connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Involving people with aphasia
in making a tool to
discover what living with
aphasia is like
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Thanks to…
• Kings Fund
• PPP Medical Healthcare Foundation
• Connect – the communication disability network
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
This talk will cover…
• Development of a ‘tool’ to document what living with aphasia is like – the Communication Disability Profile
• How people with aphasia were involved
• How people with aphasia shaped the tool
• How the tool is better because of the involvement of people with aphasia
• Challenges and lessons learnt
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
The Communication Disability
Profile
• This tool enables the person with
aphasia and the clinician to explore, but
also to rate the impact of aphasia.
• A series of questions about life with
aphasia.
• Answer using a (0-4) rating scale for each question.
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Professional phases
1. Writing & trying out the tool
2. User focus groups to see if it looked at the right things, in the right way
Inclusive phases
3. Interviews about what living with aphasia was like
4. Advisory group to guide development
Stages of development
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
• A research project to be able to predict recovery of aphasia at one year
• Developed a new assessment - using new knowledge about how the brain processes language
• Final section - perspective of the person with aphasia
Stage 1 Writing and piloting the CDP
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Writing and piloting
… involvement?Type of involvement 80 people with aphasia- 130 times (some twice)
Writing: No partPiloting: – Responded to questions– Made comments– Not asked their opinion– No part in modifying the
tool– Developer in control
What difference did itmake?
Very little
• Changes made to wording, if it was difficult to understand
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Stage 2 Focus groups
• Talk to people with aphasia and clinicians who
had used the tool -
‘Did it look at the right things, in the right way?’
• 12 people with aphasia
• One-off interview – independent researcher
• Check the researcher had got it right
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Focus group… involvement?
Type of involvement
12 people with aphasia
• Consultants
• One off meeting
• Asked opinions
• Got ‘polite responses’ ?• Researcher agenda
• Developer in control
What difference did itmake?
A lot Very useful
Confirmed that what was included was relevant
Ideas about what was missing
Quite liked the format
Pictures suggested
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Stage 3 In-depth interviews
• Detailed interviews with people with recent and long standing aphasia
‘What is it like to live with aphasia ‘
• 2 group and 15 individual interviews
• Listening with ‘open agenda’
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
In-depth interviews… involvement?
Type of involvement
27 people with aphasia• Experts• One-off consultation• Asked opinion• ‘Open agenda’• Supplied information • No part in how
information was used
What difference did itmake?
A lot Broadened items
included:e.g. things that youwant to do, have to doe.g. things that help orhindere.g. different emotions
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Stage 4 Advisory group
• Convened people with aphasia advisory group
• People with long standing aphasia with varying degrees of access to language
• Make this tool relevant and user friendly
• Role?– Initially, advise on how to incorporate pictures– Soon, advising on content, wording and format – how to use all the information gained so far…
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Advisory group
… involvement?Type of involvement
3 people with aphasia• Advisors• Year long consultation• Supplied information• Guided how the
information was used• Joint control• Decision making
What difference did itmake?
A lotShaped
Content of itemsWordingFormatScoringTone
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
So what difference did
people with aphasia make to the
Communication Disability Profile?
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Impossible Very Difficult OK No difficult problem
4 <-------------> 3 <-------------> 2 <------------> 1 <-----------> 0
x √
(before)
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Measuring the right things?
More real life situations explored
CDP now truer to what the real impact of living with aphasia is like (as described in the interviews and during the advisory group)
More emotions – one third positive
External issues are now considered
Use of ? opens up the agenda
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Was an assessment - ‘oh what’s this?’ (pictures)
Neutral tone
Old version: the person with aphasia had the problem
New version: things and people around them make it
easier or worse
Easier to use for people with aphasia (field testers say)
More people with aphasia can be asked for their
experiences (field testers say)
Measuring in the right way
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
What did the advisors think?
• Independent researcher asked them -
– ‘did you make a difference to the tool?’
– ‘what did you think of the process?’
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
• “I think we made a huge difference I think…well I’m not sure it could have been done without us really…it couldn’t have been done without us”
• “I suppose yes… I did agree…I did argues a bit and I can remember when she was quite … a lot of times she was more...oh yes kind of thing…she suddenly…we thought it was perfectly okay to say no - it’s so and so”
Did you make a difference?...
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
“rewarding… the process of it …was
good…I would do it again…the finished
thing…its gonna be a fantastic resource
…it was a good feeling”
What did you think of the process?
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Involving people with aphasia in developing a tool…the benefits
Users of the CDP (clinicians & people with aphasia)
The CDP is now:
- easier to use
- measures more relevant things
- in a better, more accessible way The developer
Learnt more about aphasia, about test design
Took risks
Had fun Advisors
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
ConflictsTraditional development & access
An example… rating issues
1. Should we use numbers & words
(descriptors) or JUST pictures (pictorial)?• Traditional might say descriptors• People with aphasia said only pictures• Specifically no words on rating scale• Simplicity over precision
2. Should we rate at all?
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Challenges?
Practical– Time and timing– Preparation – need ramps/props– Making complex things easy to follow
(e.g. ‘reliability’ for decision about rating or not, midpoint ratings or not, categorisation for social participation)
Mindset– Roles? – Who makes decisions?– What is most important?– Trust – sharing and combining expertise
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
Lessons learnt…
• Involve people from the start - aim for long term involvement
• Listen with an ‘open agenda’ first
• Don’t think/talk like a researcher/clinician
e.g. language but also consider who benefits at each stage of the process
connect trainingwww.ukconnect.org
• Practicalities:– Allow extra time for each meeting– Fatigue/timing– Location– Use props and ramps always– Documentation
• Involve people in the big decisions
• A few trusted colleagues are better than large numbers of people with less control
• It can be hard work but everyone benefits