CONTENTS
Contents .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 0
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
Key Findings..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1
The Questions... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
Background ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2
The questions .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4
How feedback currently contributes to learning ................................................................................................................................................... 4
Preferred methods of feedback ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4
three week turnaround policy .................................................................................................................................................................................. 5
Should students receive exam feedback? ............................................................................................................................................................ 6
Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
For the university of kent: ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
For Kent Union: ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7
Useful contacts ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly 2010-11
1 | P a g e
INTRODUCTION
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly campaign consisted of a consultation conducted by Kent Union and focused on feedback on
assessment. As well as being a manifesto commitment of Lauren Crowley, Vice-President (Education) 2010-2012, it stemmed from
popular opinion expressing dissatisfaction amongst the student body at the University of Kent and nationally that feedback on
assessment is not of a satisfactory quality. The results of every National Student Survey since its commencement support the premise
that this is a top concern for students. It is highly recommended that the National Student Survey results are considered in
conjunction with this report.
The survey was sent via email to 15,996 students at the launch in February, it was publicised to students via Facebook, Twitter, posters
across campus, at the Kent Union Refreshers’ Fayre, and many course representatives at the University of Kent used different
methods to secure submissions. The following video was created to screen across campus: http://bit.ly/gZNLY9. We received 350
responses to the survey.
The survey was developed in consultation with Kent Union’s marketing and democracy departments, the National Union of Students,
current students, full and part-time Kent Union officers and course representatives.
In the beginning of the academic year 2010/11, the School rep for Biosciences, Ryan Johnson, started work on feedback on
assessment standards, recognising there was a need for improvement. Because of this Bioscience students did not complete the
Good, the Bad & the Ugly survey, but Ryan’s work is in the appendices (A) of this report.
KEY FINDINGS
93% of students either strongly agree or agree with the statement ‘students should receive exam feedback’.
92% said they would like to receive formative feedback as well as summative on their assessment.
Only 61% of students said they received their assessments back within three weeks.
90% of students either agreed or strongly agreed with the statement ‘students should have access to face-to-face feedback
for the first assessment each academic year.
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly 2010-11
2 | P a g e
THE QUESTIONS...
BACKGROUND
The National Union of Students highlighted feedback on assessment as a concern for students through their own surveying of
students across different institutions. Some key facts taken from the 2008 NUS/HSBC Student Experience Report1:
Written marks and grades are received by 90% of students, and written comments received by 85%. Individual verbal
feedback is received by 25%, while group verbal feedback is received by 22%.
Only 1% of students say that they receive feedback through the internet, either online or by email.
Students who attend a post-1992 institution are most likely to receive verbal feedback, with those attending Russell Group
institutions least likely to receive verbal feedback.
71% of students said they would like to receive feedback through an individual meeting with their tutor/lecturer; however, only
25% of those surveyed currently receive feedback in this way. Only 18% of science students state they receive verbal
feedback.
90% of students said they would like to receive feedback on their exams.
From this research, NUS went on to create the ‘Charter on Feedback and Assessment2’which has helped create the survey we have
used at Kent and advocate many principles that University of Kent students are in favour of.
The results of the 2010 National Student Survey results highlighted that regardless of course or background at the University of Kent,
students were significantly less satisfied about the feedback that they received than their overall learning experience. The University
of Kent ranked 3.7 for feedback and assessment, its lowest score out of all the questions. Student satisfaction regarding this issue has
dropped 1% since 2008, and slipped out of the upper quartile in this theme. This followed levels of discontentment that had arisen in
the survey since it started in 2005, indicating that the issue is both pervasive and continuous.
1 http://bit.ly/fl2WdH 2 http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/asset/news/6010/FeedbackCharter-toview.pdf
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly 2010-11
3 | P a g e
In September, Kent Union carried out a focus group of students from the faculty of Humanities to gauge opinion on the recently
piloted coversheet and one to one feedback sessions carried out by tutors. The following are some of the recommendations:
Lecturers keeping to the three week turnaround policy.
Being able to choose the format for feedback which suits them, either via email, or verbal one to one, choosing an individual
time with a tutor or more general feedback to the class which allows them to improve in future assignments.
‘The better the essay, the smaller the amount of feedback’ – lecturers guiding even those who may be doing well, to continue
or improve further.
Further guidance on how to apply feedback.
Formative feedback throughout the term.
The following campaign objectives were therefore set for ‘The Good, the Bad & the Ugly’ feedback campaign:
Improve NSS scores by 1% for each year the campaign is run.
All university schools to provide feedback on every assessment via the recommended coversheet.
To adapt the ten principles from the NUS charter on feedback and assessment.
To establish at what percentage academics currently stick to the 3 week turnaround policy and then improve this to 90%.
To look into the following suggested feedback mechanisms with the university:
1) The provision of model answers (help grow understanding of marking criteria)
2) Generic feedback to all students (common mistakes made in exams etc)
3) Optional seminars to discuss recent assessments/exams
4) Individual one to one feedback on request
5) The provision of exam scripts with comment sheets.
However, as the research had not yet been finalised, the campaign objectives are subject to change upon the data within this
report.
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly 2010-11
4 | P a g e
65.6% Strongly Agree
24.8% Agree
5.4% Neutral
3.1% Disagree
0.6% Strongly Disagree
0.6% N/A
THE QUESTIONS
HOW FEEDBACK CURRENTLY CONTRIBUTES TO LEARNING
On the two statements, ‘Feedback on my work has helped me clarify
things I did not understand’ (69.43% strongly agree or agree) and ‘I
have received detailed comments on my work’ (69.14% strongly agree
or agree); it is evident that where students are receiving feedback it is
satisfactory – although it could be argued that this percentage could
and should be higher. The faculty of Humanities have been trialling
one face-to-face feedback session per module this academic year.
With extremely positive feedback from students and the statistic shown
here, it is recommended that the other faculties consider rolling this
out.
PREFERRED METHODS OF FEEDBACK
92.29% of survey respondents said they would like to receive formative
feedback as well as summative on their assessment. Many students
have voiced that they think feedback on formative assessment could
help them improve their quality of work. Formative assessment and
feedback is critical to the development of learning and should be
integrated into the curriculum in a strategic way.
50.86% said there should be anonymous marking for all summative
assessment, 27.43% were neutral and 20% disagreed or strongly
disagreed. NUS research shows that where anonymous marking has
been introduced there has been an improvement in the marks of
women, black and Asian students and among some other students groups. Anonymous marking provides reassurance for
“Feedback on coursework sometimes takes a very
long time, for example essay feedback would be
more useful if returned before the submission
deadline of the following essay assessment, allowing
previous feedback to be used to improve on weak
points in work. And sometimes feedback is very
vague, ticks and crosses with often no explanation of
why work is incorrect.”
Student from the School of Maths, NSS 2010
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly 2010-11
5 | P a g e
students and staff against the perception of discrimination. Where anonymous marking is not possible, especially in the arts,
there should be stringent measures to blind double mark, or use external examiners.
82.28% of students thought they should be able to submit assessment electronically; with only 4.57% disagreeing or strongly
disagreeing. University policy is that use of Turnitin should be compulsory – however some schools are not currently operating it.
This increased flexibility will support part-time and distance learners as well as other non-traditional students, such as those with
caring responsibilities or those who commute to university.
72.86% of students thought they should be supported to critique their own work with 8.85% disagreeing or strongly disagreeing.
68.57% of students believed they should be given a choice of formats for feedback. Students want feedback in a variety of
formats, including verbal, written and electronic. At the start of the year students should also be able to state their preferred
form of summative feedback. This provides a useful focus for a meeting with a personal tutor, while giving students a choice in
the form of feedback; and making the feedback more physically accessible to them. This approach should ensure that all
students, no matter whether they are full-time, part-time, or distance learners, will have easy access to their feedback.
THREE WEEK TURNAROUND POLICY
The student charter3 states, ‘Work will normally be returned within three term-
time weeks of the published deadline’. In Kent Union’s Education Forum in
2011, course reps were asked if they were aware of the policy and the result
3 http://www.kent.ac.uk/regulations/Regulations%20Booklet/Student-Charter-2008.pdf
“Our marks never come back to us within the 3 week
deadline, and haven't really done so since my first
year. It would seem some tutors don't understand
how important it is to learn from our feedback.”
Student from the School of Arts, NSS 2010
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly 2010-11
6 | P a g e
was unanimously in favour. They were then asked if they knew that the 3 weeks was specific to term time. A significantly lower
amount of reps raised their hand. Work could be done to ensure that students understand this. From this survey we can see only 60%
of students say they receive their assessments within three weeks of submission and is again reiterated by comments made by
students in the National Student Survey 2010 (Appendix B).
SHOULD STUDENTS RECEIVE EXAM FEEDBACK? 71% Strongly Agree
22% Agree
3.7% Neutral
1.4% Disagree
2% N/A
0% Strongly Disagree
Providing exam feedback is not widespread across the sector. Kent Union firmly believes
that the role of feedback as something that is not simply a measure of performance, but
also a tool to aid future learning, is equally applicable to exam assessments as to any
other type of assessment. This is a missed opportunity to aid the learning of students and
improve future work. As such, an institution’s failure to provide this to students is
unacceptable.
Some institutions that currently provide exam feedback: University of Bath, Heriot- Watt
University and Canterbury Christ Church University.
“Easily my biggest frustration with respect to this
experience is the complete lack of feedback on exams. It
seems off that exams would be the one aspect of the
learning process without feedback.”
Student from Kent Law School, NSS 2010
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly 2010-11
7 | P a g e
RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF KENT:
All academic schools to provide feedback on every assessment via the recommended cover sheet.
Students should have access to face-to-face feedback for a least the first piece of assessment each academic year.
Work should be done to ensure that feedback is timely and within the three week policy.
Students should be given the choice of format for feedback.
Students should be able to submit assessment electronically.
Anonymous marking should be considered for all summative assessment.
The provision of model answers should be considered to help grow understanding of marking criteria.
The provision of exam scripts with comment sheets should be implemented.
Generic feedback to groups should be considered and also optional seminars to discuss feedback.
FOR KENT UNION:
Run ‘The Good, the Bad & the Ugly’ again in 2011/12.
Work with the university to see a rise in satisfaction rates in the National Student Survey.
Work with the university and academic schools to specifically improve the turnaround time of feedback.
Continue to campaign for exam feedback.
Work with the university and academic schools to monitor the implementation of all above targets.
USEFUL CONTACTS
For more information about...
...’The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’ campaign please contact Kent Union’s Vice-President (Education) on union-
[email protected] or Kent Union on www.kentunion.co.uk
...the University of Kent please visit www.kent.ac.uk