EVALUATION and PROGRAM PLANNING
Evaluation and Programming Planning 2 I ( 1998) 227-236
The costs of an enhanced employee assistance program (EAP) intervention
Michael T. French”.*, Laura J. Dunlap”, Gary A. Zarkinb, Georgia T. Karuntzo&’
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to estimate the economic costs of an enhanced Employee Assistance Program (EAP) intervention being delivered through a large Midwestern EAP that services over 90 worksites. Resource use and cost estimates are determined
for both developmental and implementation activities. In addition, enhanced services costs are compared with total and average
costs of standard EAP services. The results show that total developmental costs were S44.000 and implementation costs for the first year of the intervention were $140.000. The annual cost per eligible employee for standard EAP services is $12.93 and the incremental annual cost per eligible employee for enhanced services is $5.01 under full implementation. These findings provide benchmark cost estimates for other EAPs that may be considering offering enhanced services. In future work. cost estimates will be combined with intervention outcomes for additional program evaluation. (’ 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reset-Led.
Kq~,wort/.t: Economic costs; Employee assistance program (EAP): Intervention
1. Introduction
Recent national worksite surveys have shown that
Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) are gaining
acceptance and popularity in many companies. In 1993. approximately 33% of all worksites with 50 or more full-
time employees had such programs (Hartwell et al., 1996). By 1995. overall EAP prevalence had grown to 39% of
worksites with 50 or more full-time employees (Hartwell et al., 1995). It is not clear how contemporary EAPs will
fare with the advent of managed care and cost reduction
strategies in the delivery of health care. However, anec-
dotal information suggests they may actually enter alliances and partnerships with managed care organ-
izations. which will probably increase their importance. Given the recent popularity and importance of EAPs
in contemporary worksites, we designed an ambitious project to develop, implement and evaluate an enhanced EAP protocol currently being delivered through a large
external EAP in Rockford. Illinois, U.S.A.. This 5-year Rockford Employee Assistance Program (REAP) project is being funded through a grant to the Research Triangle
*Corresponding author: Michael T. French. University of Miami.
1400 NW 10th Avenue. Suite 1105, Miami, Florida 33136. Tel.:
(305)243-3400: e-mall: mfrenchw mednet.med.miami.edu
SOl4Y-7189’98 $19.00 (’ IYYX Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved
PI1:SOl3Y 7l8Y(Yx)Oool3 5
lnstitute (RTI) by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (Grant No. R01 AA 103 18). The
enhanced protocol has two main objectives deliver comprehensive outreach activities to better reach under-
served populations (i.e. women and ethnic minorities)
and develop more effective service delivery for all EAP clients. The primary goal of this paper is to estimate and
report the economic costs of the enhanced EAP services. We present actual cost estimates for the developmental
and implementation components of the enhanced EAP
protocol. In addition. we present cost estimates for stan- dard EAP services. The concluding section of the paper
summarizes the significance of our findings. how existing
EAPs can use this information. and future research prod- ucts.
2. REAPS research design
To implement our intervention we chose a large EAP
located in Rockford. Illinois. U.S.A. This EAP provides a variety of services including assessment, intervention. crisis management, short-term counseling and referral for employees and their families at over 90 companies. In addition, the EAP also provides training and ongoing support for companies’ supervisors to help them with troubled employees. We chose this EAP because it was
228 M.T. Frmcir et al./Et~aluafion ad Program Planning 21 (199X] 227-236
already delivering a comprehensive array of services to meet the needs of a diverse workforce. We believed that implementing our enhanced protocol would be easier if
we built upon existing services that are well received by
member companies. To evaluate the costs and outcomes of our enhanced
services, we are implementing the protocol at two work-
sites that were receiving standard EAP services prior to our intervention implementation. Worksite 1 began receiving enhanced EAP services in April 1995 and Work-
site 2 began receiving enhanced EAP services in Sep-
tember 1996.*
As part of the research design, we are gathering infor- mation on EAP utilization, treatment assessment and
referral, treatment outcomes. and costs of services for the
year prior to our intervention and the year following the
intervention’s implementation. This article presents the results of our initial analysis comparing enhanced services
costs with the costs of providing standard services. Our
analysis perspective is the EAP. Costs incurred by the worksites, by individuals utilizing the EAP, or by third party payers are not considered.
3. Description of standard EAP services
The EAP’s standard services include counseling for
chemical dependency, marital/family problems, legal and
financial services and mental health problems. These
counseling services include evaluation and treatment referral, short-term counseling from EAP staff if appro-
priate and treatment planning and monitoring. In addition, the EAP offers several non-counseling services
such as supervisory consultation and training, employee outreach seminars and EAP orientations. The majority
of the clinical staffs time is spent on counseling services. However, the non-counseling services offered are also
important. These services help worksites with employee referrals to the EAP and help educate employees about
the services that are available to them. Under the standard EAP contract the EAP offers
supervisory training sessions at each worksite, employee orientations and three optional outreach seminars. The supervisory training sessions last approximately 3 hours
and are designed to train supervisors to recognize work- related behaviors or incidents that may lead to an EAP
referral for an employee, to provide guidance on docu- menting these behaviors or incidents and to inform super- visors about the appropriate procedures to follow when making an employee referral to the EAP.
The EAP’s outreach seminars serve to educate employees on issues relevant to their own work environ-
* Worksite 1 has been receiving standard EAP services for over Y
years and Worksite 2 began receiving standard services in January,
1995.
ment and to further promote the availability of EAP services. Seminar topics include substance abuse, family
issues, stress management, domestic and workplace viol- ence and other issues that may impact work performance.
Outreach seminars are scheduled at the discretion of man-
agement at the worksites and usually coincide with a
specific need. For an additional fee, companies can get a package that includes up to 12 workshops per year. The workshops range anywhere from 30 min to 2 hours, with
an average length of 1 hour. The EAP’s employee orientations are designed to
inform employees of the EAP services that are available
to them. Orientation sessions are usually conducted at the worksite and last approximately 30 min. These orien-
tations typically occur once every four years at the dis-
cretion of worksite management. Many worksites now provide information about EAP services as part of a ‘new
employee’ orientation package. The EAP also distributes
materials such as posters and newsletters to employees at their worksites. Some of these materials are displayed throughout the worksite while other materials are dis- tributed directly to the employees.
4. Description of enhanced EAP Services
Our review of the EAP’s standard package revealed
gaps in the services that were available for women and racial/ethnic minorities. Specifically, we found nine
service areas that could be enhanced. To address these
service gaps, we designed an enhanced protocol that
builds upon standard services already offered by the EAP. Thus, women and minorities could benefit significantly from the enhanced services, but all employees stand to
gain. The enhanced services are described later (see
Karuntzos, et al., 1998; for a more complete description
of the enhanced service protocol). The most significant gap in EAP services was the lack
of expertise among the EAP’s counselors regarding issues specific to women and racial/ethnic minorities. Prior to
our study, the EAP did not employ counselors that specialized in gender, family, or cultural issues. As part
of the enhanced protocol, the EAP hired two new coun- selors-an AfricanAmerican man with expertise in min- ority issues and a Caucasian woman with expertise in
women’s issues. The objective for hiring these specialized counselors was to provide a more diverse staff and to increase the knowledge and expertise of the current EAP staff with respect to providing services to minorities. The specialized counselors are available at the EAP should any client request counselors with specific expertise on these issues, or prefer to meet with a female or African American counselor. In addition, the specialized coun- selors trained the other EAP counselors and shared their expertise so that the entire staff is now better informed about issues pertaining to women and ethnic minorities.
Another gap found in EAP services was the failure of
the counselors to systematically utilize a standardized
assessment for alcohol. drugs, or mental health needs. Some counselors used screening instruments as part of the assessment process, while others relied solely on their clinical judgement and training. As part of the enhanced services. a standardized alcohol screener is now admin-
istered to all individuals coming to the EAP. The EAP clinical stafT selected the Alcohol Use Disorders Identi-
fication Test (AUDIT) (Fleming et al., 1997) as the scre-
ening instrument because it includes questions that are
more likely to detect alcohol misuse among women com- pared to other popular instruments and the language is more sensitive to minorities in general.
A key component of standard EAP services is super-
visory training at each worksite. However, our review
of this training curriculum revealed that the standard
workshops did not adequately address issues specific to women and minorities. As part of the enhanced protocol.
we augmented the training to include specific information and handouts pertaining to women and racial/ethnic min- orities. such as workplace problem symptoms that are
more common for female workers and cultural issues to be aware of when confronting a problem employee. The
supervisor training enhancements increase the training session by I h-- -to a total of 4 h.
Coupled with the short-term counseling provided by
the EAP. many of the clients receive additional treatment services from other community treatment facilities
through an EAP referral. Our evaluation of the standard
services revealed that the EAP’s referral network included few providers that specialized in, or were sensitive to, minority needs. As part of the enhanced protocol. the
EAP staff‘ is developing further ties with community resources that specialire in these needs. such as alcohol-
ism groups for Hispanics, African-Americans and
women and community centers that service minorities. Furthermore. the EAP has developed a Community
Resource Directory that catalogues and indexes all the community services and resources used by the staff to
more efficiently refer clients to appropriate agencies. The
EAP has also developed an Advisory Committee for each
worksite that serves as a vehicle to keep the workplace informed of important EAP activities and to provide the
EAP with information about the needs of the worksite employees.
A popular feature of standard EAP services is outreach seminars. As part of the enhanced protocol, additional seminars with topics related specifically to women’s
concerns (e.g. women’s health issues) and racial/ethnic minority concerns (e.g. perceptions of minority males! females) have been added to those already offered. Additional seminars specific to drug and alcohol use and abuse have also been added.
We also enhanced the EAP’s employee orientation sessions by adding topics specific to women and other
minorities such as child care issues, family relationships,
and domestic violence. Furthermore, at least one of the
counselors present at each session is knowledgeable about
gender and minority issues.
In addition to enhancements in seminars, training and counseling, we revised the outreach materials (e.g. post- ers, brochures) that the EAP distributes to worksites to include information about the improved services for
women and minorities. Lastly, we discovered that the EAP did not have any formal arrangements with
interpreters for non-English speaking clients. As part of
the enhanced protocol, formal arrangements have been
established with community agencies so that interpreters are nou available to assist EAP counselors uith non- English speaking clients during counseling sessions and
during outreach activities at the worksites.
5. Methods
The primary goal of this analysis is to estimate the economic costs (i.e. the full market value) of resources used in providing enhanced EAP services (French et al..
1995; Gold et al.. 1996). Calculating and reporting econ-
omic costs provides a standard measure of the value of EAP services because it considers all resources used in
service provision regardless of whether every resource
was fully paid for out-of-pocket by the EAP. If the EAP utilizes free or subsidized resources, then the economic
costs should exceed the actual expenditures by the differ-
ence between the market value of the resources and the amount actually paid (French et al.. 1996a: Dunlap and French. In Press).
For readers who may be unfamiliar with the oppor-
tunity cost method of cost estimation, the method is
very similar to the accrual approach 10 costing that is sometimes used in a financial appraisal. As noted by
Zelman (I 987). the cash basis approach to cost account- ing will always equate costs to cash flows. Nhereas the accrual approach is based on resource use rather than
expenditures. As a result. the accrual approach includes
the value of unpaid resources such as volunteers. in-
kind goods and donated buildings. There seems to be a consensus among cost accountants that the accrual method of unit costing enhances consistency and it tends
to be a better gauge of operational efticiency (Zelman, 1987). In this regard. accountants and economists have
similar paradigms. Regarding the calculation of unit costs. WC relied pri-
marily on broader measures of service delivery such as the number of employees who received any service and the total number of service hours across all clients. However. we recognize that not all EAP clients receive the same type or amount of EAP services. An alternative to our approach is to estimate the cost per category of client based on some criteria such as diagnosis or service
230 M. T. French et al.iEvaluation and Program Pluming 21 (199X) 227-236
consumption grouping (Ryan et al., 1994, 1997). We
intend to explore these alternatives in future analyses of the enhanced EAP intervention.
5.1. Estimatb?g standard EAP costs
The first objective of our cost study is to estimate the
cost of standard EAP services for comparison with the
cost of enhanced services. We gathered most of the resource use and cost information for standard EAP ser-
vices using a modified version of the Drug Abuse Treat-
ment Cost Analysis Program (DATCAP), a structured instrument that has been used in several economic cost
analyses of drug treatment programs (French et al., 1994,
1996a, 1997; Dunlap and French, In Press; French and McGeary, 1997). Earlier versions of DATCAP have also
been used in cost analyses of EAPs (Bray, et al. 1996). The DATCAP gathers information on client caseload
and the average length of EAP client visits or telephone contact. It also assembles resource use and expenditure
information in six broad categories-labor, contracted
services, building space, equipment, materials/supplies, and miscellaneous. For each of the resource categories
we asked the EAP staff to provide information on
resource use and expenditures during fiscal year 1994 (i.e.
the year before the implementation of our protocol at the first worksite) and to estimate the market value of resources that were subsidized or used free of charge. The
EAP staff obtained the information from expenditure reports and activity diaries. We used this information to
estimate the economic costs of standard EAP services
prior to the implementation of our enhanced service pro-
tocol. Equation 1 shows the cost components of providing
standard EAP services. Because we are estimating the
economic (opportunity) costs of providing standard ser- vices, the cost categories presented here should include
the actual expenses paid by the EAP plus the additional
fair market value of any free or subsidized resources they
received. However, because the EAP did not receive any free or subsidized resources for either standard OI enhanced services, we can rely solely on expenditure reports for our cost calculations. As shown, the total
costs of providing standard EAP services (C&) includes
the value of labor (c), contracted services (Q;,), materials
(Cl,,), equipment (C,), building space (C,) and mis- cellaneous resources (C&,,).
Ccap = ~+~,+~+++c”,+~,,, (1)
Labor costs include the salaries and fringe benefits of all EAP personnel. Contracted service costs include the fees paid for any contracted labor or services that are used by the EAP. Building costs include rent, mortgages, or another measure of fair market value (e.g. estimate by an experienced real estate agent for comparable property
in the area) for the space used by the EAP. Materials and supplies include the EAP’s expenditures on utilities, phone, taxes, insurance, publications, printing and
duplicating, security, and general office supplies. Mis- cellaneous costs include expenditures on staff training
and travel, repair and maintenance, minor equipment
(value less than $500) and any other resources not included in the other categories.
The equipment category includes the apportioned value of equipment newly purchased and equipment alre-
ady on-hand. Capital outlays for equipment are
apportioned over the equipment’s service life using the
method suggested in Drummond (1991) which converts
initial capital outlays to an annual cost. This method reflects not only the actual expenses, but also the fact
that people are not indifferent to the timing of resource
outlays and would prefer to postpone costs. For example, a vehicle that was purchased for $10,000 in 1991 with a useful service life of 10 years would have an economic cost in 1995 of $1,295-the discounted amount in the
fifth year of service life.
5.2. Estimatirzg REAPS costs
To estimate the incremental costs of the intervention,
we divided the protocol into two distinct segments-- developmental and implementation. The intervention’s
developmental period corresponds to the 6 months pre- ceding the protocol’s initial implementation. This 6-
month period was from October, 1994 through March, 1995. Protocol implementation began at the first worksite
in April, 1995. For this article, we are analyzing total
developmental costs and the implementation costs for the first full year of the intervention--April, 1995 through
March, 1996.
5.3. Decelopment costs
Equation 2 shows the cost components used in the
development of the enhanced service intervention (C&J. Developmental activities include such things as the time spent selecting an assessment instrument that is better suited for women and racial/ethnic minorities; gathering
information specific to their concerns and incorporating
these concerns into EAP orientations. supervisor train- ing, and outreach seminars; and developing program top- ics for the outreach seminars that address problems they face.
c:‘,, = c: + c,“, + c”, + C,” + c;l+ c:‘,,,, (2)
As shown in Equation (2) the total costs of developing enhanced EAP services include the value of labor (C$ contracted services (C:‘,), materials (Ci,), equipment (Cz). building space (C”,,), and miscellaneous resources (Ci,,,,).
Labor costs include the value of the time spent by the
EAP staff on developing the enhanced protocol including
any time spent in related training activities. Specifically,
this includes a portion of the salary and fringe benefits of the two specialized counselors (Ctc), EAP director (C:;,,) and one clerical person (Cy,,,). The full compensation for
these individuals is multiplied by the percentage of time they spent on developmental activities rather than coun- seling or other non-developmental activities. In addition, labor costs include the value of the time the other coun-
selors and support persons contributed to in-house train-
ing specitically related to the enhanced services protocol
L\ ’ _I
where Mu, is the rate of pay for individual .Y and tt is the amount of time that individual s contributed to inter-
vention de\,clopment. Thus. the full cost of labor related
to developmental activities can be summarized by Equa- tion (Xi):
C’;l = c:: + c,:j,, + c‘:l,,,+ i i IV, * r:‘, (2a) ,- I
We estimated the time spent by the specialized coun- selors on developmental activities as their total work time
less any time spent counseling. During the developmental period, counseling services were still ‘standard’, and
therefore we assumed that any counseling conducted by
the specialized counselors was not part of the enhanced service protocol’s development. Given these assumptions, we estimated that the counselor specializing in racial:’ ethnic minority issues spent about 30% of his time
(approximately 3 15 h) developing the protocol during the
6-month developmental period. We estimated that the
counselor specializing in women’s issues spent about 50% of her time (approximately 525 h) developing the proto-
col. In addition to the specialized counselors, we esti- mated that the EAP director spent about 15% of his time
(approximately 149 h) on developmental activities. We
also estimated that clerical staff spent approximately 240 h helping with the development of the enhanced protocol.
We developed a cost algorithm similar to Equations 1 and 2 that describes the resources used in implementing
the enhanced service protocol. Implementing the pro- tocol includes activities such as using the AUDIT alcohol screener at intake. offering ‘enhanced’ counseling services. conducting enhanced outreach seminars and supervisor training, distributing enhanced outreach materials. on-going training of the other counselors by the specialized counselors and updating the database of
community agencies whose services are especially rel-
evant for women and ethnic minorities.
Equation 3 shows the cost components of implement- ing our enhanced service protocol.
c:.,,, = c; + c:, + c:, + c’:. + C’;, + C’: ,,,, i (3)
Equation (?a) summarizes the full cost of labor related to implementation activities during year 1 with all resource categories defined the same as previously.
c; = c:,+c:,,,+c:,,,.+ i i ct’,*f,‘) (3a) \ -- I
We estimated that the specialized counselor with expertise in ethnic minority issues spent 100°/o of his time
(20X0 h) on enhancement activities. We estimated that the specialized counselor with expertise in women’s issues
spent approximately 90% of her time (1872 h) on enhancement activities because she had a few additional
duties that were unrelated to our protocol. In addition.
we estimated that the EAP director spent approximately 15Y/o of his time (about 3 I2 h) on enhancement activities.
The implementation also required approximately 480 h of clerical support.
6. Results
Table I presents the economic costs of providing stan- dard services to over 90 worksites in 1994 (in 1996
dollars). As shown in Table 1. the total annual economic cost of standard EAP serbices was $435,399. Personnel accounted for about 82O/u of the total costs. indicating
that EAP services are highly labor intensive. Personnel costs include the salaries and benefits ofthe EAP director.
five counselors. a secretary, a receptionist and a mar-
keting person. Contracted services totaled S23,037 and accounted for about 5% of the total annual costs. These
services included consultation with a medical director and fees to other professionals (e.g.. interpreters and psy-
chiatrists). The EAP’s contracted personnel further
emphasize the labor intensity of providing EAP services. Combining personnel costs and contracted labor costs, we find that labor accounted for about X7’%, of the total costs of providing standard EAP services. The EAP did
not use any other contracted services and as noted earlier. the EAP did not receive any free or subsidized resources.
Building expenses in 1994 were $23.423 (in 1996 dol-
lars) and accounted for about 5’%, of the total annual costs. These expenses included the monthly rent for approximately I300 ft’ of office space. Material and sup- ply expenses were S25,104 and accounted for almost 6% of the total annual costs. These expenses included elec- tricity. telephones. printing and duplicating, publi- cations. office supplies. and other miscellaneous
232 M.T. Fwnch rt al.lE~~aluation and Program Planning 21 (1998) 227-236
Table 1 Annual economic costs of standard EAP services in fiscal year 1994 (pre-intervention)”
_
Percentage of Cost per client Cost per service Cost per ehgible Cost category Annual cost annual cost servedh hour’ employee”
S % S S $ _
Personnel 356,514 0.8188 402.39 96.12 18.76
Contracted services 23.037 0.0529 26.00 6.21 1.21 Materials and supplies 253,104 0.0577 28.34 6.77 1.32
Building 23.423 0.0538 26.43 6.31 I .23 Equipment 2.669 0.006 I 3.01 0.72 0.14 Miscellaneous 4.652 0.0107 5.26 1.26 0.24
Total annual cost 435,399 I .oooo 49 1.42 1 17.39 22.92
“Amounts shown are in 1996 dollars. h In fiscal year 1994, the EAP served 886 clients. ‘In fiscal year 1994. the EAP provided 3709 service hours.
” In fiscal year 1994, 18,998 employees were eligible for EAP services.
materials. Equipment expenses of $2,669 accounted for
less than I % of the total annual costs and included the
prorated value of equipment newly purchased or already
on-hand. Much of the equipment used by the EAP is
mostly or fully depreciated because the age is greater than
the normal service life. Finally, miscellaneous resources
totaled $4,652, which accounted for only I % of the total costs for providing standard EAP services. These
resource costs included the value of statr training and
travel, repair and maintenance and minor equipment (i.e.
value less than $500). Estimates of total program cost are informative, but
unit costs are more useful for program evaluation and
decision making purposes. Unit cost data are often diflicult to collect and analyze, however, due to defi-
nitional problems, operational problems and utilization
problems (Zelman, 1987). As noted earlier, we estimate
the economic costs of EAP services, which is similar to
the accrual method of cost accounting. Defining units of service to use in the denominator of the unit cost
calculations is subject to the objectives of the analysis
and evaluator preference (Ryan et al., 1994; Ryan et al.,
1997). Since we have data on service contacts and total
contact time, we decided to use several broad measures of service units such as number of eligible employees,
number of employees who received any service(s) and
total number of contact hours delivered. Table 1 presents the annual cost per client served, the
annual cost per service unit (i.e., service hour) and the annual cost per eligible employee. In 1994, 18,998 employees were eligible for services at the EAP. The EAP actually served 886 clients and provided 3709 service hours. As shown in Table 1, the annual cost per client served was $491.42, the annual cost per service hour was
$117.39 and the annual cost per $22.92.
6.2. REAPS dewlopment costs
eligible employee was
Table 2 presents the costs of developing the enhanced service protocol. The value of the time of the specialized counselors, the EAP director and the clerical staff totaled $34,693 (in 1996 dollars) and accounted for 79% of the
total developmental costs. The EAP staff also contracted
with a psychiatrist for consulting on the development of
the enhanced service protocol. This consultant was under contract with the EAP prior to the protocol development,
but we estimated that the EAP paid $482 for consulting related to the protocol’s development. Contracted ser-
vices were limited to psychiatric consulting and
Table 2
Economic costs of developing enhanced EAP services (IO: I :94- 3:3 I;‘95
Cost category
Development
cost” ($)
Percentage of
total development
cost“
Personnel 34.693 0.7Y
Contracted services 482 0.0 I Materials and supplies 1,421 0.03 Building 681 0.02
Equipment 6.016 0.14 Miscellaneous 705 0.02
Total development cost 43.YY8 1.00
“Amounts shown are in 1996 dollars
h Total may not total I .OO due to rounding
accounted for approximately 1% of the total costs of
the protocol development. Overall, labor costs including
consultant fees totaled $35,175 and accounted for about
80% of the total costs of development. The other resources used in developing the enhanced
service protocol include the building space occupied by the specialized counselors. the purchase of equipment
and materials needed for protocol development and the costs of any related external training and travel by the EAP staff. We estimated that the building space used by
the specialized counselors was 203 ft’ and the EAP paid
a fair-market monthly rent of SI .36 per ft’. Because the
specialized counselors devoted only a portion of their
time (from 30~70”/0) to developmental activities. we attri- buted only that portion of the additional space occupied
by the specialized counselors to the costs of the protocol’s development. For example, one of the specialized coun-
selors spent 50% of her time on development activities. Therefore, we attributed the value of 50% of her office
space to the total costs of developing the protocol. The
cost of building space attributed to the protocol’s devel- opment was $681 (in 1996 dollars). This was about 1.5% of the total costs of the protocols development.
The materials purchased by the EAP included new
brochures, posters, materials for new supervisor training
manuals. and a flipchart tripod. The cost of these
materials was $1,421. Miscellaneous costs include staff
training fees, local travel, equipment repairs, and minor equipment purchases (less than $500). The labor time for traveling and attending training sessions is included in
the personnel category. During the development of the protocol. some EAP staff attended external training ses- sions pertaining to cultural issues. In addition. there was
some local travel to these sessions and to the worksites.
The total cost of miscellaneous resources was $705 and
accounted for almost -?O/O of the total costs. Finally, the
EAP purchased computers for its specialized counselors as part of the development of the enhanced services pro-
tocol. The cost of these computers was $6.016 and accounted for 14%) of the total development costs. Over-
all. resources other than labor accounted for approxi- mately 31% of the total costs of’ developing the enhanced
service protocol.
6.3. REAPS irnl,l~~nl~~ntrrtiorl co.cts
Table 3 presents the total cost for the first year
implementation of the enhanced protocol $140.161~
Table 3 Economic costs of implementing enhanced EAP services
First year Implcmcntation costs (4 I 95 3’31’96)
Cost categoq Annual cost ($)
Personnel” I28.6Y2
Contracted ser\~cc~ 1 YO2 -.
Materials 3.797
Building j 2 3 ‘1 Eqmpmcnt 0
M~sccllaneous I .5? I
Percentage 01
annual cost
0.92
0.02
0.03
0.02 0.00
0.01
Cost per client
servedh ($)
237.Yh
5.59
7.3’
6.24
0.00
2.Y5
Cost per service
hour’ (S)
30.76
0.69
0 91
0.77
0.00
0.37
Cost per eligible
employee” (Ij)
13.61
0.33
0.43
0.37
0.00
0 17
Total annual co>1 I40.16 I I .oo 270.06 33.50 15.91
Full implementation costs
Cost catcgoq Annual cost ($)
Cost per eligible
employee’ ($)
Cost per service
hour’ ($)
Personnel.’ 128.692 4.60 21.5.5
Contracted ser\ Ices 2.902 0.10 0.62
Materials 3.797 0.14 0.X1
Building . 3 ._. 179 0.12 0.69
Equipment 0 0.00 0.00
Miscellaneous I.531 0.05 0.33
Total annual cost 140.161 5.01 30.00
.’ Includes labor cost of EAP staff attending in-house training.
’ Between 4 ‘I Y5 and 3:3 I :96 the EAP provided enhanced services to 5 19 employees at IX u orksitcs.
’ Between 4. I ‘Y5 and 3;3 I.96 the EAP provided 4,184 hours of enhanced services.
“Between 4. I 95 and 3:3 I :96, IX worksites or 8810 employees were eligible for enhanced EAP service>
‘Between 4 1’95 and 3/31 ;96 the number of eligible employees was 27.971.
’ Between 4 I ‘95 and 3’31 ‘96 the EAP provided 4.672 hours of service to employees.
234 M. T. French Ed ul.lE~~aluation und Progrum Plunnitzg 21 (1998) 227-236
and how this amount is distributed by categories. As shown in Table 3, the value of labor time spent by the EAP staff on implementation activities accounted for
almost 92% of the total cost ($128,692). This includes the time spent by the specialized counselors on counseling,
outreach seminars, supervisor training and any other
enhancement activities. The EAP also contracted with a
psychiatrist for consulting purposes. We estimated that the fees paid by the EAP for the psychiatrist’s time that
was attributable to the protocol implementation was
$2,902. Including the consultant fees and the value of the EAP’s staff time spent on the protocol implementation,
we found that labor accounted for almost 94% of the total cost for the first year implementation.
Building space, materials and miscellaneous resources
made up the remaining 6% of the total costs of the
enhanced service protocol. Specifically, the EAP paid $3,239 (approximately 2% of total costs) in the first year for the building space used by the specialized EAP coun-
selors. This was calculated by multiplying 193 ft” of
additional space (after adjusting the 203 total ft’ of office
space occupied by the specialized counselors to account
for the amount of time they spent on implementation activities) by the rental rate of $1.36 per ft’ per month. It was determined that this rental rate was the fair market
value. The EAP paid $3,797 (approximately 3% of total
costs) for materials used in implementing the protocol.
These costs included a new EAP video, new and revised brochures, flip charts used in outreach seminars and
supervisor training and general office supplies. Finally,
the EAP paid $1,531 (approximately 1% of total costs)
for miscellaneous resources. These items included minor repairs, staff training and travel and a new printer stand.
Rather than reporting only total costs, a more informa- tive approach is to estimate the annual cost of enhanced EAP services per eligible employee, per serviced employee
and per service hour. Average or unit cost estimates pro-
vide financial information about a program that adjusts
for program size. Because of these adjustment factors, programs of different sizes can be compared and analyzed in a meaningful way (Zelman, 1987).
Before presenting the average cost estimates, it is help-
ful to briefly explain how intervention implementation
influenced the resulting average cost estimates. Recall
that we focused the intervention on one worksite (Work- site I) and intentionally withheld any aspects of the inter- vention for another worksite (Worksite 2) during year 1 of implementation. Some of the remaining worksites served by the EAP were exposed to the intervention while others did not receive any enhanced services. The full intervention will be implemented at Worksite 2 during year 2 of implementation and all other worksites served by the EAP will receive enhanced services thereafter.
To estimate per employee costs for implementation, we first determined that 18 worksites were exposed to the
enhanced service protocol during year 1. This amounted to 88 10 employees who were eligible to receive enhanced EAP services. The EAP actually provided enhanced ser- vices to 5 I9 clients, corresponding to 4184 service hours.
We then determined the number of worksites and employees that would be eligible for enhanced services
under full implementation. This amounted to over 90
worksites and 27,971 employees (excluding dependents).
The latter value was used to calculate the cost per eligible
employee under full implementation. Finally, the EAP
provided 4672 service hours to employees and assuming that this value remains constant during full implemen-
tation, we calculated the cost per service hour. As shown in Table 3, the cost per client served during
the first year of implementation was $270.06, the annual
cost per service hour was $33.50 and the annual cost per eligible employee was $15.91. Table 3 also reports the
projected cost per eligible employee that is based on pro- viding enhanced services to employees at all worksites
who currently contract with the EAP. The cost per eligible
employee under full implementation is $5.01. which is a
good estimate of the average costs associated with full implementation of the enhanced services intervention at
all worksites served by the EAP. Note that we expect the average intervention cost to decline to $5.01 in sub-
sequent years as it becomes available to all worksites serviced by the EAP.
Lastly, the EAP provided 4672 h of service to employees at all worksites between April 1. 1995 and
March 3 1, 1996. Assuming this is a reasonable estimate
of the service hours that will be provided during the intervention’s full implementation, Table 3 reports that
the total cost per service hour for providing the enhanced
service protocol is $30.
7. Discussion
The economic cost of standard and enhanced EAP
services for a large external provider were calculated and reported using several different measures. All costs are
reported in 1996 dollars for comparison across years. The total annual cost of standard EAP services in fiscal year
1994 (i.e. the year prior to beginning the intervention)
was $435,399. The average values amounted to $491 per client served, $117 per service hour and $23 per eligible employee. As expected, personnel accounted for a large majority (i.e. 80%) of the total cost.
The cost of the enhanced services provided through the EAP was divided between developmental and implementation costs. Developmental costs for the enhanced EAP protocol were incurred over a 6-month period from October, 1994 through March, 1995. We defined cost categories for developmental activities that are identical to those for standard EAP services. The
developmental costs are separated from implementation
costs because several preparation activities are necessary
before delivering the intervention and these costs are less
dependent on the size and scope of the intervention. For our study intervention, we incurred total developmental costs of almost $44,000, with personnel accounting for almost 79% of the total.
We estimated that the total cost of implementing the
intervention during the first year was about $140,000. Although tirst-year implementation activities were
focused on delivering the intervention at Worksite I, this annual cost estimate is not likely to vary much in future
years. Over time. enhanced services will be integrated with standard services at all worksites. Thus, we divided
the total annual cost estimate (i.e. $140,161) by five mea- sures of EAP size and/or service delivery: the number of employees that were eligible for enhanced EAP services
during the first year of implementation, the number of employees that actually received enhanced EAP services
during the first year of implementation, the number of
enhanced service hours during the first year of implemen- tation, the number of employees that are projected to be
eligible for enhanced EAP services at full implementation of the intervention and the number of total service hours that are projected to be provided to EAP clients at full
implementation. Using the broadest measure ofeligibility
(i.e. full implementation), the cost per employee is $5.01, which is considerably lower than the per employee cost when the worksites with no exposure to enhanced services
during year I are excluded (i.e. $15.91). The cost per service hour delivered at full implementation is estimated
to be about $30.00. Compared to the range of case study cost estimates
reported in Bray et al. (1996), the cost per eligible employee Ihr standard EAP services at the Rockford
EAP is close to the median. Rockford EAP costs are also
approximate to the median per-employee cost reported by French ct al., (1996b) and French, et al. (1997) using data from national surveys. However, no comparable cost estimates for enhanced EAP services are available in the literature to assess the magnitude of our intervention
costs.
To help interpret the estimates for the enhanced service
costs and determine potential uses of the data, we olTer the following suggestions. Since most EAPs do not have
the personnel or other resources to immediately implement a protocol of this type, they should expect to incur some one-time developmental costs. Depending on
the expertise of existing staff and the characteristics of
standard EAP services. the cost of this investment will vary across programs. The Rockford EAP invested about $44.000 in developmental costs, which can be viewed as a real-world example at an existing program.
Unlike developmental costs. the cost of implementing the enhanced protocol is a recurring investment in improved service delivery. Economies of scale and greater
operational efficiency are possible as the intervention pro-
ceeds, but the cost of implementing the intervention dur-
ing the first year is unlikely to vary much in future years
unless the intervention design changes. Thus, the cost per eligible employee for enhanced services can be added to the cost per eligible employee for standard services to calculate the new per-employee cost of all EAP services.
For the Rockford EAP. the per-employee cost fat enhanced services (i.e. S.5.01) is about X0/;, of the per-
employee cost for standard services (i.e. $22.92). Added together, the cost per eligible employee for the full service
package is $27.93. which is still very similar to the median
EAP costs reported in Bray ct al. (1996) and French ct al. (1996b). Other EAPs can use these estimates to help
predict the types and magnitude of costs they will incur if they decide to offer similar services.
It is natural to \iew thecost perelipibleemployee under full implementation (i.e. S5.01) ;LS the incremental cost
per employee to deliver the enhanced services. This is
not completely accurate. however. Because the enhanced
services were built upon the standard services, the dis- tinction between standard and enhanced services was
sometimes difficult to define and we were more likely to assign a cost as enhanced in these cases. For example, the
EAP counselors did not keep detailed time logs. In some cases we relied on their recall to distinguish between labor
hours spent providing enhanced versus standard EAP
services. Consequently, we believe that rhe pet- employee cost for enhanced services ih best viewed as an upper bound estimate of the incremental cost from standard services.
The advantages of having current cost estimates for
de\,eloping and implementing an actual EAP intervention
have been stated throughout this paper. Houever. v,e strongly discourage EAP staff and other EAP researchers from using cost estimates alone lo evaluate programs
and develop resource allocation rules. A full and careful evaluation requires quantitative information on inter-
vention outcomes and economic benefits (French ct al..
1995). From ;I policy perspective. benefit-cost studies are a critical tool for demonstrating program v;~luc and sec-
uring additional funding.
In conclusion. the enhanced EAP protocol is pro-
ceeding smoothly within the Rockford program and implementation is quickel and considcrubly more
efficient at each new workplace. The protocol will be fully implemented at our two analysis sites by the end of‘ 1997 and all Rocktbrd EAP clients should have at least some
exposure to the enhanced services by the end of 1998. We
continue to collect EAP utilization and human resources data. which will enable us to cxaminl: changes in work- place behavior for those individuals who sought help from the EAP. In addition, anonymous employee surveys will indicate the degree of understanding and support for the standard and enhanced EAP services. Future research projects will combine the cost data reported here with
236 M.T. French eI al.lEraluation und Program Planning 21 i 1998) 227-236
EAP utilization and outcome data to compare the econ- omic costs and benefits of the REAP intervention.
Acknowledgments
Financial assistance for this study was provided by the
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism through a grant to the Research Triangle Institute (grant
No. AA10318) and a subcontract to the University of Miami. The primary aims of the grant are to design,
implement and evaluate a new employee assistance pro- gram (EAP) outreach intervention. Program information and helpful suggestions from Jeremy Bray, Mark Kend-
all, Sheryl Andreason, Lee Hicks, Robert Anwyl and two
anonymous referees improved the paper.
References
Bray, J. W., French, M. T.. Bowland. B. J., & Dunlap, L. J. (1996).
The cost of employee assistance programs (EAPs): Findings from
seven case studies. Employee Assistance Quarter!,.. 78, I-19.
Drummond, M. (1991). Economic studies. In W. W. Holland, R. Detels
and G. Knox (Eds), Oxfbrd tezthook of public healrh: Vol. 2.
Method3 of public henlrh 2nd ed.. (pp. 295-307). Oxford Medical
Publications.
Dunlap, L. J.. & French, M. T. (in press). A comparison of two methods
for estimating the costs of drug abuse treatment. Jourt7ul y/‘Main-
tenunce in the Addicictions.
Fleming. M. F.. Barry, K. L.. Manwell. L. B.. Johnson, K., & London,
R. (1997). Brief physician advice for problem alcohol drinkers:
A randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care
practices. Journal of/ha Anwrican Medkal Association, 277. 1039-45.
French, M. T., Bradley, C. J.. Calingaert, B.. Dennis. M. L., &
Karuntzos. G. T. (1994). Cost analysis of training and employment
services in methadone treatment. Evaluation and Program Plattning,
17. 107-120.
French, M. T., Zarkin, G. A., & Bray, J. W. (1995). A methodology for
evaluating the costs and benefits of employee assistance programs.
Journal of Drug Imes, 25, 45 l-470.
French, M. T., Dunlap, L. J., Galinis. D. N., Rachal, J. V., & Zarkin,
G. A. (1996a). Health care reforms and managed care for substance
abuse services: Findings from eleven case studies. Journal of Public,
Healrh Polic:v. 17. 18 I-203.
French, M. T., Zarkin, G. A., Bray, J. W.. & Hartwell, T. D. (1996b).
Costs of employee assistance programs: Comparison of national
estimates from 1993-1995. Unpublished manuscript.
French, M. T., Dunlap. L. J.. Zarkin, G. A., McGeary. K. A.. &
McLellan. A. T. (1997). A structured instrument for estimating the
economiccost ofdrug abuse treatment: The Drug Abuse Treatment
Cost Analysis Program (DATCAP). Journal q/ Suhvronce Abuse
Treatmenr, 1415). 445-455.
French. M. T., & McGeary. K. A. (1997). Estimating the economic
cost of substance abuse treatment. Health Economkr. 6. 539-544.
French, M. T., Zarkin, G. A.. Bray, J. W., & Hartwell, T. D. (1997).
Costs of employee assistance programs: Findings from a national
survey ofworksites. Amcricctn J~turnul~~fHeoi~~~ Promotion. II, 219--
222.
Gold. M. R., Siegel. J. E., Russell. L. B., & Weinstein, M. C. (1996).
Cost-ef~ectir,ette.s.s in health mti medicine. New York: Oxford Uni-
versity Press.
Hartwell. T. D.. Steele, P. D.. French. M. T., Potter, F. J.. Rodman.
N. F., & Zarkin, G. A. (1995. October) Pret~alence of emplo~~ee
assistunce programs lEAPsI in the United Stare.7: IY95. Paper pre-
sented at the Annual Conference of the American Public Health
Association. San Diego, CA.
Hartwell, T. D., Steele, P.. French. M. T., Potter, F. J., Rodman,
N. F., & Zarkin, G. A. (1996). Aiding troubled employees: The
prevalence. cost. and characteristics of employee assistance pro-
grams in the United States. American Journul of Public Health. 86.
804G308.
Karuntaos. G. T., Dunlap, L. J., Zarkin. G. A., & French. M. T. (1998).
Designing an employee assistance program (EAP) intervention for
women and minorities. Emplo>,ee Assi.c~ancc Quartet-I>,, 141 I), 49%
67.
Ryan, C. S., Sherman, P. S., & Judd. C. M. (1994). Accounting for case
manager effects in the evaluation of mental health services. Journal
of‘consuirittg oml Ciitricai Ps~~choiog~~. 62. 965-977.
Ryan, C. S.. Bogart. L. M., & Sherman, P. S. (1997). Patterns of services
and consumer outcome in an intensive case management program.
Journttl of’Con.suiring and Clinical P.\j~hology, 65. 485-493.
Zelman. W. N. (1987). Cost per unit of service. Evaluation and Ptqram
Planning, IO. 2OlL207.