The Industry The Industry Perspective on Perspective on Ballast Water Ballast Water ManagementManagementASTM Seminar on Environmental ASTM Seminar on Environmental
Requirements for Efficient Maritime Requirements for Efficient Maritime Operations and Effective Environmental Operations and Effective Environmental
StewardshipStewardship
Kathy MetcalfKathy Metcalf
December 9, 2009December 9, 2009
Ballast Water ManagementBallast Water Management
Balance of Powers gone wrong!Balance of Powers gone wrong! Legislative, judicial and executive branchLegislative, judicial and executive branch BW Legislation?BW Legislation? Court case – NW Environmental Advocates Court case – NW Environmental Advocates
vs. EPA (Industry intervened)vs. EPA (Industry intervened) EPA and USCG regulatory programsEPA and USCG regulatory programs State programsState programs
INDUSTRY BASED INDUSTRY BASED ASSUMPTIONSASSUMPTIONS
Need for internationally accepted mandatory Need for internationally accepted mandatory BW management programBW management program
Consistency between international and Consistency between international and domestic programsdomestic programs
Solutions must provide real benefit to the Solutions must provide real benefit to the environmentenvironment
We are experts in vessel operations, not We are experts in vessel operations, not marine/invasion biologymarine/invasion biology
INDUSTRY POSITIONSINDUSTRY POSITIONS
Mandatory national BW management Mandatory national BW management programprogram
Exchange as technology benchmark but no Exchange as technology benchmark but no longer appropriate focus for future control longer appropriate focus for future control strategiesstrategies
Promote ID and testing of new technologiesPromote ID and testing of new technologies Oppose dual regulatory structures e.g. CWA Oppose dual regulatory structures e.g. CWA
NPDES NPDES and and ballast water statuteballast water statute
LAY OF THE LEGAL LAY OF THE LEGAL LANDSCAPELANDSCAPE
Finalized IMO ConventionFinalized IMO Convention Development of IMO GuidelinesDevelopment of IMO Guidelines US Legislative Initiatives (Fed/State)US Legislative Initiatives (Fed/State) Regulatory Initiatives (Fed/State/Local)Regulatory Initiatives (Fed/State/Local) Multitude of technology developers all Multitude of technology developers all
assuring their “silver bullet”assuring their “silver bullet”
IMO CONVENTION VS. US IMO CONVENTION VS. US LEGISLATIONLEGISLATION
IMO entry into force????IMO entry into force???? Multiple US legislative efforts Multiple US legislative efforts US legislation enactment expected ???US legislation enactment expected ??? Industry position to maximize alignment of Industry position to maximize alignment of
national and IMO requirementsnational and IMO requirements 100% alignment unlikely (performance std.)100% alignment unlikely (performance std.)
DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS (IMO DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS (IMO Guidelines)Guidelines)
Sediment and BW Reception FacilitiesSediment and BW Reception Facilities SamplingSampling Equivalent Compliance for pleasure/SAR vesselsEquivalent Compliance for pleasure/SAR vessels BW Management PlansBW Management Plans BW ExchangeBW Exchange Additional measures and risk assessment protocolsAdditional measures and risk assessment protocols Approval of ballast water management systemsApproval of ballast water management systems Procedures for approval of “active” substancesProcedures for approval of “active” substances Prototype BW treatment technologiesPrototype BW treatment technologies
DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS (US DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS (US Legislative and Regulatory)Legislative and Regulatory)
General legislation with details left to General legislation with details left to regulatory programs or…regulatory programs or…
Specific legislation with less detail left to Specific legislation with less detail left to regulatory programs?regulatory programs?
IMO requirements reflected in total…in IMO requirements reflected in total…in part…or not at all?part…or not at all?
Intentional or inadvertent loopholes with Intentional or inadvertent loopholes with partial adoption of IMO requirementspartial adoption of IMO requirements
PERFORMANCE BASED PERFORMANCE BASED STANDARDSTANDARD
Mandatory requirements “do able” by all Mandatory requirements “do able” by all vessels regardless of location, vessel type vessels regardless of location, vessel type or weather/sea conditionsor weather/sea conditions
New technology verified by standardized New technology verified by standardized test protocolstest protocols
Timed phase-in differentiating between new Timed phase-in differentiating between new and existing shipsand existing ships
ALTERNATIVE BW ALTERNATIVE BW MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY
PROGRAMPROGRAM
Must be transparent processMust be transparent process Specified process for proposal Specified process for proposal
submittal, evaluation and approvalsubmittal, evaluation and approval Specified format and contentSpecified format and content Use of technology verification protocolsUse of technology verification protocols ““Temporary” approval for testing Temporary” approval for testing
program with final review and approval program with final review and approval for successful test programsfor successful test programs
FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF STATE REQUIREMENTSSTATE REQUIREMENTS
NISA 96 recognizes need for national and NISA 96 recognizes need for national and international consistencyinternational consistency
Equally applicable to federal and state Equally applicable to federal and state programsprograms
Must have strong legal and policy Must have strong legal and policy justification to gain Congressional supportjustification to gain Congressional support
Current evidence of “patchwork quilt” in Current evidence of “patchwork quilt” in varying state and national requirements varying state and national requirements (NPDES Vessel General Permit – Ch. 6)(NPDES Vessel General Permit – Ch. 6)
NEED FOR EXCLUSION FROM NEED FOR EXCLUSION FROM CLEAN WATER ACT PROVISIONSCLEAN WATER ACT PROVISIONS
Text to make national legislation the Text to make national legislation the EXCLUSIVE statute for managing ballast EXCLUSIVE statute for managing ballast waterwater
Otherwise, provisions of CWA permitting Otherwise, provisions of CWA permitting program (NPDES) would apply as wellprogram (NPDES) would apply as well
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONSCONSIDERATIONS
Maximum operational flow rate (vessel)Maximum operational flow rate (vessel) Maximum operational flow rate Maximum operational flow rate
(application and/or residence time)(application and/or residence time) Adaptability to shipboard environmentAdaptability to shipboard environment FootprintFootprint Installation and maintenance feasibilityInstallation and maintenance feasibility Back-up capability and redundancyBack-up capability and redundancy Sampling and monitoring needsSampling and monitoring needs
CHALLENGESCHALLENGES
Standardized test protocolsStandardized test protocols Finalized IMO guidelines and domestic Finalized IMO guidelines and domestic
requirementsrequirements Ramp-up from lab to pilot to shipboardRamp-up from lab to pilot to shipboard Conversion of existing performance data (% Conversion of existing performance data (%
removal to concentration based format)removal to concentration based format) Sufficient funding (public and private)Sufficient funding (public and private) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT THERE IS NO ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT THERE IS NO
SILVER BULLET!SILVER BULLET!
PENDING LEGISLATION PENDING LEGISLATION (FEDERAL)(FEDERAL)
None as yet in new CongressNone as yet in new Congress Expect re-introductions of ballast water Expect re-introductions of ballast water
legislation in House and Senate?legislation in House and Senate? Senate players – Levin, Inouye, BoxerSenate players – Levin, Inouye, Boxer House players – Oberstar, Ehlers, House players – Oberstar, Ehlers,
LoBiondoLoBiondo
STATE ACTIONSSTATE ACTIONS
California (zero discharge by 2020)California (zero discharge by 2020) Provides perfect example of why a national Provides perfect example of why a national
program is necessary e.g. varied program is necessary e.g. varied requirementsrequirements
Wide variety of state requirements in Wide variety of state requirements in NPDES Vessel General Permit (Ch. 6)NPDES Vessel General Permit (Ch. 6)
Expect more in next round of VGP reviewExpect more in next round of VGP review
Rulemaking petition ◦ Dec. 2003: Lawsuit filed by Northwest Environmental Advocates and
others challenging petition denial
Litigation & outcome in U.S. District Court◦ March 2005: Ruling that the regulation (40 CFR 122.3(a)) excluding
discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel from NPDES permitting exceeded the Agency’s authority under the CWA
◦ Sept 2006: Final order vacating (revoking) the regulatory exclusion as of September 30, 2008, and potentially affects all incidental discharges of vessels
◦ July 2008: 9th Circuit upholds lower court decision◦ August/December 2008: US District Court grants extension of
application to Feb 6, 2009
Current status – case filed in DC Circuit Court of Appeals
17
All vessels with discharges of pollutants over 79’ subject to permit on 2/6/2009 (60,000+)
Congressional exemption for recreational boaters and fishing vessels
Coverage automatic on February 6, 2009; vessels allowed 6-9 months to file NOI
Not just limited to ballast water discharges but includes other operational discharges◦ But does NOT affect exemptions specifically
contained in CWA itself (see earlier slide)
18
How to address State WQ standards that vary reach-by-reach or State to State?
How to integrate with any applicable international or domestic requirements under statutes besides CWA? (e.g., Coastal Zone Management Act which requires State certification as to consistency with coastal zone management plans)
19
Incorporate current legal requirements Create Best Management Practices (BMPs)
reflecting current practices Some “add ons” with biggest impacts on
vessels not going outside 3 nm and those that do but remain inside for extended period (anchorage, repairs, etc.)
20
Use of ambiguous terms (minimize, where practical, to the extent possible)
Insufficient science and fleet data to justify discharge restrictions (no environmental impacts analysis)
Lack of temporal and spatial distribution data
State 401 certification process and varying state requirements
21
Kathy MetcalfDirector, Maritime AffairsChamber of Shipping of America1730 M Street, NWSuite 407Washington, DC [email protected]
22