8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
1/33
Management Accounting
TACTICAL DECISION MAKING
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
2/33
MEMBER OF GROUP
Keichy Anomosa 1110532068
Putri Suryani 1110532063
Winda Wulansari 1110532012
Ramagita Iswara 1110532049
Triana W.W.N 1110533046
Yulvita Andriani 1110533025
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
3/33
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1. Distinguish between tactical decisionmaking and strategic decision making
2. Explain the tactical decision model
3. Explain relevant costs and irrelevant cost as
well as the examples of relevant costs and
irrelevant costs4. Apply the concept of relevant cost to make
our by decision
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
4/33
LEARNING OBJECTIVES (Cont.)
5. Apply concept of relevant cost to keep or drop decision
6. Apply concept of relevant cost to special order decision
7. Apply to concept of relevant cost to sell at split offpoint or process further decision
8. Explain the impact of cost on pricing decisions.
9. Use linear programming to find the optimal solution toa problem of multiple constrained resources.
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
5/33
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
6/33
SUB-TOPICS OF DISCUSSION (Cont.)
Application of relevant cost to make or buy
decision
Application of relevant cost to keep or drop
decision
Application of relevant cost to special order
decision
Application of relevant cost tosell at split off
point or process furthher decision
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
7/33
TACTICAL DECISION MAKING :
DEFINITION
Tactical decision making consist of
choosing among alternatives with an
immediate or limited end in viewStrategic decision making is selecting
among alternative strategies so that
long term competitive advantage is
estabilished.
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
8/33
TACTICAL DECISION MODEL
Recognized , define the problem
Identify alternatives , eliminating those that
are unfeasible
Identify costs and benefits
Total relevant costs , benefits of each
alternatives Assess qualitative factors
Select alternative with greatest overall benefit
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
9/33
Step 1 : define the problem Increase capacity for warehousing and production
Step 2 : identify alternatives 1. Build new facility
2. Lease larger facility ; sublease current facility
3. Lease additional facility
4. Lease warehouse space5. Buy shafts and bushing ; free up space
Step 3 : identify costs ,
benefits
Alt 4: +benefits
Alt 5: +benefits
Step 4 : total relevant costs
and benefits
Alt 4 : cost $1000 rent and make
Alt 5 : cost $ 800 (buy from supplier)
Differential cost $200 (alt 5 chosen)
Step 5 : assess qualitative
factors
1. Product quality
2. Reliability of external supplier
3. Price stability4. Labor relations and community image
Step 6 : make decision Continue producing and lease warehouse (alt 4 is
chosen if assuming qualitative factors are not)
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
10/33
Relevant Costs Defined
relevant cost is the cost that affects the
decision . The main characteristic of relevant
costs are future costs are future costs that
differ across alternatives
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
11/33
COST CONCEPTS ASSOCIATED WITH
DECISION MAKING Opportunity cost
Opportunity cost is benefit (revenue) that is sacrificed because of choosing
alternative. For example, salary that you sacrifice because of choosing to study
at the university. Opportunity cost is relevant cost because it affects the
decision that will be made
Avoidable and unavoidable cost
Avoidable cost is the cost that will vanish by choosing the alternatives . For
examples are variable production costs and avoidable fixed factory overhead
cost . Avoidable cost is relevant cost . Unavoidable cost is the cost that will still
occur whatever alternatives are chosen . Avoidable cost is irrelevant cost.
Sunk cost
Sunk cost is cost that occurred because of previous decision , for example
depreciation expense . Sunk cost is relevant cost.
Differential cost
Differential costs are that differ among the alternatives . Differential cost is a
relevant cost .
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
12/33
APPLICATION OF RELEVANT COST
Make or buy decision
Keep or drop decision
Special order decision
Sell at split off point or process furtherdecision
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
13/33
When is this decision?When there is supplier offering the samecomponent a lower price
What are relevant costs and irrelevant costs in
this decision?- Relevant costs are avoidable cost
- Irrelevant costs are unavoidable fixed factoryoverhead cost
When is buy decision made?When avoidable manufacturing costs is greaterthan cost of purchase or cost of purchase minusopportunity cost
MAKE OR BUY DECISION
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
14/33
Example:
Production cost of component X at capacity of 1000 units arefollows:
Unit cost Total
Raw material Rp. 500 Rp. 500.000
Direct Labour 400 400.000
FOH-variable 150 150.000
FOH-fixed 450 450.000Total Rp. 1500 Rp.1500.000
Of total fixed factory overhead cost, included property tax
Rp. 50.000, and depreciation expense of factory buildingRp.200.000. External supplier offers the same componentfor Rp. 1350/per unit.
Required: Should we accept the suppliers offering?
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
15/33
KEEP OR DROP DECISION Keep or drop decision is the decision about whether or not
a segment , such as a product line , division, or branch
should be kept or dropped When is this decision made ? When the segment is getting
a loss
Segmented report prepared on a variable costing basisprovides valuable information for keep or drop decision
What are relevant costs and irrelevant costs for thisdecision?
- Relevant costs are avoidable costs (variable costs andavoidable fixed costs) and opportunity cost
- Irrelevant costs are unavoidable fixed costs When is drop decision made?
When revenues of dropped segment is lower than theiravoidable costs or when segment has a loss
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
16/33
PT.Coca Cola producers three products: Coca
Cola, Fanta, and Sprite. The accounting
manager has prepared the following
estimated income statement for 200x (in
thousand of rupiahs) :
Sample Problem
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
17/33
Coca cola Fanta Sprite Total
Sales 500 800 150 1,450
Variable expenses (250) (480) (120) (850)Contribution margin 250 320 30 600
Direct fixed expenses :
-Advertising (10) (10) (10) (30)
-Salaries (17) (20) (15) (52)
-depreciation (73) (60) (30) (163)
-Total (100) (90) (55) (245)
Segment Margin 150 230 (25) 355Common fixed expenses (40) (40) (40) (120)
Operating income (loss) 110 190 (65) 235
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
18/33
Because the projected performance of sprite
product line shows a negative segment
margin, management of PT Coca Cola is trying
to decide to drop the Sprite product line.
Required :
What is the best decision for this case?
To drop the sprite product line (assuming the sprite
capacity is idle)
Sprite capacity used for expansion of Fanta product line
(increase sales of 20%)
Sprite capacity can be rented to other party for Rp
50,000
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
19/33
SPECIAL ORDER DECISION
This decision is related to accept or reject the special order from a
particular customer When is this decision made?
When customer wants to buy the product at highly lower price
Special order is the order from potential customers in markets not
ordinarily served or non regular customers Fixed costs will not be assigned to special order because they have
been fully assigned to regular sales (orders)
What are relevant costs and irrelevant costs for this decision?
- Relevant costs are variable costs and additional costs related to
special order
- Irrelevant costs are fixed cost
When will special order be accepted?
When the price of special order is greater then variable costs and
additional costs related to special order
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
20/33
SELL AT SPLIT OFF POINT OR PROCESS FURTHER
DECISION
Join product are two or more products that areproduced through a common process
Join products can be identified at a split off point(the point that products are distinguishable ).
Joint costs are the costs to produce the jointproduct
Separable costs are the costs incurred afterproducts are identifiable or costs to processfurther
Sometimes, it is more profitable to process a jointproduct further , beyond the split off point
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
21/33
What are relevant costs and irrelevant costs forthis decision
- Relevant costs are separable costs andopportunity cost (revenue of split off productforegone because of processing further) as wellas the price after products are processed further
- Irrelevant costs are joint costs When is process the product further decision
made
When additional revenue is greater than separablecost or when sales revenue after products areprocessed further is greater than separable costsand opportunity costs
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
22/33
the impact of cost on pricing decisions
Costs are important inputs into the pricing
decision. Cost-based pricing uses a markup
based on a subset of costs. Target costing
works backward from a price acceptable toconsumers to find the cost necessary to
manufacture the product.
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
23/33
Use linear programming to find the
optimal solution
Linear programming is a method that locates
the optimal solution in a set of feasible
solutions. The graphical method may be usedwith two products. When more than two
products are involved, the simplex method is
used.
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
24/33
Formulasi dari linear programing
Formulasi dari linear programing dibuat dalam
model matematik dan sesuai dengan problem
manajerial, untuk itu perlu diketahui lebih
dahulu: Problem manajerial harus dapat dijelaskan dengan sempurna
Mengidentifikasi mana yang menjadi fungsi tujuan dan fungsi
batasan
Tentukan variabel yang akan menjadi keputusan Variabel-variabel yang ada dalam fungsi tujuan dan batasan
harus dapat diekspresikan dalam bentuk matematik
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
25/33
Case
Sebuah perusahaan menghasilkan dua macam produk yaitu
tas dan dompet . Jumlah sumber daya yang diperlukan untukmemproduksi kedua macam produk ini adalah kulit danbenang. Setiap unit tas yang dihasilkan membutuhkan kulit
dan benang 0,5m dan 0,25kg. Keperluan untuk dompet setiapunitnya memerlukan kulit 0,25m sedangkan benang 1kg.Sumberdaya yang tersedia di perusahaan setiap bulannyapaling banyak untuk bahan kulit 100m dan benang 100kg.Pada kasus ini masalah yang dihadapi perusahaan adalah
menentukan jumlah tas dan dompet yang akan diproduksiagara perusahaan dapat memperoleh keuntungan yang maxdimana keuntungan per unit untuk tas 1000 dan dompet 250.
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
26/33
1. Fungsi tujuan(objective function)
Z=1000X+250Y
2.Contraints function (fungsi kendala)
Batasan kulit: 0,50X+0,25Y100
Batasan benang: 0,25X+Y1003. Non negatif contraints
x0; y0
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
27/33
1. Sumbu kulit
0,5x+0,25Y100
Mis x=0, maka
0,5(0)+0,25y100
X400 ..A(0,400)
Y=0, maka
0,5x+0,25(0)100
Y200.B(200,0)
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
28/33
2.Sumbu benang
0,25x+y100Mis: x=0,maka
0,25(0)+y100
y100........C(0,100)
y=0,maka
0,25x+0100
X400.D(400,0)
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
29/33
E:
0,5 x+0,25y 100 1 0,5 x+0,25y 1000,25 x+ y 100 2 0,5 x+ 2y 200
-1,75y -100
y57,1430,5 x+0,25(57,143) 100
x 171,43
E(171,43;57,143)
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
30/33
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
31/33
Kesimpulan:Dari keempat titik O,C,B,E maka nilai yang palingmaksimal ada di titik B. Berarti produksi tassebanyak 200 unit dan tidak memproduksi
dompet maka keuntungan yang akan di perolehakan maximal yaitu senilai 200.000
Titik Sudut X Y Z=1000x+250y
O 0 0 0C 0 100 25000
B 200 0 200000
E 171,43 57,143 185715,75
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
32/33
Graphical solutions are not practical with
more than two or three products. Fortunately,
an algorithm called the simplex method can
be used to solve larger linear programmingproblems.
Metode simplek linear programing
dipecahkan secara aljabar
8/12/2019 Tactical Decision Making Group
33/33
hanks for attention