Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1791766
1
Sarbanes Oxley Effectiveness on the Earning Management
by
Rachel Ang
3/5/2011
ABSTRACT
The study examined the degree to which the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), specifically Section 404, has impacted earnings management practices among Fortune 500 companies. Companies practice earnings management to (a) be selective about the information on financial performance investors receive, and (b) hide or misrepresent the corporation’s true earnings. By examining the impact of regulatory intervention, accounting standard-setting organizations will have the opportunity to measure the strength of statutory oversight. Findings suggested that regulatory intervention through the implementation of SOX reduced the practice of earnings management. The findings enabled leadership to better understand the insight and to offer transformation to the companies’ ethical paradigms. As corporate leaders have a fiduciary responsibility to behave ethically and responsibly to provide investors, employees, stakeholders, and the public with the ethically based financial reports.
Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1791766
2
Introduction
In 2000 to 2005, based on the way earnings were reported Green (2004) noted a
loss of $8 trillion dollars to investors, and Fortune 500 companies started to collapse.
Investigations of the financial reports uncovered (a) accounting irregularities (i.e.,
problems with the way accounting principles were applied), (b) fraud, and (c) unethical
forms of earnings management (Chang et al., 2006; Geiger & North, 2006). In August
2002, 12 companies were investigated for accounting irregularities. Senior chief
executive officers (CEOs) and chief financial officers (CFOs) from more than 10 leading
corporations were arrested for financial misconduct (Chang et al.).
These well-publicized investigations and arrests of prominent corporate leaders
lead to increased concerns about the integrity of internal management control systems for
financial statement reporting (Geiger & Taylor, 2003; Geiger & North). Corporate
leaders’ decisions to deviate from generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
(Rockness & Rockness, 2005). Since the 1930s, reputable accountants have followed
generally acceptable accounting principles (GAAP) in the preparation of financial reports
to disclose relevant, reliable information investors can use to make informed decisions
about firm performance (Xiong, 2006).
Earnings management has became a part of the financial reporting process in the
1900s, and in 2002 the U.S. Congress enacted Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) to regulate the
use of earnings management by corporate leaders (SOX, 2002). Earnings management
involves corporate leaders’ strategic handling of earnings information in financial reports,
and allows corporate leaders to (a) be selective about the information investors receive on
Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1791766
3
financial performance, and (b) hide or misrepresent the corporation’s true earnings
(Akers, Giacomino, & Bellovary, 2007; Financial Accounting Standards Board, 1980).
The effectiveness of Section 404 legislation on earnings management is not
known (Scarborough & Taylor, 2007) as the widespread use of earnings management has
been cited as one reason for the decrease in investor confidence in corporate America
(Chang, Chen, Liao, & Mishra, 2006). To address these concerns, the U.S. General
Accounting Office (U.S. GAO, 2002) conducted a study in which financial statement
restatements were examined. Accounting fraud was the result of company failure to apply
GAAP correctly (Lobo & Zhou, 2006).
Companies did not follow GAAP to record revenue-producing transactions. For
example, Enron created temporary, special-purpose companies to hide liabilities and
report higher earnings (Duchac, 2004). U.S. GAO (2002) found 39% of the 919 financial
restatements made between 1997 and 2002 occurred as 238 publicly traded companies
reported revenue before it was earned, a form of aggressive earnings management.
Accounting fraud had a negative effect on investor confidence (Giroux, 2003). To
restore confidence, the U.S. Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to
“protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures”
(SOX, 2002, p. 1). Section 404 of the Act requires companies to establish, document, and
maintain an internal control system for managing earnings in financial reports, and to
disclose their earnings practices (Bedohazi, 2007).
Data Description
A total of 217 domestic U.S. public companies were retrieved from the publicly
available financial reports, Mergent Online database. The specific population included
4
Fortune 500 companies required to file internal control financial reports between the
period 2000 and 2006 (i.e., from two years immediately before to four years immediately
after the enactment of SOX). The study excluded utility industry firms with a 2-digit
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) between 40 and 49 and financial institutions with
a 2-digit SIC between 60 and 69. It also excluded missing key data, with the exclusions,
66 companies were analyzed.
Data Findings
Table 1 provides the descriptive statistics for the Discretionary Accruals and
Market Value for the four years.
Table 1
Descriptive Statistics for the Discretionary Accruals and Market Value (N=63)
Year Median M SD Range
Discretionary accruals
2000 -631.98 -1132.18 1340.69 -6026.16–148.43
2001 -463.60 -952.90 1156.12 -4806.77–347.19
2003 -526.40 -1064.08 1427.95 -6514.71–1773.64
2004 -687.08 -1195.86 1470.11 -6740.29–892.80
Market value
2000 7.00 18.98 34.45 0–194
2001 9.00 21.78 40.29 0–243
2003 8.00 17.02 30.72 0–178
2004 10.00 23.49 43.42 0–282
5
Discussion to Hypotheses 1, and 2
Hypothesis 1 addressed the effectiveness of SOX.
Ha1: Earnings management by measures of discretionary accruals will decrease
from before the establishment of internal control procedures required by SOX Section
404 to after the implementation of the controls.
H01: Earnings management by measures of discretionary accruals will not
decrease from before the establishment of internal control procedures required by SOX
Section 404 to after the implementation of the controls.
Before SOX implementation, not all 63 corporations had a certified internal
control system in 2000 and 2001. The implementation of SOX in 2002 shows 60 of the
corporations with a certified internal control system. Only three corporations did not have
a certified system. Figure 1 displayed the findings.
Figure 1. Discretionary accrual mean for the four years.
6
In Figure 1, illustrated the above, and t-tests supported the findings (Mean
increase = 179.28, SD = 486.77, t(62) = 2.92, p < .01), and the values decreased
significantly from 2001 to 2004 (Mean decrease = -242.96, SD = 642.43, t(62) = 3.00, p
< .01). The findings supported the alternative hypothesis (Ha1).
Hypothesis 2 addressed the impact that regulatory intervention had on earnings
management.
Ha2: There will be a relationship between earnings management (discretionary
accruals) and corporate governance (market value).
H02: There will not be a relationship between earnings management (discretionary
accruals) and corporate governance (market value).
Table 2 presents the correlations between the discretionary accrual and market
value for the four years.
Table2
Spearman Correlations between Discretionary Accrual and Market Value (N = 63)
Year DA 00 DA 01 DA 03 DA 04 MV00 MV01 MV03 MV04
DA 2000 --
DA 2001 .93 --
DA 2003 .92 .93 --
DA 2004 .86 .86 .97 --
MV 2000 -.59 -.56 -.56 -.52 --
MV 2001 -.60 -.60 -.60 -.57 .96 --
MV 2003 -.44 -.51 -.52 -.50 .85 .92 --
MV 2004 -.44 -.50 -.52 -.51 .86 .91 .98 --
7
Note. All ps < .001. DA = Discretionary Accrual; MV = Market Value.
The correlations in bold font from Table 2 suggested the range of -.51 to -.60.
Each correlation showed a highly significant (p < .001), moderately strong, negative or
inverse relationship between discretionary accrual and market value. The findings thus
supported the alternative hypothesis for Hypothesis 2.
Implication
Perhaps the most important significance impact of this study is the improved
understanding of the results. The study discloses information about the impact on
corporate leaders’ financial reporting decisions have on investors’ ability to evaluate a
firm’s performance management (Dogan, Coskun, & Çelik, 2007; Bedohazi, 2007). The
study demonstrated how leadership could offer insight to change the companies’ ethical
paradigms. Corporate leaders have a fiduciary responsibility to behave ethically (Staubus,
2005). They have the responsibility to provide investors with ethically based financial
reports where current financial performance is presented (Entwistle, Feltham, &
Mbagwu, 2006; Gore, Pope, & Singh, 2007; Lee, Li, & Yue, 2006). The study also serves
as a benchmark for the impact of legislative intervention on corporate accounting
methods.
Conclusion and Future Research
With pressure to achieve earnings projections, leaders used earnings management
approaches to enhance their company’s financial performance and image of the company
(Giroux, 2003). The study explored new insights on the percentage of companies required
to restate their financial statements as accounting irregularities grew 145% from January
1997 to June 2002. The number of companies restating financial information doubled
8
from 92 in 1997 to 225 in 2001. In a 2006 follow-up study, GAO found a 67% increase in
restatements between July 2002 and September 2005.
These activities became so significant that Fortune 500 companies began filing
for bankruptcy protection, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC, 2003)
filed 515 enforcement actions against companies who restated financial statements from
July 1997 to July 2002. Enforcement actions were based on improper financial reporting
and fraud. Federal civil suits were brought against 186 of the 515 companies against
which with enforcement actions had been filed. To improve the financial reporting
process and increase investor confidence, Congress enacted SOX.
Future study may consider a longer time series, and conduct a survey to evaluate
characteristics such as cost of review, number of years conducting internal control
compliance audits, number of times fraud was detected, training of auditors, and changes
in organizational leadership. These characteristics could potentially affect the
effectiveness of SOX, and the requirements for how companies are required to comply
with SOX Section 404.
9
References
Akers, M. D., Giacomino, D. E., & Bellovary, J. L. (2007). Earnings management and its
implications. The CPA Journal, 77(8), 64-68.
Bedohazi, Z. (2007). International financial reporting standards in service of firms’
management. Management of Organizations: Systematic Study, 43, 7-26.
Chang, H., Chen, J., Liao, W. M., & Mishra, B. K. (2006). CEOs’/CFOs’ swearing by the
numbers: Does it impact share price of the firm? The Accounting Review, 81, 1–
27.
Dogan, M., Coskun, E., & Çelik, O. (2007). Is timing of financial reporting related to
firm performance? International Study Journal of Finance and Economics, 12,
220-233.
Duchac, J. (2004). The dilemma of bright line accounting rules and professional
judgment: Insights from special purpose entity consolidation rules. International
Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 1, 324–338.
Entwistle, G., Feltham, G., & Mbagwu, C. (2006). Misleading disclosure of pro forma
earnings: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 69, 355–372.
Giroux, G. (2003). Detecting Earnings Management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Green, S. (2004). Manager’s guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley act. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Lee, C.-W. J., Li, L. Y., & Yue, H. (2006). Performance, growth and earnings
management. Review of Accounting Studies, 11(2-3), 305–334.
Lobo, G. J., & Zhou, J. (2006). Did conservatism in financial reporting increase after the
Sarbanes-Oxley act? Initial evidence. Accounting Horizons, 20(1), 57–73.
10
Rockness, H., & Rockness, J. (2005). Legislated ethics: From Enron to Sarbanes-Oxley,
the impact on corporate America. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(1), 31–54.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), Pub. L. No. 107-610, H.R. 3763, 117th Cong.
(2002). Retrieved March 1, 2011, from
news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/gwbush/sarbanesoxley072302.pdf
Scarborough, K. E., & Taylor, M. H. (2007). Two years and counting: A review of
Sarbanes-Oxley section 404 reporting. Journal of Accountancy, 203(6), 74–80.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2004). Final rule: Management's report on
internal control over financial reporting and certification of disclosure in
Exchange Act periodic reports. Rel. Nos. 33-8392, 34-49313 and IC-26357, 69
Fed. Reg. 9721 [Mar. 1, 2004]. Retrieved March 1, 2011, from
http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8392.htm
Staubus, G. J. (2005). Ethics failures in corporate financial reporting. Journal of Business
Ethics, 57(1), 5–15.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). (2002). Financial statement restatements:
Trends, market impacts, regulatory responses, and remaining challenges.
Retrieved March 5, 2011, from http://www.gao.gov/news.items/d03138.pdf
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). (2006). Financial restatements: Update of
public company trends, market impacts, and regulatory enforcement activities.
Retrieved March 5, 2011, from http://www.gao.gov/news.items/d06678.pdf
Xiong, Y. (2006). Earnings management and its measurement: A theoretical perspective.
The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 9(1), 214-219.
11
APPENDIX A: SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS
TABLE A-1
STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATIONS OF SAMPLE COMPANIES
Code Standard Industrial Classification Total
13 Oil and gas extraction 3
20 Food and kindred products 3
21 Tobacco products 1
23 Apparel and other textile products 1
24 Lumber and wood products 2
25 Furniture and fixtures 1
26 Papers and allied products 1
27 Printing and publishing 2
28 Chemical and allied products 9
29 Petroleum and coal refining 3
30 Rubber and miscellaneous plastics products 1
32 Stone, clay, and glass products 1
33 Primary metal industries 1
34 Fabricated metal products 2
35 Industrial machinery and equipment 4
36 Electronic and other electrical equipment 2
37 Transportation equipment 10
12
Code Standard Industrial Classification Total
38 Instruments and related products 2
39 Miscellaneous manufacturing industries 1
50 Wholesale trade durable goods 2
51 Wholesale trade nondurable goods 2
55 Automotive dealers and service stations 1
58 Eating and drinking places 1
59 Miscellaneous retail 3
70 Hotels and other lodging places 1
73 Business services 4
80 Health services 2
Recommended