The Green Cruise Port Project
HELCOM Cooperation Platform“Results of Interreg Project Green Cruise Port”
Ingo Fehrs, Hamburg Port Authority
Helsinki, March 27th, 2019
2
Basic InformationEU Interreg Programme
• GCP is a project in the EU Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme 2014‐2020 (www.interregbaltic.eu)
• GCP elaborates a multidimensional strategic approach for a sustainable and qualitative future development for cruise shipping in port areas.
• GCP encourages investments and procedures in environmentally friendly cruise port infra and superstructure in the Baltic Sea Region
• GCP was implemented from March 2016 to February 2019.
• GREEN CRUISE PORT embraces 20 partners, covering geographically all BSR countries and The Netherlands.
• Budget: 2.8 Mio € (ERDF/NO budget 2.1 Mio € plus 0.7 Mio € own contribution).
Green Cruise Port (GCP) Overview
3
GCP OverviewBasic InformationMap
4
Development of Sustainability in Cruise Port Locations
Full Partner
1. Hamburg Port Authority2. Hamburg Cruise Net e.V.3. Rostock Port 4. Freeport of Riga Authority 5. Port of Tallinn 6. Klaipeda State Seaport Authority7. Maritime Institute Gdansk 8. Port of Helsinki 9. Port of Bergen 10. Port of Esbjerg
5
11. Port of Oslo,12. Port of Stockholm,13. Port of Copenhagen14. Rosmorport Kaliningrad Branch15. Port of Amsterdam 16. Port of Gothenburg17. Rosmorport Northwest Basin
Branch St. Petersburg18. AIDA Cruises19. TUI Cruises20. Senate Chancellery of City of Hamburg
Development of Sustainability in Cruise Port Locations
Associated Partner
6
Project Structure
WP2: Sustainable energy supply & solutions for emission reduction
WP3: Smart cruise terminal buildings & reception facilities
WP4: Smart cruise porttraffic solutions & economic effects
Improvement of portinfrastructure in orderto reduce cruise vesselemissions in harboursby adaption of latesttechnical sustainabiltydevelopments
establish cruise portsuperstructuree.g. modern terminalbuildings, barrier‐freeaccess and suitablereception facilities
Environment‐friendly traffic inte‐gration of cruiseports into localtransport systemsandeconomic impact onport cities andregions
WP1: Project Management, Administration, Communication
7
Project Structure• 10 Workshops and 2 Conferences for Partners and Stakeholders• 2 Best Practice Tours for Partners• 7 Steering Committee Meetings (internal)• 12 Conceptual‐, Analytical‐, Technical‐Studies and Business Plans (ST)• Green Cruise Port Action Plan 2030
8
Cruise industry in the Baltic Sea Region faces two main challenges
PROJECTIONS FOR SHIPPING’S CO2 EMISSIONS TO 2035
cruise industry has to respond to environmental challenges and try to minimize negative externalities
Source: ITF (2018): Decarbonising Maritime Transport
DEVELOPMENT OF CRUISE PASSENGER VISITS IN THE BSR
cruise industry has to create the structural conditions to accommodate the expected industry growth
Main Goals of Action Plan
Merge the knowledge generated within the GCP project and in other related projects worldwide to provide information on how to
meet growing sustainability requirements
accommodate the projected industry growth
strengthen economic effects
9
Relevant Environmental Rules For Ships And Ports
Emission type Regulations considered
Air Emission Rules and Requirements
For ships: MARPOL Annex VI, Directive 2012/33/EU of the European Parliament For road and non-road vehicles: EURO standards
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rules and Regulations
For ships: MARPOL Energy Efficiency Design Index and Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan / EU MRV
For road and non‐road vehicles: EURO standards, EG Nr. 443/2009 and EG Nr. 510/2011
Noise Rules and Requirements
For ports: Directive 2002/49/EC (Environmental Noise Directive END) For ships: SOLAS regulations of the IMO
Wastewater Discharge Rules and Requirements
MARPOL Annex IV (special area for sewage from passenger ships in Baltic Sea), CLIA policies PRF Directive: indirect fee (30% ) also for sewage, and mandatory delivery also covers sewage from
ships (in accordance with the MARPOL discharge norms and with the exception based on sufficientstorage capacity)
Waste Management Rules and Regulations
For ports: MARPOL 73/78, EU Port Reception Facility Directive which requires MS to provide for adequate PRF, and provides for No‐Special‐Fee for garbage, New Directive will be adopted in April 2019.
For ships: MARPOL Annex V (Pollution by Garbage, PRF Directive: article 7: mandatory delivery obligation, as well as dedicated inspection regime (article 11)
MARPOL Annex I: oily waste (including oily slops): PRF Directive MARPOL Annex II: tank washing containing NLS: PRF Directive MARPOL Annex VI: scrubber residues: PRF Dirctive Green Ship concept: PRF Directive (article 8)
10
Proposal of measures on how to improve level of sustainability
Measures suggested are designed to reduce emissions and waste in cruise ports that arise from
• Cruise ships at berth
• Pier & cargo handling equipment
• Terminal buildings
• Road (external) traffic
EMISSION SOURCES OF A TYPICAL CRUISE TERMINAL
Land-side emissions & waste
Water-side emissions & waste
11
two main criteria for assessment
1. Impact on sustainabilityQuality of a measure with regard totheir potential on reducing local airpollutants, greenhouse gas and noiseemissions
more than 100 measures have been compiled and prioritised
2. Efforts for implementationCapital and operational expenditureas well as operational efforts toimplement a certain measure
12
Evaluation of measures for WP 2 ‐ Sustainable Energy Supply & Innovative Solutions for Emission Reduction
Objective 1: Avoid or reduce ship GHG and air emissions in ports Ship-port interface
1. On-shore power supply (OPS) 2. LNG PowerPac 3. LNG bunkering facilities: truck-to-ship (TTS) 4. LNG bunkering facilities: shore to ship 5. LNG bunkering facilities: ship- to-ship (STS) 6. LNG bunkering facilities: local liquefaction plant 7. Mobile LNG barge 8. Automated mooring Systems
Exhaust gas treatment systems 9. Diesel particle filer (DPF) 10. Selective catalytic reduction system (SCR) 11. Scrubber systems
Alternative fuels 12. LNG 13. Advanced biofuels 14. Ammonia (NH3) 15. Electric / hybrid propulsion 16. Hydrogen (H2) 17. Methanol
Energy efficiency measures 18. Energy efficiency measures
Objective 2: Avoid or reduce ship noise emissions in ports 19. Exhaust silencers 20. Noise reduction of ventilation systems Further measures: 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 18
13
Evaluation of measures for WP 3 – Smart Cruise Terminal Buildings & Innovative Reception Facilities
14
Evaluation of measures for WP 3 – Smart Cruise Terminal Buildings & Innovative Reception Facilities
15
Evaluation of measures for WP 4 – Smart Cruise Port Traffic Solutions & Economic Effects
16
Evaluation of measures for WP 4 – Smart Cruise Port Traffic Solutions & Economic Effects
17
Summary: Top 5 measures to reduce ship and port emissions and waste in port areas (WP 2+3)
Measure AreaEmission focus Evaluation
GHG Air Noise Waste Impact Efforts
Vessel‐related emissions
On‐shore power supply Ship‐port interface X X XLNG bunkering facilities: truck‐to‐ship
Ship‐port interface X X
Liquefied natural gas Vessel fuels X X
Energy efficiency measures Vessel X X
Exhaust silencers Vessel X
Port‐related emissions
Emission reduction target Whole port area X X X XObtain “green” energy Whole port area XEco‐driving lessons Pier & cargo handling
equipmentX X X
Waste fee reduction Whole port area XLED technology Terminal building X
18
Summary: Top 5 measures to strengthen economic effects of cruise tourism and accommodate the projected industry growth
Measure
Impact on Evaluation
Seaward accessibility
Landward accessibility
Passenger flows
Economiceffects
Cruise line behaviour Impact Efforts
Provide adequate sign posting X
Limit number of group sizes of land excursions X
Bring together local vendors and shipping lines X (X) (X)
Establish “Green Port Fees” X
Extend berth and pier infrastructure X
19
Project StructureFour Work Packages (WP)
GCP Outline 2/2
20
Website
www.greencruiseport.eu
Please download the GCP Action Plan 2030
21
Studies published on www.greencruiseport.eu
Port of Helsinki and Ecobio Ltd:Green Cruise Port Waste Management – Port ReceptionFacility: Cost Efficiency and Future Prospects Report
Maritime Institute in Gdansk:Common standards in the measurement of economiceffects by cruise tourism.
Klaipeda State Seaport Authority and PERITUS Partners:Klaipeda City Accessibility for Passengers of Cruise Ships;Passenger Behaviour and Smart Traffic Links with the Cityand the Near‐Hinterland of cruise ports by incl. ITfunctionalities, creating a software on accessibility andguidance
Rostock Port GmbH and Baltic Marine Consult / HPCHamburg Port Consulting GmbH: Nautical Simulation Study
22
Studies published on www.greencruiseport.euBergen og Omland Havnevesen and DNV GL:Onshore Power Supply f. Cruise Vessels, Assessment ofopportunities and limitations f. connecting cruise vesselsto shore power
Rostock Port and CPL Competence in Ports and LogisticsGmbH / NIT Institut für Tourismus‐ und Bäderforschung inNordeuropa Tourism Crowding in Cruise Ports – AComparative Study.
Port of Esbjerg, COWI A/S and Kosan Krisplant A/S:Business Plan / Sustainable Energy Supply & innovativeSolutions for Emission Reduction "Green bunkering ofcruise vessels with sustainable fuel options”.
Maritime Institute in Gdansk:Port dues strategies and incentives for cruise linecompanies for using green port feature.
23
Studies published on www.greencruiseport.eu
HPA Hamburg Port Authortity and DW‐Ship‐ Consult GmbH:Technical noise investigations at a Hamburg City cruiseterminal.
HPA Hamburg Port Authortity and DW‐Ship‐Consult GmbH:Emission sources and possible mitigation measures of cruiseterminals.
Rostock Port GmbH and DW Ship‐Consult:Feasibility of noise monitoring in the cruise port ofWarnemünde.
Rostock Port GmbH and SeaConsult HAM GmbH:Dimensions of Ocean‐going Cruise Vessels
24
Studies published on www.greencruiseport.eu
Port of Tallinn and AS Sweco Projekt:Sustainable energetic solutions for cruise terminal buildingsin Northern Climate
Maritime Institute in Gdansk:Port dues strategies and incentives for cruise line companiesfor using green port feature.
Port of Tallinn, AS Sweco Projekt, and Salto AB OÜ:Building Design Documentation of Cruise Terminal in the OldCity Harbour Port of Tallinn
Rostock Port and NIT Institut für Tourismus‐ undBäderforschung in Nordeuropa GmbH et al.: Rostock CruiseTourism: Local Economic Impact and Customer Satisfaction.
Hamburg Port Authority AöR
Ingo Fehrs
Neuer Wandrahm 4
20457 Hamburg
Germany
+49 40 42847 3019
www.greencruiseport.eu
25