Transcript
Page 1: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Sue Lindemulder, MD, MCRMedical Director, Childhood Cancer Survivorship Program

September 12, 2013

Page 2: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Objectives

After this presentation, participants should be able to:

• Identify late effects common in children who are survivors of childhood cancer and stem cell transplant

• Know how to screen patients for common late effects of treatment.

• Identify resources available to aid providers in screening for late effects

Page 3: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Background

Majority of children with cancer become long term survivors

Majority of childhood cancer survivors have late effects

Page 4: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Approximately 80% will be Survivors

Page 5: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

• Multi-institutional collaborative study (26 centers)

• Diagnosed with cancer in childhood or adolescence and survived at least 5 years

• Diagnoses: Leukemia, Kidney, Bone, Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Neuroblastoma, Hodgkin’s or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and primary CNS malignancy.

• Diagnoses between January 1, 1970 and December 31, 1986

Page 6: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

• 17,565 eligible survivors not lost to follow-up, 4855 eligible siblings

• Baseline questionnaire: 24 pages with demographic variables, medical conditions, surgical procedures and other health outcomes

• 14,362 (81.8%) survivors and 3901 (80.4%) siblings completed the questionnaire

• 12,480 survivors had complete treatment data abstracted

Page 7: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

CCSS: Percentage with Late Effects

Oeffinger KC et al. 2006

Page 8: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

CCSS: Type of Late Effects

Oeffinger KC et al. 2006

Page 9: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

CCSS: Timing of Late Effects

Oeffinger KC et al. 2006

Page 10: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study

• 1713 participants diagnosed between 1962-2001• Follow-up between Oct 1, 2007 and Oct 31, 2012• Median time from Diagnosis: 25 years• Screened per Children’s Oncology Group Long-

Term Follow-Up Guidelines (www.survivorshipguidelines.org)

• Chronic health Condition: 98.2% (97.5%-98.8%)• Serious or life-threatening condition: 67.6%

(65.3%-69.8%)

Page 11: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

SJLIFE: Effect of Screening

Page 12: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

CCSS: Survivors and Medical Care

Nathan PC et al. 2008.

Page 13: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Putting a Face on Survivorship

Page 14: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Taken from Oregonian, April 27, 2012

Page 15: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Diagnosis: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Relapse (left occular & CNS) 6/7/2004 Date of Diagnosis: 1/03/2003 Date of Bone Marrow Transplant: 9/15/2004 Protocol: POG 9906; followed by relapse therapy CCG 1951 Chemotherapy exposures (cumulative dose): Anthracycline (72 mg/m2), Cytoxan (4.7 g/m2), 6-MP, Vincristine, Dexamethasone, Cytarabine, L' asparginase, Peg-Asparaginase, Methotrexate (IV, PO & IT), Ifosfamide (9 g/m2); Etopophos (allergy to Etoposide) (2.2 g/m2); Triple intrathecals x 4, Tacrolimus, Prednisone (ended 11/11/2005). Off immunosuppressives since 10/01/2006. Radiation Therapy: 2400 cGy to the left eye & 1200 cGy cranial & 1200 cGy TBI (2004) Last ECHO: (2012) FS 29%; EF 56% Last PFT: (2011) Improved from previous Surgeries: Line placement x 2 (2004 & 2005); Right hip replacement (2006); Bilateral cadaveric knee allografts (2007) Blood Products/year: 2004 on file - presumed 2003 Problem List from History: History of low shortening fraction on echo from 2004 treated with digoxin & lisinopril until 9/2004; History of hyperlipidemia; History of iatrogenic hypertension; Decreased vision left eye; Avascular necrosis; History of chronic GVHD of the skin and gut; Gonadal failure; Hypothryroid; Severe influenza requiring ICU hospitalization shortly after transplant. Neuropsych testing: (8/21/2004) (pre-transplant)- Intellectual functioning intact; normal on all examinations

Cancer Treatment Summary

Page 16: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Cardiac Toxicity

Late Effect: Cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmia, Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction, Valve dysfunction.

• Cancers: Almost all, high doses with sarcomas• Chemotherapy Agents: Anthracyclines• Radiation: Total Body, Whole lung, Mantle etc• Risk Factors: Obesity, Congenital Heart

Disease, Isometric exercise, Smoking, Illicit drug use.

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 17: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Cardiac ToxicityPeriodic Evaluation• History (yearly): SOB, DOE, Orthopnea, Chest

pain, Palpitations, if <25 yrs abdominal symptoms

• Physical (yearly): Cardiac murmur, S3/S4, Increased P2 sound, Pericardial rub, Rales, JVD

Screening• ECHO or MUGA baseline at entry into LTFU

then at intervals. EKG baseline at entry into LTFU then as clinically indicated

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 18: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Cardiac Toxicity Screening GuidelinesAge at Treatment Radiation with Potential

Impact to the HeartAnthracycline Dose Recommended

Frequency

< 1 year old Yes Any Every year

No<200 mg/m2 Every 2 years

≥200 mg/m2 Every year

1-4 years old Yes Any Every year

No<100 mg/m2 Every 5 years

≥100 to <300 mg/m2 Every 2 years

≥300 mg/m2 Every year

≥5 years old Yes <300 mg/m2 Every 2 years

≥300 mg/m2 Every year

No <200mg/m2 Every 5 years

≥200 to <300 mg/m2 Every 2 years

≥300 mg/m2 Every year

Any age with decrease in serial function Every year

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 19: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Pulmonary Toxicity

Late Effect: Pulmonary fibrosis, interstitial pneumonitis

• Cancers: Hodgkin’s, germ cell tumors, BMT• Chemotherapy Agents: Bleomycin, Busulfan• Radiation: Whole lung, Total Body, Mediastinal

etc• Other: Chronic GVHD• Risk Factors: Younger age at tx, higher doses,

radiation dose ≥ 10Gy, smoking

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 20: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Pulmonary Toxicity

Periodic Evaluation• History (yearly): Cough, SOB, DOE, Wheezing• Physical (yearly): Pulmonary examScreening• Chest x-ray and Pulmonary function testing

(including DLCO and spirometry): Baseline at entry into long term follow-up. Repeat as clinically indicated if abnormal or if progressive dysfunction.

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 21: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Meet Jessica

Page 22: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Jessica’s Cancer Treatment Summary

Diagnosis: Philadelphia + acute biphenotypic leukemia diagnosed at age 11; 2 x relapsed on therapy 10/14/1993 after two courses (paused for infection) & 1/1994 (after 2 courses of salvage therapy). Date of Diagnosis: 5/1993 Date of Bone Marrow Transplant: 3/27/1994 Chemotherapy exposures (cumulative dose): Anthracycline (430 mg/m2), Cytoxan (2 gram/m2), Vincristine (12mg/m2), Steroids (prednisone and dexamethasone), Cytarabine (10.3 gram/m2), Asparginase, 6-mercaptopurine, 6-thioguanine, Etoposide (800 mg/m2), Fludarabine (41mg/m2) and Intrathecal methotrexate and cytarabine. BMT preparative chemotherapy: Thiotepa (900 mg/m2) and Etoposide (1.5 gram/m2). Radiation Therapy: Cranial 1800 cGy (1993); TBI 1200 cGy (1994) Surgeries: Thyroid cyst removed (1984); Cholecystectomy; Appendectomy (1995); multiple central lines; Bilateral hip total arthoplasty (2007); Left knee total arthroplasty (2007); Manipulation of left knee arthoplasty (2008). Fracture repair & plating of right distal radius (2009); Multiple dental extractions (2012 & 2013) Blood Product Exposure/year: 1993 On therapy complications: Multiple episodes of sepsis and bacteremia, clostridium cellulitis of hip, leg, and perineum, veno-occlusive disease, septic arthritis, acute graft-versus-host disease, multiple compression fractures of the spine, hepatic abscesses, GI bleed, seizures. Off therapy complications: Chronic graft-versus-host disease, osteonecrosis of bilateral hips and left knee, fracture of right wrist, hyperlipidemia, ovarian failure (OCPs to be prescribed once triglycerides are controled), growth failure without GH treatment, sub clinical hypothyroidism, vitamin D deficiency, cholecystitis, osteoporosis, dry eye, diabetes type 2 (controled) and excessive dental caries. Alteration in body image

Page 23: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Bone ToxicityLate Effect: Reduced Bone Mineral Density,

Osteonecrosis• Cancers: ALL, osteosarcoma• Chemotherapy Agents: Steroids, HD

Methotrexate• Radiation: Any• Other: Bone marrow transplant• Risk Factor: Younger age, lower weight, growth

hormone deficiency, hypogonadism/delayed puberty, inadequate vitamin D or calcium intake, smoking

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 24: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Bone Toxicity

Periodic Evaluation• History (yearly): Fracture history, joint pain• Physical (yearly): No specificScreening• Bone Density Evaluation: Baseline at long

term follow-up and than as clinically indicated (baseline is age dependent).

• Vitamin D levels

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 25: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Endocrine Toxicity: Thyroid

Late Effect: Hypothyroidism, Thyroid nodules, Thyroid cancer

• Cancers: Hodgkin’s, Brain tumors, BMT• Chemotherapy Agents: None• Radiation: Cranial, Spine, Supraclavicular,

Chest, Mantle, Mediastinal, Total Body• Risk Factors: Female, Radiation doses ≥ 10

Gy, Thyroid directly in field

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 26: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Endocrine Toxicity: ThyroidPeriodic Evaluation• History (yearly): Fatigue, Weight gain, Cold

intolerance, Constipation, Dry skin, Brittle Hair, Depressed mood.

• Physical (yearly): Height, Weight, Hair and skin, thyroid exam

Screening• TSH and free F4 yearly. May need more

frequently during periods of rapid growth

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 27: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Meet Brady

Page 28: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Brady’s Cancer Treatment Summary

Diagnosis: Stage IV Adrenal Neuroblastoma (Age 3 years)Date of Diagnosis: 11/1993 Date of Bone Marrow Transplant: Auto, July 1994 (CHLA) Protocol: CCG 3891 Regimen: B - Bone marrow transplant Chemotherapy exposures (cumulative dose): Carboplatin (1 g/m2); Cisplatin (300 mg/m2); Etoposide (1.64 g/m2); Doxorubicin (150 mg/m2); Cyclophosphamide (9 g/m2); Melphalan (210 mg/m2); Retinoic Acid. Radiation Therapy: 999 cGy TBI (1994); 2000 cGy to the sphenoid sinus, right shoulder, right hip, right tibia, left tibia (1994); 1000 cGy to the abdomen (1994); MIBG 330 mCU (8/1995). Surgeries: Subtotal resection of left adrenal mass (1994); Left sphenoid sinus sinusotomy (1994); Line placement x 2 (1994 & 1995); Resection of anterior abdominal wall fibromatosis (1995); Resection of chest wall keloid and detached retina repair (1997); Left cataract removal and lens implant (2003); YAG laser capsulotomy left eye (2004); Left tonsillectomy (path of mass = lymphoid follicular hyperplasia) and right tonsil biopsy (2005); Bilateral tibia-fibula osteotomy (2006). Blood Products/year: None on file, presume 1993 Problem List from History: Hypothyroid; Short Stature; Gonadal failure; Cataracts and retinal detachment. Neuropsych testing: (2001) Intellectually in the "bright normal to superior range". Susceptible to distraction.

Page 29: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Brady’s Growth Chart

Page 30: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Growth Abnormalities

Late Effect: Growth Abnormalities (isolated limb or global)

• Chemotherapy Agents: ? intrathecals• Radiation: Cranial, Spine, Total Body, any

bone• Risk Factors: Younger age, higher radiation

doses

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 31: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Growth AbnormalitiesPeriodic Evaluation• History (every 6 months until growth

complete): Assessment of nutritional status • Physical (every 6 months until sexually

mature): Height, Weight, BMI and Tanner Stage

Screening• Plot and follow growth curves carefully. If

there is one risk factor and cross one height percentile line refer to endocrine.

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 32: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Warning! Decreased Velocity!

Page 33: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Eye Toxicity

Late Effect: Cataracts• Cancers: ALL, BMT, Brain tumors• Chemotherapy Agents: Busulfan, Steroids• Radiation: Cranial, Total Body• Risk Factors: Radiation dose ≥10 Gy. TBI ≥ 5

Gy. Combination therapy.

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 34: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Eye ToxicityPeriodic Evaluation• History (yearly): Visual changes (decreased

acuity, halos, diplopia)• Physical (yearly): Eye exam (visual acuity,

fundoscopic exam for lens opacity)Screening• Yearly evaluation by ophthalmologist for

those who received TBI or ≥ 30 Gy radiation• Evaluation every 3 years for everyone else

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 35: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Meet Leah

Page 36: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Leah’s Cancer Treatment SummaryDiagnosis: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia, high risk for age, slow early response, diagnosed at 11 years old, finished planned chemo 5/2003; Myelodysplastic syndrome with monosomy 7 diagnosed August 2003. Date of Diagnosis: 1/2001 Date of Bone Marrow Transplant: 11/2003 – MUD marrow Chemotherapy exposures (cumulative dose): Anthracycline (300 mg/m2); cytoxan (10 grams/m2); including SCT dose); thiopurines, vincristine, steroids, cytarabine, asparaginase, methotrexate, Busulfan (16 mg/kg); fludarabine (160 mg/m2). Grade 1 GVHD off immunosuppression since Oct 2004; Radiation Therapy: Cranial prophylaxis 1800 cGy Surgeries: Central line x 2, Cholecystectomy (2003), Sinus irrigation (2004) Blood Products/year: 2001 Problem List from History: Ovarian failure; Acne; Gastroesophageal reflux; Recurrent vaginal yeast infections. Neuropsych testing: (7/2009) FS IQ 107; Attention issues

Page 37: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Endocrine Toxicity: Gonadal Function

Late Effect: Delayed puberty, oligo/ azospermia, premature menopause, infertility

• Cancers: Sarcomas, Hodgkin’s, BMT• Chemotherapy Agents: Alkylating agents• Radiation: Cranial, radiation to ovary or

testes• Risk Factors: Higher cumulative doses of

alkylators combine with radiation, smoking

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 38: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Endocrine Toxicity: Gonadal Function

Periodic Evaluation• History (yearly): Puberty (onset, tempo), Sexual

function, Medications impacting sexual function• Physical (yearly): Tanner Staging, Testicular

volume until sexually mature for boysScreening• FSH, LH, Estradiol/Testosterone: At age 13

(girls)/14 (boys) and as indicated for signs of gonadal deficiency. Sexual function.

• Semen analysis

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 39: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Neurocognitive Function

Late Effect: Deficits in executive function, attention, memory, processing speed, visual-motor integration

• Chemotherapy agents: Cytarabine (high dose), Methotrexate (IT and high dose),

• Radiation: Cranial, Total Body• Risk Factors: Younger age, female, CNS

leukemia/ lymphoma, CNS-directed therapy, Radiation

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 40: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Neurocognitive Function

Periodic Evaluation• History (yearly): Educational and/or

vocational progressScreening• Referral for formal neuropsychological

evaluation: Baseline at entry into long term follow-up then as indicated

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 41: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Risk for All?

Page 42: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Second CancersAML/MDS:

– Chemotherapy Agents: Anthracyclines, Etoposide

– Other: Bone marrow transplantSkin Cancer:

– Radiation: Skin in any fieldSoft Tissue Cancer (Bone, Brain, Thyroid,

Breast, GI, Muscle):– Radiation: Any tissue in the field

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 43: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

When are they at Risk?

Robison LL et al. 2009

Page 44: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Does the Risk Ever End?

Robison LL et al. 2009

Page 45: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Second Cancers: Screening• AML: CBC every year for 10 years (ongoing for

BMT)• Skin Cancer: Yearly dermatologic exam• Soft Tissue Cancer: Yearly exam• Breast Cancer: Mammogram beginning 8 years

after radiation or at age 25 years (later date). Breast MRI yearly in addition to mammography.

• Colorectal Cancer: Colonscopy every 5 years (minimum) beginning at 10 years after radiation or age 35 years (later date).

Children’s Oncology Group; www.survivorshipguidelines.org

Page 46: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Tools to Assist Medical Providers

Page 47: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Tools for Providers and Patients

Comprehensive Survivorship Program• Access to risk-based recommendations• Access to multi-disciplinary consultation and

instruction regarding issues• Education regarding future screening• Communication with providers

Page 48: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Doernbecher Childhood Cancer Survivorship Program

• Multi-disciplinary clinics on Fridays– Program Coordinator: Kitt Swartz– Medical Director: Sue Lindemulder– Nurse Practitioner: Kelly Anderson– Psychologist: Michael Harris & Debbie Dwelle– Social Worker: Sue Best– Educational Specialist: Kerri Russell– Dental Support: Dental residents– Neuro-oncologist: Stacy Nicholson– Orthopedic Surgeons: Ivan Krajbich and James Hayden– Oncology Nurse: Katie Loomis

Page 49: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship
Page 50: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship
Page 51: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Conclusions

• Most children will survive their cancer. • Survivors are at risk for medical and

psychosocial late effects and need lifelong monitoring

• Education for patients and providers with regard to screening for late effects is important to maintain future health

• There are many tools and resources to assist with the care of these patients

Page 52: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

Thank you for Your Attention!

Page 53: The Pediatric Perspective on Cancer Survivorship

References

Chow EF et al. Risk of Thyroid Dysfunction and Subsequent Thyroid Cancer Among Survivors of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatr Blood Cancer (2009). 53: 432-437.

Hudson MM et al. Clinical Ascertainment of Health Outcomes Among Adults Treated for Childhood Cancer. JAMA (2013). 309(22): 2371-2381.

Nathan PC et al. Medical Care in Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol (2008). 26(27): 4401-4409.

Oeffinger KC et al. Chronic Health Conditions in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer. NEJM (2006). 355(15): 1572-1582.

Robison LL et al. Treatment-associated subsequent neoplasms among long-term survivors of childhood cancer: The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study experience. Pediatr Radiol (2009). 39(Suppl 1): S32-S37.


Recommended