Structure and Evolution of Stars
Lecture 15
ANRV320-AA45-05 ARI 14 July 2007 16:21
3500
NIV
OIV
U u b B v V r
CIII HeII CIII
WC5
WC6
WC8
WC9
CIV
NIV
WN
WC
Rec
tifi
ed f
lux
+ C
on
stan
tR
ecti
fied
flu
x +
Co
nst
ant
Tran
smis
sio
n
Wavelength (Å)
NIII –V HeII HeII
WN4
WN6
WN7
WN8
HeI
0
0
5
0
1
10
15
20
12
2
4
6
8
10
60005500500045004000
3500 60005500500045004000
3500 60005500500045004000
Figure 1Montage of optical spectroscopy of Milky Way WN and WC stars together with the Smith(1968b) ubv and Massey (1984) r narrow-band and Johnson UBV broad-band filters.
www.annualreviews.org • Physical Properties of Wolf-Rayet Stars 181
Annu. R
ev. A
stro
. A
stro
phys.
2007.4
5:1
77-2
19. D
ow
nlo
aded
fro
m a
rjourn
als.
annual
revie
ws.
org
by S
TE
WA
RD
OB
SE
RV
AT
OR
Y o
n 0
3/2
4/0
8. F
or
per
sonal
use
only
.
ANRV320-AA45-05 ARI 14 July 2007 16:21
Hell 4686
off-Hell 4686
on-off image
NGC300
Figure 2Composite ESO Wide Field Imager B, V, R, and Hα image of NGC 300 obtained at theMPG/ESO 2.2-m telescope (Press Photo 18a-h/02). A box marks the OB association iv-v(40 × 40 arcsec). Narrow-band images of the association are shown on the right, centered at λ
4684 (He ii 4686, top) and λ 4781 (off-He ii 4686, middle), plus a difference image (on-off,bottom) obtained with ESO VLT/FORS2 (Schild et al. 2003). A number of WR stars showinga He ii excess (white) can be seen in the lower right image, including a WC4 star (white circle inall FORS2 images).
Consequently, only the most massive single stars reach the WR phase in metal-poorenvironments. Single stars reaching the WC phase at high metallicity may end theirlives as RSG or WN stars in a lower metallicity environment. As such, one mightsuspect that most WR stars at low metallicity are formed via binary evolution. How-ever, Foellmi, Moffat & Guerrero (2003a) suggest a similar WR binary fraction forthe SMC and Milky Way.
Not all WR subtypes are observed in all environments. Early WN and WC sub-types are preferred in metal-poor galaxies, such as the SMC (Massey, Olsen & Parker2003), whereas late WC stars are more common at super-Solar metallicities, suchas M83 (Hadfield et al. 2005). Line widths of early WC and WO stars are higherthan late WC stars, although width alone is not a defining criterion for each spectraltype. The correlation between WC subclass and line width is nevertheless strong(Torres, Conti & Massey 1986). The subtype distributions of WR stars in the SolarNeighborhood, LMC, and SMC are presented in Figure 3. We address this aspectin Section 4.4.
www.annualreviews.org • Physical Properties of Wolf-Rayet Stars 185
An
nu
. R
ev.
Ast
ro.
Ast
rop
hy
s. 2
00
7.4
5:1
77
-21
9.
Do
wn
load
ed f
rom
arj
ou
rnal
s.an
nu
alre
vie
ws.
org
by
ST
EW
AR
D O
BS
ER
VA
TO
RY
on
03
/24
/08
. F
or
per
son
al u
se o
nly
.
ANRV320-AA45-05 ARI 14 July 2007 16:21
0.9 1.20
3.0
WNWC
WR11(WC8 + 0)
WR42(WC7 + 0)
WR30(WC6 + 0)
WR151(WN5 + 0)
WR155(WN6 + 0)
WR141(WN6 + 0)
WR22(WN7ha + 0)
WR47(WN6 + 0)
WR20a(2 x WN6ha)
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
1.5
log MWR (M )
q =
MW
R /
Mo
1.8
Figure 4Stellar masses for MilkyWay WR stars, MWR,obtained from binaryorbits (van der Hucht2001, Rauw et al. 2005,Villar-Sbaffi et al. 2006).
these are not believed to represent rotation velocities, because the former has a late-Obinary companion, and the absorption lines of the latter are formed within the stellarwind (Marchenko et al. 2004). Fortunately, certain WR stars do harbor large-scalestructures, from which a rotation period may be inferred (St-Louis et al. 2007).
Alternatively, if WR stars were rapid rotators, one would expect strong deviationsfrom spherical symmetry owing to gravity darkening (Von Zeipel 1924; Owocki,Cranmer & Gayley 1996). Harries, Hillier & Howarth (1998) studied linear spec-tropolarimetric data sets for 29 Galactic WR stars, from which just four single WNstars plus one WC+O binary revealed a strong line effect, suggesting significantdepartures from spherical symmetry. They presented radiative transfer calculationssuggesting that the observed continuum polarizations for these stars can be matchedby models with equator-to-pole density ratios of 2–3. Of course, the majority of MilkyWay WR stars do not show a strong linear polarization line effect [e.g., Kurosawa,Hillier & Schulte-Ladbeck (1999)].
2.6. Stellar Wind BubblesRing nebulae are observed for a subset of WR stars. These are believed to representmaterial ejected during the RSG or LBV phases that is photoionized by the WR star.The first known examples, NGC 2359 and NGC 6888, display a shell morphology, al-though many subsequently detected in the Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds exhibit
188 Crowther
Annu. R
ev. A
stro
. A
stro
phys.
2007.4
5:1
77-2
19. D
ow
nlo
aded
fro
m a
rjourn
als.
annual
revie
ws.
org
by S
TE
WA
RD
OB
SE
RV
AT
OR
Y o
n 0
3/2
4/0
8. F
or
per
sonal
use
only
.
ANRV320-AA45-05 ARI 14 July 2007 16:21
20 R(Sun)
HD 96548(WN8)
HD 66811(O4 If)
HD 164270(WC9)
Figure 5Comparisons between stellar radii at Rosseland optical depths of 20 ( = R∗, orange) and 2/3( = R2/3, red ) for HD 66811 (O4 If ), HD 96548 (WR40, WN8), and HD 164270 (WR103,WC9), shown to scale. The primary optical wind line-forming region,1011 ≤ ne ≤ 1012 cm−3, is shown in dark blue, plus higher density wind material,ne ≥ 1012 cm−3, is indicated in light blue. The figure illustrates the highly extended winds ofWR stars with respect to Of supergiants (Repolust, Puls & Herrero 2004; Herald, Hillier &Schulte-Ladbeck 2001; Crowther, Morris & Smith 2006b).
evolutionary models, namely
logRevol
R⊙= −1.845 + 0.338 log
LL⊙
(1)
for H-free WR stars (Schaerer & Maeder 1992). Theoretical corrections to suchradii are frequently applied, although these are based upon fairly arbitrary assump-tions that relate particularly to the velocity law. Consequently, a direct comparisonbetween temperatures of most WR stars from evolutionary calculations and empiricalatmospheric models is not straightforward, except that one requires R2/3 > Revol, withthe difference attributed to the extension of the supersonic region. Petrovic, Pols &Langer (2006) established that the hydrostatic cores of metal-rich WR stars above∼15 M⊙ exceed Revol in Equation 1 by significant factors if mass loss is neglected, ow-ing to their proximity to the Eddington limit, !e = 1. Here, the Eddington parameter,!e , is the ratio of radiative acceleration owing to Thomson (electron) scattering tosurface gravity and may be written as
!e = 10−4.5qeL/L⊙
M/M⊙, (2)
where the number of free electrons per atomic mass unit is qe . In reality, high em-pirical WR mass-loss rates imply that inflated radii are not expected, such that thediscrepancy in hydrostatic radii between stellar structure and atmospheric models hasnot yet been resolved.
www.annualreviews.org • Physical Properties of Wolf-Rayet Stars 191
An
nu
. R
ev.
Ast
ro.
Ast
rop
hy
s. 2
00
7.4
5:1
77
-21
9.
Do
wn
load
ed f
rom
arj
ou
rnal
s.an
nu
alre
vie
ws.
org
by
ST
EW
AR
D O
BS
ER
VA
TO
RY
on
03
/24
/08
. F
or
per
son
al u
se o
nly
.
ANRV320-AA45-05 ARI 14 July 2007 16:21
SMCa
LMCb
Milky way (d< 3kpc)c
WN WC
WN WC
32 4 5 6 7 8 9 WO 4 5 6 7 8 9
32 4 5 6 7 8 9 WO
WN WC3 4 5 6 WO
4
0
5
10
15
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
55
0
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
15
10
5
0
N
N
N
Figure 3Subtype distribution of(a) Small Magellanic Cloud,(b) Large Magellanic Cloud,(c) Milky Way (d < 3 kpc)WN (blue) and WC (green)Wolf-Rayet stars, accordingto Foellmi, Moffat &Guerrero (2003a,b),Bartzakos, Moffat &Niemela (2001), van derHucht (2001). Both visualand close WR binaries areshaded (e.g., only three ofthe LMC WC4 stars areclose binaries according toBartzakos et al. 2001). Rare,intermediate WN/C starsare included in the WNsample.
2.3.3. WR galaxies. Individual WR stars may, in general, be resolved in Local Groupgalaxies from ground-based observations, while the likelihood of contamination bynearby sources increases at larger distances. For example, a typical slit width of 1 arcsecat the 2-Mpc distance of NGC 300 corresponds to a spatial scale of ∼10 pc. Relativelyisolated WR stars have been identified, albeit in the minority (recall Figure 2). Thisis even more problematic for more distant galaxies such as M83 where the greatmajority of WR stars are observed in clusters or associations (Hadfield et al. 2005).So-called WR galaxies are typically starburst regions exhibiting spectral features fromtens, hundreds, or even thousands of WR stars (Schaerer, Contini & Pindao 1999).
Average Milky Way/LMC WN or WC line fluxes (Schaerer & Vacca 1998) aretypically used to calculate stellar populations in WR galaxies. These should be validprovided that the line fluxes of WR templates do not vary with environment. However,it is well known that SMC WN stars possess weak emission lines (Conti, Garmany& Massey 1989). In spite of small statistics and a large scatter, the mean He ii λ 4686line luminosity of WN2–4 stars in the LMC is 1035.9 erg s−1, a factor of five timeshigher than the mean of equivalent stars in the SMC (Crowther & Hadfield 2006).
186 Crowther
Annu. R
ev. A
stro
. A
stro
phys.
2007.4
5:1
77-2
19. D
ow
nlo
aded
fro
m a
rjourn
als.
annual
revie
ws.
org
by S
TE
WA
RD
OB
SE
RV
AT
OR
Y o
n 0
3/2
4/0
8. F
or
per
sonal
use
only
.
Neugent & Massey 2019
Figure 12.4. Kippen-
hahn diagram of the evo-
lution of a 60M⊙ star at
Z = 0.02 with mass loss.
Cross-hatched areas indi-
cate where nuclear burn-
ing occurs, and curly sym-
bols indicate convective
regions. See text for de-
tails. Figure from Maeder
& Meynet (1987).
material that was formerly in the He-burning convective core is exposed at the surface: N, which was
consumed in He-burning reactions, disappears while the products of He-burning, C and O, appear.
The last 0.2Myr of evolution this star spends as a WC star.
In general, mass-loss rates during all evolution phases increase with stellar mass, resulting in
timescales for mass loss that are less that the nuclear timescale for M ∼> 30M⊙. As a result, there
is a convergence of the final (pre-supernova) masses to ∼ 5 − 10M⊙. However, this effect is much
diminished for metal-poor stars because the mass-loss rates are generally lower at low metallicity.
12.3 Advanced evolution of massive stars
The evolution of the surface properties described in the previous section corresponds to the hydrogen
and helium burning phases of massive stars. Once a carbon-oxygen core has formed after He burning,
which is massive enough (> 1.06M⊙) to undergo carbon ignition, the subsequent evolution of the
core is a series of alternating nuclear burning and core contraction cycles in quick succession (see
Fig. 12.5). Due to strong neutrino losses (see Sect. 12.3.1) the core evolution is sped up enormously:
∼< 103 years pass between the onset of carbon burning until the formation of an iron core. During
this time the mass of the C-O core remains fixed. Furthermore, the stellar envelope hardly has time
to respond to the rapid changes in the core, with the consequence that the evolution of the envelope
is practically disconnected from that of the core. As a result the position of a massive star in the HR
diagram remains almost unchanged during carbon burning and beyond. We can thus concentrate on
the evolution of the core of the star from this point onwards.
12.3.1 Evolution with significant neutrino losses
Neutrinos are produced as a by-product of some nuclear reactions. However, even in the absence of
nuclear reactions, weak interaction processes can result in spontaneous neutrino production at high
T and high ρ. Owing to the fundamental coupling of the electromagnetic and weak interactions, for
each electronic process that emits a photon, there is a small but finite probability (of the order of
172
Table 12.1. Properties of nuclear burning stages in a 15M⊙ star (from Woosley et al. 2002).
burning stage T (109 K) ρ (g/cm3) fuel main products timescale
hydrogen 0.035 5.8 H He 1.1 × 107 yr
helium 0.18 1.4 × 103 He C, O 2.0 × 106 yr
carbon 0.83 2.4 × 105 C O, Ne 2.0 × 103 yr
neon 1.6 7.2 × 106 Ne O, Mg 0.7 yr
oxygen 1.9 6.7 × 106 O, Mg Si, S 2.6 yr
silicon 3.3 4.3 × 107 Si, S Fe, Ni 18 d
Following carbon exhaustion in the centre, the core – which is now composed mostly of O and
Ne – contracts on its neutrino-accelerated Kelvin-Helmholtz timescale and carbon burning continues
in a convective shell around this core. Several such convective shell-burning episodes can occur in
succession, as shown in Fig. 12.7, their number depending on the mass of the star. The discrete nature
of these shell burning events can also produce a discrete (discontinuous) dependence of the final state
of the core on the initial stellar mass.
In stars with masses up to about 11M⊙ (C-O core masses less than 1.38M⊙) carbon burning
proceeds somewhat differently. The C-O core becomes partially degenerate and neutrino losses ef-
fectively cool the centre of the star, so that carbon does not ignite in the centre but in an off-centre
shell in a mildly degenerate flash (analogous to, but much less violent than the He flash in low-mass
stars). After one or more of these mild carbon flashes the burning front moves to the centre and
stable carbon burning in a convective core follows. After carbon burning, the O-Ne core becomes
degenerate and no further nuclear fuels are ignited. The structure of these stars is then very similar to
those of AGB stars with degenerate CO cores, discussed in Ch. 11, and such stars have been named
super-AGB stars. The fate of such stars is uncertain and depends on whether the O-Ne core can reach
the Chandrasekhar limit by shell burning. If this is the case the core eventually collapses, producing a
supernova explosion. On the other hand, if mass loss is strong enough to remove the envelope before
the Chandrasekhar limit is reached, the final remnant is a O-Ne white dwarf.
Neon and oxygen burning
In stars with masses ∼> 11M⊙, once the temperature in the contracting O-Ne core reaches ≈ 1.5×109 K
neon is ‘burned’ into oxygen and magnesium by a combination of photo-disintegration and α-capture
reactions (Sec. 6.4.5). Neon burning always occurs in a convective core, regardless of stellar mass. By
this time increased neutrino losses have accelerated the rate of evolution by a factor ∼ 103 compared
to the carbon-burning phase (see Fig. 12.6). The duration of the neon-burning phase is therefore very
short, of order 1 year. Neon burning then shifts to a shell, as was the case for carbon burning, but in
this case the time left until the next fuel is ignited is so short that no significant shell burning occurs.
When T9 ≈ 2.0 oxygen is ignited in the core by means of the16O+16O reaction, producing mostly
28Si and 32S with a significant admixture of other isotopes (see below). Oxygen burning also occurs in
a convective core, with a typical mass of ≈ 1.0M⊙ (see Fig. 12.7). The duration is somewhat longer
than that of neon burning, of order 1 year, despite the higher neutrino loss rate at this stage. The
reasons for this longer duration are the large oxygen mass fraction, ∼ 0.7, and the large energy gain
per gram compared to Ne burning. Similar to carbon burning, after central oxygen burning a number
of convective oxygen-burning shells appears in quick succession. By this point the remaining time
until core collapse (< 1 yr) is so short that the overlying helium- and carbon-burning shells remain
frozen into the stellar structure.
176
15
Sprin
g 20
09 Example of spectral analysis: hot starsO4 supergiant �
Puppis
Pauldrach, Puls,
Kudritzki
et al. 1994,
SSRev, 66, 105
UV spectrum
Stellar winds
Wolf-Rayet (WN11) star in NGC 300 at 2 Mpc distance
Bresolin et al. 2002
1 INTRODUCTION 10
The photon is absorbed and reemitted again
=
WIND
The principle of radiatively driven winds
Photons
STAR
OBSERVER
totally transferred momentum
electron
nucleus
Figure 2: Principle of radiative line-driving (see text).
�
r
r + dr
v + dv
v
L�
Conc
epci
on 2
007
46
complex atomic models for O-stars (Pauldrach et al., 2001)
Munich solar eclipse, 1999
4 P CYGNI PROFILES 23
Figure 14: Response of theoretical P Cygni profiles to a variation of ion density (line strength)and velocity field. See text.
In all figures it was assumed that the ion density varies proportional to the total wind density.For different assumptions on this relation, completely different line shapes can arise, as you willsee during your lab work.
NOTE: From a certain threshold on, the profiles are no longer changing when the ion density isfurther increased. This is the reason to call such profiles saturated !
Doublets: superposition of two profiles
A closer look at the observed P Cygni profiles (e.g., Sect. 3) reveals that all but the Niv λ1720line consist of two components. This is because most of the UV resonance lines from a certain ionhave two different ground states7 with very similar energies (both of which can be radiativelyexcited). This means, that these profiles consist of two superimposed P Cygni components,called doublets. This fact has to be accounted for in the simulation and analysis, of course.
Regarding the determination of v∞, this quantity still can be read off the blue edge of thecomposite profile. One just has to translate the frequency shift with respect to the transition
7due to fine-structure splitting
!"#$%%&'&#(
!!"# " !!!"#
$$!
! " !!$$!
!!"# " !!!"#
$
$!
#%&& " "!
%&&!$$!"!!! !"#$ ! ! $
$!"!!!#!!
!$ " !$!!$$!"!!!
!
)**+#,-./01
2345C&-"#-$%8,-./0/
93%:,-2345C&-"#-$%8,-.//;
7!$<
%+=-7
%+=->?7@
ABA:3>
ACA:3>
%+=-!?#@
ABA:3>
ACA:3>
%+=-##:
!max
3 Jul 2003 22:16 AR AR194-AA41-02.tex AR194-AA41-02.sgm LaTeX2e(2002/01/18) P1: GJB
MASSIVE STARS IN THE LOCAL GROUP 33
Figure 5 A comparison is shown between the observed mass-loss rates determined by Puls
et al. (1996) and that predicted by the empirical fit of de Jager et al. (1988) (open symbols)
and the theoretical formalism of Vink et al. (2001) ( filled symbols). Circles denote Galactic
stars, squares denote LMC stars, and triangles denote SMC stars.
the situation is more complicated than a simple power-law scaling, with a thresh-
old effect at low Z. However, over the metallicity range usually considered (i.e.,
SMC to solar neighborhood), a scaling with (Z/Z⇥)0.5 turns out to be a good
approximation, at least for O-type stars (see his table 2). However, Vink et al.
(2001) concludes that the mass-loss rates scale as (Z/Z⇥)0.7 when one includes
the dependence of the terminal velocity with metallicity.
Further observational checks would be useful on mass-loss rates, particularly at
higher metallicities. So far, mass-loss rates have been derived in a consistent man-
ner only for Milky Way, LMC, and SMC stars, which cover a range of metallicity
of a factor of 3.7 (Table 1). This could be pushed to a factor of �15 by studiesof massive stars throughout the Local Group, and probe regions that are higher in
metallicity than the solar neighborhood, e.g., in the Andromeda Galaxy. Fledgling
efforts in this direction have been taken by Bianchi et al. (1994, 1996), Smartt
et al. (2001), Urbaneja et al. (2002), and even beyond the Local Group by Bresolin
et al. (2002a). (See also Prinja & Crowther 1998, who reanalyze much of these
data, but stop short of deriving mass-loss rates.) The UV observations needed to
measure the terminal velocities are well within the reach of HST, and the optical
data (needed to determine the other stellar parameters) are obtainable with 8-m
class ground-based spectroscopy.
An
nu
. R
ev
. A
stro
. A
stro
ph
ys.
20
03
.41
:15
-56
. D
ow
nlo
ad
ed
fro
m w
ww
.an
nu
alr
ev
iew
s.o
rgb
y C
am
bri
dg
e U
niv
ers
ity
on
07
/18
/11
. F
or
pers
on
al
use
on
ly.
Massey 2003