Speech and speaker normalization (in vowel normalization)
Venice International University
Phonetic and technological aspects of speaker characteristics
Prof. Dr. J. Harrington
Presented by
Clara Tillmanns
18.10.2007
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
2
Contents
1. Speech and speaker normalization in vowel normalization: definition
2. Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalization
3. Theories
4. Studies: Johnson 1990 and 1999
5. Recapitulation
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
3
Definition
Normalization.
We know there is extensive variation in speech. How come that listeners agree in their perception of vowels?
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
4
Fig. 1: Scatter plot of first and second formant values of American English vowels. From Peterson & Barney 1952
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
5
Definition
Normalization.
Which information influences this decision?
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
6
Definition
Normalization.
And, which mechanism leads to the decision?
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
7
Contents
1. Speech and speaker normalization: definition
2. Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalization
- Context- Formant ratio- F0- Visual information- Auditory gestalts
3. Theories4. Studies: Johnson 1990 and 19995. Recapitulation
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
8
Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalization
Extrinsic Intrinsic
Context Formant ratio
F0
Visual information
Auditory gestalts
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
9
Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalization
Extrinsic Intrinsic
Context Formant ratio
F0
Visual information
Syllable external Syllable internal
Auditory gestalts
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
10
Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalization
Extrinsic Intrinsic
Context Formant ratio
F0
Visual information
Syllable external Syllable internal
Vocalic Prosodic
Tonal Auditory gestalts
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
11
Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalizationContext:
Perceived vowel quality is influenced - by the formant frequencies of context vowels
(Ladefoged & Broadbent 1957)
- by the F0 range of the carrier phrase (Johnson 1990)
Tones: Pitch range of a context utterance influences Mandarin Chinese tones (Leather 1983)
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
12
Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalization
Extrinsic Intrinsic
Context Formant ratio
F0
Visual information
Syllable external Syllable internal
Vocalic Prosodic
Tonal Gender
Relative patterns
Auditory gestalts
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
13
Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalizationFormant ratio
Vowels are relative patterns - no absolute frequencies
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
14
Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalizationFormant ratio
Fig. 2: Spectrogram of a man and a woman saying “cat”. The three lowest vowel formants (vocal tract resonant frequencies are marked as F1, F2 and F3) (Johnson 2004)
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
15
Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalizationF0
Miller 1953doubled F0 and found vowel category shift for
most American English vowels
Fujisaki & Kawashime 1968:Found F1 boundary shifts from 100Hz to 200Hz
for F0 shifts of 200Hz
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
16
Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalization
Extrinsic Intrinsic
Context Formant ratio
F0
Visual information
Syllable external Syllable internal
Vocalic Prosodic
Tonal Gender
Gender / AgeArticulatory gestures
Relative patterns
Auditory gestalts
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
17
Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalizationVisual information- Gender: boundary shift much like the F0 shift
(Strand & Johnson 1996)- Age- Vowel quality: boundary shift through differing
visual phonetic information (Johnson 1999)- Sociocultural: Speech intelligibility is reduced,
when the voice is associated with an Asian looking face (Rubin 1992)
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
18
Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalizationAuditory gestalts - “secondary cues” DurationFormant frequency movement trajectories:- Lehiste & Metzger 1973:
- Fixed duration vowels synthesized with steady-state formant frequencies (51% correct)
- mixed lists of the original vowels from men, women and children 79% correct.
- Hillenbrand & Neary 1999:- Flat-formant vowels were correctly identified 74% of the time,
while vowels synthesized with the original formant frequency trajectories were correctly identified 89% of the time.
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
19
Contents
1. Speech and speaker normalization in vowel normalization: definition
2. Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalization
3. Theories3.1 Vocal tract normalization (VTN)
3.2 Talker normalization (TN)4. Studies: Johnson 1990 and 1999
5. Recapitulation
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
20
Theories - VTN
Vocal tract normalization theories consider that listeners perceptually evaluate vowels on a talker specific coordinate system.” (Johnson 2004)
• Context vowels (reference)
• Visual information about the size of the vocal tract
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
21
Theories - VTN
But: Talkers may differ from each other at the level of their articulatory habits of speech:
“Perception may not be able to depend on vocal tract normalization to “remove” talker differences by removing vocal tract differences.” (Johnson 2004)
Speaker/speech variation depends on anatomical differences only?
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
22
Theories - VTN
Cross-linguistic gender differences
Bladon, Henton and Pickering (1984):The difference between men and women vary
from language to language. Cultural factors are involved in defining and
shaping male or female speech Anatomy does not completely determine the
vowel formant frequencies
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
23
Theories - VTN
Fig. 3 Spectral shift needed to normalize male and female spectra From Bladon, Henton & Pickering (1984)
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
24
Theories - VTN
“This seems to suggest that talkers choose different styles of speaking as social, dialectal gender markers.
A speaker normalization that removes vocal tract differences will fail to account for the linguistic categorical similarity of vowels that are different due to different habits of articulation.”
(Johnson 2004)
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
25
Theories - TN
Talker normalization is subject to expectations:
Magnuson & Nusbaum (1994) compared
1-voice with 2-voice instructions in a mixed-talker and blocked-talker experiment.
Advantage of blocked-talker disappeared when subjects didn’t know about the different F0s of the two voices.
Talker normalization is an active process:
Kato & Kakehi (1988) Listener adaptation to talker voice:
Increase in recognition accuracy over the course of 5 stimuli presented in noise
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
26
Theories - TN
“In this approach, cognitive categories are represented as collections of the stored cognitive representations of experienced instances of the category,
rather than as normalized abstract representations from which category-internal structure has been removed” (Johnson 2004)
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
27
Contents
1. Speech and speaker normalization in vowel normalization: definition
2. Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalization
3. Theories
4. Studies4.1 Johnson 19904.2 Johnson 1999
5. Recapitulation
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
28
Studies
“The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels” (Johnson 1990)
Presentation of vowels from a “hood”-”hud” continuum in two different intonational contexts which were judged to have been produced by different speakers, even though the F0 of the test word was identical in the two contexts.
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
29
Studies
“The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels” (Johnson 1990)
Shift in identification as a result of the intonational context
which was interpreted as evidence for the role of perceived speaker identity in vowel normalization
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
30
Studies
“Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception” (Johnson 1999)
Exp. 1 found, that the gender of auditory-visually presented stimuli shift the phoneme boundary of a vowel continuum
Exp. 2 found that visual phonetic information is integrated in the boundary shift
Exp. 3 showed that listeners integrate abstract gender information with phonetic information in speech perception
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
31
Contents
1. Speech and speaker normalization in vowel normalization: definition
2. Influencing parameters and instruments for vowel normalization
3. Theories
4. Studies: Johnson 1990 and 1999
5. Recapitulation
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
32
Recapitulation
- Great internal and external influence on the perception (of vowels)
- Explanation must integrate repeated learning
- Information on speaker identity influences the perception (of vowels)
- But: Is the perception of speaker identity influenced by certain components of the speech signal?
- May speaker identity be manipulated?
Clara Tillmanns - Speech and speaker normalization
33
ReferencesBladon, R.A., Henton, C. G. & Pickering, J. B. (1984) Towards an auditory theory of speaker normalization. Language
Communication 4, 59-69.Fujisaki, H. & Kawashima, T. (1968) The roles of pitch and higher formants in the perception of vowels. IEEE Transactions
on Audio and Electroacoustics AU-16, 73-77.Hillenbrand, J. M. & Neary, T. M. (1999) Identification of synthesized /hVd/ utterances: Effects of formant contour. J.
Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 3509-3523.Ladefoged, P. & Broadbent, D. E. (1957) Information conveyed by vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29, 98-104Leather, J. (1983) Speaker normalization in the perception of lexical tone. Journal of Phonetics 11, 373-382Lehiste, I. & Metzger, D. (1973) Vowel and speaker identification in natural and synthetic speech. Language and Speech
16, 356-364.Johnson, K., Strand, E. A. & D’Imperio, M. (1999) Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal
of Phonetics 27, 359-384Johnson, K. (2004) Speaker normalization in speech perception. Ohio State UniversityJohnson, K. (1990) The role of percieved speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88 642-654Kato, K & Kakehi, K. (1988) Listener adaptability to individual speaker differences in monosyllabic speech perception. J.
Acoust. Soc. Of Japan 44, 180-186Magnuson, J. & Nusbaum, H. (1994) Are representations used for talker identification available for talker normalization?
Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.Miller, R. L. (1953) Auditory tests with synthetic vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 25, 114-121.Peterson, G. E. & Barney, H. L. (1952) Control methods used in the study of vowels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 24, 175-184Rubin, D. L. (1992) Non-language factors affecting undergraduates’ jedgements of non-native English-speaking teaching
assistants. Research in Higher Education 33, 4.Strand, E. A. & Johnson, K. (1996) Gradient and visual speaker normalization in the perception of fricatives. In Natural
languag processing and speech technology: results of the 3rd KONVENS conference, Bielefeld, (D. Gibbon, Ed.), Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter (pp. 14-26).