah 92 Alaska 83 Montana 82 Mississippi 81 Nevada 80

Big Ten/Northwest Territory States

Iowa 74 Total United States 72 Illinois 69 Wisconsin 67 Minnesota 67 Ohio 66 Indiana 65 Michigan 67

States with the Lowest Birth Rates Massachusetts 57 West Virginia 57 Delaware 56 District of Columbia 56 Vermont 51

Page 9: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

TABLE 2. State Age-Adjusted Death Rates Per 100,000 in 2009

State

Deaths per 100,000

States with Lowest Death Rates

Hawaii 620 Minnesota 652 California 652 Arizona 653 New York 666

Big Ten/Northwest Territory States Wisconsin 709 Iowa 725 Total United States 741 Illinois 743 Michigan 786 Ohio 814 Indiana 816

States with Highest Death Rates Louisiana 888 Kentucky 898 Alabama 920 Mississippi 926 West Virginia 902

Page 10: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 5. Natural Increase (Births minus Deaths) and Net Internal Migration, Annual Estimates, 1980 to 2010

-175

-150

-125

-100

-75

-50

-25

0

25

50

75

100

TH

OU

SA

ND

S

Natural Increase(Population Gain)

Net Internal Migration(Population Loss)

Page 11: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

29.2

33.6

33.8

33.8

34.6

36.6

37

37.2

37.4

38.1

38.5

38.8

38.9

40.1

40.7

41.1

41.3

41.5

42.7

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Utah

Texas

Alaska

District of Columbia

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Total United States

Minnesota

Iowa

Wisconsin

Ohio

Michigan

Pennsylvania

Florida

New Hampshire

West Virginia

Vermont

Maine

AGE IN YEARS

OLDEST STATES

NORTHWEST TERRITORY OR BIG TEN STATES

YOUNGEST STATES

FIGURE 6. Median Age of the Population of “Oldest” States, Northwest Territory or Big Ten States, and “Youngest” States, Census 2010

Page 12: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

MAP 2. Percent Age 65 and Over in the Counties of Michigan and in Comparison to the Nation, Census 2010

Legend

Michigan_Counties

Age 65 and Over.AGE_65_PLU

Less than 12% (Younger)

13.9% to 12.1% (Close to National Average)

14.0% to 17.0% (Somewhat Older)

17.1% to 23.9% (Older)

Over 24% (Much Older)

Iron

Delta

LuceMarquette

Kent

AlgerGogebicChippewa

Huron

Baraga

Sanilac

Ontonagon

Lake

Ionia

Bay

Schoolcraft

Allegan

Mackinac

Clare

Oakland

Tuscola

Barry

Iosco

Alcona

Cass

Eaton

Saginaw

Lapeer

Newaygo

St. Clair

WayneJackson

AlpenaAntrim

Calhoun

Gratiot

Dickinson

ClintonOttawa

LenaweeBerrien

Mason

Oscoda

Monroe

Otsego

Isabella

Ingham

Montcalm

Emmet

Branch

Genesee

Osceola

Hillsdale

Wexford

Oceana MidlandMecosta

Gladwin

Ogemaw

Kalkaska Crawford

Manistee

WashtenawVan Buren

Presque Isle

Arenac

Benzie

Menominee

Houghton

Cheboygan

LivingstonMacomb

Missaukee

Kalamazoo

Muskegon

St. Joseph

Roscommon

Shiawassee

Montmorency

Leelanau

Charlevoix

Keweenaw

Grand Traverse

Houghton

Keweenaw

Chippewa

Page 13: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

MAP 3. Natural Decrease Counties in Michigan―Counties with More

Deaths than Births, July 2010 to June 2011

Iron

Delta

LuceMarquette

Kent

AlgerGogebicChippewa

Huron

Baraga

Sanilac

Ontonagon

Lake

Ionia

Bay

Schoolcraft

Allegan

Mackinac

Clare

Oakland

Tuscola

Barry

Iosco

Alcona

Cass

Eaton

Saginaw

Lapeer

Newaygo

St. Clair

WayneJackson

AlpenaAntrim

Calhoun

Gratiot

Dickinson

ClintonOttawa

LenaweeBerrien

Mason

Oscoda

Monroe

Otsego

Isabella

Ingham

Montcalm

Emmet

Branch

Genesee

Osceola

Hillsdale

Wexford

Oceana MidlandMecosta

Gladwin

Ogemaw

Kalkaska Crawford

Manistee

WashtenawVan Buren

Presque Isle

Arenac

Benzie

Menominee

Houghton

Cheboygan

LivingstonMacomb

Missaukee

Kalamazoo

Muskegon

St. Joseph

Roscommon

Shiawassee

Montmorency

Leelanau

Charlevoix

Keweenaw

Grand Traverse

Houghton

Keweenaw

Chippewa

Counties shown in red report more deaths than births.

Page 14: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 7. Michigan’s Population by Age in 2009 and Projected Population in 2030 (in Thousands)

POPULATION (000)

1,000 600800 200400 0 200 400 600 800 1,000

0-4

5-9

10-14

15-19

20-24

25-29

30-34

35-39

40-44

45-49

50-54

55-59

60-64

65-69

70-74

75-79

80-84

85+Michigan, 2009

Total Population: 9,996,000Median Age: 37.6 years

Michigan, 2030Total Population: 10,692,000

Median Age: 40.2 years

Page 15: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 7. Number of Jobs Each Month from January 2000 to March 2011 in Michigan and the Rest of the United States (in thousands)

Total United States, Except Michigan

110,000

115,000

120,000

125,000

130,000

135,000

140,000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

NU

MB

ER

OF

JO

BS

(00

0)

3,600

3,800

4,000

4,200

4,400

4,600

4,800

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

NU

MB

ER

OF

JO

BS

(00

0)

Michigan

Page 16: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 8. Employment Change by Industry in Michigan and Rest of the United States, 2000 to 2010, and Percent of Employment in Major Industrial Sectors, 2010

7.7%-10.8%

-0.1%-15.8%

-20.4%-29.3%

29.8%26.0%

16.4%-0.2%

-4.7%11.8%

-0.7%-30.5%

5.6%0.0%

11.7%-11.4%

14.8%-4.6%

30.6%19.0%

-21.6%-37.1%

13.8%-4.7%

13.6%

38.0%

-40% -20% 0% 20% 40%

Michigan Rest of U.S.

Michigan Rest of U.S.

NON-DURABLE MANUFACTURING

SOCIAL SERVICES

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

FINANCE, INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE

CONSTRUCTION

REPAIR AND PERSONAL SERVICES

POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION

TOTAL EMPLOYMENT

TRANSPORTATION AND WAREHOUSING

5.7%6.4%

3.7%

100%

4.0%3.5%

4.0%5.2%

4.2%4.7%

4.7%6.2%

3.3%4.2%

4.1%

100%

3.0%3.0%

DURABLE GOODS MANUFACTURING

PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES

ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION

RETAIL TRADE18.7%

27.7%

12.7%6.5%

9.9%11.3%

5.9%6.2%

MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES

11.9%10.6%

Page 17: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 9. Economic Status of Persons Living in Michigan and Elsewhere in the United States: Per Capita Income for Residents 21 and Over, Median Household Income and Poverty Rate, 1950 to 2008

1950 1960 19801980

1970 1990 2000 2008 1950 1960 19801980

1970 1990 2000 2008

PER CAPITA INCOME$15,358

$23,273

$32,338$33,555

COMFORTABLE(Incomes 500% or more of the poverty line)

MIDDLE CLASS(Incomes 300% to 499% of the poverty line)

NEAR POOR(Incomes 100% to 199% of the poverty line)

IMPOVERISHED(Incomes below the poverty line)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

MICHIGAN ELSEWHERE IN UNITED STATES

$34,574 $35,084

$40,333$13,982

$21,186

$28,851$30,846

$34,750 $38,370

$39,099

Page 18: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 10. Job Growth Rates for States from January 2011 to April 2012 (Bureau of Labor Statistics Monthly Survey of Employers)

0.8%

1.4%

1.4%

1.4%

1.5%

1.8%

2.2%

0.1%

2.9%

3.0%

3.0%

3.2%

0.0%

0.0%

-0.4%

-0.2%

-0.2%

-1% -1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3% 3% 4%

Wisconsin

New Hampshite

Rhode Island

Maine

Mississippi

Illinois

Total United State

Iowa

Ohio

Minnesota

Michigan

Indiana

North Dakota

Texas

Louisiana

Oklahoma

Utah

STATES WITH HIGHEST RATES OF NEW JOB GROWTH

NORTHWEST TERRITORY OR TRADITIONAL BIG TEN STATES

STATES WITH NO NET JOB GROWTH OR A LOSS OF JOBS

Page 19: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 8. Index of Labor Productivity in Manufacturing for the Nation, 1990 to 2011: Number of Workers Needed in Years Past to Achieve Output of 100 Workers in 2011

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

NU

MB

ER

OF

WO

RK

ER

S

Page 20: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 9. Population of Michigan Age 65 and Over, 1990 to 2030

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

1,800

2,000

2,200

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

2018

2020

2022

2024

2026

2028

2030

MIL

LIO

NS

Page 21: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 10. Percent Change in Employment in Michigan Metropolitan Areas, the Remainder of Michigan, and the Rest of the United States, 2000 to 2010

9.1%

-10.8%

-7.2%

-11.0%

-6.3%

-7.9%

-7.9%

-1.8%

-23.8%

-10.6%

-11.9%

1.9%

-30% -25% -20% -15% -10% -5% 0% 5% 10%

Remainder of United States

Total State of Michigan

Remainder of Michigan

Saginaw-Bay City-Midland

Lansing-East Lansing

Kalamazoo-Battle Creek

Jackson

Grand Rapids-Muskegon

Flint

Detroit

Benton Harbor

Ann Arbor

Page 22: The Population Trends that are Reshaping Michigan

FIGURE 11. Per Capita Income, 2000 to 2010, for Persons Aged 21 and Percent Change

in Constant Dollar Per Capita Income, 2000 to 2010, for Most Prosperous States, Big Ten States, and Least Prosperous States

$35,832

$26,842

$27,569

$28,474

$29,426

$30,161

$31,882

$32,509

$32,821

$33,882

$34,852

$35,283

$37,829

$39,490

$46,393

$47,483

$48,163

$51,205

$55,973

$25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 $50,000 $55,000 $60,000

Total United States

Mississippi

West Virginia

Arkansas

Kentucky

Idaho

Indiana

Michigan

Ohio

Iowa

Wisconsin

Pennsylvania

Illinois

Minnesota

Massachusetts

Maryland

New Jersey

Connecticut

District of Columbia

LEAST PROSPEROUS STATES

NORTHWEST TERRITORY OR "BIG TEN" STATES

MOST PROSPEROUS STATES

Percent Changein Decade

4.7%

-8.9%

-6.4%

-2.3%

-4.6%

-20.6%

-14.4%

-5.6%

-11.0%

-5.9%

-11.3%

-7.5%

-15.6%

-5.3%

--8.3%

-10.0%

-12.4%

-10.8%

-15.6%


Recommended