STANDARDIZATION IN
EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT
CONSTRUCTION –
ROLE OF BIS
Shri D. Bhadra, Scientist C
Bureau of Indian Standards
Eastern Regional Office
18 November 2010
INTRODUCTION
In the past 3 centuries over 3 million people
have died due to earthquakes and earthquake
related disasters.
The economic losses estimated for the period
1929-1950 are in excess of Rs. 500 billion
2/3 of the earths crust is seismically active,
which means that about 1,000,000,000 people
are living in areas of the world that are prone to
earthquakes.
INTRODUCTION
What do we know?
Earthquakes cannot be prevented nor
accurately predicted.
It is not ground shaking itself that causes life
and economic loss but the collapse or
damage of buildings and infrastructure that
are too “weak” to resist the ground shaking.
What is Earthquake Engineering?
The application of civil engineering to reduce
life and economic losses due to earthquakes,
(i.e to mitigate seismic risk)
What is Seismic Risk ?
the probability of losses occurring due to
earthquakes within the lifetime of a structure;
these losses can include human lives, social
and economic disruption as well as material
damage.
What earthquake effects
cause damage?
Ground shaking
Surface rupture
Landslides
Liquefaction
Tsunamis
INDIAN SEISMIC ZONE
India lies at the northwestern end of the Indo-Australian Plate, which encompasses India, Australia, a major portion of the Indian Ocean and other smaller countries. This plate is colliding against the huge Eurasian plate and going under the Eurasian plate. This process of one tectonic plate getting under another is termed as subduction. When continents converge, large amounts of shortening and thickening takes place like at the Himalayas and the Tibet. Three chief tectonic sub-regions of India are the Himalayas along the North, the plains of the ganges and other rivers and the peninsula.
EARTHQUAKES IN INDIA
SEISMIC
ZONATION
MAP OF
INDIA
Seismic zonation map of a country is a guide to the
seismic status of a region and its susceptibility to
earthquakes. India has been divided into five zones with
respect to severity of earthquakes. Of these, Zone V is
seismically the most active where earthquakes of
magnitude 8 or more could occur. Recent strong motion
observations around the world have revolutionized
thinking on the design of engineering structures, placing
emphasis also on the characteristics of the structures
themselves.
Seismic zonation map of India
INDIAN SCENARIO
India has been traditionally vulnerable to natural disasters on
account of its unique geo-climatic conditions.
More than 59% of the landmass is prone to earthquakes of moderates to very high intensity; over 40 million hectares (12% of land) is prone to floods and river erosion; close to 5700 kms out of 7516 kms long coast line, is prone to cyclones and tsunamis; 68% of the cultivable area is vulnerable to drought including the capital of the country. Further, hilly areas are also at risk from landslides and avalanches.
In the decade 1990-2000, an average of about 4344 people lost their lives and about 30 million people were affected by disasters every year.
The loss in terms of private, community and public assets has been astronomical.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA’s INITIATIVES
DISASTER MITIGATION AND PREVENTION
APPROACH
The Government of India has brought into a paradigm shift
in the approach to disaster management. Going beyond
the historical focus on relief and rehabilitation after the
event, the new approach proceeds from the conviction that
development cannot be sustainable unless disaster
mitigation is built into the development process. Another
corner stone of the approach is that mitigation has to be
multi-disciplinary spanning across all sectors of
development. The new policy also emanates from the
belief that investments in mitigation are much more cost
effective than expenditure on relief and rehabilitation.
DISASTER MITIGATION AND PREVENTION
APPROACH
After the Indian Ocean Tsunami, the GOI has constituted
National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA), headed by
the PM, through an Act of Parliament, to spearhead and
implement a holistic and integrated approach to Disaster
Management in India.
The Disaster Management Act 2005 was enacted on 23rd
December 2005. This Act ensures dedicated and exclusive
institutional mechanism at the National, State, District and
Local level.
The National Vision is of a paradigm shift, from the erstwhile
response-centric syndrome to a proactive prevention,
mitigation and preparedness driven approach to Disaster
Management.
DISASTER MITIGATION AND
PREVENTION APPROACH
In India, the changed policy/approach, however, mandates a
priority to pre-disaster aspects of mitigation, prevention and
preparedness and new institutional mechanisms are being put
in place to address the policy change. The Government of
India has adopted mitigation and prevention as essential
components of the development strategy.
Disaster prevention involves engineering intervention in
buildings and structures to make them strong enough to
withstand the impact of natural hazard or to impose
restrictions on land use so that the exposure of the society to
the hazard situation is avoided or minimized.
TECHNOLOGICAL TRENDS
APPLICABLE TO ALL
STRUCTURES/CONSTRUCTION
Adobe structures
Limestone and sandstone structures
Timber frame structures
Light-frame structures
Reinforced masonry structures
Reinforced concrete structures
Prestressed structures
Steel structures
TECHNOLOGICAL TRENDS-
SEISMIC RETROFIT
External post-tensioning
Base isolators
Supplementary dampers
Tuned mass dampers
Slosh tank
Active control system
Adhoc addition of structural support/ reinforcement
Connections between buildings and their expansion additions
Exterior concrete columns
Infill shear trusses
RELEVANCE OF STANDARDS IN
DISASTER MANAGEMENT
In view of the construction boom and rapid urbanization,
municipal bye-laws are being made technology and user
friendly, so as to safeguard the interests of communities.
These bye-laws are reviewed periodically to identify safety
gaps, from seismic and other hazards and suitable
modifications are being made to align them to revised
building codes. Also, the undesirable professional practices,
that tend to crop up from time to time, need to be addressed
in the bye-laws. The tendency to allow utilization of
unsuitable areas for construction further adds to
vulnerabilities and needs to be guarded against. Similarly,
the existing bye-laws for rural areas are also be attended to
and notified.
RELEVANCE OF STANDARDS IN
DISASTER MANAGEMENT
The aim of a mitigation strategy is to reduce losses in the
event of a future occurrence of a hazard.
Structure mitigation may comprise construction of
individual disaster resistant structure like retrofitted or
earthquake-resistant buildings or creation of structure whose
function is primarily disaster protection like flood control
structures, dykes, levees, infiltration dams etc.
Mitigation measures essentially need to be considered in
land use and site planning activities. Construction in
hazardous areas like flood plains or steep soft slopes are
more vulnerable to disasters. Necessary mitigation
measures need to be built into the design and costing of
development projects.
RELEVANCE OF STANDARDS IN
DISASTER MANAGEMENT
Mitigation measures on individual structures can be
achieved by design standards, building codes and
performance specifications. Buildings codes, for
achieving stronger engineered structures, are being
formulated in accordance with the vulnerability of
the area and implemented through appropriate
techno-legal measures. Continuous efforts being
made to revise the safety codes and suitably modify
them periodically.
BIS EFFORTS TO MITIGATE
DISASTERS
Indian Standards are formulated through several technical
committees through consensus and involve consultation with
consumers, manufacturers, technologists, R&D organizations
and government officials. In the field of Disaster Mitigation, BIS
has formulated about 200 standards through various technical
Committees. The list of published standards is available on BIS
website: www.bis.org.in .
In consonance with Government policies for reducing the risk to
the people and to the functioning of the society, the most
effective remedy will be to reduce the vulnerability of the
physical assets by structural measures of safer new construction
and retrofitting the existing unsafe assets for which effective
building Codes have been already developed through the
Bureau of Indian Standards.
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, CED 39
Himalayan-Nagalushai region, Indo-Gangetic plain, Western India and Cutch and Kathiawar regions are
geologically unstable parts of the country and some devastating earthquakes of the world have occurred there. A major part of peninsular India has also been
visited by strong earthquakes, but these were relatively few in number and had considerably lesser intensity. The Seismic Zoning Map of India classifies the country in four seismic zones, having 20.8 percent of land area
in most serve seismic zone V, 17.5 percent land area in next severe seismic zone IV, and 30.8 percent land area in moderate seismic zone III. Thus the country
has about 59 percent area liable to the risk of earthquake damage.
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, CED 39
It has been a long felt need to rationalize the earthquake
resistant design and construction of structures taking into
account seismic data from studies of these earthquakes.
It is to serve this purpose that standards have been
formulated in the field of Design and Construction of
Earthquake Resistant Structures and also in the field of
measurement and tests connected therewith by the
Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee, CED 39.
IS 1893:1984 Criteria for
Earthquake Resistant Design of
Structures
This standard deals with earthquake resistant design of
structures and is applicable to buildings; elevated
structures; bridges; dams etc. It also gives a map which
divides the country into five seismic zones based on the
seismic intensity.
IS 1893 was initially published in 1962 as
`Recommendations for Earthquake Resistant Design of
Structures’ and then revised in 1966. As a result of
additional seismic data collected in India and further
knowledge and experience gained the standard was
revised in 1970, 1975 and then in 1984.
IS 1893:1984 Criteria for
Earthquake Resistant Design of
Structures (contnd.) Consequent to the publication of this standard on account of
earthquakes in various parts of the country including that in
Uttar-Kashi and Latur and technological advancement in the
field, the technical committee decided to revise the standard into five parts which deals with different types of structures:
Part 1 : General provisions and Buildings
Part 2 : Liquid retaining Tanks – Elevated and Ground
Supported
Part 3 : Bridges and Retaining Walls
Part 4 : Industrial Structures Including Stack Like Structures
Part 5 : Dams and Embankments
IS 1893(Part 1):2002 `Criteria for Earthquake
Resistant Design of Structures : Part 1
General provisions and Buildings’
This standard contains provisions that are general in nature and applicable to all structures. Also, it contains provisions that are specific to buildings only. It covers general principles and design criteria, combinations, design spectrum, main attributes of buildings, dynamic analysis, apart from seismic zoning map and seismic coefficients of important towns, map showing epicenters, map showing tectonic features and lithological map of India.
IS 1893(Part 1):2002 `Criteria for Earthquake
Resistant Design of Structures : Part 1 General
provisions and Buildings’ (contnd) Following are the major and important modifications made in this
revision: The seismic zone map is revised with only four zones, instead of five.
Erstwhile Zone I has been merged to Zone II and hence Zone I does not appear in the new zoning; only Zones II, III, IV and V do. The killari area has been included in Zone III and necessary modifications made, keeping in view the probabilistic Hazard Evaluation. The Bellary isolated zone has been removed. The parts of eastern coast area have shown similar hazard to that of the killari area, the level of Zone II has been enhanced to Zone III and connected with Zone III of Godawari Graben area.
This revision adopts the procedure of first calculating the actual force that may be experienced by the structure during the probable maximum earthquake, if it were to remain elastic. Then the concept of response reduction due to ductile deformation or frictional energy dissipation in the cracks is brought into the code explicity, by introducing the `response reduction factor’ in place of the earlier performance factor.
IS 1893(Part 1):2002 `Criteria for Earthquake
Resistant Design of Structures : Part 1 General
provisions and Buildings’ (contnd) The values of seismic zone factors have been
changed; these now reflect more realistic
values of effective peak ground acceleration
considering Maximum Considered Earthquake
(MCE) and service life of structure in each
seismic zone.
A clause has been introduced to restrict the
use of foundations vulnerable to differential
settlements in severe seismic zones.
IS 1893(Part 4):2005 `Criteria for
Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures:
Part 4 Industrial Structures Including Stack
Like Structures This standard deals with earthquake resistant design of the
industrial structures (plant and auxiliary structures) including stack-like structures such as process industries, power plants, textile industries, off-shore structures and marine/port/harbour structures.
In addition to the above, stack-like structures covered by this standard are such as transmission and communication towers, chimneys and stack-like structures and silos (including parabolic silos used for urea storage).
The characteristics (intensity, duration, etc) of seismic ground vibrations expected at any location depends upon the magnitude of earthquake, its depth of focus, distance from the epicenter, characteristics of the path through which the seismic waves travel, and the soil strata on which the structure stands.
IS 1893(Part 4):2005 `Criteria for Earthquake
Resistant Design of Structures: Part 4
Industrial Structures Including Stack Like
Structures (contnd)
The response of a structure to ground vibrations is a function of the nature of foundations, soil, materials, form, size and mode of construction of structures; and the duration and characteristics of ground motion. This standard specifies design forces for structures standing on rocks or soils, which do not settle, liquify or slide due to loss of strength during vibrations.
The design approach adopted in this standard is to ensure that structures possess minimum strength to withstand minor earthquakes which occur frequently, without damage; resist moderate earthquakes without significant structural damage though some non-structural damage may occur; and withstand a major earthquake (MCE) without collapse.
NOTE - Formulation of revised codes for other parts of IS 1893 are in advance stages.
IS 4326:1993 Earthquake Resistant Design
and Construction of Buildings - Code of
Practice
This standard provides guidance in selection of materials, special features of design and construction for earthquake resistant buildings including masonry construction, timber construction, prefabricated construction etc. In this standard, it is intended to cover the specified features of design and construction for earthquake resistance of buildings of conventional types. The general principles to be observed in the construction of such earthquake resistant buildings as specified in this standard are Lightness, Continuity of Construction, avoiding/reinforcing Projecting and suspended parts, Building configuration, strength in various directions, stable foundations, Ductility of structure, Connection to non-structural parts and fire safety of structures.
IS 4326:1993 Earthquake Resistant Design
and Construction of Buildings - Code of
Practice (contnd)
Special Construction Features like Separation of Adjoining Structures, Crumple Section, Foundation design, Roofs and Floors and Staircases have been elaborated in the standard. It also covers the details pertaining to the type of construction, masonry construction with rectangular masonry units, masonry bearing walls, openings in bearing walls, seismic strengthening arrangements, framing of thin load bearing walls, reinforcing details for hollow block masonry, flooring/roofing with precast components and timber construction.
IS 13827:1993 Improving Earthquake
Resistance of Earthen Buildings – Guidelines
The guidelines covered in this standard deal with the
design and construction aspects for improving
earthquake resistance of earthen houses, without the
use of stabilizers such as lime, cement, asphalt, etc.
The provisions of this standard are applicable for
seismic zones III, IV and V. No special provisions
are considered necessary in Zone II. However,
considering inherently weak against water and
earthquake, earthen buildings should preferably be
avoided in flood prone, high rainfall areas and
seismic zones IV and V.
IS 13827:1993 Improving Earthquake
Resistance of Earthen Buildings – Guidelines
(contnd.)
It has been recommended that such buildings should be light, single storeyed and of simple rectangular plan. Qualitative tests for the suitability of soil have been suggested.
Guidelines for Block or Adobe Construction, Rammed earth construction, Seismic strengthening of bearing wall buildings, Internal bracing in earthen houses and earthen constructions with wood or cane structures have heen elaborated in this standard.
IS 13828:1993 Improving Earthquake Resistance
of Low Strength Masonry Buildings – Guidelines
This standard covers the special features of design and construction for improving earthquake resistance of buildings of low-strength masonry.
The provisions of this standard are applicable in all seismic zones. No special provisions are considered necessary for buildings in seismic zone II if cement-sand mortar not leaner than 1:6 is used in masonry and through stones or bonding elements are used in stone walls.
The various provisions of IS 4326:1993 regarding general principles, special construction features, types of construction, categories of buildings and masonry construction with rectangular masonry buildings of low strength dealt with in this standard. There are however certain restrictions, exceptions and additional details which are specifically included herein.
IS 13920:1993 Ductile Detailing of
Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to
Seismic Forces – Code of Practice
This standard covers the requirements for designing and
detailing of monolithic reinforced concrete buildings so as
to give them adequate toughness and ductility to resist
severe earthquake shocks without collapse.
The provisions for reinforced concrete construction given
in this standard apply specifically to monolithic reinforced
concrete construction. Precast and/or prestressed
concrete members may be used only if they can provide
the same level of ductility as that of a monolithic
reinforced concrete construction during or after an
earthquake.
IS 13920:1993 Ductile Detailing of
Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected to
Seismic Forces – Code of Practice
Provisions on minimum and maximum reinforcement
have been elaborated which includes the requirements
for beams at longitudinal reinforcement in beams at joint
face, splices and anchorage requirements. Provisions
have been included for calculation of design shear force
and for detailing of transverse reinforcement in beams.
Material specifications are indicated for lateral force
resisting elements of frames. The provisions are also
given for detailing of reinforcement in the wall web,
boundary elements, coupling beams, around openings, at
construction joints, and for the development, splicing and
anchorage of reinforcement.
IS 6922:1973 Criteria for Safety and
Design of Structures Subject to
Underground Blasts This standard deals with the safety of structures
during underground blasting and is applicable to normal structures like buildings, elevated structures, bridges, retaining walls, concrete and masonry dams constructed in materials like brickwork, stone masonry and concrete.
As underground blasting operations have become almost a must for excavation purposes, this standard lays down criteria for safety of such structures from cracking and also specifies the effective accelerations for their design in certain cases.
IS 4991:1968 Criteria for Blast Resistant
Design of Structures for Explosions Above
Ground
This standard covers the criteria for design of structures for blast effects of explosions above ground excluding blast effects of nuclear explosions.
IS 4967:1968 Recommendations for
Seismic Instrumentation for River
Valley Projects
This standard covers recommendations for
instrumentation for investigation of seismicity,
study of micro tremors and predominant
period of a dam site and permanent
installation of instruments in the dam and
appurtenant structures and in surrounding
areas.
These standards endeavor to provide a
guideline in designing and repairing of
buildings under seismic forces.
RETROFITTING OF LIFELINE AND
IMPORTANT BUILDINGS IN
SEISMICALLY VULNERABLE ZONES: The mitigation measures take care of the new construction but the
problem of unsafe existing building stock still remain.
Assessment of seismic vulnerability of existing building stock to urban areas would help in disaster mitigation and management by planning mitigations measures before an earthquake, selecting engineered retrofitting schemes for the existing buildings and carrying out rehabilitation following an earthquake. Delhi being the national capital has had the privilege of planned development but the unusual growth of this mega city has set off all the plans. The city is dotted with all kinds of buildings and infrastructural facilities comprising of very good construction to poorly designed and constructed ones. The most challenging task is to evaluate seismic safety of these constructions and take necessary steps for their retrofitting so as to protect them from future earthquakes at a place like Delhi, which is seismically very active.
BIS has formulated guidelines which covers the selection of materials and techniques to be used for repair and seismic strengthening of damaged buildings during earthquakes and retrofitting for upgrading of seismic resistance of existing buildings.
IS 13935:2009 Repair and Seismic
Strengthening of Buildings – Guidelines
This standard covers the selection of materials and techniques to be used for repair and seismic strengthening of damaged buildings during earthquakes and retrofitting for upgrading of seismic resistance of existing buildings.
The provisions of this standard are applicable for buildings in seismic zones III to V of IS 1893:1984, which are based on damaging seismic intensities VII and more on MSK Scales.
IS 13935:2009 Repair and Seismic
Strengthening of Buildings – Guidelines
The buildings affected by earthquake may suffer both non-structural and structural damages. This standard lays down guidelines for non-structural/architectural as well as structural repairs, seismic strengthening and seismic retrofitting of existing buildings. Guidelines have been given for selection of materials for repair work such as cement, steel, epoxy resins, epoxy mortar, quick setting cement mortar and special techniques such as shotcrete, mechanical anchorage etc. Seismic Strengthening techniques for the modification of roofs or floors, inserting new walls, strengthening existing walls, masonry arches, random rubble masonry walls, strengthening long walls, strengthening reinforced concrete members and strengthening of foundations have been elaborated in detail.
BUILDING CODE OF INDIA
THE NATIONAL BUILDING CODE
OF INDIA 2005 (NBC 2005) takes
into account the various aspects of
Earthquake Resistance Construction
in the Indian Scenario.
STANDARDIZATION EFFORTS
ELSEWHERE IN THE WORLD ISO 22762-1:2010 Elastomeric seismic-protection
isolators -- Part 1: Test methods
ISO 22762-2:2010 Elastomeric seismic-protection isolators -- Part 2: Applications for bridges -- Specifications
ISO 22762-3:2010 Elastomeric seismic-protection isolators -- Part 3: Applications for buildings -- Specifications
ISO 19901-2:2004 Petroleum and natural gas industries -- Specific requirements for offshore structures -- Part 2: Seismic design procedures and criteria
ISO 23469:2005 Bases for design of structures -- Seismic actions for designing geotechnical works
STANDARDIZATION EFFORTS
ELSEWHERE IN THE WORLD
ISO/TR 25741:2008 Lifts and escalators subject to seismic conditions -- Compilation report
ISO 24314:2006 Structural steels -- Structural steels for building with improved seismic resistance -- Technical delivery conditions
ISO 6258:1985 Nuclear power plants -- Design against seismic hazards
ISO 3010:2001 Basis for design of structures -- Seismic actions on structures
ISO 16134:2006 Earthquake- and subsidence-resistant design of ductile iron pipelines
BS EN 1998-5:2004 Euro code 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Foundations, retaining structures and geotechnical aspects
CONCLUSION Earthquake construction means implementation of seismic
design to enable building and non-building structures to live through the anticipated earthquake exposure up to the expectations and in compliance with the applicable BUILDING CODES
Design and construction are intimately related. To achieve a good workmanship, detailing of the members and their connections should be, possibly, simple. As any construction in general, earthquake construction is a process that consists of the building, retrofitting or assembling of infrastructure given the construction materials available
Each CONSTRUCTION PROJECT requires a QUALIFIED TEAM OF PROFESSIONALS who understand the basic features of seismic performance of different structures as well as CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Merci Danke
gut
Thank you
Dhanyavad
THANK YOU
Capacity Building for Earthquake Preparedness
Friday, May 17, 2013 1
Dr. Damodar Maity Civil Engineering Department, IIT Kharagpur
2
What is Earthquake?
Earthquake- the vibration of the ground
Cause: Due to movement of rocks along a fault
– Rocks under stress accumulate strain energy over time.
– When stress exceeds strength of rocks, the rock breaks.
– Strain energy is released as seismic waves.
– The longer that energy is stored up and is maintained without
release, the more likely that a strong earthquake will occur.
– Continuing adjustment of position results in aftershocks
– Aftershock- tremors that occur as rocks adjust to their new
position
An earthquake is a sudden violent motion of the earth,
which lasts for a short time, within a very limited region.
Most earthquakes last for less than a minute, but sometimes
shock may last, for as long as 3 to 4 minutes.
Friday, May 17, 2013
3
Types of Plate Boundaries • Spreading Zone
- This is an area where two plates are moving apart from
one another
- Example: Mid-Atlantic Ridge
• Transform Fault
- This is where two plates are sliding past each other
- One example is the San Andreas Fault on the coast of
California and Northwestern Mexico
• Subduction Zone
- This is where one plate moves on top of another causing one to be subducted into the mantle where it melts.
- One example is the Western Coast of South America near Chile.
Friday, May 17, 2013
4
Worldwide distribution of Earthquakes
Friday, May 17, 2013
5
Where Do Earthquakes Occur and How Often?
~80% of all earthquakes occur in the circum-Pacific belt
– most of these result from convergent margin activity
– ~15% occur in the Mediterranean-Asiatic belt
– remaining 5% occur in the interiors of plates and on spreading ridge centers
– more than 1,50,000 quakes strong enough to be felt are recorded each year
Friday, May 17, 2013
6
Frequency vs Depths
• 90% of Earthquakes occur within depths less than 100
km
• Majority of Catastrophic Earthquakes occur within
Depths less than 60-km Deep
– 1964 Alaska EQ ---- 33 km from surface
– 1995 Kobe, Japan--- 20 km from surface
Friday, May 17, 2013
7
Magnitude Approximate Number per year 1 7,00,000 2 3,00,000 3 20,000 4 6,000 5 800 6 150 7 50 8 and above 1 in every few years
Magnitude Vs. No. of Earthquakes
Friday, May 17, 2013
8
Direct Effects of Earthquakes
• Ground shaking
• Disruption of Utilities
• Damage to personal
items and buildings
• Water table
adjustment
• Aftershocks
Friday, May 17, 2013
9
Indirect Effects of Earthquakes
• Ground failures
• Landslides
• Subsidence (drop in elevation of land due to removal of water)
• Liquefaction (reduction in the strength of saturated soils)
• Tsunamis (tidal waves)
• Flooding
• Fires from electrical difficulties
Friday, May 17, 2013
Friday, May 17, 2013 10
Capacity Building for Earthquake Preparedness Priorities for Action:
Make Disaster Risk Reduction a Priority
Identify, Assess and Monitor Risk
(Such as we should have a realistic vulnerability map at the
micro level)
Build a culture of resilience through awareness, education
& training
(eg., peoples’ participation needs to be chalked out as how
people will participate in preparing it.)
Earthquake Forces
Friday, May 17, 2013 11
Friday, May 17, 2013 12
Capacity Building for Earthquake Preparedness Priorities for Action:
Reduce Risk in Key Sectors
(Public Buildings like hospital, school, transmitter tower,
bridge, nuclear power plant, dam etc. need to be made EQ.
Resistant.)
Strengthen Disaster Preparedness for Effective Response
(BIS and NBC codes may be incorporated in the states
depending upon their vulnerability.)
Capacity Building for Earthquake Preparedness
Strategies for vulnerability reduction before earthquakes
• Development of Earthquake preparedness plans at grass
root level
• Public education on earthquake disasters through
awareness campaigns
• Enhance national capacities for the development and
implementation of a countrywide framework for disaster
risk preparedness, management and mitigation in
education sector
Friday, May 17, 2013 13
Square
(Best)
Rectangular
L - Shape
Shape of House
Friday, May 17, 2013 14
(a) Rectangular Plan (L<3B)
(b) I Type Plan with small Projection
(L<3B, B’<B/3)
Fig. 7 Desirable Symmetrical Plans
B
L
B
L
B’
(a) Rectangular Plan (L>3B)
(b) I Type Plan with Long Projection
(B’> B/3)
Fig. 8 Undesirable Symmetrical Plans
B
L
B
L
B’
Friday, May 17, 2013 15
Fig. 9 Undesirable Unsymmetrical Plans
(a) U Shape Plan
(b) Unsymmetrical Plan
Friday, May 17, 2013 16
Fig. 10 Uses of Separation Gaps to Improve Plans
B
L<3B L<3B
Separation gap
(b) Separation gap for I type block
(Separation gap for
long rectangular block
(c) Separation gap for U shape block (d) Separation gap for unsymmetrical block
Friday, May 17, 2013 17
Accurate detailing is important
Friday, May 17, 2013 18
Horizontal Band is must
Friday, May 17, 2013 19
•Safety measures must be incorporated in all types of
structures.
•Existing buildings and bridges needs to be retrofitted.
•Ensuring construction of Earthquake resistant buildings at
the administrative level throughout
•Seismic safety needs to be highlighted in the design itself.
•States can adopt the national codes or make their own
codes specific to the state.
•Fixing of responsibility of adhering to the building codes
and norms.
Strategies for vulnerability reduction before earthquakes
Friday, May 17, 2013 20
Danger of Open Ground Storey
Friday, May 17, 2013 21
Courtesy: NICEE, NPEEE, IIT Kanpur, BMTPC, New Delhi
Danger of Open Ground Storey
Friday, May 17, 2013 22
Dissemination of the Earthquake
Preparedness Plan:
• Involving of media – both print and electronic in
dissemination of the earthquake preparedness plan
•Advertisements related to disasters prior, during and after
may be given in the media.
•Advertisements over radio, TV and other channels at peak
time of news. These advertisements can be region specific
and disaster specific in different local languages.
•Media needs to be sensitized and made a partner in
Disaster Mitigation.
Friday, May 17, 2013 23
•Hospital safety may be given top priority Building and
equipment of Hospitals guidelines framed out by MHA
need to be followed strictly.
•Facility for stock piling of relief material at the district
Headquarters should be created.
•The District Authority should have a protocol to
manage the relief material.
• Assistance of various NGO can be sought.
•Simulation/Mock exercises can be carried out where all
the concerned functionaries will participate and an
assessment of the preparedness can be made.
Strategies for vulnerability reduction before earthquakes
Friday, May 17, 2013 24
Capacity Building for Earthquake Preparedness
2. Strategies for vulnerability reduction during earthquakes
Friday, May 17, 2013 25
26
Dos and Donts for Protection
Friday, May 17, 2013
Courtesy: Dept. of Earthquake Engg. IIT Roorkiee Rajiv Gandhi Foundation, New Delhi
27
If you are caught indoors at the time of an earthquake: • Keep calm. • Stay away from glass windows, doors, almirahs, mirrors etc. • Stay away from falling plaster, bricks or stones.
Friday, May 17, 2013
28
If you are caught indoors at the time of an earthquake: • Get under a table or a sturdy cot so that you are not hurt by falling objects. • Do not rush towards the doors or staircase. They may be broken or jammed.
Friday, May 17, 2013
29
If you are outdoors at the time of earthquake: • If open space is available nearby, go there. • Keep away from tall chimneys, buildings, balconies and other projections. • Do not run through streets; hoardings or lamps may fall on you.
Friday, May 17, 2013
30
After an earthquake: • Check if you or anyone else is hurt. Use first aid at least on the cuts and bruises. • Keep the streets clear for emergency services. • Switch off all appliances like the refrigerator, TV or radio. • Wear shoes to protect your feet from debris. • A battery operated radio will help you to get important messages. • Be prepared for more shocks. These aftershocks always follow an earthquake. •Turn off the gas.
Friday, May 17, 2013
31
Avoid the following in an earthquake: • Do not crowd around damaged areas or buildings. • Do not waste water. It will be needed for fire fighting. • Do not move the seriously hurt people. • Wait for medical help to arrive. • Do not spread rumors. They lead to panic and worsen the situation
Friday, May 17, 2013
32
Thanks….
Friday, May 17, 2013