© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Tennessee Department of Education
Elementary School Mathematics
Grade 2
The Instructional Tasks Matter:
Analyzing the Demand of Instructional Tasks
Rationale Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks
Tasks form the basis for students’ opportunities to learn
what mathematics is and how one does it, yet not all
tasks afford the same levels and opportunities for student
thinking. [They] are central to students’ learning, shaping
not only their opportunity to learn but also their view of
the subject matter. Adding It Up, National Research Council, 2001, p. 335
By analyzing two tasks that are mathematically similar,
teachers will begin to differentiate between tasks that
require thinking and reasoning and those that require the
application of previously learned rules and procedures.
2
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Learning Goals and Activities
Participants will:
• compare mathematical tasks to determine the
demand of the tasks; and
• identify the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)
for Mathematical Content and Mathematical Practice
addressed by each of the tasks.
3
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Comparing the Cognitive Demand of Mathematical Tasks
What are the similarities and differences between the two tasks?
• The Strings Task
• The Apples Task
4
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
The Strings Task
Solve the set of addition expressions. Each time you solve a problem, try to use the previous equation to solve the problem.
7 + 3 = ___17 + 3 = ___27 + 3 = ___37 + 3 = ___47 + 3 = ___
Solve each problem two different ways. Make a drawing or show your work on a number line.
What pattern do you notice? If the pattern continues, what would the next three equations be?
5
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
The Apples Task
One basket has 27 green apples and 3 fell out of the basket. How many green apples do we have?
Another basket has 37 red apples and 3 fell out of the basket. How many red apples do we have?
6
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
The Common Core State Standards (CCSS)Examine the CCSS:
− for Mathematical Content
− for Mathematical Practice
• Will second grade students have opportunities to use the standards within the domain of Operations and Algebraic Thinking and Number Operations in Base Ten?
• What kind of student engagement will be possible with each task?
• Which Standards for Mathematical Practice will students have opportunities to use with each task?
7
The CCSS for Mathematical Content: Grade 2
Common Core State Standards, 2010
Operations and Algebraic Thinking 2.OA
Represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction.
2.OA.A.1 Use addition and subtraction within 100 to solve one- and two-step word problems involving situations of adding to, taking from, putting together, taking apart, and comparing, with unknowns in all positions, e.g., by using drawings and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the problem.
Add and subtract within 20.
2.OA.B2 Fluently add and subtract within 20 using mental strategies. By end of Grade 2, know from memory all sums of two one-digit numbers.
8
The CCSS for Mathematical Content: Grade 2
Common Core State Standards, 2010
Operations and Algebraic Thinking 2.OA
Work with equal groups of objects to gain foundations for multiplication.
2.OA.C.3 Determine whether a group of objects (up to 20) has an odd or even number of members, e.g., by pairing objects or counting them by 2s; write an equation to express an even number as a sum of two equal addends.
2.OA.C.4 Use addition to find the total number of objects arranged inrectangular arrays with up to 5 rows and up to 5 columns; write an equation to express the total as a sum of equal addends.
9
The CCSS for Mathematics: Grade 2
Number and Operations in Base Ten 2.NBTUnderstand place value.
2.NBT.A.1 Understand that the three digits of a three-digit number represent amounts of hundreds, tens, and ones; e.g., 706 equals 7 hundreds, 0 tens, and 6 ones. Understand the following as special cases:
a. 100 can be thought of as a bundle of ten tens—called a “hundred.”
b. The numbers 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 refer to one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, or nine hundreds (and 0 tens and 0 ones).
Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 19, NGA Center/CCSSO 10
The CCSS for Mathematics: Grade 2
Number and Operations in Base Ten 2.NBT
Understand place value.
2.NBT.A.2 Count within 1000; skip-count by 5s, 10s, and 100s.
2.NBT.A.3 Read and write numbers to 1000 using base-ten numerals, number names, and expanded form.
2.NBT.A.4 Compare two three-digit numbers based on meanings of the hundreds, tens, and ones digits, using >, =, and < symbols to record the results of comparisons.
Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 19, NGA Center/CCSSO 11
The CCSS for Mathematics: Grade 2
Number and Operations in Base Ten 2.NBTUse place value understanding and properties of operations to add and subtract.
2.NBT.B.5 Fluently add and subtract within 100 using strategies based on place value, properties of operations, and/or the relationship between addition and subtraction.
2.NBT.B.6 Add up to four two-digit numbers using strategies based on place value and properties of operations.
Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 19, NGA Center/CCSSO 12
The CCSS for Mathematics: Grade 2
Number and Operations in Base Ten 2.NBT
Use place value understanding and properties of operations to add and subtract.
2.NBT.B.7 Add and subtract within 1000, using concrete models or drawings and strategies based on place value, properties of operations, and/or the relationship between addition and subtraction; relate the strategy to a written method. Understand that in adding or subtracting three-digit numbers, one adds or subtracts hundreds and hundreds, tens and tens, ones and ones; and sometimes it is necessary to compose or decompose tens or hundreds.
2.NBT.B.8 Mentally add 10 or 100 to a given number 100–900, and mentally subtract 10 or 100 from a given number 100–900.
2.NBT.B.9 Explain why addition and subtraction strategies work, using place value and the properties of operations.
Common Core State Standards, 2010, p. 19, NGA Center/CCSSO 13
Table 1: Common Addition and Subtraction Situations
Common Core State Standards, 201014
The CCSS for Mathematical Practice
1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.
2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively.
3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.
4. Model with mathematics.
5. Use appropriate tools strategically.
6. Attend to precision.
7. Look for and make use of structure.
8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.
Common Core State Standards, 2010
15
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Comparing Two Mathematical Tasks
How do the differences between the Strings Task and
the Apples Task impact students’ opportunity to learn
the Standards for Mathematical Content and to use the
Standards for Mathematical Practice?
16
Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project
…Not all tasks are not created equal - different tasks
require different levels and kinds of student thinking.
Stein M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development, p. 3. New York: Teachers College Press
17
Linking to Research/Literature
There is no decision that teachers make that has a
greater impact on students’ opportunities to learn and
on their perceptions about what mathematics is than
the selection or creation of the tasks with which the
teacher engages students in studying mathematics.
Lappan & Briars, 1995
18
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Instructional Tasks: The Cognitive
Demand of Tasks Matters
19
Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project
The Mathematical Tasks Framework
TASKS
as they appear in curricular/ instructional materials
TASKS
as set up by the teachers
TASKS
as implemented by students
Student Learning
Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, 2000, p. 4
20
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project (continued)
• Low-Level Tasks The Apples Task
• High-Level The Strings Task
21
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project (continued)
• Low-Level Tasks– Memorization– Procedures Without Connections (e.g., The
Apples Task)
• High-Level Tasks– Doing Mathematics (e.g., The Strings Task)– Procedures With Connections
22
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
The Mathematical Task Analysis Guide
Research has identified characteristics related to each of the categories on the Mathematical Task Analysis Guide (TAG).
How do the characteristics that we identified when discussing the Strings Task relate to those on the TAG? Which characteristics describe the Apples Task?
23
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
The Cognitive Demand of Tasks(Small Group Work)• Working individually, use the TAG to determine if
tasks A – L are high- or low-level tasks.
• Identify and record the characteristics on the TAG that best describe the cognitive demand of each task.
• Identify the CCSS for Mathematical Practice that the written task requires students to use.
• Share your categorization in pairs or trios. Be prepared to justify your conclusions using the TAG and the Mathematical Practice Standards.
24
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Identifying High-level Tasks(Whole Group Discussion)
Compare and contrast the four tasks.
Which of the four tasks are considered to have a high-level of cognitive demand and why?
25
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Relating the Cognitive Demand of Tasks to the CCSS for Mathematical Practice
What relationships do you notice between the
cognitive demand of the written tasks and the
Standards for Mathematical Practice?
26
The CCSS for Mathematical Practice
1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.
2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively.
3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.
4. Model with mathematics.
5. Use appropriate tools strategically.
6. Attend to precision.
7. Look for and make use of structure.
8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning.
Common Core State Standards, 2010
27
Linking to Research/Literature: The QUASAR Project
If we want students to develop the capacity to think,
reason, and problem-solve, then we need to start with
high-level, cognitively complex tasks.
Stein, M. K. & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and
reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project.
Educational Research and Evaluation, 2 (4), 50-80.
28
Linking to Research/Literature
Tasks are central to students’ learning, shaping not only
their opportunity to learn but also their view of the subject
matter.
Adding It Up, National Research Council, p. 335, 2001
29
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
Gallery Walk Procedure
• Circulate and analyze the modified tasks of the other groups.
• On a yellow sticky-note, comment about the ways in which the task was modified to increase the cognitive demand of the task.
• On a pink sticky-note, write wonderings if you can think of other ways the demand of the task can be increased.
30
References
Smith, M. S., Stein, M. K., Arbaugh, F., Brown, C. A., & Mossgrove, J. (2004). Characterizing the cognitive demands of mathematical tasks: A task-sorting activity. In G. W. Bright and R. N. Rubenstein (Eds.), Professional development guidebook for perspectives on the teaching of mathematics: Companion to the sixty-sixth yearbook (pp. 45 - 47). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Smith, M. S. & Stein, M. K. (1998). Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3 (5), 344 - 350.
31